Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Women aren't attracted to men (an article)

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Postby djfourmoney » Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:38 pm

Blue Murder wrote:
djfourmoney wrote:That's hardly unusual...
Once you as a male become 30, you're still trying to date women about 22. Women that young are far more concerned about things like height and income. However that said, shorter guys (White Men) generally don't have a problem. Shorter Black men do have a problem. Just look at any dating site with Black Women on it and you'll see over 6'0 comes up many times...

I don't date Black Women and I'm over 6'0 so both of these are not issues.

Finally. Something your dumbarse and I agree on: Heightism.

It is the worst in black women. Them hoes ask for unreal heights too. Fuckin' 6'2" and shit. A small percentage of men (regardless of race) are that high, with most coming in at 5'9" - 6'0" (like you in this case). Forget about everything else -- they don't even let you put your foot in the door unless you're a f***ing behemoth.


Why you calling me names? This is why MRA is counterproductive.....
djfourmoney
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles







Postby djfourmoney » Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:42 pm

Blue Murder wrote:
djfourmoney wrote:That's hardly unusual...
Once you as a male become 30, you're still trying to date women about 22. Women that young are far more concerned about things like height and income. However that said, shorter guys (White Men) generally don't have a problem. Shorter Black men do have a problem. Just look at any dating site with Black Women on it and you'll see over 6'0 comes up many times...

I don't date Black Women and I'm over 6'0 so both of these are not issues.

Finally. Something your dumbarse and I agree on: Heightism.

It is the worst in black women. Them hoes ask for unreal heights too. Fuckin' 6'2" and shit. A small percentage of men (regardless of race) are that high, with most coming in at 5'9" - 6'0" (like you in this case). Forget about everything else -- they don't even let you put your foot in the door unless you're a f***ing behemoth.


Not concerned about AW shortcomings, pun intended.

What I want is not located here, never has been and I have known that since the early 90's. If shes her, she's White, not Latina, not Asia, not Black, White.

Only FOB or Overweight Minorities give me any attention, historically.
djfourmoney
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby All_That_Is_Man » Sat Jun 09, 2012 3:05 am

djfourmoney wrote:
Blue Murder wrote:
djfourmoney wrote:That's hardly unusual...
Once you as a male become 30, you're still trying to date women about 22. Women that young are far more concerned about things like height and income. However that said, shorter guys (White Men) generally don't have a problem. Shorter Black men do have a problem. Just look at any dating site with Black Women on it and you'll see over 6'0 comes up many times...

I don't date Black Women and I'm over 6'0 so both of these are not issues.

Finally. Something your dumbarse and I agree on: Heightism.

It is the worst in black women. Them hoes ask for unreal heights too. Fuckin' 6'2" and shit. A small percentage of men (regardless of race) are that high, with most coming in at 5'9" - 6'0" (like you in this case). Forget about everything else -- they don't even let you put your foot in the door unless you're a f***ing behemoth.


Not concerned about AW shortcomings, pun intended.

What I want is not located here, never has been and I have known that since the early 90's. If shes her, she's White, not Latina, not Asia, not Black, White.

Only FOB or Overweight Minorities give me any attention, historically.


Depending on your acronym of "FOB", this could actually be a very good thing to attract! However, you've used it in a negative context, so I'm guessing it isn't "Fresh Off the Boat" (newly arrived foreign-born women) but rather "Fat Overweight Bitches".

:?

For the record, I would love to attract "Fresh Off the Boat" women. They still have all of their non-westernized cultural morals, they don't speak a word of English, but they have a universal attraction to me and wanna f**k my brains out :wink: Foreign-born women (whom have moved here from abroad) are the only women I've come to give any attention to until I leave America. It's just a real drag that here in the midwest, all of them are already married.
"Manginas grovel. Men travel." - me (04/17/2012)

"I used to be one of those men who believed that men are better than women at everything. Then I stood corrected!
Women are better than men at... getting fat." - me (02/24/2013)

Black women suck at life.
All_That_Is_Man
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:31 am

Postby Blue Murder » Sat Jun 09, 2012 4:32 am

So I overhear a conversation one day.

"We save nice guys for marriage."

Yup. You heard it right, folks. There's another reason not to get married; bitches won't even give you their best years. f**k all the false alphas they want, and give a true alpha a beat-up, worn-out p***y that's already-been-chewed.
Self-improvement addict. Always striving for perfection.
Blue Murder
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 699
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 10:25 pm
Location: Climbing that mountain; reaching that plateau.

Postby OutsideoftheBox » Sat Jun 09, 2012 7:02 am

djfourmoney wrote:
polya wrote:
Someone wrote:This post is of great interest to me because I thought the 2008 switch in dating prospects for men was a local matter, and Only affected the city where I live (Washington DC)... but as the OP suggests it looks like a more global thing. I've had a lot of conversations with my buddies here in Washington DC that the years 2001-2007 vs 2009-present were like night and day.

It doesnt look like the recession per se is to blame. It's either demographics, or Facebook, or something else.

If anyone has any theories or experiences, please share!

The very first thing I started noticing in 2009 was that the ratios in nightclubs started climbing to 2:1. Hard to believe now, but in the mid 00s there used to be more women in bars and clubs across the US. Around the same time, eye contact from women disappeared, and bottle service emerged.

One of the theories that was floated on some forums (and it sounds incredible) is that men's dating status is affected by whether a Republican or a Democrat is in the White House. It's definitely a head scratcher but the years of GW Bush were an active dating period for men, while the Obama years seem to have produced the current situation. Very weird, but not impossible.



I hate to tell you, but it was around 1991 when Madonna sang "Don't go for 2nd best baby" when the US dating scene went to hell - I think it was because then women got "more rights than men" - women could sue for sexual harassment, child support laws got very tough, women got custody over 90% of the time, etc. All these rights made women thinkthey're better than men and no longer wanted tomarry and act reasonably. In the 1980s AW were marriage material (except in big cities like NY).

This is the shift I noticed, and things got steadily worse after this when"stalking" laws were passed, when Police always arrested the man after domestic violence was alleged (not proven)... the dating scene followed these changes.


Seeing that as a DJ hurt, you're talking about "Express Yourself" which was originally done by The Staple Singers in the 70's.

Anyway, Women have started to hook up with Maginas, you see it all the time. These are men that are generally useless around the house and elsewhere. They are however very obedient and this is attractive to SOME WOMEN, not all.

Dating in America is worst than its ever been. Why do you need PUA if dating was okay? This doesn't exist in other country, that should be your first clue.

Eastern Europe, South America and SE Asia are not the only places where you can date and find a reasonable number of women to marry. All you need is your passport and stop making excuses.



I always tell men that instead of sitting here complaining about American females simply make plans to get the hell up out of here. These bitches aren't going to change and they are only getting worse.
OutsideoftheBox
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 12:57 am

Postby polya » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:15 am

djfourmoney wrote:
polya wrote:
Someone wrote:This post is of great interest to me because I thought the 2008 switch in dating prospects for men was a local matter, and Only affected the city where I live (Washington DC)... but as the OP suggests it looks like a more global thing. I've had a lot of conversations with my buddies here in Washington DC that the years 2001-2007 vs 2009-present were like night and day.

It doesnt look like the recession per se is to blame. It's either demographics, or Facebook, or something else.

If anyone has any theories or experiences, please share!

The very first thing I started noticing in 2009 was that the ratios in nightclubs started climbing to 2:1. Hard to believe now, but in the mid 00s there used to be more women in bars and clubs across the US. Around the same time, eye contact from women disappeared, and bottle service emerged.

One of the theories that was floated on some forums (and it sounds incredible) is that men's dating status is affected by whether a Republican or a Democrat is in the White House. It's definitely a head scratcher but the years of GW Bush were an active dating period for men, while the Obama years seem to have produced the current situation. Very weird, but not impossible.


