Welcome to our new upgraded phpbb 3.2 forum! The upgrade is now complete. See announcement and new features here, or report any problems or issues here. Enjoy the new forum.



Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.



View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       FAQ Topics


Solution to world overpopulation problem?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

User avatar
publicduende
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3029
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 6:20 pm

Post by publicduende » June 27th, 2014, 8:50 pm

Cornfed wrote:It would lead to a surplus of parasitical old people. The demise pill or some other strategy would have to be devised to help them on their way.


It was women, blacks and project managers. Now you're racist towards old people too. LOL - is there anybody on this planet you'd rather see alive than dead? :)

pete98146
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1125
Joined: June 22nd, 2009, 4:31 pm

Post by pete98146 » June 27th, 2014, 9:24 pm

I think the answer is print billions of Hillary Clinton posters. Any country with population problems passes a rule that you must hang a Hillary Clinton poster above the bed of said husband and wife.

Don't know about you guys but I could be in bed with Brooklyn Decker and if I looked up and saw Hillary's face my erection would fade fast. Yup, Hillary Clinton, the anti Viagra. Guaranteed to turn any steamy bedroom into a Frigidare.

Taco
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4545
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 5:30 pm

Post by Taco » June 27th, 2014, 9:34 pm

Only 3% of the land in America has people living on it, there's not enough people.

The argument that high population causes poverty is a lie. Hong Kong and Singapore have high population densities but have tremendous wealth because there's no taxes. Third world countries have high inflation which is just another tax.

ntm1972
Freshman Poster
Posts: 88
Joined: January 8th, 2013, 4:55 pm
Location: North America

Post by ntm1972 » June 27th, 2014, 10:34 pm

Taco wrote:The argument that high population causes poverty is a lie. Hong Kong and Singapore have high population densities but have tremendous wealth because there's no taxes.


The tax argument is the wrong one to make here, because it comes from a Western-style, individualistic mentality in which the concepts of wealth and taxation are adversarial.

The economic models of both HK and Singapore are much more communitarian in nature. They are corporate socialist models - meaning that big business and government work together, openly and inextricably, to maximize economic productivity within the context of a paternalistic framework in which all citizens are taken care of, however minimally.

In other words, when you make a purchase from a corporation based out of HK or Singapore, some portion of the funds you spend likely constitutes a direct contribution to the social welfare of the inhabitants of said region.

Take housing, for example. More than eighty percent of Singapore's population lives in public housing [1], while nearly half of HK's residents do the same [2].

[1] http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_ ... 7Ae03.html

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_hou ... _Hong_Kong

Taco
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4545
Joined: July 9th, 2011, 5:30 pm

Post by Taco » June 27th, 2014, 10:47 pm

ntm1972 wrote:
Taco wrote:The argument that high population causes poverty is a lie. Hong Kong and Singapore have high population densities but have tremendous wealth because there's no taxes.


The tax argument is the wrong one to make here, because it comes from a Western-style, individualistic mentality in which the concepts of wealth and taxation are adversarial.

The economic models of both HK and Singapore are much more communitarian in nature. They are corporate socialist models - meaning that big business and government work together, openly and inextricably, to maximize economic productivity within the context of a paternalistic framework in which all citizens are taken care of, however minimally.

In other words, when you make a purchase from a corporation based out of HK or Singapore, some portion of the funds you spend likely constitutes a direct contribution to the social welfare of the inhabitants of said region.

Take housing, for example. More than eighty percent of Singapore's population lives in public housing [1], while nearly half of HK's residents do the same [2].

[1] http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_ ... 7Ae03.html

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_hou ... _Hong_Kong


I was wrong. However, the tax rate in HK is very low.

HK Tax Guide
http://gohongkong.about.com/od/business ... ongTax.htm

ntm1972
Freshman Poster
Posts: 88
Joined: January 8th, 2013, 4:55 pm
Location: North America

Post by ntm1972 » June 28th, 2014, 12:32 am

Taco wrote:However, the tax rate in HK is very low.

HK Tax Guide
http://gohongkong.about.com/od/business ... ongTax.htm


Good point. HK and Singapore are more business-friendly than the U.S., but they're also more people-friendly. Many would argue that this combination makes their economic models superior to those of the West, and I'm not inclined to disagree.

Wolfeye
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1298
Joined: December 29th, 2013, 7:18 am

Post by Wolfeye » June 28th, 2014, 2:36 am

As I understand, the whole overpopulation myth is bullshit. Supposedly, it's something that was started by people that just don't like people in general & see them as a drain on things they want to have for themselves.

There isn't enough resources if destroying those resources is a model of behavior. There isn't enough if the style is to have double & throw half out, or to erode the means to survive as a method of providing for it. This "woodchipper mentality" is debilitating & not sustainable. It's like a point system based on how much is destroyed.

It seems that everything to provide for the precious economy is something corrosive to people, the environment, or life in general. It doesn't make sense that there's this constructed conditional that poses an extra hurdle and/or a counterfactor to survival. In order to pay for things, the point to those things is cancelled out?

Zionosis
Freshman Poster
Posts: 424
Joined: December 30th, 2013, 1:08 pm

Post by Zionosis » June 28th, 2014, 8:52 am

Excalibur wrote:Overpopulation is only a growing problem in most 3rd world countries. For industrialized and civilized countries, you don't need any kind of child policy, because the birth rate in these countries is already far below the replacement level of 2.0.

And even if you enacted child policy, how would you enforce it, especially in many African countries (that are growing in population) where infrastructure is poor and the government has a limited power?


Exactly. Also Winston sorry the NWO doesn't want to wipe everyone out and reptilians don't exist. Get back to reality.

The governments if anything are causing overpopulation in the 3rd world.
Take the African continent. The UN forces member countries to pay foreign aid to Africa. Africa in 1950 had a population of 230 million people and as of today it's 1.1 billion. They are the fastest growing population and by 2100 are expected to reach over 4 billion and be 40% of the world population.

The governments are not wiping people out but in fact the very opposite. The amount of foreign aid paid to these places directly correlates to them over breeding like rabbits.

All civilized countries like European, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and China all have birth rates below the replacement rate and are all slowly shrinking and all have aging populations now.

As far as the guy on here claiming that overpopulation is good because it spreads the workload. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. If you want to do menial jobs in factories alongside hundreds of others and get paid lower then be my guest. Overpopulation actually always = lower living conditions and people are financially poorer.

While China and India have powerful economies, per head they are very poor people living in low conditions.
Japan has a very powerful economy and less people than any of the other powerful economies including the USA.
That's why in Japan their living conditions and average wealth per person is high.
Last edited by Zionosis on June 28th, 2014, 9:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5811
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 5:22 am

Post by Cornfed » June 28th, 2014, 9:17 am

Zionosis wrote:Exactly. Also Winston sorry the NWO doesn't want to wipe everyone out and reptilians don't exist. Get back to reality.

The governments if anything are causing overpopulation in the 3rd world.
Take the African continent. The UN forces member countries to pay foreign aid to Africa. Africa in 1950 had a population of 230 million people and as of today it's 1.1 billion. They are the fastest growing population and by 2100 are expected to reach over 4 billion and be 40% of the world population.

The governments are not wiping people out but in fact the very opposite. The amount of foreign aid paid to these places directly correlates to them over breeding like rabbits.

All civilized countries like European, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and China all have birth rates below the replacement rate and are all slowly shrinking and all have aging populations now.

So from your own statement it would appear that the NWO are wiping out humans and replacing them with blacks.

Zionosis
Freshman Poster
Posts: 424
Joined: December 30th, 2013, 1:08 pm

Post by Zionosis » June 28th, 2014, 9:31 am

Cornfed wrote:
Zionosis wrote:Exactly. Also Winston sorry the NWO doesn't want to wipe everyone out and reptilians don't exist. Get back to reality.

The governments if anything are causing overpopulation in the 3rd world.
Take the African continent. The UN forces member countries to pay foreign aid to Africa. Africa in 1950 had a population of 230 million people and as of today it's 1.1 billion. They are the fastest growing population and by 2100 are expected to reach over 4 billion and be 40% of the world population.

The governments are not wiping people out but in fact the very opposite. The amount of foreign aid paid to these places directly correlates to them over breeding like rabbits.

All civilized countries like European, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and China all have birth rates below the replacement rate and are all slowly shrinking and all have aging populations now.

So from your own statement it would appear that the NWO are wiping out humans and replacing them with blacks.


Well it can't really be denied. That is sort of what seems to be happening.
The governments seem to like the idea of a mixed and unintelligent general population.

Manson Maan
Freshman Poster
Posts: 46
Joined: May 27th, 2014, 9:10 pm

Post by Manson Maan » June 28th, 2014, 10:57 am

Cornfed wrote:
Excalibur wrote:Overpopulation is only a growing problem in most 3rd world countries. For industrialized and civilized countries, you don't need any kind of child policy, because the birth rate in these countries is already far below the replacement level of 2.0.

It is because of their child policy that we are going extinct. Feminism is explicity a population reduction strategy.


cornfed you hit the nail on the head !


we are not over populated however we have the wrong type of population. if any governing body want to reduce the population its for one reason, their comfort.

the stupidity of this is confusing, on one hand they reward people for having children by supporting them financially , and then on the other hand they want less of us.. its dumb. Personally you should get a licence to have a child, you need one to drive a car , you should earn a licence to have a child. That will reduce the amount of people springing up with no means to fend for themselves.

Yes , you heard right , a licence to have children. Means test to see if you can afford it, Aptitude test to see if you know how to raise one, Basics like don't let it drink too much soda or junk food.. you know easy questions like that. Then the big one , do you have a partner ? if you are a couple and have a child then divorce the one who files for the divorce has to pay for the childs up bringing alone.

yeah thatll put a huge spanner in the money making machine hey femm bots ! ?

User avatar
publicduende
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3029
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 6:20 pm

Post by publicduende » June 28th, 2014, 11:28 am

pete98146 wrote:I think the answer is print billions of Hillary Clinton posters. Any country with population problems passes a rule that you must hang a Hillary Clinton poster above the bed of said husband and wife.

Don't know about you guys but I could be in bed with Brooklyn Decker and if I looked up and saw Hillary's face my erection would fade fast. Yup, Hillary Clinton, the anti Viagra. Guaranteed to turn any steamy bedroom into a Frigidare.


And yet, she's earmarked to be the next US president. Well done you :)

User avatar
publicduende
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3029
Joined: November 30th, 2011, 6:20 pm

Post by publicduende » June 28th, 2014, 11:35 am

Cornfed wrote:So from your own statement it would appear that the NWO are wiping out humans and replacing them with blacks.


Or Filipinos, or Colombians, or from any country where they still enjoy making babies thinking how much their university fees are going to cost them. Having children is a biological imperative: you can twist and bend human nature with artificially imposed constructs like social policies, feminism et al. The vast majority of the planet is not hooked the same way we (first world, Western) people are and will continue to trend up their births per capita figure nonchalantly.

Tezcatlipoca
Freshman Poster
Posts: 151
Joined: November 27th, 2013, 6:42 am
Location: California

Post by Tezcatlipoca » June 29th, 2014, 3:45 pm

Nwo/illuminati don't exist, like leprechauns
Stop being angry at the stuff you don't have (yet) in life and instead focus on how to get it.

User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5811
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 5:22 am

Post by Cornfed » June 29th, 2014, 8:17 pm

Tezcatlipoca wrote:Nwo/illuminati don't exist, like leprechauns

The NWO is another term for globalization, and most people realize that globalization and the people behind it exist.

Post Reply

Return to “General Discussions”