Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Admiralty Law

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Admiralty Law

Postby PeterAndrewNolan » Wed Aug 01, 2012 4:38 pm

Winston,
if you can believe this...MRAs and MRMs still deny the facts presented herein.

Dumb bastards.

Family Law is admiralty law, UCC Law.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u941NGbsKvo[/youtube]
Feel free to check out my blog:Click ME!
PeterAndrewNolan
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1722
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:25 am







Re: Admiralty Law

Postby Jester » Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:22 am

PeterAndrewNolan wrote:Winston,
if you can believe this...MRAs and MRMs still deny the facts presented herein.

Dumb bastards.

Family Law is admiralty law, UCC Law.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u941NGbsKvo[/youtube]


Peter I have heard bits and pieces of this before. This video seems like a intelligible and concise summary.

I know a lot of it to be true from personal experience (UCC.... tax agency debiting account without notice.... guilt by assertion when a regulatory agency with no jurisdiction sends sends you a letter with their opinion.... CSS hearing officer is also the prosecutor ...) but presentations I have seen before this one have typically been mixed with what I consider misinformation - from folks like Sorcha Fal etc., or just people who jumped to conclusions. Like the idea that Founding Fathers were actually Illuminati agents risking their lives to create a phony revolution, or that the United States is only one portion of Washington DC, etc. I am not interested in relying on sources that make these types of assertions - which I have researched myself already. I realize they have a few facts, but I am not interested in conjecture, just provable facts.

Anyway, since this video you've posted here does look credible, I am going to look at it in the morning when I'm fresh.

Could you give please me an idea of who is responsible for it, and what sources they used?
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Re: Admiralty Law

Postby PeterAndrewNolan » Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:28 pm

Jester,
I believe that snippet is from the first zeitgeist movie.

On my forums2 page on the lower half are LOTS of links to the background material for this.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/aus ... rums2.aspx

Here are some of the best.

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/aus ... fault.aspx

http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/aus ... fault.aspx

I researched all this back in 2008/09.....I have PROVEN that the guvments of the world run UCC. Indeed the UN is a UCC Legal Entity and all member states therefore run UCC.

I really have spent more than 4,000 hours on this. I really did make all that I learned available for free. I really WAS ignored.

So I commercialised my time. Now that I am the ONLY man in the world to do this.......I will require men to pay for my time to make up for all the investment I have made. Men pay for plumbers, electricians, motor mechanics...they can pay for me....I am sick and tired or providing "free help". It cost me more than USD500,000 to give men "free help". They are too dumb to use it.

There is a MASSIVE amount of information out there. There really is. And as far as I know there is no man who knows it better than me...though, to be fair, I think a man who made himself known to me this week might be better informed than me.....I am reading his books now.

Experience counts...and I am the ONLY man with THIS experience in the family courts. This video got 150 hits yesterday. I wish it was 150,000. Men who are getting divorced would do very well to hire me and make sure that they set up the later court case to get their property back.

Men who have been divorced who can PROVE their wife committed a crime in the divorce, like perjury, would be VERY well advised to hire me to prepare their case to get their property back.....we are ready to prepare such cases now....and I will be VERY expensive once we start WINNING cases.....it is best for men to get in while my fees a low and the service unproven...because once I run my case and get my remedy and the whole service is PROVEN then I will copy right it and I will sue anyone who tries to provide the same service without paying me.

I am about to be a very, very wealthy man. I wil use that wealth to provide a better life and better opportunities for young lads whose fathers killed themselves in divorce. Anyone who bitches about paying me is bitching about providing money to lads whose fathers were murdered by proxy in divorce.

I am also going to set up schools for originie boys in Australia to teach them skills that will last them a lifetime.

I think giving young boys a good education and a good chance in life is the most noble cause I can contribute to.

If any men here disagree I would be very interested in debating that topic on a separate thread.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL7KT4FkA0c [/youtube]
Feel free to check out my blog:Click ME!
PeterAndrewNolan
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1722
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:25 am


Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest