Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Women in military, airforce, etc

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Re: Women in military, airforce, etc

Postby Moretorque » Wed Jul 24, 2013 11:42 pm

marklambo wrote:I may be bashed by some but I just don't feel that women should have anything to do with being in the military, airforce, etc. It's completely unfeminine and a waste of the female gender. Feminism really has destroyed our women.....

Opinions and thoughts anyone?


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeSEjifcLa8 [/youtube]


I don't think any of us should have anything to do with being in the standing armies here, as a matter fact there are supposed to be no standing armies here and the militia which is the armed citizens of America are supposed to be the only standing army here.

So yes I agree women nor anybody should be involved with the standing armies here in the USA. :D
Time to Hide!
Moretorque
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4153
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 2:00 pm
Location: USA,FL







Postby Dark_Sol » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:44 am

Repatriate wrote:
Dark_Sol wrote:
Repatriate wrote:Why should anyone care if American women want to go to the front lines or not? I'm all for it because if they want equality and really feel the need to "prove" something then by all means go ahead.

There are a lot of delusional American women out there though who were raised on Hollywood movies where you have 100 lb women flip kicking 250 lb bodybuilders in the head or dual wielding submachine guns.

The reality is that war is dangerous and unpredictable. If they get captured the enemy will do all sorts of horrible shit to them so they must prepare themselves for that fact before they sign on the dotted line.


The problem is they will lower the standards for the women. Cause they can't do it. Would you want someone who can't even pass the minimum to fight alongside you. That could get you and everyone else killed. I'm not willing to let some politically correct, ideological, fantasy get people killed.


The current batch of conflicts that have happened over the last 40+ years don't require high standards. The MIC and TPTB just need warm bodies with guns to throw around. All the serious stuff is done by air and with heavier firepower as well. Infantry is almost obsolete except for the special ops type stuff which has its own recruiting and training criteria anyways.


Infantry isn't obsolete. Special ops still need support in some areas and there isn't a lot of them to cover a lot of ground. Then you have to add deployment rotation. Marines, airborne and the 10th mountain fill in when needing more bodies. Also, standards is high(well this does depend on the Unit you are in), carrying over 90lbs of gear and walking for days with barely any sleep. Then add rough terrain and it wears you down.
Dark_Sol
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:13 am
Location: Colorado

Re: Women in military, airforce, etc

Postby BigJmack » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:44 am

marklambo wrote:I may be bashed by some butI just don't feel that women should have anything to do with being in the military, airforce, etc. It's completely unfeminine and a waste of the female gender. Feminism really has destroyed our women.....

Opinions and thoughts anyone?


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeSEjifcLa8 [/youtube]



ROTFL Dude! Lemme give you some advice: NEVER APOLOGIZE.

Men DON'T apologize for saying women don't belong in the military. Christ, that's so gay! LOL

Ooops! Did I say "gay" in a derogatory way? Oh excuse me, I might be bashed for saying that LOL

Anyway to answer your question, they shouldn't have been allowed in but since this society's f***ed 6 ways to Sunday, might as well let'em join. Worse is better, I say.
BigJmack
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 19
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:12 am

Re: Women in military, airforce, etc

Postby Jester » Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:56 am

BigJmack wrote:Worse is better, I say.


Wow. Somber thought.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Re: Women in military, airforce, etc

Postby marklambo » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:13 am

BigJmack wrote:
marklambo wrote:I may be bashed by some butI just don't feel that women should have anything to do with being in the military, airforce, etc. It's completely unfeminine and a waste of the female gender. Feminism really has destroyed our women.....

Opinions and thoughts anyone?


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeSEjifcLa8 [/youtube]



ROTFL Dude! Lemme give you some advice: NEVER APOLOGIZE.

Men DON'T apologize for saying women don't belong in the military. Christ, that's so gay! LOL

Ooops! Did I say "gay" in a derogatory way? Oh excuse me, I might be bashed for saying that LOL

Anyway to answer your question, they shouldn't have been allowed in but since this society's f***ed 6 ways to Sunday, might as well let'em join. Worse is better, I say.


My words may have seemed to send a wrong message. I was in no way apologizing... what I truly meant by saying "I may be bashed by some but..." simply meant "Some people may bash what I say but I don't give a f**k, this is what I feel..."

If I was trying to apologize, I would have said something like "Please don't bash me..." :D
Private Investment Club
3%-5% a month average returns. No trading involved, all collateral based with low risk. PM for details.

Private Jet Flights
PM for details.
marklambo
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:37 pm
Location: Las Vegas

Postby Repatriate » Thu Jul 25, 2013 3:30 am

Dark_Sol wrote: Infantry isn't obsolete. Special ops still need support in some areas and there isn't a lot of them to cover a lot of ground. Then you have to add deployment rotation. Marines, airborne and the 10th mountain fill in when needing more bodies. Also, standards is high(well this does depend on the Unit you are in), carrying over 90lbs of gear and walking for days with barely any sleep. Then add rough terrain and it wears you down.

A lot of military missions seem to be of the occupational nature where you need soldiers patrolling and basically acting as mobile cannon fodder for IEDs and to "engage" in sweeps of various backwards locales. Any 80 IQ Cletus or Mary Jane from Mississippi can don cheap made in China body armor and act as walking bait for Jihadi to pad some Pentagon general's career stats. That's why I said you don't need high standards, just warm bodies to do the occupying.

The real heavy lifting missions are from drone strikes, navy/air force missions, and spec ops precision strikes.
Repatriate
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2533
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:39 pm

Postby Dark_Sol » Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:03 am

Repatriate wrote:
Dark_Sol wrote: Infantry isn't obsolete. Special ops still need support in some areas and there isn't a lot of them to cover a lot of ground. Then you have to add deployment rotation. Marines, airborne and the 10th mountain fill in when needing more bodies. Also, standards is high(well this does depend on the Unit you are in), carrying over 90lbs of gear and walking for days with barely any sleep. Then add rough terrain and it wears you down.

A lot of military missions seem to be of the occupational nature where you need soldiers patrolling and basically acting as mobile cannon fodder for IEDs and to "engage" in sweeps of various backwards locales. Any 80 IQ Cletus or Mary Jane from Mississippi can don cheap made in China body armor and act as walking bait for Jihadi to pad some Pentagon general's career stats. That's why I said you don't need high standards, just warm bodies to do the occupying.

The real heavy lifting missions are from drone strikes, navy/air force missions, and spec ops precision strikes.


Yeah... just don't want to admit it. Just hate seeing how they just keep lowering their standards. I remember how most of us in my unit were over 250pt score and 112 gt. But more and more were coming in that couldn't even do 10 pullups or couldn't even keep up with me in a run, even though I was one of the slowest. Shit, more and more, the missions we did overseas was patrolling or escorting a SGM or high ranking officer. I guess it is inevitable that the military just go downhill. Fucken feminism and p***y ass men in charge.
Dark_Sol
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 298
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:13 am
Location: Colorado

Postby momopi » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:05 am

The % of military that are infantry have been on steady decline from 19th to 20th century. In the 21st century we observed the rise of combat drones. For example, this UAV can be had for $1 million USD:

Image


The performance specs are probably on par or better with the MQ-1, with 2,500 - 3,500 km range and 200 kg payload.

To put it in perspective, assuming that you had the communications infrastructure to command the drone, it's possible to fly this drone from Hong Kong to Tokyo (and vice versa) to drop a few laser-guided bombs through someone's window.

With China's low prices, even poorer states will be able to afford this on their limited budget. But anyway, the point is that does it really matter if the joystick jock is male or female, when they're sitting >1,000 km away in a C&C center away from the front lines?
momopi
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4710
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 4:44 am
Location: Orange County, California

Postby C.J. » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:16 am

Jester wrote:I suspect, however, that with their "classified" weapons like lasers, earthquake rays, mindjamming rays, and barometric bombs, the NWO feels secure enough that they can feminize the traditional armed forces without fear.

The elite will lose regardless. Their zombie military will crumble; they can no longer function without killing themselves.
C.J.
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:56 pm

Postby zacb » Sat Jul 27, 2013 1:30 am

On one hand, if I am required to perform SS, why should women be exempt and mooch of the system and no expense to her? And if she wants to be like one of the boys, let her, but don't lower the barriers.

On the other hand, the Israeli military did this, to disastrous effect. In addition, I find all the "You can do it" women's lib as BS. It reminds me of the Bill Burr skit on how there is no feminist in a house fire, since they are little giggly girls trying to get out, and since men are the last ones out, that is why they earn more.
The Daily Agorist, Learn to Live Independent of the System! http://www.theagoristreview.blogspot.com
zacb
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1510
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 3:33 am
Location: Michigan

Previous

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 11 guests