Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.



View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Would you be with woman that had 3some in the past?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: fschmidt, jamesbond

Re: off thread

Postby leavingusa » November 25th, 2012, 9:42 am

Ginger wrote:
leavingusa wrote:
As opposed to what you do which is hijacking thread and talking about yourself constantly.

You are the troll, coming here to shame people and call them maladjusted because they won't wife up skanks and talk about YOU and how YOU FEEL and get male attention for YOU from the male attention whore man shamer pubic dunderhead.



If people address me and ask me for further explanation or to expound on something, I am free to respond. If you will say that I am trolling by responding to you, then there is no reasoning with you.

Please cite direct quotes of your accusations (in red), namely:

1. what you do which is hijacking thread and talking about yourself constantly I responded to Banano and others who have asked for or posted a reply as to what I 'personally' think, aka opinions
2. coming here to shame people and call them maladjusted because they won't wife up skanks Huh? Where is this specific post located? Are you sure you are not hallucinating?
3. get male attention for YOU from the male attention whore man shamer pubic dunderhead Oh well, he is indeed one of those who responded to me, but how about Ghost (and many others)? I got an idea, maybe he is the 'real' target, no? You should call out Ghost (and many others)as well.

I shall check myself from responding further to you, lest you call me a troll (projections).

I've reviewed your posts here and on other threads; it seems that you have an issue with PD, so since I addressed him and he addressed me on some posts, you are now displacing on me.

PS: Please stop listening to the 'voices'.



Here's #2 I should not need cites for 1 and 3 because you and your white knight do the same act in every thread. Your opinions have a common theme which are shaming men for their observations about AW and derail the thread. (see below).

I agree some posters are quite extreme sounding, maybe it's true because of the limited vocabulary concepts and labels they do have to define women.

I've noticed the most avid haters are those who have little or no experience abroad, and can't really get dates/women in their home country, so maybe they are just venting. Also perhaps it's the environment they live in that cultivates the negative attitude about women in general...I'm not defending them, rather,I am simply seeing that they are choosing to b*tch about their predicament instead of doing something about it besides trolling forums like this. They blame all females and choose to hate (aka sourgraping to the highest level) for their unhappiness instead of seeking a viable solution. I can understand how it is to be frustrated, so I'll try to be more forgiving and understanding.


You have feminist ideas, this is not a feminist forum, feminism and the desire to escape from it is why this forum exists.

You are also very condescending "stop listening to voices".
leavingusa
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 322
Joined: June 21st, 2011, 9:13 pm





Postby publicduende » November 25th, 2012, 5:52 pm

leavingusa wrote:Love sounds nice, until I saw the price tag.

Let's see...10k ring, 20k wedding, 500k house...a couple kids at 150-250, a pop and if she's not happy she makes me her slave and takes the kids. Before you call paranoia, is it paranoia when you personally know people who have done prison time over this?

I'm looking at a dog and a hooker, I can't afford emotions.

As we know no woman wants to just BE with a man for who he is, it's what he does for her. Once she has no use for him, he is discarded.


That's because you're associating love with a series of transactions. You can get to love a woman for years, fully reciprocated, before the M word even gets uttered. And no, perhaps it's in your system of materialism that you have the notion of a 10K ring, a 20K wedding, etc. No need for that. As for the kids, the house etc., they are mutual decisions the couple will jointly take when it's time.

Maybe you'd be better off with your dog and your hooker.
User avatar
publicduende
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2884
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 6:20 pm

Postby leavingusa » November 25th, 2012, 8:50 pm

publicduende wrote:
leavingusa wrote:Love sounds nice, until I saw the price tag.

Let's see...10k ring, 20k wedding, 500k house...a couple kids at 150-250, a pop and if she's not happy she makes me her slave and takes the kids. Before you call paranoia, is it paranoia when you personally know people who have done prison time over this?

I'm looking at a dog and a hooker, I can't afford emotions.

As we know no woman wants to just BE with a man for who he is, it's what he does for her. Once she has no use for him, he is discarded.


That's because you're associating love with a series of transactions. You can get to love a woman for years, fully reciprocated, before the M word even gets uttered. And no, perhaps it's in your system of materialism that you have the notion of a 10K ring, a 20K wedding, etc. No need for that. As for the kids, the house etc., they are mutual decisions the couple will jointly take when it's time.

Maybe you'd be better off with your dog and your hooker.


Years? It doesn't work like that. Six months and you hear "where is this going" depending on how loudly the clock ticks.

I am better off, that's the point. Again, censorship by shaming, that's what you do here.

You can't just say you disagree, there has to be something wrong with me.
leavingusa
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 322
Joined: June 21st, 2011, 9:13 pm

Postby publicduende » November 25th, 2012, 9:47 pm

leavingusa wrote:
publicduende wrote:
leavingusa wrote:Love sounds nice, until I saw the price tag.

Let's see...10k ring, 20k wedding, 500k house...a couple kids at 150-250, a pop and if she's not happy she makes me her slave and takes the kids. Before you call paranoia, is it paranoia when you personally know people who have done prison time over this?

I'm looking at a dog and a hooker, I can't afford emotions.

As we know no woman wants to just BE with a man for who he is, it's what he does for her. Once she has no use for him, he is discarded.


That's because you're associating love with a series of transactions. You can get to love a woman for years, fully reciprocated, before the M word even gets uttered. And no, perhaps it's in your system of materialism that you have the notion of a 10K ring, a 20K wedding, etc. No need for that. As for the kids, the house etc., they are mutual decisions the couple will jointly take when it's time.

Maybe you'd be better off with your dog and your hooker.


Years? It doesn't work like that. Six months and you hear "where is this going" depending on how loudly the clock ticks.