I hate to tell you, but it was around 1991 when Madonna sang "Don't go for 2nd best baby" when the US dating scene went to hell - I think it was because then women got "more rights than men" - women could sue for sexual harassment, child support laws got very tough, women got custody over 90% of the time, etc. All these rights made women thinkthey're better than men and no longer wanted tomarry and act reasonably. In the 1980s AW were marriage material (except in big cities like NY).

This is the shift I noticed, and things got steadily worse after this when"stalking" laws were passed, when Police always arrested the man after domestic violence was alleged (not proven)... the dating scene followed these changes.


Seeing that as a DJ hurt, you're talking about "Express Yourself" which was originally done by The Staple Singers in the 70's.

Anyway, Women have started to hook up with Maginas, you see it all the time. These are men that are generally useless around the house and elsewhere. They are however very obedient and this is attractive to SOME WOMEN, not all.

Dating in America is worst than its ever been. Why do you need PUA if dating was okay? This doesn't exist in other country, that should be your first clue.

Eastern Europe, South America and SE Asia are not the only places where you can date and find a reasonable number of women to marry. All you need is your passport and stop making excuses.


I totally agree - dating in the USA is the worst that it's ever been & guys have to leave the USA now as it's so bad. However, guys need to live all their lives in her country. Taking a foreign woman to the USA doesn't work as she will turn into an AW in 1-2 years of living here.
I understand Madonna's song wasn't original, but the shift in women's thinking was really noticable in 1991 - girl no longer wanted to marry the local boy, but to turn into brooding Carrie Bradshaws who "wanted it all"
"Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal... If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters." Cato the Elder
polya
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:21 am

Postby polya » Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:21 am

Someone wrote:Polya, the period 2000-2007 was really good for men. I'm a short guy and I didn't even have to do anything at all, in clubs girls would look at you and approach you on their own. The stories I have from that period are incredible especially the years 2005 and 06. All of my friends had the same experiences.

Women were *definitely* pushing for marriage and commitment around that time while the guys would usually crack jokes about their impending loss of freedom and how they wanted to stay single and have fun. Have you forgotten about "The Rules" and SATC and Bridget Jones?

I have an article for you that documents how the dating game has flipped 180 degrees, a Newsweek columnist has been out of the game for 5 yrs (since the mid-2000s) and is shocked to learn that men are no longer as cavalier as they were 5 yrs ago, while the women suddenly much pickier and not as interested in marriage:

www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/02/ ... nough.html


OK, I believe you that you & your friend had a good time from 2000-2007 - probably because you were young & desirable back then. Like I was young in 1991.I think that now you've got older you're all stereotyped out by all women & nothing you do can change this.
I read that article printed in 2012 & is by an AW - Jessica Bennett. I think she is the one being picky & difficult, not all the guys she's "pumping & dumping." She needs to get real and take a guy who is less than perfect.
"Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal... If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters." Cato the Elder
polya
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:21 am

Postby Maker55 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:51 pm

Blue Murder wrote:So I overhear a conversation one day.

"We save nice guys for marriage."

Yup. You heard it right, folks. There's another reason not to get married; bitches won't even give you their best years. f**k all the false alphas they want, and give a true alpha a beat-up, worn-out p***y that's already-been-chewed.


Exactly.

This is exactly what Tom Leykis says.
Maker55
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:08 am

Postby Maker55 » Sat Jun 09, 2012 5:54 pm

OutsideoftheBox wrote:
djfourmoney wrote:
polya wrote:
Someone wrote:This post is of great interest to me because I thought the 2008 switch in dating prospects for men was a local matter, and Only affected the city where I live (Washington DC)... but as the OP suggests it looks like a more global thing. I've had a lot of conversations with my buddies here in Washington DC that the years 2001-2007 vs 2009-present were like night and day.

It doesnt look like the recession per se is to blame. It's either demographics, or Facebook, or something else.

If anyone has any theories or experiences, please share!

The very first thing I started noticing in 2009 was that the ratios in nightclubs started climbing to 2:1. Hard to believe now, but in the mid 00s there used to be more women in bars and clubs across the US. Around the same time, eye contact from women disappeared, and bottle service emerged.

