Happier Abroad Forum Community

Marriage rates have been falling in the west since the 50s or 60s, right? I think the only way this can be reversed, or even halted is to remove all the advantages women gain from marriage; rescind alimony laws, make child support payments more reasonable and give fathers an equal chance of gaining primary custody of the children. Obviously not going to happen, so what state will the institution of marriage be in, in say, another 40 years?

Will there be enough manginas to keep this institution alive? Or will be there be enough men who have woken up to turn the tide?

clowny wrote:Marriage rates have been falling in the west since the 50s or 60s, right? I think the only way this can be reversed, or even halted is to remove all the advantages women gain from marriage; rescind alimony laws, make child support payments more reasonable and give fathers an equal chance of gaining primary custody of the children.

Under common law children are the property of their fathers. If the fathers aren't able to raise them then a man relative in his family should. Anyone responsible for allowing a female to kidnap a child from its father should be horribly tortured or worked to death over a period of months. Calling for females to get custody half the time makes you a feminist/mangina in my book.

Obviously the other anti-husband hate policies should go, but that in itself would not be enough. It would actually discourage females from marrying. We need to get females out of universities and out of non-menial jobs that they suck at where they are paid ridiculous amounts for nothing, while raising rates of pay for men to provide an economic incentive for marriage. Corporate whores (aka female "managers") in particular should be abolished and the whoremongers responsible for hiring them executed as traitors. Of course for this to happen Western ZOGs would have to be deposed.

Obviously not going to happen, so what state will the institution of marriage be in, in say, another 40 years?

If things keep on the way they are going, females will all be dykes who have whore-type sex with rich big-shots when the big shots feel like it. Ordinary Joes who associate with women in any sexual manner will simply be killed. They will drop the pretence that this has anything to do with the hurting the female's idiot feelings (which is insane) and tell it like it is - that the ruling class owns females and doesn't like the rabble messing with their property. Of course the white race will be largely extinct by then.

I doubt there will be enough manginas to keep it alive, at least in America. In between men just veging out due to not knowin ghow to cope with domineering women, or cohabitation becoming the de facto standard for partnerships. So I think you are seeing some push backs already within the culture, it is jsut the media is too busy chasing Obbummer buddies tail.

Cornfed wrote:

clowny wrote:Marriage rates have been falling in the west since the 50s or 60s, right? I think the only way this can be reversed, or even halted is to remove all the advantages women gain from marriage; rescind alimony laws, make child support payments more reasonable and give fathers an equal chance of gaining primary custody of the children.

Under common law children are the property of their fathers. If the fathers aren't able to raise them then a man relative in his family should. Anyone responsible for allowing a female to kidnap a child from its father should be horribly tortured or worked to death over a period of months. Calling for females to get custody half the time makes you a feminist/mangina in my book.

Obviously the other anti-husband hate policies should go, but that in itself would not be enough. It would actually discourage females from marrying. We need to get females out of universities and out of non-menial jobs that they suck at where they are paid ridiculous amounts for nothing, while raising rates of pay for men to provide an economic incentive for marriage. Corporate whores (aka female "managers") in particular should be abolished and the whoremongers responsible for hiring them executed as traitors. Of course for this to happen Western ZOGs would have to be deposed.

Obviously not going to happen, so what state will the institution of marriage be in, in say, another 40 years?

If things keep on the way they are going, females will all be dykes who have whore-type sex with rich big-shots when the big shots feel like it. Ordinary Joes who associate with women in any sexual manner will simply be killed. They will drop the pretence that this has anything to do with the hurting the female's idiot feelings (which is insane) and tell it like it is - that the ruling class owns females and doesn't like the rabble messing with their property. Of course the white race will be largely extinct by then.

LMAO! Posts like this make me keep coming back to this forum. What are ZOGs?

Social movements move a lot slower than the proliferation of technology. Robot companions will be commonplace, long before any major changes occur in society. Think of today 2012-2016, more as the years 1975-1980 to the dawn of the PC. In the decade & half which followed, PCs were in nearly every middle class home, and today, in ppl's phones. Likewise, digital companions will do the exact same thing, esp with ultra cheap high speed computing.

Here's my thread on Robot Companions:

viewtopic.php?t=10078

So in effect, women will use strap-on dildos to pleasure one another, kinda like a nationwide Seven Sisters college scene, and the average Joe will turn to s*xbots to calm themselves down, in place of regular dating. Even women will start to adopt male s*xbots, to have menage-a-trios with their lady friends w/o any "disgusting" males around to ruin their gal power orgies.

S_Parc wrote:Social movements move a lot slower than the proliferation of technology. Robot companions will be commonplace, long before any major changes occur in society. Think of today 2012-2016, more as the years 1975-1980 to the dawn of the PC. In the decade & half which followed, PCs were in nearly every middle class home, and today, in ppl's phones. Likewise, digital companions will do the exact same thing, esp with ultra cheap high speed computing.

Here's my thread on Robot Companions:

viewtopic.php?t=10078

So in effect, women will use strap-on dildos to pleasure one another, kinda like a nationwide Seven Sisters college scene, and the average Joe will turn to s*xbots to calm themselves down, in place of regular dating. Even women will start to adopt male s*xbots, to have menage-a-trios with their lady friends w/o any "disgusting" males around to ruin their gal power orgies.

Here's my question to you.

We know that feminism will get worse and that women, particularly YOUNG women will become more and more bisexual.

When these sex male robots become available to women, what percentage of women born in the 1980s and 1990s and afterwards do you think will engage in these threesomes with the male sex robots and other women?

I suspect that these sex robots will catch fire in the media and pop culture.

Maker55 wrote:Here's my question to you.

We know that feminism will get worse and that women, particularly YOUNG women will become more and more bisexual.

When these sex male robots become available to women, what percentage of women born in the 1980s and 1990s and afterwards do you think will engage in these threesomes with the male sex robots and other women?

I suspect that these sex robots will catch fire in the media and pop culture.

I think the best barometer is the Seven Sister colleges like Smith, Vassar, Sarah Lawrence, Simmons, etc. At these places, anywhere from 33 to 50% of women experiment with Lesbianism. In other words, the pure heteros there are almost a minority. Since that's considered the *educational ideal for women*, aside from attending Princeton or Harvard for the brand name/prestige et al, I suspect that less educated mainstream gals will want to emulate their more educated brethren at Smith by using a male 'bot, to seduce a formerly pure heterosexual woman.

Thus, this off campus Smith College motif may infiltrate up to 50% or more of women born after the 80s. I'd even argue that aside from the tight ethnic diasporas like the Brazilians, Cambodians, or tight religious sects like the Mormons or the Amish, where ppl still value human one-on-one relationships, it could even form ~70% of the non-diaspora populations in America, since internet connections (which means software as service, etc) will be on-demand and instant for women seeking different personalities for those male 'bots.

Realize this, women don't like to work, to attract a man. That includes makeup, dressing up, and pretending to be educated. Men, up until zero women are available, will pursue women. Aside from guys like us (with some commonsense), most men will wait till the age of 30, when they've exhausted all their resources, before going full steam with a fembot. Financing options will always be there. Thus, the intrinsic laziness factor in women, will almost guarantee that a male 'bot will be on their collective horizons.

clowny wrote:Marriage rates have been falling in the west since the 50s or 60s, right? I think the only way this can be reversed, or even halted is to remove all the advantages women gain from marriage; rescind alimony laws, make child support payments more reasonable and give fathers an equal chance of gaining primary custody of the children. Obviously not going to happen, so what state will the institution of marriage be in, in say, another 40 years?

Will there be enough manginas to keep this institution alive? Or will be there be enough men who have woken up to turn the tide?

Multiple generation families living in one apartment will be the norm.

Single family homes will be a marking of the upper middle class.

Catching and keeping a husband will be a status marker, especially one with his own single family home.

Some men will avoid marriage and live better, quieter lives for it.

Other men will have access to lots of women. Some of them will catch crotch-critters and other unmentionables.

Some individual businesses that depend on the marriage industry will fold.

Some women will resort to less than optimal means of supporting themselves. Crotch-critters will be an occupational hazard.

Life goes on.

S_Parc wrote:

Maker55 wrote:Here's my question to you.

We know that feminism will get worse and that women, particularly YOUNG women will become more and more bisexual.

When these sex male robots become available to women, what percentage of women born in the 1980s and 1990s and afterwards do you think will engage in these threesomes with the male sex robots and other women?

I suspect that these sex robots will catch fire in the media and pop culture.

I think the best barometer is the Seven Sister colleges like Smith, Vassar, Sarah Lawrence, Simmons, etc. At these places, anywhere from 33 to 50% of women experiment with Lesbianism. In other words, the pure heteros there are almost a minority. Since that's considered the *educational ideal for women*, aside from attending Princeton or Harvard for the brand name/prestige et al, I suspect that less educated mainstream gals will want to emulate their more educated brethren at Smith by using a male 'bot, to seduce a formerly pure heterosexual woman.

Thus, this off campus Smith College motif may infiltrate up to 50% or more of women born after the 80s. I'd even argue that aside from the tight ethnic diasporas like the Brazilians, Cambodians, or tight religious sects like the Mormons or the Amish, where ppl still value human one-on-one relationships, it could even form ~70% of the non-diaspora populations in America, since internet connections (which means software as service, etc) will be on-demand and instant for women seeking different personalities for those male 'bots.

Realize this, women don't like to work, to attract a man. That includes makeup, dressing up, and pretending to be educated. Men, up until zero women are available, will pursue women. Aside from guys like us (with some commonsense), most men will wait till the age of 30, when they've exhausted all their resources, before going full steam with a fembot. Financing options will always be there. Thus, the intrinsic laziness factor in women, will almost guarantee that a male 'bot will be on their collective horizons.

Hmmmm. Interesting....

I am assuming that many of the unmarried women born in the 80s and 90s will do what you just described.

What will happen to the women born in the 80s and 90s who ARE married or have boyfriends?

Will many of them simply leave their husbands or boyfriends for other females and male sex robots or will they bring female sex robots into their marriages with men?

Once these male and female sex robots hit the mainstream, there will undoubtedly be a dramatic shift in our culture.

Maker55 wrote:Hmmmm. Interesting....

I am assuming that many of the unmarried women born in the 80s and 90s will do what you just described.

What will happen to the women born in the 80s and 90s who ARE married or have boyfriends?

Will many of them simply leave their husbands or boyfriends for other females and male sex robots or will they bring female sex robots into their marriages with men?

Once these male and female sex robots hit the mainstream, there will undoubtedly be a dramatic shift in our culture.

I think no discovery, since the invention of fire (and yes, that includes gun powder, mass printing, electricity, & the atom bomb), will be as dramatic, as the proliferation of robots, in terms of commerce/industry and interpersonal relationships. Robotics has the potential to replace most physical labor, servicing, and information service work and at the same time, allow people to form entire lifestyles, without a single true human interaction. That's the biggest game changer in all of history. And I see nothing on the horizon, which can stop it.

Do you how much $$$ are lost in the hands of many that depend on the extortion of women from men. Many things/circumstances would dramatically change with a product like that if hits mainstream. We're talking about billions of dollars here

What about congress, feminists trying to stop the advancement of sex bots?
Is that possible in this day of age

I don't see conservatives, partaking of those bots anyways, that's my opinion personally

well-informed wrote:Do you how much $$$ are lost in the hands of many that depend on the extortion of women from men. Many things/circumstances would dramatically change with a product like that if hits mainstream. We're talking about billions of dollars here

What about congress, feminists trying to stop the advancement of sex bots?
Is that possible in this day of age

I don't see conservatives, partaking of those bots anyways, that's my opinion personally

Look @ what el gato had dragged in??

It's the Dominican-American version of Cleon from Dead Presidents. Jajajajajajaja
Cleon was a war-mongering character in Dead Presidents 1995 movie...and then Cleon
became "saved" and got into church.

The old well-informed was thread-post-warring, but now is benevolent. lol
Bienvenido, pai!

well-informed wrote:Do you how much $$$ are lost in the hands of many that depend on the extortion of women from men. Many things/circumstances would dramatically change with a product like that if hits mainstream. We're talking about billions of dollars here

What about congress, feminists trying to stop the advancement of sex bots?
Is that possible in this day of age

I don't see conservatives, partaking of those bots anyways, that's my opinion personally

It's all my lengthy thread on this topic.

It needs to be declared full sentient A.I, not a simulation, for constitutional lawyers to draft laws to stop it. That's what ~2150 AD? That's a true leap forward in tech, not in the present century.

Otherwise, nothing has limited the rise of information technologies in the interim. Plus, male bots will be available and thus, the Smith College types, ala Hillary Clinton & Co, will actually want the male version around, to stop those *dirty men* from stealing their women. It's a win for the Femi-Nazis. It's only the truly lazy ones, the ones who don't want to co-habit with a woman, who'll lose out.

And also, that desktop where you and I are writing from, will be a supercomputing P7 server room strength, in only another 10 years. The brain of that 'bot will reside on your computer, not the actual moving doll. The doll itself, is wireless hubs, cameras, actuators, sensors, and polycarbonate materials. You see, you can't just pass laws ad hoc, to stop computer hardware makers from making replicas and software makers from writing code. Realize, ppl want to make money on IPOs, including the rich folks. And money is what it's about. When the born agains decide to submit laws to stop AI coders, it'll be way past the point of no return, as this code will be written on nearly every continent on the globe.

Hahaha whats going on man, i use to go off on the forum especially at Winston too lol good times.

Had a lot of anger in me, before i came to Christ. Old things have passed, looking forward for the future (it isnt easy since the world is so chaotic nowadays so my faith is my rock you know) and whats it brings with Gods blessings. Obviously i changed a lot in many areas of my life, im not going to be in those p4p types of convos you know.

I still be posting but sparingly, not like i use to be.

For some reason, im just strangely attracted to the forum, cant get it out of my mind hehe. Lots of wisdom being offered in the site (ive always respected that here)

The born-agains aint making laws against it, im pretty sure they wont. Its like a huge tidal-wave that they would rather not get into. Who knows they might, but i doubt it

they may preach against sex bots in the church thats pretty much it for the sake of not commiting fornication and sexual immorality.