Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.



View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       FAQ Topics       Mobile Friendly Theme


European Standard of Living - useful information.

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: fschmidt, jamesbond

Post Reply
RobinHood
Freshman Poster
Posts: 106
Joined: September 30th, 2012, 9:48 am
Location: England

European Standard of Living - useful information.

Post by RobinHood » December 13th, 2012, 5:59 pm

Guys,

See below for the standard of living for countries in Europe.

If your looking for a foreign woman, go for the poorer countries, you will still have some value as a male in these countries.

My girlfriend is from Bulgaria.


STANDARDS OF LIVING IN THE EU - PER CENT ABOVE OR BELOW AVERAGE

Luxembourg 40
Norway 35
Switzerland 30
Germany 20
Austria 19
United Kingdom 18
Sweden 16
Netherlands 13
Denmark 13
France 13
Finland 12
Belgium 11
Iceland 7
Ireland 1
Italy 1
Cyprus -2
Spain -6
Greece -9
Malta -16
Slovenia -19
Portugal -19
Czech Republic -29
Slovakia -30
Lithuania -30
Poland -31
Hungary -39
Croatia -41
Estonia -42
Latvia -43
Turkey -43
Montenegro -47
Romania -53
Bulgaria -55
Serbia -57
Former Yugoslav Re of Macedonia -60
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Robin Hood.

eurobrat
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2346
Joined: August 25th, 2011, 10:18 am

Post by eurobrat » December 14th, 2012, 1:18 pm

....
Last edited by eurobrat on May 25th, 2013, 12:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

RobinHood
Freshman Poster
Posts: 106
Joined: September 30th, 2012, 9:48 am
Location: England

Post by RobinHood » December 14th, 2012, 1:24 pm

eurobrat wrote:Wow great stuff, can you post where you got this info?
http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news ... tions.html

Here's where I got the info from.
Robin Hood.

Tsar
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2030
Joined: August 7th, 2012, 8:40 pm
Location: Somwhere, Maine

Re: European Standard of Living - useful information.

Post by Tsar » December 14th, 2012, 5:12 pm

Are Czech, Slovenian, and Slovakian girls feminine and nice? Or are they like AW and Swedish women?

From what I heard Hungarian and Bulgarian girls are very feminine and nice, does anyone know what they're . Just like the girls from Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Romania.

I'm not too sure about girls from the Czech Republic. It's close to Germany and Sweden, and I heard the porn industry is big in the Czech Republic which means the girls might be sleeping with as many men as girls do here in America.

fuzzy_corleone
Freshman Poster
Posts: 66
Joined: April 25th, 2012, 10:47 am

Post by fuzzy_corleone » December 15th, 2012, 6:30 am

I would simply get a girlfriend from a poor country but live in one of the higher standard countries (i.e.: Switzerland, Luxembourg)

RobinHood
Freshman Poster
Posts: 106
Joined: September 30th, 2012, 9:48 am
Location: England

Post by RobinHood » December 17th, 2012, 12:56 pm

fuzzy_corleone wrote:I would simply get a girlfriend from a poor country but live in one of the higher standard countries (i.e.: Switzerland, Luxembourg)

Yeah if feasible, moving the woman to your home / higher standard countries could be a good option. If this happens I think you need to be very careful with the types of western women that they mix with as they will do you no favours.
Robin Hood.

User avatar
publicduende
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3056
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 6:20 pm

Post by publicduende » December 17th, 2012, 1:48 pm

A bit misleading to link parameters such as per capita consumption of goods and services and GDP output, to something as subjective and elusive as living standards. If my living standard is defined by living within my own means, without spending streams of revolving credit money on crap I rarely use and never needed in the first place, eat quality food and spend plenty of time with my family and friends, Italy or Greece may easily jump from midpoint and climb a lot higher than Switzerland, Germany and even the UK.

At some point, I hope, we'll realise how fundamentally obsolete a system of macroeconomic parameters solely based on production and consumption is.

Tsar
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2030
Joined: August 7th, 2012, 8:40 pm
Location: Somwhere, Maine

Post by Tsar » December 17th, 2012, 3:18 pm

publicduende wrote:A bit misleading to link parameters such as per capita consumption of goods and services and GDP output, to something as subjective and elusive as living standards. If my living standard is defined by living within my own means, without spending streams of revolving credit money on crap I rarely use and never needed in the first place, eat quality food and spend plenty of time with my family and friends, Italy or Greece may easily jump from midpoint and climb a lot higher than Switzerland, Germany and even the UK.

At some point, I hope, we'll realise how fundamentally obsolete a system of macroeconomic parameters solely based on production and consumption is.
I agree. Credit is not prosperity and consumption is finite. America's paradigm can't exist without increasing consumption. To continue the American economic fallacies they have the Federal Reserve artificially induce inflation to give an illusion that consumption is increasing. In the future the dollar will lose the World Reserve status and will no longer dominate international trade. When that happens America will no longer dominate international affairs or be able to manipulate the world. Without being able to dominate international affairs or export it's culture, feminism will slow.

Think of feminism as a DoS attack. It can only gain strength the more feminists have a voice and a microphone to shout. America supports the feminists the most and America exports it's culture. In a DoS attack it relies on a huge number of attacks to flood a system and destroy all opposing views;

Feminists want to first destroy tradition and the warm feminine spirit. The American propaganda machine disseminates feminism across the world. The collapse of America=sending feminists to the the stone age, stopping feminists in their tracks, and letting the traditional cultures regain the dominant voice in the world. There is no hope to reverse the trend and fix the problems, the only way things like feminism culture stops is when the dominant culture that disperses it falls.

User avatar
publicduende
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3056
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 6:20 pm

Post by publicduende » December 18th, 2012, 12:17 am

Tsar wrote:
publicduende wrote:A bit misleading to link parameters such as per capita consumption of goods and services and GDP output, to something as subjective and elusive as living standards. If my living standard is defined by living within my own means, without spending streams of revolving credit money on crap I rarely use and never needed in the first place, eat quality food and spend plenty of time with my family and friends, Italy or Greece may easily jump from midpoint and climb a lot higher than Switzerland, Germany and even the UK.

At some point, I hope, we'll realise how fundamentally obsolete a system of macroeconomic parameters solely based on production and consumption is.
I agree. Credit is not prosperity and consumption is finite. America's paradigm can't exist without increasing consumption. To continue the American economic fallacies they have the Federal Reserve artificially induce inflation to give an illusion that consumption is increasing. In the future the dollar will lose the World Reserve status and will no longer dominate international trade. When that happens America will no longer dominate international affairs or be able to manipulate the world. Without being able to dominate international affairs or export it's culture, feminism will slow.

Think of feminism as a DoS attack. It can only gain strength the more feminists have a voice and a microphone to shout. America supports the feminists the most and America exports it's culture. In a DoS attack it relies on a huge number of attacks to flood a system and destroy all opposing views;

Feminists want to first destroy tradition and the warm feminine spirit. The American propaganda machine disseminates feminism across the world. The collapse of America=sending feminists to the the stone age, stopping feminists in their tracks, and letting the traditional cultures regain the dominant voice in the world. There is no hope to reverse the trend and fix the problems, the only way things like feminism culture stops is when the dominant culture that disperses it falls.
What you call feminism is just the re-engineering of market economy, and the media system that serve it, to exploit the female psyche for the maximum benefit of the markets. Women can be more easily manipulated into extracting as much assets as possible from a divorce, and that benefits their consumerist lifestyle and divorce lawyers (= big business). Women like to be said they are "empowered" and, due to declining education and moral standards, they almost always interpret that as "empowered consumers".

The industry is always finding new markets to empower with an imagery of beauty, success in competing with peers, well being, entitlement, etc. The exploitation of these markets happens without any regard whatsoever to moral and ethical standards. Think of the huge industry targeting the tweens and sometimes children as young as 5. From pole dancing classes to sexy clothing, to make up sets, to the all-American farce of child pageants. I once used to believe that relentless beating children into the shape of fully formed consumers was a crafty business openly in conflict with an otherwise sane parenting. No, I have to retreat: dads and moms are often the main drivers behind those trends. They're the ones who give their daughters Facebook and chat-enabled smartphones as soon as they turn 8, or show them the joys of revealing clothes as they drag them along in their shopping sprees.

What you call feminism is the final victory of the market economy, and the media system that serve it, against any remaining shroud of critical thinking and moral sense, and this applies to both boys and girls, I'm afraid. The same market economy couldn't care less if "empowered" young women have 2 or 20 sex partners a month, as long as their consumption patterns continue unabated, or increase: buy clothes to look sexy, buy (or get bought) booze to feel frisky and (hopefully) buy those condoms, etc.

We're in terminal stage...

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General Discussions”