One of the theories that was floated on some forums (and it sounds incredible) is that men's dating status is affected by whether a Republican or a Democrat is in the White House. It's definitely a head scratcher but the years of GW Bush were an active dating period for men, while the Obama years seem to have produced the current situation. Very weird, but not impossible.



I hate to tell you, but it was around 1991 when Madonna sang "Don't go for 2nd best baby" when the US dating scene went to hell - I think it was because then women got "more rights than men" - women could sue for sexual harassment, child support laws got very tough, women got custody over 90% of the time, etc. All these rights made women thinkthey're better than men and no longer wanted tomarry and act reasonably. In the 1980s AW were marriage material (except in big cities like NY).

This is the shift I noticed, and things got steadily worse after this when"stalking" laws were passed, when Police always arrested the man after domestic violence was alleged (not proven)... the dating scene followed these changes.


Seeing that as a DJ hurt, you're talking about "Express Yourself" which was originally done by The Staple Singers in the 70's.

Anyway, Women have started to hook up with Maginas, you see it all the time. These are men that are generally useless around the house and elsewhere. They are however very obedient and this is attractive to SOME WOMEN, not all.

Dating in America is worst than its ever been. Why do you need PUA if dating was okay? This doesn't exist in other country, that should be your first clue.

Eastern Europe, South America and SE Asia are not the only places where you can date and find a reasonable number of women to marry. All you need is your passport and stop making excuses.



I always tell men that instead of sitting here complaining about American females simply make plans to get the hell up out of here. These bitches aren't going to change and they are only getting worse.


I agree.

There are enough opportunities in America to fix your life and finances, then you can go abroad. They need to stop whining and fix the damn problem.

There are endless ways to fix the damn problem.
Maker55
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:08 am

Postby Blue Murder » Sat Jun 09, 2012 6:35 pm

And the men that DO tell people to stop whining are "trolls".
Self-improvement addict. Always striving for perfection.
Blue Murder
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 699
Joined: Sat May 12, 2012 10:25 pm
Location: Climbing that mountain; reaching that plateau.

Postby Winston » Wed Jun 13, 2012 5:50 pm

This topic got me thinking about something.

Why is it that when a woman gets a tattoo with a name on it, she will pick the name of her mother, her best girlfriend, her child, or her pet, but never her boyfriend or husband? Doesn't that say something? Namely, that they aren't really attached to men deep down in their hearts?

What do you think? Anyone ever notice this?

Likewise, women with internet accounts tend to pick the name of their pet or child as their password, but never their male lover. Anyone ever notice that?

Does this support the claim in the OP?
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23609
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:16 pm

Re: Women aren't attracted to men (an article)

Postby Renata » Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:43 pm

[author unknown] wrote:Women aren't attracted to men.

WOMEN ARE ATTRACTED TO:
(1) status
(2) money
(3) how much a man smiles and laughs
(4) how much friends and resources a man has
(5) how full a man’s life is
(6) how many cool, exciting, and prestigious things he is doing or connected to
(7) how others view him
(8how others want to be around him


I prefer a guy I'm comfortable with, who makes me happy, isn't too critical or argumentative, likes to do stuff with me as I'll be happy to do stuff he likes as well. Lets me be how I am; he has to bear in mind where I'm from & that we are different. I'll admit to 3 & 5 above. A relationship strain happens if I don't get enough attention or time, then I'll start missing him like hell & that's never a good thing for me. I am quite tolerant but not really sometimes lol... but that's just being human I guess.
If there's more tears than happiness, more bad days than good ones... don't bother fixing anything just move on.
- It's easy to give, when you know what it's like to have nothing. -

- Develop a backbone, not a wishbone. -
Renata
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1106
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 11:14 pm
Location: Ireland

Postby All_That_Is_Man » Wed Jun 13, 2012 8:36 pm

Winston wrote:This topic got me thinking about something.

Why is it that when a woman gets a tattoo with a name on it, she will pick the name of her mother, her best girlfriend, her child, or her pet, but never her boyfriend or husband? Doesn't that say something? Namely, that they aren't really attached to men deep down in their hearts?

