Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.



View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Solution to world overpopulation problem?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: fschmidt, jamesbond

Solution to world overpopulation problem?

Postby Winston » December 19th, 2012, 5:49 pm

I have a question. Why can't the world overpopulation problem just be solved with this simple solution, rather than killing off 85 percent of the world population as the Illuminati and NWO allegedly want to do?

Just enact a 2 child policy per couple. This will mathematically guarantee population reduction, because there will always be a portion of people who die before having kids, or decide not to have any. Simple isn't it?

You don't even need a one child policy like in China. A two child policy would be enough. So why doesn't China just adopt a two child policy instead?

So why would the Illuminati or NWO need to try to kill off 85 percent of the world population, when there is a simple solution like this?

Also, is the overpopulation issue really a crisis? I heard that you can fit the population of the whole world just in the state of Texas with a square mile between everyone. Is that really true? Is it still true? If so, then the world is pretty sparsely populated in that most of the land is unpopulated right?
Last edited by Winston on June 27th, 2014, 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 24542
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 2:16 pm




Check out our Dating Sites and HA International Romance Tours!



Postby abcdavid01 » December 19th, 2012, 6:00 pm

Overpopulation is only a problem in homogenous economies like agrarian based ones. Now it is better to have an increase in population because it allows for the division of labor.
中国人万岁! 中国美女万岁!
abcdavid01
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1580
Joined: November 18th, 2012, 7:52 am
Location: On the run

Postby Cornfed » December 19th, 2012, 7:48 pm

It would lead to a surplus of parasitical old people. The demise pill or some other strategy would have to be devised to help them on their way.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 5:22 am

Postby Renata » December 20th, 2012, 12:36 am

The problem of overpopulation isn't a matter of space, it's resources. There's still lots of people in poverty, due to lack of food. I believe governments are just negligent towards people & could do more to at least get them above the poverty line.

The issue of the Illuminati and NWO allegedly ploting to kill off 85% of the world population, again I think it's about Natural Resources & Reserves. They're just plain greedy; it's easy to wipe out populations so they could take wahtever they like.
- It's easy to give, when you know what it's like to have nothing. -

- Develop a backbone, not a wishbone. -
Renata
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1106
Joined: May 7th, 2012, 12:14 am
Location: Ireland

Postby Excalibur » December 20th, 2012, 12:48 am

Overpopulation is only a growing problem in most 3rd world countries. For industrialized and civilized countries, you don't need any kind of child policy, because the birth rate in these countries is already far below the replacement level of 2.0.

And even if you enacted child policy, how would you enforce it, especially in many African countries (that are growing in population) where infrastructure is poor and the government has a limited power?
Excalibur
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 25
Joined: September 7th, 2012, 5:54 am

Postby Cornfed » December 20th, 2012, 1:12 am

Excalibur wrote:Overpopulation is only a growing problem in most 3rd world countries. For industrialized and civilized countries, you don't need any kind of child policy, because the birth rate in these countries is already far below the replacement level of 2.0.

It is because of their child policy that we are going extinct. Feminism is explicity a population reduction strategy.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 5:22 am

Postby Winston » June 27th, 2014, 8:39 am

Check out the same topic about overpopulation in fschmidt's CoAlpha Forum. Some of the solutions proposed are downright cruel.

http://www.coalpha.org/What-to-do-about ... 75230.html

Why not just have a two child policy? That would work.

When will China's one child policy end? Why doesn't it just have a two child policy? That would work too. A one child policy seems too extreme.
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 24542
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 2:16 pm

Postby Cornfed » June 27th, 2014, 9:01 am

Winston wrote:Check out the same topic about overpopulation in fschmidt's CoAlpha Forum. Some of the solutions proposed are downright cruel.

I don't think anyone wants to be cruel, but it is not clear what non-cruel solution can be had. If you can think of one, please post it.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 5:22 am

Postby MarcosZeitola » June 27th, 2014, 10:16 am

Cornfed wrote:
Winston wrote:Check out the same topic about overpopulation in fschmidt's CoAlpha Forum. Some of the solutions proposed are downright cruel.

I don't think anyone wants to be cruel, but it is not clear what non-cruel solution can be had. If you can think of one, please post it.


Neither of you guys has to worry about overpopulation. As neither of you guys are in any way responsible for it, nor major contributors. Winston has one child, Cornfed is childless. So neither of you are part of the problem of overpopulation. You can blame Africans and Middle Easterners for that.
User avatar
MarcosZeitola
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2027
Joined: May 31st, 2014, 8:13 pm
Location: Phillipines

Re: Simple solution to world overpopulation problem?

Postby Teal Lantern » June 27th, 2014, 10:43 am

Winston wrote:Also, is the overpopulation issue really a crisis?
No.
Winston wrote:I heard that you can fit the population of the whole world just in the state of Texas with a square mile between everyone. Is that really true? Is it still true? If so, then the world is pretty sparsely populated in that most of the land is unpopulated right?

Texas is big, but not that big.
Land Area of Texas = 261,232 sq. miles
World Population = ~7.13 billion people
=~1021 sq. feet / person

A bad-at-math AZN? :shock:

не поглеждай назад. 8)

"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
User avatar
Teal Lantern
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2766
Joined: August 14th, 2012, 12:48 am
Location: Briar Patch, Universe 25

Postby Cornfed » June 27th, 2014, 11:03 am

MarcosZeitola wrote:
Cornfed wrote:
Winston wrote:Check out the same topic about overpopulation in fschmidt's CoAlpha Forum. Some of the solutions proposed are downright cruel.

I don't think anyone wants to be cruel, but it is not clear what non-cruel solution can be had. If you can think of one, please post it.


Neither of you guys has to worry about overpopulation. As neither of you guys are in any way responsible for it, nor major contributors. Winston has one child, Cornfed is childless. So neither of you are part of the problem of overpopulation. You can blame Africans and Middle Easterners for that.

The thing is that we exist in this world, and we are MEN. Therefore we are part of the situation whether we like it or not.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5582
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 5:22 am

Postby MarcosZeitola » June 27th, 2014, 11:19 am

Cornfed wrote:
MarcosZeitola wrote:
Cornfed wrote:
Winston wrote:Check out the same topic about overpopulation in fschmidt's CoAlpha Forum. Some of the solutions proposed are downright cruel.

I don't think anyone wants to be cruel, but it is not clear what non-cruel solution can be had. If you can think of one, please post it.


Neither of you guys has to worry about overpopulation. As neither of you guys are in any way responsible for it, nor major contributors. Winston has one child, Cornfed is childless. So neither of you are part of the problem of overpopulation. You can blame Africans and Middle Easterners for that.

The thing is that we exist in this world, and we are MEN. Therefore we are part of the situation whether we like it or not.


Become a sperm donor.

If there's one thing that's in abundance today, it's stupid people. There's a severe intelligent people shortage. Make some clever babies if you care about humanity's future. ;)
User avatar
MarcosZeitola
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2027
Joined: May 31st, 2014, 8:13 pm
Location: Phillipines

Postby onethousandknives » June 27th, 2014, 4:19 pm

Better management of resources.

For example, food. Right now most grain is used to feed animals. Numbers anywhere from 3-12lbs of grain are needed for one pound of beef. So logically, for efficiency, you're better off feeding said grains to humans. Note, I'm not a vegetarian, just saying from a mathematical perspective.

Other ideas of better management of resources include utilizing different plants. For example, kudzu, the invasive species that's taking over the Southern USA, is very good animal feed. And it's free, except for the manpower or machine power needed to harvest it. But, we've not figured out the logistics to get it harvested for whatever reasons. So we have, I dunno, enough food for a lot of animals just being wasted that the US government throws herbicide on every year. So Monsanto/etc is saying you need GMO food to feed the overpopulated planet or whatever, but we're just wasting resources like that. In the case of kudzu, nobody can really make a ton of money off it, that's probably why it's not used. Nobody's farming it specifically, it grows everywhere. Monsanto can't patent it and sue people for their GMO kudzu pollinating their non-GMO kudzu, etc. And there's many things in the world like this.

That's talking just companies, but other people's personal habits too do need to change to make things less wasteful. IE, the trend of giant SUVs to hold giant (in waist girth) Americans and their giant families. Especially nowadays that car safety standards have gotten better, there's no reason the average family of 2-3 kids can't fit in something like a Volkswagen diesel Golf or Polo like in Europe that gets 40-60mpg. It'd just be "annoying." The kids would poke each other and not have a captain's seat to themselves. Or even better, why don't more people have lower displacement motorbikes for their general transportation? Or even bicycles not meant for recreation but for transportation?

Lastly, with regard to killing people. China has entirely abandoned cities. They've also aborted many many people. China is a centrally planned economy. So now these abandoned cities are built and there are no people to fill them. If the government has the power to basically declare life and death, I'm sure they could declare some people to live in those cities, but they killed them.

So the solution to overpopulation isn't killing anyone. It's simply just being a better manager of resources.
onethousandknives
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 461
Joined: January 26th, 2013, 12:35 am

Postby starchild5 » June 27th, 2014, 4:36 pm

Its all Illuminati, NWO , Dark Forces propaganda....They are brainwashing us with BS all the time.

I'm from India, 1.2 billion take that NWO :lol:

and I have been to China :shock:

I may have seen more people in the world than most here....:) ..If you are American ...300 million...multiply by 4 plus some more....to get to Indian population figure for a perspective.

And we have this huge gigantic festivals like Maha Kumbh Mela which is officially the highest gathering of humanity on earth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kumbh_Mela

It is considered to be the largest peaceful gathering in the world where around 100 million people were expected to visit during the Maha Kumbh Mela in 2013 in Allahabad.[5

Yes. You read that right 100 million people at one place. That's like 30% of US population at one place, and yet barring few incidences it was peaceful.

-----

Even though I had a shity dating life...India is very peaceful country, there are far less crime than in western world, even China is also very peaceful.

Human being in general wants to live peacefully and co-exist but this sinister manipulation behind the scenes is the route cause of all our misery not Over Population. Anyways, Who decides when is the perfect time for humanity to stop?

The Illuminati cabal should stop printing more money and manipulating currency to make the world a worse place to live and then blame all there sins on humanity and call it Karma and then blame some more on over population.

Earth is Huge, it can easily support 1 trillion humans But it cannot support manipulation like suppressing free energy, political boundaries, currency manipulation etc.

The problem is not us BUT THEM...Why is this so hard for all of us to understand? Why are we still blaming humanity for our misery....haven't we all suffered enough?

The inbreds should stop making their evil on earth first. We are really really going to their way of thinking. WE NEED TO BE CLEAR IN OUR MINDS.

THERE IS NO OVER POPULATION. NO UNDER POPULATION. NO STABLE POPULATION ETC. ITS ALL FREAKING MANIPULATION.

We are all natural beings, evolving to a far higher place in the universe. There is no mathematical number on us to how much we produce and how much we cannot.



Image

Image

Image
User avatar
starchild5
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2172
Joined: December 20th, 2013, 11:32 am

Postby MrPeabody » June 27th, 2014, 4:49 pm

Overpopulation has always been a problem. The hunter-gatherers during the good years would increase their populations and then they would collapse by starvation during the droughts. So, they invented agriculture to make the food supply more reliable. But, then agriculture made the populations explode and enabled cities, i.e. civilization. Civilizations would periodically collapse as they increased in numbers and used up their resources. For example, there is strong evidence that Easter Island and the Mayans collapsed due to overuse of resources. Antibiotics, sanitation, and the industrial revolution made the population explode. So now the new barrier appears to be an upper limit on the amount of carbon dioxide we can produce and release into the atmosphere. The demographers claim that the population is going to slowly decrease again as the world becomes more industrialized because middle class people hooked into the system have less children.
MrPeabody
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1281
Joined: April 13th, 2008, 7:53 pm

Next

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests