Page 4 of 4

Posted: May 24th, 2013, 11:54 am
by S_Parc
Maverick wrote:He was also recently inducted into the NBA Hall of Fame. I wonder how much of a part his persona played in that.
On court, Rodman was a true professional, possibly among the top five defenders of his era. In the 80s, when he was playing on the Pistons (and prior to the tatoos, etc), he was one of Detroit's McNasty/McFilthy defenders who got in Larry Bird's face and made it very hard for the Celtics to breakaway against a less powerful team. And although he did have a sort of fall out, during his time in San Antonio, when he was on the Bulls afterwards, he was pretty much, mopping up the boards at will and made the game hell for opposing forwards and centers. The Bull's 72-10 record (a team w/o a real center) was mostly due to him and Pippen putting a stranglehold on the league while Jordan did his flying act. Despite the tatoos and attitude, if I were to create a dream team, he'd be one of my defensive stoppers alongside M. Malone, M. Cooper, & Olajuwon.

Posted: May 24th, 2013, 1:34 pm
by E Irizarry R&B Singer
Array9 wrote:
leavingusa wrote: To be more attractive, be more trendy, more superficial, more of a dickhead, break laws, beat people up, f**k a lot of girls, have/sell drugs, drink a shitload of alcohol, don't have a job, get some DUIs, join a band, etc.
A good example of this is former Athlete Dennis Rodman. He went from being a decent role player who was very quiet to a bad boy almost overnight. The quiet guy that most non sports fans never heard of, changed his style. He got tattoos all over his body, colored his hair and carried a "don't give a crap" attitude around.

This change worked in his favor as he wrote a few books, was featured on network TV shows, WCW wrestling and then got his share of decent looking women, including Madonna and Carmen Electra.
You're right. However, crazy as this may sound, Dennis Rodman is one of the few bad boys that has my respect. He said f.uck the US gov't and went to NK. He tore Madonna and Carmen's sugar walls to kibbles and bits. Yeah he did the Ving Rhames-dra.g f.ag s.hit but I can look past that for the most part due to other things he did that I like.

He throws Blacks underneath the bridge for them being so myopic towards life in general and towards how "eccentric" and different he is from most Blacks. I don't really have a problem with him.

Posted: May 24th, 2013, 3:09 pm
by Taco
Dennis Rodman was normal before he started hanging with Madonna. Then he started drinking like a fish and wearing wedding dresses.

Western women are only interested in men that are more narcissistic than they are. Their choice of men is a symptom of their own profound emotional instability. There's no evolutionary reason why a woman would choose a man that will leave her as soon as she gets pregnant. If you can't attract western women it means your "normal".

Posted: May 24th, 2013, 3:34 pm
by Cornfed
Taco wrote:There's no evolutionary reason why a woman would choose a man that will leave her as soon as she gets pregnant.
Actually there is, since the dirtbag will be free to impregnate other females. If his descendants behave in the same way, they will spread the females' genes as well as their own. Of course in the past this would be balanced by the fact that such descendants would have slim prospects of survival without manly input, but since the guvmint is provider and protector now, this is not a consideration for Western skanks.

Posted: May 25th, 2013, 2:00 am
by Maverick
S_Parc wrote:
Maverick wrote:He was also recently inducted into the NBA Hall of Fame. I wonder how much of a part his persona played in that.
On court, Rodman was a true professional, possibly among the top five defenders of his era. In the 80s, when he was playing on the Pistons (and prior to the tatoos, etc), he was one of Detroit's McNasty/McFilthy defenders who got in Larry Bird's face and made it very hard for the Celtics to breakaway against a less powerful team. And although he did have a sort of fall out, during his time in San Antonio, when he was on the Bulls afterwards, he was pretty much, mopping up the boards at will and made the game hell for opposing forwards and centers. The Bull's 72-10 record (a team w/o a real center) was mostly due to him and Pippen putting a stranglehold on the league while Jordan did his flying act. Despite the tatoos and attitude, if I were to create a dream team, he'd be one of my defensive stoppers alongside M. Malone, M. Cooper, & Olajuwon.
Interesting. Yeah, he was before my time for the most part (I think I was born in his second or third year in the league lol) so I never saw him play. I only knew him by his legacy (which was largely his off-court antics). I was surprised that he made it into the Hall of Fame, but it definitely makes sense with this information.

Posted: May 25th, 2013, 2:51 am
by navigator
Taco wrote:If you can't attract western women it means your "normal".
+infinity. Not being able to attract today's disgusting women should be worn as a badge of honor, not as a badge of shame.

Posted: May 25th, 2013, 11:14 am
by S_Parc
Maverick wrote:
S_Parc wrote:
Maverick wrote:He was also recently inducted into the NBA Hall of Fame. I wonder how much of a part his persona played in that.
On court, Rodman was a true professional, possibly among the top five defenders of his era. In the 80s, when he was playing on the Pistons (and prior to the tatoos, etc), he was one of Detroit's McNasty/McFilthy defenders who got in Larry Bird's face and made it very hard for the Celtics to breakaway against a less powerful team. And although he did have a sort of fall out, during his time in San Antonio, when he was on the Bulls afterwards, he was pretty much, mopping up the boards at will and made the game hell for opposing forwards and centers. The Bull's 72-10 record (a team w/o a real center) was mostly due to him and Pippen putting a stranglehold on the league while Jordan did his flying act. Despite the tatoos and attitude, if I were to create a dream team, he'd be one of my defensive stoppers alongside M. Malone, M. Cooper, & Olajuwon.
Interesting. Yeah, he was before my time for the most part (I think I was born in his second or third year in the league lol) so I never saw him play. I only knew him by his legacy (which was largely his off-court antics). I was surprised that he made it into the Hall of Fame, but it definitely makes sense with this information.
The league and press tend to prop up the elite, flashy scorers like Jordan, Kobe, LeBron, or Durant. It's rare, that elite defenders get much attention, outside of the academic b-ball fans. And it's unfortunate because for the most part, it's defense which wins championships, although [ at least for the past decade ] the shady refs have tried to lean it towards more flashy scoring by franchise players, by making bad calls. In general, if one could construct that perfect team of top defenders like M. Malone, M. Cooper, Olajuwon, & Rodman, it's highly unlikely that a Kobe or Durant could score more than 50% of their baskets, for more than one or two games in a best of 7 series.

Thus, for Rodman to secure a media star brand name, he had to re-invented himself as "The Worm", and be the d*ckhead, douchebag weirdo of the league.

Posted: May 25th, 2013, 12:37 pm
by Teal Lantern
Taco wrote:Western women are only interested in men that are more narcissistic than they are. Their choice of men is a symptom of their own profound emotional instability. There's no evolutionary reason why a woman would choose a man that will leave her as soon as she gets pregnant. If you can't attract western women it means your "normal".
If she already has a kid with a beta-provider-schlub, she gets fun for her + genetic variety for her offspring.
No loss if beta-provider-schlub never catches on. Minimal risk in tribes, where you know everyone is somehow related, one way or another.
She still has extended family support, if the man bails or dies.
The Greeks & Romans took more interest in their nephews than their own sons because they knew for sure their sisters sons were related to them.

Evolution doesn't care about wedlock, monogamy, our personal sensitivities or whether the planet is dominated by Christians, Muzzies, or Welfare Queens with 14 children.
Evolution only cares about whose offspring survive long enough to make the next viable generation.
With BigDaddyGov keeping irresponsible tramps and their bastards from starving, their chances are as good as anyone else's -- even better, in fact, because while decent people wear themselves out working, vermin can collect EBT, stay home, and fvck.

Posted: May 25th, 2013, 3:09 pm
by fschmidt
Renata wrote:Why women desire thugs & bad boys ?

The statement good triumphs over evil is very overated. It's a lie. We live in a dark age where everything bad or negative has become attrative. That's why women gravitate to undesirable men. Last year I was put in charge of an english drama club, everyone wanted to be the witch & the socerer, no one wanted to be a fairy or an angel.
This is the most reasonable post in this thread. Modern women are not particularly attracted to masculinity, dominance, or confidence. They are attracted to immorality and stupidity, the two primary traits of bad-boys. The reason for this is explained here:

http://www.actbiblically.org/Human-Evol ... 95955.html