What do you think? Anyone ever notice this?

Likewise, women with internet accounts tend to pick the name of their pet or child as their password, but never their male lover. Anyone ever notice that?

Does this support the claim in the OP?


Great point, Winston. I notice that women often have their baby daddy offsprings' names tattooed on them, but rarely, if ever, the baby daddy.
"Manginas grovel. Men travel." - me (04/17/2012)

"I used to be one of those men who believed that men are better than women at everything. Then I stood corrected!
Women are better than men at... getting fat." - me (02/24/2013)

Black women suck at life.
All_That_Is_Man
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 12:31 am

Postby DarkMinxMish » Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:36 am

Winston wrote:This topic got me thinking about something.

Why is it that when a woman gets a tattoo with a name on it, she will pick the name of her mother, her best girlfriend, her child, or her pet, but never her boyfriend or husband? Doesn't that say something? Namely, that they aren't really attached to men deep down in their hearts?

What do you think? Anyone ever notice this?

Likewise, women with internet accounts tend to pick the name of their pet or child as their password, but never their male lover. Anyone ever notice that?

Does this support the claim in the OP?


No offense Winston, but I think it's hella stupid for a female to have any males name tattooed on them....especially a lover. -_-

I mean tattoos are suppose to mean something and they kinda stay with you forever. (though there are ways to remove them)
Mainly you never know whats going to happen. Plus the women(ditz) who do get tats for love often end up not with that person after a certain period of time. So your left loveless and with a momento that won't come off...that'll suck.

In certain cases sure since it is a personal choice. I could see girls doing it for the love of their lives and for lovers they were deeply in love with, but lost. Or the other case would be couples do it for marriage. Sort of like a lady would wear her hubby's name in honor of him. Somewhere so not out in the open.

For me personally as kinda romantic that may seem, it just represents a brand of sorts. Even if there was someone I was crazy for (there might be) I still wouldn't wear their name on my skin. It would be a bit embarrassing....
Sure the male can own our hearts, but not the skin we're in if that makes any sense...
Pricking up her golden head:
We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots?"
DarkMinxMish
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:14 am

Postby OutsideoftheBox » Fri Jun 15, 2012 1:16 am

DarkMinxMish wrote:
Winston wrote:This topic got me thinking about something.

Why is it that when a woman gets a tattoo with a name on it, she will pick the name of her mother, her best girlfriend, her child, or her pet, but never her boyfriend or husband? Doesn't that say something? Namely, that they aren't really attached to men deep down in their hearts?

What do you think? Anyone ever notice this?

Likewise, women with internet accounts tend to pick the name of their pet or child as their password, but never their male lover. Anyone ever notice that?

Does this support the claim in the OP?


No offense Winston, but I think it's hella stupid for a female to have any males name tattooed on them....especially a lover. -_-

I mean tattoos are suppose to mean something and they kinda stay with you forever. (though there are ways to remove them)
Mainly you never know whats going to happen. Plus the women(ditz) who do get tats for love often end up not with that person after a certain period of time. So your left loveless and with a momento that won't come off...that'll suck.

In certain cases sure since it is a personal choice. I could see girls doing it for the love of their lives and for lovers they were deeply in love with, but lost. Or the other case would be couples do it for marriage. Sort of like a lady would wear her hubby's name in honor of him. Somewhere so not out in the open.

For me personally as kinda romantic that may seem, it just represents a brand of sorts. Even if there was someone I was crazy for (there might be) I still wouldn't wear their name on my skin. It would be a bit embarrassing....
Sure the male can own our hearts, but not the skin we're in if that makes any sense...


Actually a tattoo is just a raunchy tattoo which females utilize to draw attention to their bodies. The thing that is supposed to "mean something" and "stay with you forever" is your mate. You place more value on raunchy juvenile bullshit, such as tattoos, than the man you choose to mate with.

Your post merely proves how f***ed up in the head, and ass backwards Americanized females truly are. No wonder the world is sick of your kind.

Americanized females = Epic failure.
OutsideoftheBox
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 241
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 12:57 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests