Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


IMF considers abandoning fractional reserve system!

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Postby Banano » Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:41 pm

But I don't see what tariffs have to do with keeping American corps. from outsourcing jobs. Are the tariffs he proposes going to be on American companies manufacturing abroad, as well as foreign companies? The tariffs would have to be almost prohibitively high to offset the cheaper cost of labor abroad. I'm all for a bit of protectionism; I just don't know if it will bring back the defecting companies. And mainly what I'm hearing from Romney is more "trade agreements," which means the opposite of tariffs.[/quote]


American corps? What American corps? hmm..you see globalization screwed up everything, who is to say that Apple is american, if you try to tax them more they will simply register in some other country where tax rules are favorable to them, just like many bookmakers did to avoid strict rules and taxes

Corps have $$ to bribe and lobby politicians, Romney just talks, there is no way he could change anything to bring business back unless we elect Hugo Chavez as president

US had G Bush Republican for 8 years and wht has he done to economy?
Amazes me how people believe that after elections things will get better if their candidate wins? How much of a sheep you gotta be to believe that
cant they see trend, trend is your friend :roll:
Banano
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2013
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2011 8:26 am







Postby Jester » Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:23 am

Banano wrote:
Amazes me how people believe that after elections things will get better if their candidate wins? How much of a sheep you gotta be to believe that
cant they see trend, trend is your friend :roll:


Well-said.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Postby Jester » Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:32 am

gsjackson wrote:
But I don't see what tariffs have to do with keeping American corps. from outsourcing jobs. Are the tariffs he proposes going to be on American companies manufacturing abroad, as well as foreign companies?

Tariffs fall on products, not companies. So manufacturing jobs would come back, regardless of who owns factories here or overseas.

Outsourcing of call centers, engineering services etc is a separate matter. Good point, I never thought about that. It could be addressed by the income tax code. Or by graduating some damn engineers here. I think curriculums, guidance counselors and student financial aid should all be geared to useful tech skills. That would help some. Plus we could ban datasharing about customer data between corporations or across borders without explicit, large-print customer permission. That would cut way down on utsourcing I think.

gsjackson wrote:The tariffs would have to be almost prohibitively high to offset the cheaper cost of labor abroad.

That's the point. And it works.


gsjackson wrote:And mainly what I'm hearing from Romney is more "trade agreements," which means the opposite of tariffs.

Yup. Romney will not bring prosperity.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Re: IMF considers abandoning fractional reserve system!

Postby Teal Lantern » Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:57 pm

Banano wrote:http://www.infowars.com/what-if-we-adopted-a-system-where-the-banks-did-not-create-our-money/


Riiiight. :roll:
Banksters: "Now that we've stolen .. er .. 'rehypothecated' everything that wasn't nailed down, let's re-imagine a world without theft." :evil:
не поглеждай назад. 8)

"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
User avatar
Teal Lantern
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:48 pm
Location: Briar Patch, Universe 25

Re: IMF considers abandoning fractional reserve system!

Postby Jester » Thu Oct 25, 2012 8:59 pm

Teal Lantern wrote:
Banano wrote:http://www.infowars.com/what-if-we-adopted-a-system-where-the-banks-did-not-create-our-money/


Riiiight. :roll:
Banksters: "Now that we've stolen .. er .. 'rehypothecated' everything that wasn't nailed down, let's re-imagine a world without theft." :evil:


:lol:
Exactly!

Maybe we should do business in scalps.

"I'll give you twenty Fannie Mae loan packagers for one Illuminati..."

"OK, throw in an NSA eavesdropper and you gotta deal!"
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Postby golgi » Fri Nov 23, 2012 7:41 am

Think about it like this:

What if everything that you thought that you knew, including conspiracy theories that get any significant traction on the net, was/were designed and planted to become eventually become widespread as accepted doctrine?

Than would mean that the entire 'end-the-fed' movement is designed so that it eventually comes to pass. Why? Well, if you think about it, doing so would take care of a large elite perceived problem: overpopulation. On one hand, bringing a one world government into existence (it's here, the only obstacle now being ethnic/nationalistic associations of people and some shithole country hold-outs that are being toppled one-by-one - everything else is theater, imo) would have been impossible without the fractional reserve system. No one political entity would be able to wield enough power to do so without almost unlimited resources that were able to be created out of thin-air. No one government would have had enough assets/production to fund a campaign to politically overpower every other political entity in the world. The unfortunate side effect of printable resources (money) is that it fosters greatly accelerated population growth. Getting rid of the fractional reserve system would cause a violent deleveraging of the artificial support system that keeps all of the excess people in the world alive. You would see starvation on mass scale, as jobs and income would bottom out. This is why they can't get rid of the fractional reserve system, at least not until they are fully confident that they can handle the ruckus and death that follows. I don't see a logical continued need for it, from their perspective, and I think that they now likely view it as primarily supporting the undesirable side-effect of continued over-population. The end-the-fed movement was put in place so that they can credibly stage the revolution necessary to switch out of the fractional reserve system when it's time. All 'revolutions' are fake/staged, btw, in this day in age. People don't: a. have the organizational capability b. the financial capability c. the large scale risk taking impulse necessary to even cause a moderate disturbance these days, especially when they would have to go up against modern police forces. It's a fact that revolutions are now all fake / staged, including the one that will eventually end the fed.
golgi
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:29 am

Previous

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests