Welcome to our new upgraded phpbb 3.2 forum! The upgrade is now complete. See announcement and new features here, or report any problems or issues here. Enjoy the new forum.
Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics
Discuss and talk about any general topic.
3 posts • Page 1 of 1
When there is resource inequality among menâ€”the case in every human societyâ€”most women benefit from polygyny: women can share a wealthy man. Under monogamy, they are stuck with marrying a poorer man.
The only exceptions are extremely desirable women. Under monogamy, they can monopolize the wealthiest men; under polygyny, they must share the men with other, less desirable women. However, the situation is exactly opposite for men. Monogamy guarantees that every man can find a wife. True, less desirable men can marry only less desirable women, but that's much better than not marrying anyone at all.
Men in monogamous societies imagine they would be better off under polygyny. What they don't realize is that, for most men who are not extremely desirable, polygyny means no wife at all, or, if they are lucky, a wife who is much less desirable than one they could get under monogamy
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles ... ure?page=2
A wealthy man can have a harem of hot girlfriends. Look at Hugh Hefner and his Playboy Mansion. That's the American dream boys.
Multiple women can benefit under one rich man. They are taken care of financially and accommodations are provided for. Women are still little girls inside who seek daddy's approval.
Women have more to lose during sex aka unwanted pregnancies.
We know it's you Konrad, give it up "philosophical filipino".
You just can't stop trolling can you.