Debunking Pseudo-Skeptical Arguments Of Paranormal Debunkers
Argument # 23: The Dying Brain
Hypothesis for Near Death Experiences.
Stated as:
“Near death experiences (NDE's) are simply
hallucinations that stem from the result of a dying brain that shuts down in a
way that produces those experiences. They aren't evidence of an afterlife.”
This argument, called the Dying Brain Hypothesis, is purported by
many skeptics and materialists. NDE
Skeptic and
The main criticism of her
work by other NDE experts tends to be that she dismisses the vast data that
doesn’t fit into her hypotheses. NDE
author Kenneth Ring, who wrote Lessons
from the Light: What We Can Learn from the Near-Death Experience pointed this out in an
article he wrote for the Winter 1995 issue of the Journal of Near-Death Studies (www.iands.org/journal.html).
Although many features of
the NDE can be explained by neurological or physiological processes, this
doesn’t explain the message being sent. In
fact, the neurological effects could just be the result effects of the NDE,
rather than the cause. Perhaps the
TV/radio analogy to the NDE helps explain this best. As NDE researcher and www.near-death.com webmaster Kevin
Williams relates:
“Such reductionism, however, may only be explaining
the mechanism of the near-death experience, not necessarily the near-death
experience itself. In the same way, it is possible to reduce a television set
to its basic elements such as electrodes and tubes, but one cannot
satisfactorily explain the television show being played on it using reductionist terms. Concerning the chemical basis of the
near-death experience and using this television analogy, if the brain can be
thought of as a television set, then the near-death experience can be thought
of as the television show being played on it. Science maybe able to quantify
everything concerning the television set components (i.e. the brain), but
science is unable to satisfactorily quantify the television show being played
on it (i.e. the near-death experience).”
There are several convincing
categories of evidence to suggest that NDE’s are not
just mere hallucinations caused by a brain that is shutting down. For more on this, see http://www.near-death.com. These tend to be ignored or dismissed by Blackmore and others who support the Dying Brain
Hypothesis:
1) First and most importantly, there are many well documented cases
where the NDEer while out of body were able to see
specific details and hear conversations in other rooms and far away places that
they couldn’t have known about beforehand, and yet upon returning to the body
find that what they saw or heard was in fact verified to be accurate and
true. This is a phenomena that skeptics
and materialists still haven’t been able to explain away no matter how hard
they try. Blackmore
herself knows about these cases and even mentions them in her book, but she
dismisses it simply by stating that she doesn’t believe them. This of course reflects the closed mental
model of skeptics who dismiss facts and data that don’t fit into their
hypotheses. If NDE’s
and OBE’s were just dreams or hallucinations, then
these perceptions at a distance wouldn’t turn out to be accurate. The separation of spirit from body or the
mind’s ability to remote view are the best hypotheses that fit this well
documented data. One famous example of
this is the case of a nurse named Kimberly Clark. Talbot describes this incident in The
Holographic Universe: (page 231-232)
“Such facts notwithstanding, no amount of statistical
findings are as convincing as actual accounts of such experiences. For example, Kimberly Clark, a hospital
social worker in
Maria told
Skeptical but intrigued,
Bruce Greyson and C. P.
Flynn, The Near Death Experience (Chicago: Charles C. Thomas, 1984), as quoted
in Stanislov Grof, The
Adventure of Self Discovery (Albany, N.T.: SUNY Press, 1988), pp. 71-72.”
In addition, research
studies back up these claims as well.
One example is the experiment done by Cardiologist Michael Sabom. Talbot
describes this as well: (page 232-233)
“Experiencing an OBE during cardiac arrest is
relatively common, so common that Michael B. Sabom, a
cardiologist and professor of medicine at
Of the nonexperiencers, 20
made major mistakes when they described their resuscitations, 3 gave correct
but general descriptions, and 2 had no idea at all what had taken place. Among the experiencers,
26 gave correct but general descriptions, 6 gave highly detailed and accurate
descriptions of their own resuscitation, and 1 gave a blow-by-blow accounting
so accurate that Sabom was stunned. The results inspired him to delve even deeper
into the phenomenon, and like
Michael B. Sabom,
Recollections of Death (New York: Harper
& Row, 1982), p. 184.”
Also significant are the
studies done that support the validity of Out of Body Experiences (NDE’s are considered a type of OBE). Rick Stack describes one notable example of
these in his book Out-Of-Body
Adventures:
(page 12-13)
“A notable study by Osis
and McCormick involved an out-of-body subject trying to view a target that was
contained within an optical image device and could be viewed only from a
specific location. The target was a
picture composed of several elements.
These elements were not physically together in any one place within the
apparatus. If you looked through the
viewing window from a point directly in front of the apparatus, however, the
various elements of the final target came together as an optical illusion. The OOBE subject, Alex Tanous,
was instructed to project into the room with the target, which was several
rooms away, and to try to view it.
Meanwhile, the experimenters attempted to measure physical effects at
the target location (effects that may be caused by the subject's out-of-body
presence). They placed sensor plates in
a shielded chamber at the viewing location.
The sensors were capable of picking very small movements, or vibrations,
which would then generate electrical impulses in extremely sensitive strain
gauges. These strain gauges, therefore,
enabled the experimenters to note very minutes changes in the vibration of the
sensor plates. Tanous
was led to believe that the strain gauges were being used only for a subsequent
task in order to reduce the possibility of his deliberately trying to affect
the sensors while attempting to view the optical image device.
Osis and McCormick thought that the OOBE might be a state
that fluctuated with respect to degree of externalization; that is to say,
there may be degrees of clarity of intensity in the out-of-body state. It may be possible, for example, to be both
partially out of and partially in your body.
The investigators hypothesized that when the OOBE subject was most fully
out and, consequently, able to view the target more accurately, there would be
greater mechanical (physical) effect caused by the experient's
out-of-body presence than there would be when the subject was less out and,
therefore, less able to accurately view the target.
The results of the Osis-McCormick
study supported their hypothesis "that ostensibly unintentional kinetic
effects can occur as by-products of narrowly localized
2.
"Kinetic Effects at the Ostensible Location of an Out of Body
Projection during Perceptual Testing" Journal of the American Society for
Psychical Research 74 (1980): pp. 319-329.”
Another notable example was
done by Charles Tart, where a girl known as Miss Z was able to identify a 5
digit number above her bed in a position that she could only have seen if she
had floated up there. This experiment is
described at http://www.paradigm-sys.com/cttart/sci-docs/ctt68-apsoo.html
2) Second, NDE’s usually result in
permanent life changing effects whereas dreams and hallucinations do not. Usually, real experiences are what cause life
changes, not imaginary ones. NDEers usually report that through their NDE they gain
valuable insight into the universe, about themselves, what their lives are
really all about and how we’re all really connected in a vast superconsciousness, etc.
Many also report life reviews where everything they’ve ever done flashes
through in a brief moment and they feel the impact of their actions on others,
which allows them to reevaluate their lives from a much higher
perspective. As a result, many learn to
love more altruistically and be less selfish.
In addition, most NDEers lose all fear of
death as well, claiming that they’ve discovered that death is just a doorway,
not an end.
3) Third, people have had NDE’s while they
were declared dead with flat EEG lines on their brain activity. Any activity in the brain/mind, even simple
thoughts, results in some EEG activity.
Therefore, it should be impossible (according to materialistic science)
to have any kind of conscious experience while your brain shows a flat EEG
line, yet this has happened with NDE’s.
4) Fourth, some people have NDE’s even when
they were not in danger of death.
Pediatrician Dr. Melvin Morse notes some of these in his article Are Near Death Experiences Real?: (http://www.melvinmorse.com/e-what.htm)
“The experiences do not only occur to dying
dysfunctional brains. The Journal of the Swiss Alpine Club, in the late 1800s,
reported 30 first hand accounts of mountain climbers who fell from great
heights and lived. The climbers reported being out of their physical body,
seeing heaven, having life reviews, and even hearing the impact of their bodies
hitting the ground. They were not seriously injured.
Yale University Pediatric Cancer specialist Dianne Komp repoorts that many dying
children have near death experiences, without evidence of brain dysfunction.
Their expereinces often occured
in dreams, prayers, or visions before death. One boy stated that Jesus had
visited him in a big yellow school bus and told him he would die soon. Others
heard angels singing or saw halos of light.
The American Journal of Psychiatry, in 1967, reported
the experiences of two miners trapped for days in a mine. They were never near death
and had adequate food and water. They said that mystical realities opened
before them in the tunnels. They also said a third miner who seemed real to
them helped them to safety, but disappered when they
were resuscued.”
For more on NDE’s, this website has the most extensive information I’ve
ever seen on the web:
www.near-death.com. You can also
go to www.spiritweb.com and select “Near Death Experiences”. Also look for books by authors such as
Kenneth Ring, Raymond Moody, and PMH Atwater.
In my opinion, the biggest and most comprehensive easy to read book is
PMH Atwater’s The complete idiot's guide to Near-Death experiences. In it, she writes of Blackmore’s
Dying Brain Hypothesis:
“A parapsychologist at the time of her original work
but now focusing on psychological research, Blackmore
has written one of the most influential books on the near-death experience - Dying
to Live: Near-Death Experiences - in which she presents a detailed
version of the dying brain theory. Her
aim is to provide a materialistic interpretation of near-death states.
Blackmore’s theory is too complex to present in its entirety
here, but the following is a summary of it:
·
Anoxia can cause
the occurrences of hearing music (by stimulating the cochlear region of the
ear), seeing tunnels, and seeing a light.
·
An inordinate
release of endorphins at the time of death are the source of the euphoria
associated with a near-death episode.
·
The actions of
endorphins and neurotransmitters cause such cerebral structures as the
hippocampus (associated with memory) o release stored memories, resulting in
the life review.
·
The sense of
timelessness is the result of the breakdown of one’s sense of self at death
(the self being the basis upon which we distinguish moments of time).
To respond to each of these points is not
necessary. Instead, we can offer a
rebuttal to the whole by quoting Dr. Kenneth Ring’s criticism from his
excellent review of Blackmore’s book in the Journal
of Near-Death Studies (Winter 1995, p. 123): “Does the brain state associated
with the onset of an NDE explain the experience or does it merely afford access
to it?” In other words, although many
(all?) of the near-death-related phenomena may be traceable to our body’s
responses to dying, does that mean that those responses explain the phenomena,
or do they simply provide us with an interesting way of talking about them?
There is no answer.
To see this, consider the popular Psych 101
experiment of imagining that you’re eating a lemon. Make that experience as vivid, as
sensory-rich as you can. If you imagine
it strongly enough, you’ll taste the tartness and you’ll begin to salivate -
despite there not being any lemon in your mouth. So the imagination can produce the identical
physical responses as an “objective” experience. Does this mean, then, that when you’re eating
a real lemon, it’s not the lemon but your imagination that’s producing the
physical sensations you’re having?
Well, we know the answer to that.”
To research more on NDE’s, see the following links.
Kenneth Ring’s book: Lessons from the Light: What We Can Learn from the Near-Death Experience
http://www.melvinmorse.com/light.htm
(The website of Near Death Experience researcher and pediatrician Dr. Melvin
Morse, M.D.)
http://www.near-death.com
(A site with a comprehensive list of articles on the Near Death experience
representing many viewpoints.)
http://www.nderf.org (Another comprehensive
site of stories and articles)
Journal of Near-Death Studies (www.iands.org/journal.html)
International Association for Near-Death Studies (IANDS) www.iands.org
Medical
Evidence for NDEs by Pim van Lommel
In reply to a "Skeptic" article by Michael Shermer,
Pim van Lommel presents
strong scientific evidence for the reality of Near Death Experiences.
Previous
Page Back to
Table of Contents Next
Page