What happens if marriage continue its decline in the west?

[S_Parc]

Here's the scoop Well-Informed, what will need to be legislated is the controls and limitations on AI/Machine Learning algorithm design and development. Since for the most part, the brain of the 'bot lives on the PC/Supercomputer or perhaps, even a globally based cloud server supply chain.

Here's why that will never happen. The first batch of industries to mint trillions will include the following ...

1) Data Management companies, including Google, Amazon, MasterCard, & VISA
2) AI Medical Assistants, esp for elderly hospice care
3) Defense contractors who want to enhance smart drones & fabricate super soldiers
4) Energy/Commodities companies with high end shale and mineral expert system extraction 'bots

Now, I hope you get the picture. The only difference between the above, non-X-rated applications, and the XXX ones, is simply a few coding parameters & a mobile replica. Thus, the s*xbots can hit, almost without a splash, because it'll be in the line with everything else [ *Hint: All the lobbying power in information technology ] and Congress will turn a type of blind eye on the availability of simulated s*x with a machine, since RealDoll and imitators have been cruising already, w/o protestors trying to shut them down for their high end mannequins. And then, how easy will it be to turn a bland looking medical assistant into a hot looking model? It's kinda a no-brainer, it's a true money maker and will be available.

[well-informed]

got it, thanks for the information

[Ghost]

.

[E_Irizarry]

Society will splinter. We are already seeing the seams begin to burst. Societies do not simply keep going on after a period of decadence, nor does history show that they restore themselves and change their ways.

Collapse is what happens. The collapse ongoing in the U.S. keeps straining things, and it is surely the worst collapse the world has ever gone through. Complex societies hold to virtues, like traditional marriage and family structure and patriarchy, and prosper. Empires at least get about 10 generations and then collapse. Refer to Glubb's "Fate of Empires."

Collapse is social, financial, and resource based, but the social part is what determines the fate. A virtuous society could save itself. A decadent society is capable but refuses or is lazy.

So the West is collapsing, but this won't mean the end of all the people. Collapse means going from more complex to less complex of a society. The Romans didn't disappear when Rome collapsed, after all.

The whole world will not be taken down along with the U.S. of Gay. Australia switched its focus to SEA and E. Asia. BRIC has switched their focus. Some will be scarred (with two r's), but they will never become destitute from the succumber of the U.S. The post-world still will suffice.

[S_Parc]

The whole world will not be taken down along with the U.S. of Gay. Australia switched its focus to SEA and E. Asia. BRIC has switched their focus. Some will be scarred (with two r's), but they will never become destitute from the succumber of the U.S. The post-world still will suffice.

The US will still be a money laundering country, much like the City of London, after the decline of the British Empire in the late 60s/early 70s.

In effect, the confiscatory govts of east China, esp China Inc, has made the US a spot to round trip capital for either hiding or diversification, out of local Asian currencies. Thus, the US will be a 2nd world banana republic more than a pure 3rd world nation. And eventually, much of the population will be on welfare anyways, as robots do much of the work.

[clowny]

The whole world will not be taken down along with the U.S. of Gay. Australia switched its focus to SEA and E. Asia. BRIC has switched their focus. Some will be scarred (with two r's), but they will never become destitute from the succumber of the U.S. The post-world still will suffice.

The US will still be a money laundering country, much like the City of London, after the decline of the British Empire in the late 60s/early 70s.

In effect, the confiscatory govts of east China, esp China Inc, has made the US a spot to round trip capital for either hiding or diversification, out of local Asian currencies. Thus, the US will be a 2nd world banana republic more than a pure 3rd world nation. And eventually, much of the population will be on welfare anyways, as robots do much of the work.

Won't the proliferation of these robots and sexbots create new jobs for humans, too? I can see the future of sports entertainment flashing before my eyes: robot football, robot gladiators, robot wars, robot F1. Maybe even robot porn, LOL.

[S_Parc]

And eventually, much of the population will be on welfare anyways, as robots do much of the work.

Won't the proliferation of these robots and sexbots create new jobs for humans, too? I can see the future of sports entertainment flashing before my eyes: robot football, robot gladiators, robot wars, robot F1. Maybe even robot p**n, LOL.

Sure, but I think you need to already be in those industries as QA, producers, set technicians, marketers, and such. Thus, I have an eye out on those fields.

In general, however, in terms of transportation/warehousing, machinery, mining/drilling, fast food preparation, data analytics, pharmaceutical dispensing, etc, a lot of formerly well paying work will be replaced. And then, those who still have jobs will be expected to have their robo-assistants multiply the amount of productivity. So in place of let's say an insurance provider hiring 12 actuaries, they'll have 2 certified fellows on staff, to talk with clients, and the real work will be done by computers.

[abcdavid01]

I can see robot football and robot gladiator fights, but as an F1 fan myself making the cars auto drive just seems boring as hell. They already changed the rules to make it more competitive with drag resistance and forced tire changes.

On the other hand, it could be pretty awesome if you transform it into something entirely different.



IGPX. My favorite show as a kid (still is). Formula One style racing, but with pilots fighting in giant mecha suits down the track.

[S_Parc]

You know, the more barracuda like, women become, see my thread on the Public Notarizer below ...

viewtopic.php?t=18207

the more I like the idea of robots.

I mean let's face it, many of times, we do need to be in western nations (USA, Canada, etc) for business, training, etc. Can't always be in Rio or what have you.

Wouldn't it just be better to have a robot around than some dumb@ss skank, with all her nonsense, even if it's just a nosy neighbor prying into your business?

I mean I tend to live a relatively focused life. I have a steady line of work which occupies time/energy, hobbies like Martial Arts, B-ball, etc, and I'd eventually like to transition into becoming a mad scientist like my Avatar. And then, when I do socialize, I like to get together with guy pals, so that we can have some laughs and enjoy life, instead of continually needing to impress the chicks at the bar/restaurant.

[S_Parc]

I mean let's face it, many of times, we do need to be in western nations (USA, Canada, etc) for business, training, etc. Can't always be in Rio or what have you.

Wouldn't it just be better to have a robot around than some dumb@ss skank, with all her nonsense, even if it's just a nosy neighbor prying into your business?

Let me highlight with an example ...

You come home from a client visit. "Lady Valerie" opens the door, greets you, & closes the door. She then proceeds to unzip you and polishes your knob. She then proceeds with a deep throat and you finish inside her. You thank her and proceed with the day.

You do a few pull ups, some dumbell curls, and complete the set with some Pilates swings.

Afterwards, you take a shower. You then dry off and take off to your seminar on Expert Systems.

Do you see how efficient that was above? In a span of 15-20 mins you got in a boink, a mid-day workout, a shower, and with plenty of time to get to your class.

[onethousandknives]

http://www.returnofkings.com/2090/how-b ... our-future

I think this was most accurate.

[zboy1]

http://www.returnofkings.com/2090/how-b ... our-future

I think this was most accurate.

Wow! What an eye-opening article. Thanks for posting, onethousandknives.

[zboy1]

Another article from the same website:

More Women Are Rejecting Feminism
http://www.returnofkings.com/7905/more- ... g-feminism


A great comment left by a female on this article:

I'm a 20 year old girl who has been reading Roosh and Roissy since I was 17 years old. While all of my friends were riding the cock carousel from age 14 (and continue to do so today), I was the only one who realized that being a whore is not something to be proud of. I'm still a virgin and all of my close friends are also women who realize that being a "feminist," whatever that means nowadays, is not the way to true happiness, and that every man they sleep with erodes away a part of their soul. I'm still socially awkward, but I'm also aware of what men actually value in a girl, and I make sure to wear high heels every time I go out, even when I go to class most days.

I've even showed other female friends who were previously feminists how in reality, it's the men who are getting the short end of the stick, especially when it comes to education & dating. My dad was a victim of divorce rape, when his wife (and my mother) of 31 years drained us of our funds (including my college fund) to the point that I could barely afford to go to college. I told her as such and MY OWN MOTHER would have rather taken 'revenge' on my father than settle on a lower alimony payment and allow me to go to college. Since then I vowed that if/when I get married, I would request a prenupt where neither party splits funds, even if he didn't want one.

Thank you Roosh for showing me the right path, because I know my mother sure didn't.

[Teal Lantern]

Another article from the same website:

More Women Are Rejecting Feminism
http://www.returnofkings.com/7905/more- ... g-feminism


A great comment left by a female on this article:

I'm a 20 year old girl who has been reading Roosh and Roissy since I was 17 years old. While all of my friends were riding the cock carousel from age 14 (and continue to do so today), I was the only one who realized that being a whore is not something to be proud of. I'm still a virgin and all of my close friends are also women who realize that being a "feminist," whatever that means nowadays, is not the way to true happiness, and that every man they sleep with erodes away a part of their soul. I'm still socially awkward, but I'm also aware of what men actually value in a girl, and I make sure to wear high heels every time I go out, even when I go to class most days.

I've even showed other female friends who were previously feminists how in reality, it's the men who are getting the short end of the stick, especially when it comes to education & dating. My dad was a victim of divorce rape, when his wife (and my mother) of 31 years drained us of our funds (including my college fund) to the point that I could barely afford to go to college. I told her as such and MY OWN MOTHER would have rather taken 'revenge' on my father than settle on a lower alimony payment and allow me to go to college. Since then I vowed that if/when I get married, I would request a prenupt where neither party splits funds, even if he didn't want one.

Thank you Roosh for showing me the right path, because I know my mother sure didn't.

Typically when a female bothers to overtly say she's "against" or "rejects" feminism, you will find that she has been personally inconvenienced by it, no longer directly benefiting from it, or has a close male relative that has been (or could be) harmed by it.

In this case, the close male relative is the dad and the inconvenience is/was mom siphoning off money that would have made paying for college easier.
Women with sons (and without daughters) tend to be against it, also, and second wives tend to speak up against "unfair alimony laws" -- at least until it's their own turn to collect ca$h & prizes (if there's anything left to collect).

Most women don't "see the light" until they feel the heat. It's getting warm.

[ringspun]

Marriage rates have been falling in the west since the 50s or 60s, right? I think the only way this can be reversed, or even halted is to remove all the advantages women gain from marriage; rescind alimony laws, make child support payments more reasonable and give fathers an equal chance of gaining primary custody of the children. Obviously not going to happen, so what state will the institution of marriage be in, in say, another 40 years?

Will there be enough manginas to keep this institution alive? Or will be there be enough men who have woken up to turn the tide?

Multiple generation families living in one apartment will be the norm.

Single family homes will be a marking of the upper middle class.

Catching and keeping a husband will be a status marker, especially one with his own single family home.

Some men will avoid marriage and live better, quieter lives for it.

Other men will have access to lots of women. Some of them will catch crotch-critters and other unmentionables.

Some individual businesses that depend on the marriage industry will fold.

Some women will resort to less than optimal means of supporting themselves. Crotch-critters will be an occupational hazard.

Life goes on.

Very good, totally agree with this... this is gonna be the future, you only got to look how much single housing there is now, its unreal, family homes are double the price of an apartment and most men who are divorced cannot keep one.

I have been single now for 5 years, I travel a lot and have good non western relationships, and now have more money than I have ever had for not having to spend it on a moaning woman to keep her happy!