Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


If what winston says is true, how does the human race exist?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

If what winston says is true, how does the human race exist?

Postby clowny » Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:51 am

According to winston, you can't approach females in public because it feels inappropriate as they have this "ice wall" around them that makes socialising burdensome. He also says that it's nearly impossible to get a woman because something like 1 in 20 numbers will get you date or something like that. So if all this shit he says is true, then how do people in murica reproduce? Why is the birth rate still at a sustainable level. Is it only White people in murica who are this way, for example are hispanics or blacks more open to socialising etc. Is this "problem" a work of Winston's imagination?
clowny
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:05 am







Postby Cornfed » Sat Apr 27, 2013 10:29 am

Most Western populations do indeed have extinction level birthrates, but there is still some breeding going on via females being impregnated by dirtbags, females conning dweebs into marrying them after the dirtbags have finished with them and then being impregnated either by the dweebs or by dirtbags with lower standards and so on.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4633
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Re: If what winston says is true, how does the human race ex

Postby ryanx » Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:26 am

clowny wrote:According to winston, you can't approach females in public because it feels inappropriate as they have this "ice wall" around them that makes socialising burdensome. He also says that it's nearly impossible to get a woman because something like 1 in 20 numbers will get you date or something like that. So if all this shit he says is true, then how do people in murica reproduce? Why is the birth rate still at a sustainable level. Is it only White people in murica who are this way, for example are hispanics or blacks more open to socialising etc. Is this "problem" a work of Winston's imagination?


If.
ryanx
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 10:08 am

Postby Bane » Sat Apr 27, 2013 11:36 am

Cornfed wrote:Most Western populations do indeed have extinction level birthrates, but there is still some breeding going on via females being impregnated by dirtbags, females conning dweebs into marrying them after the dirtbags have finished with them and then being impregnated either by the dweebs or by dirtbags with lower standards and so on.


What Cornfed said. Also, you need to factor in that women in the past (20-30 years ago) were much more open to approaches and much more open to socializing with different types of men than women nowadays. 20-30 years ago, even if you were unattractive, women would at least acknowledge you and give you the time of day. Nowadays, you are lucky to have that even if you are slightly above average looking. Yes, white birthrates in America are abysmally low (around 1.7 TFR and dropping) Yes, people are reproducing, but it's mostly the "Alpha" types, and the occasional beta who is suckered into marriage when his woman finds out how large his bank account is.
"A dreamer is one who can only find his way by moonlight, and his punishment is that he sees the dawn before the rest of the world." -Oscar Wilde

"Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability is in the opponent" -Sun Tzu
Bane
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:58 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Postby clowny » Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:11 pm

Bane wrote:
Cornfed wrote:Most Western populations do indeed have extinction level birthrates, but there is still some breeding going on via females being impregnated by dirtbags, females conning dweebs into marrying them after the dirtbags have finished with them and then being impregnated either by the dweebs or by dirtbags with lower standards and so on.


What Cornfed said. Also, you need to factor in that women in the past (20-30 years ago) were much more open to approaches and much more open to socializing with different types of men than women nowadays. 20-30 years ago, even if you were unattractive, women would at least acknowledge you and give you the time of day. Nowadays, you are lucky to have that even if you are slightly above average looking. Yes, white birthrates in America are abysmally low (around 1.7 TFR and dropping) Yes, people are reproducing, but it's mostly the "Alpha" types, and the occasional beta who is suckered into marriage when his woman finds out how large his bank account is.


Why were women much more open to approaches 20 or 30 years ago? What changed them?
clowny
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:05 am

Postby clowny » Sat Apr 27, 2013 12:12 pm

Bane wrote:What Cornfed said. Also, you need to factor in that women in the past (20-30 years ago) were much more open to approaches and much more open to socializing with different types of men than women nowadays. 20-30 years ago, even if you were unattractive, women would at least acknowledge you and give you the time of day. Nowadays, you are lucky to have that even if you are slightly above average looking. Yes, white birthrates in America are abysmally low (around 1.7 TFR and dropping) Yes, people are reproducing, but it's mostly the "Alpha" types, and the occasional beta who is suckered into marriage when his woman finds out how large his bank account is.


Why were women much more open to approaches 20 or 30 years ago? What has changed since then?
clowny
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 9:05 am

Postby jamesbond » Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:02 pm

clowny wrote:Why were women much more open to approaches 20 or 30 years ago? What has changed since then?

I can tell you exactly what changed in the past 30 years. Women are more afraid of men because of the 24 hour news cable channels which keep giving news reports like, "last night a woman was raped and beaten in Chicago" and "yesterday a woman was kidnapped in Houston" or "a woman's former boyfriend keeps stalking her in New York city." These news reports make women afraid of men.

Also, facebook, myspace and internet dating all make it much more difficult to meet women today than ever before. Most dating websites have men than women on them, so the women are getting bombarded with guys sending them messages. Also, women get messages from guys on facebook and myspace, so she may never even have to leave her home to meet men.

Remember, in America talking to strangers is considered taboo and socially unacceptable. The only place where it's considered socially acceptable to meet women is bars and nightclubs. This is why bars and clubs in the US are jammed packed on Friday and Saturday nights.
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"

"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
User avatar
jamesbond
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7485
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 5:45 pm
Location: USA

Postby Cornfed » Sat Apr 27, 2013 7:08 pm

clowny wrote:Why were women much more open to approaches 20 or 30 years ago? What changed them?

The process of slutification/horribilization has moved on since then.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4633
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am


Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Kradmelder and 5 guests