well-informed wrote:The male robot can't give her real compliments, can't take her to dinner, can't propose to her, can't give her MONEY and much more. Even though AW dislike almost all men they STILL NEED US FOR SOMETHING. All we need from women is sex in the most selfish desire.
Correct, which is why the 1st generation 'bots, let's say the 2018 to 2028 users' crowd will be widely laughed at, much like the realdoll owners today. (IMO, the smart current day realdoll owners aren't getting on the news, the interviewed media clowns are fools looking for attention). Realize, ridicule is the AWs' primary weapon. Afterwards, as more and more people have 'bots, not only for routine sex but also, as a housekeeper or even someone to talk to, society as a whole will change. As corporations get more global and longer hours become the norm (than just for the corporate overachievers), people will work longer hours & have more and more of their social lives around their tablets, home appliances, etc, since that'll cut down on vacation time, etc.
well-informed wrote:That's why im still a little confused, because sex robots will jeopardise the heterosexual union quickly (not completely) because most men WILL get what they want and most women WON'T get what they want. Most AW are not like the hardcore-femanazis from Smith College
Here's the thing, I concur that Smith/Northampton MA feminazis aren't the core of AWs, however, they're the ones most active in DC think tanks and can effect legislation, esp with regards to palimony, importing foreign brides (see faux trafficking accusations, etc), and so forth.
The problem is that 'bots won't be declared sentient beings, until they pass some Turing test. That's really still ~50 or so years away, in terms of programming paradigms. Once they get declared sentient, then feminazis will pass legislation which will restrict the software level of one's bot and thus, a true female replica will be another *person* trying to apply for US, UK, or Canadian citizenship. I don't see that event happening till let's say 2110+, not the time frame we're talking about.
During our lifetimes, the simulation will be more a type of VR paradigm where on some level, we'll realize that it's mainly a smart super appliance but with adaptive features which matches our personality traits. And realize, its personality can sit on a desktop PC, thus, once again, the 'bot is an animatronic wireless add-on, not even the key component of the application.
Think about this, you and I are having a discussion over a few IP hubs. Neither of us are face to face but we have a conceptualization of sitting at a desktop in Boston typing, while you're in NYC at another desktop, reading my postings. Thus, we've substituted a discussion, which used to go on in the 50s/60s at let's say a cafe in Harvard Sq Cambridge MA or Greenwich Village NYC, but with digital interfaces. If it was the year 2030, I could be a digital computer answering these questions with S_Parc's former memories programmed in & for the most part, you wouldn't be able to make a 100% discernment w/o a type of Turing test software to tell if it were the real me.
And that's really the crux of it. Technology is moving ahead but social restrictions are legislated between humans, corporations, and municipalities. That's why the drive for greater profits and corporatization will drive people to become even more attached to machines and then, the femi-nazi legislators (Hillary Clinton, Ellen Degeneres, Melissa Etheridge) will have what they want, a world where men and women don't interact anymore. The regular AWs will simply follow the path of least resistance in a corporatized, machine driven society.