I am better off, that's the point. Again, censorship by shaming, that's what you do here.

You can't just say you disagree, there has to be something wrong with me.


Do you think it's all good with someone who claims "he can't afford" emotions and love? You tell me. It's not about disagreeing, it's your life and you do what you want with it. My only opinion on the matter is that you could be happier than that, if you muster the courage to trust (selected) women again.
User avatar
publicduende
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2884
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 6:20 pm

Postby lavezzi » November 25th, 2012, 11:14 pm

leavingusa wrote:As we know no woman wants to just BE with a man for who he is, it's what he does for her. Once she has no use for him, he is discarded.


who is the "we" that knows this? im assuming its a group of individuals very similar to you. seeing as evidently a woman is just a number for you to add up and brag about the (immensely exaggerated) total sum on an internet forum, how can you claim to know the first thing about them? you see through a deluded lense so unsuprisingly you get a deluded perception.
lavezzi
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 707
Joined: July 12th, 2011, 6:38 pm
Location: Republic of Éire

Postby leavingusa » November 26th, 2012, 12:51 am

lavezzi wrote:
leavingusa wrote:As we know no woman wants to just BE with a man for who he is, it's what he does for her. Once she has no use for him, he is discarded.


who is the "we" that knows this? im assuming its a group of individuals very similar to you. seeing as evidently a woman is just a number for you to add up and brag about the (immensely exaggerated) total sum on an internet forum, how can you claim to know the first thing about them? you see through a deluded lense so unsuprisingly you get a deluded perception.


Anyone having any level of experience with women foreign or not.

OK, tell a woman that you have no intention of marrying her or giving her money. Follow through with that intention for a few years. See how long she stays.

Or, tell a woman up front you are not interested in marriage and paying her bills, only companionship.

When men lose their job, typically women will divorce them if they can afford to. There are exceptions but the only reason she will stick around is because she "believes in you" as in she believes you will get another job in a reasonable time frame.
leavingusa
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 322
Joined: June 21st, 2011, 9:13 pm

Postby leavingusa » November 26th, 2012, 12:55 am

publicduende wrote:
leavingusa wrote:
publicduende wrote:
leavingusa wrote:Love sounds nice, until I saw the price tag.

Let's see...10k ring, 20k wedding, 500k house...a couple kids at 150-250, a pop and if she's not happy she makes me her slave and takes the kids. Before you call paranoia, is it paranoia when you personally know people who have done prison time over this?

I'm looking at a dog and a hooker, I can't afford emotions.

As we know no woman wants to just BE with a man for who he is, it's what he does for her. Once she has no use for him, he is discarded.


That's because you're associating love with a series of transactions. You can get to love a woman for years, fully reciprocated, before the M word even gets uttered. And no, perhaps it's in your system of materialism that you have the notion of a 10K ring, a 20K wedding, etc. No need for that. As for the kids, the house etc., they are mutual decisions the couple will jointly take when it's time.

Maybe you'd be better off with your dog and your hooker.


Years? It doesn't work like that. Six months and you hear "where is this going" depending on how loudly the clock ticks.

I am better off, that's the point. Again, censorship by shaming, that's what you do here.

You can't just say you disagree, there has to be something wrong with me.


Do you think it's all good with someone who claims "he can't afford" emotions and love? You tell me. It's not about disagreeing, it's your life and you do what you want with it. My only opinion on the matter is that you could be happier than that, if you muster the courage to trust (selected) women again.


Whether I am "all good" is irrelevant. Attack the argument, not the man.

The problem is not the women, it is the society and legal system we live under. Women are the same everywhere.

I will not hand any woman a gun after she is deluged with offers of cash and prizes and trust her not to pull the trigger after 10 years. It's too much to ask, of course she'll bail at the first sign of trouble. Why shouldn't she? It's so much easier just to get another guy and not have to work.

As they say, if you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Marriage lands men in jail these days and I don't agree that women are the source of a man's "happiness", whatever that's supposed to mean. There are other avenues in life to explore, staying single is always an option.

If guys hear all that and still want to do it that's great, at least marry one with low mileage and avoid the one that gets spit roasted.
leavingusa
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 322
Joined: June 21st, 2011, 9:13 pm

Postby leavingusa » November 26th, 2012, 1:36 am

I simply think a lot of guys here when they get older they will regret getting tied down, my personal opinion.

I don't crave female affection, sex or companionship the way I used to so for me it's not worth much risk at all. I value my comfort and freedom more.

But that's my point.
leavingusa
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 322
Joined: June 21st, 2011, 9:13 pm

Re: Would you be with woman that had 3some in the past?

Postby Jester » November 28th, 2012, 8:55 am

publicduende wrote:
Jester wrote:A woman who has done this is human vermin. The male equivalent would be an Iraq veteran who deliberately shot a child. Steer clear.

A woman who has even FANTASIZED this is grandiose and narcissistic. Plus she will cut your heart out, unless you yourself are a hardened SOB. Steer clear, except for a fling of few nights. Even then, make sure you have another gf or two simultaneously, to keep yourself from getting in too deep. None of us are as invulnerable as we think.


Why all the fuss for somebody who might have simply wanted to experiment a sexual game? Having a 3some doesn't make a woman a slut in the sense that role-playing with handcuffs and whip doesn't make a woman (or a man) abusive or violent! I actually applaud the woman's honesty to reveal one of her past experience, or perhaps a current fetish of hers... Why do I every so often smell double-standard on this forum? The next thread to this could be one of us boasting about having sex with two 20-something hot Pinays on the same night, and everyone else duly coming to high-five him.


{scratches head}
I kinda thought that what you call "double standard" is the POINT here.

As in, celebrating the DIFFERENCES.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7874
Joined: January 20th, 2009, 10:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Previous

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests