Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Were our male ancestors strict on women for a reason

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Were our male ancestors strict on women for a reason

Postby Mr.Darcy » Sun Jul 28, 2013 4:36 pm

to prevent what we have today
Mr.Darcy
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:21 pm







Postby SilverEnergy » Sun Jul 28, 2013 5:36 pm

Yes, a civilization won't last long unless it's governed by male leadership.

Societies ruled by too much feminine energy don't last as long as societies ruled by masculine energy historically.

This world won't last too much longer if men don't take back the power.

The ruling elite know this, that's why they're eventually going to take back the privileges of women and restore men back to power.

Women weren't designed by nature to rule an empire, men were.

Women were afraid of men in the ancient days and they were too scared to pull the s*** that they pull today.
"Allow me to show you the Power Cosmic!" - Silver Surfer
SilverEnergy
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:41 pm

Re: Were our male ancestors strict on women for a reason

Postby colibri » Sun Jul 28, 2013 6:30 pm

Mr.Darcy wrote:to prevent what we have today


You bet !

lol
If God is watching us, the least we can do is be entertaining.
User avatar
colibri
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 3:53 am
Location: AZTLAN

Postby Repatriate » Sun Jul 28, 2013 7:53 pm

During different Roman and Chinese civilization periods they were able to strike a pretty good balance between the feminine and masculine spheres of influence. I really think Romans understood the nature of women and society the best. They gave women class, status, and power over households however they understood that women were not men in society.

The blurring of these gender lines and assuming men and women are biologically the same is flawed feminist thinking.

Patriarchy can go out of control though. Many of the islamic fundamentalist societies are examples of this. The very idea of femininity is considered dangerous instead of being treated as normal. Men become repressed miserable creatures and women are relegated into tertiary caregiver roles. It's equally as unnatural as some of the gender swapping going on in "progressive" western societies.
Repatriate
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2533
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:39 pm

Postby theprimebait » Sun Jul 28, 2013 8:38 pm

Repatriate wrote:During different Roman and Chinese civilization periods they were able to strike a pretty good balance between the feminine and masculine spheres of influence. I really think Romans understood the nature of women and society the best. They gave women class, status, and power over households however they understood that women were not men in society.

The blurring of these gender lines and assuming men and women are biologically the same is flawed feminist thinking.

Patriarchy can go out of control though. Many of the islamic fundamentalist societies are examples of this. The very idea of femininity is considered dangerous instead of being treated as normal. Men become repressed miserable creatures and women are relegated into tertiary caregiver roles. It's equally as unnatural as some of the gender swapping going on in "progressive" western societies.


thats not true at all.most of them are very Happy and content with their lives.if they need their sexual needs met beforem arriage they just visit the whores.

and women are relegated into tertiary caregiver roles. It's equally as unnatural as some of the gender swapping going on in "progressive" western societies.


How is that a bad thing?


I really think Romans understood the nature of women and society the best. They gave women class, status, and power over households however they understood that women were not men in society.


How did that end up for them?
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Postby well-informed » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:10 pm

@SilverEnergy

What do you mean the ruling elite are going to give back and restore power back to men. In what ways do you speak of

Dont they want to divide and conquer and get rid of the nuclear family
well-informed
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:46 am
Location: New York City

Postby SilverEnergy » Sun Jul 28, 2013 11:15 pm

well-informed wrote:@SilverEnergy

What do you mean the ruling elite are going to give back and restore power back to men. In what ways do you speak of

Dont they want to divide and conquer and get rid of the nuclear family


Of course they want to divide and conquer but women aren't going to always have the power in western society like they do today.

If women continue to have this kind of power, our world might be toast in 20 years.

You can take away the rights and priviledges from women and still keep the nuclear family unit destroyed.

The main goal of the elite was to give women careers to tax more of the population and to separate the family unit.

They have accomplished that.

The elite don't care women at all, they have been using women to further their agenda.
"Allow me to show you the Power Cosmic!" - Silver Surfer
SilverEnergy
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:41 pm

Postby well-informed » Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:01 am

Yep i just know guys who have just proverbially have given up spiritually, emotionally basically on all areas of their lives.

Basically hedonism and chasing p***y has become their god and they'll do whatever it takes to get it.

Your #1 mission in your life (whatever that may be for you) should never be women ever. Women are to sexually compliment you as well as help you and be a part of YOUR LIFE. Being alongside with you especially if you have children together

No reason to become a productive citizen in this sick society when you have people in the back lurking, waiting and banking on your demise as a male (lawyers, judges , women, cops, etc)

No thanks i'll keep my sanity in check, and use wisdom at my discretion. As well as having high standards for myself if one is going to participate in my life
well-informed
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 475
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:46 am
Location: New York City

Postby Teal Lantern » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:27 am

SilverEnergy wrote:Yes, a civilization won't last long unless it's governed by male leadership.

Societies ruled by too much feminine energy don't last as long as societies ruled by masculine energy historically.

This world won't last too much longer if men don't take back the power.

The ruling elite know this, that's why they're eventually going to take back the privileges of women and restore men back to power.

Women weren't designed by nature to rule an empire, men were.

Women were afraid of men in the ancient days and they were too scared to pull the s*** that they pull today.


Civilization has certainly waxed and waned before, but the "world" is no more going to end with the decline of the Anglo-American empire than it did with any other empire.

Is 8th-century BC "ancient" enough? :wink:
Isaiah 3:12 (KJV) As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them.
O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

Proverbs 25:24 (KJV) It is better to dwell in the corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman and in a wide house.

Women have been pulling s*** for as long as they've been women.
Only difference now is men can compare notes. :D
не поглеждай назад. 8)

"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
User avatar
Teal Lantern
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:48 pm
Location: Briar Patch, Universe 25

Postby SilverEnergy » Mon Jul 29, 2013 11:56 am

Teal Lantern wrote:
SilverEnergy wrote:Yes, a civilization won't last long unless it's governed by male leadership.

Societies ruled by too much feminine energy don't last as long as societies ruled by masculine energy historically.

This world won't last too much longer if men don't take back the power.

The ruling elite know this, that's why they're eventually going to take back the privileges of women and restore men back to power.

Women weren't designed by nature to rule an empire, men were.

Women were afraid of men in the ancient days and they were too scared to pull the s*** that they pull today.


Civilization has certainly waxed and waned before, but the "world" is no more going to end with the decline of the Anglo-American empire than it did with any other empire.

Is 8th-century BC "ancient" enough? :wink:
Isaiah 3:12 (KJV) As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them.
O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

Proverbs 25:24 (KJV) It is better to dwell in the corner of the housetop, than with a brawling woman and in a wide house.

Women have been pulling s*** for as long as they've been women.
Only difference now is men can compare notes. :D


If we eventually do away with feminism, we will survive and flourish.

If not, then the world will die off.

Remember, the strongest unit in any civilization is the heterosexual family unit and it was much stronger in ancient times than it is right now in western society.

I don't think you can compare today's society with 8 B.C., we are much more heavily populated and women have much more power than they did back then.

No empire in the past has ever let women get away with what they get away with now in western society.

The poison of western society will spread to the eastern world.

The family unit has NEVER been as destroyed as it is now and there has never been the equivalent of the widespread feminism you see today.

Feminism is going global which this world has never seen before.

Basically, with our advanced technology, along with feminism, it's going to be even more devastating.

It's on a global scale now in a way it wasn't in the past.

In some form or fashion, men have always been able to control women much of the time in ancient days, not so in western society.

You do know that feminism is going to get worse, right?

And you think our world can handle feminism indefinitely and not have consequences.

Remember, we haven't ever seen anything like this in ancient times.

Western society is experiencing a negative birthrate, sex androids will soon be a reality, soon most young women will lose interest in men altogether and get artificial insemination.

This world is being destroyed slowly until feminism is either stopped or halted.
"Allow me to show you the Power Cosmic!" - Silver Surfer
SilverEnergy
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:41 pm

Postby Teal Lantern » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:27 pm

I believe "feminism" is part of female nature.
Add prosperity and safety, and you get the modern entitlement princess.

I agree things will get worse before they get better, but the welfare-state is rapidly running out of money and easy make-work jobs. :D
Remember, men are getting fewer of those high-wage (or even medium wage) jobs AND women prefer men who make more than they do. Western women will and ARE delaying marriage, in hopes of snagging such a man.

This means the state will be taxing more working women to subsidize
a) low/no wage baby-mommas :lol: and
b) the ongoing cost of sickly children by women who waited a little too long to have kids.
Haven't you noticed the shrinking X, in the "1 in X children are born with autism" celebrity ads?

As "Feminism" (political) becomes more and more a problem/cost for women, that's when you'll see the biggest push-back against it.
As long as it is only a problem for men, it will be ignored.
не поглеждай назад. 8)

"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
User avatar
Teal Lantern
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2686
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 11:48 pm
Location: Briar Patch, Universe 25

Re: Were our male ancestors strict on women for a reason

Postby Voice of Reason » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:31 pm

Mr.Darcy wrote:to prevent what we have today


Yes.

You give women an inch and they take a mile.

No matter how much you give them, they never stop...until we end up with the situation today where women are not held accountable for anything.
Voice of Reason
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2012 4:55 am
Location: Out of the West

Postby SilverEnergy » Mon Jul 29, 2013 4:48 pm

Teal Lantern wrote:I believe "feminism" is part of female nature.
Add prosperity and safety, and you get the modern entitlement princess.

I agree things will get worse before they get better, but the welfare-state is rapidly running out of money and easy make-work jobs. :D
Remember, men are getting fewer of those high-wage (or even medium wage) jobs AND women prefer men who make more than they do. Western women will and ARE delaying marriage, in hopes of snagging such a man.

This means the state will be taxing more working women to subsidize
a) low/no wage baby-mommas :lol: and
b) the ongoing cost of sickly children by women who waited a little too long to have kids.
Haven't you noticed the shrinking X, in the "1 in X children are born with autism" celebrity ads?

As "Feminism" (political) becomes more and more a problem/cost for women, that's when you'll see the biggest push-back against it.
As long as it is only a problem for men, it will be ignored.


So do you think that eventually feminism will naturally crash due to it becoming more of a problem for women?

And will women actually regret they ever supported feminism?

Do you think that once the current currency crashes, that we will be given a new currency and feminism will lose its power?
"Allow me to show you the Power Cosmic!" - Silver Surfer
SilverEnergy
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:41 pm

Postby theprimebait » Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:00 pm

Teal Lantern wrote:I believe "feminism" is part of female nature.
Add prosperity and safety, and you get the modern entitlement princess.

I agree things will get worse before they get better, but the welfare-state is rapidly running out of money and easy make-work jobs. :D
Remember, men are getting fewer of those high-wage (or even medium wage) jobs AND women prefer men who make more than they do. Western women will and ARE delaying marriage, in hopes of snagging such a man.

This means the state will be taxing more working women to subsidize
a) low/no wage baby-mommas :lol: and
b) the ongoing cost of sickly children by women who waited a little too long to have kids.
Haven't you noticed the shrinking X, in the "1 in X children are born with autism" celebrity ads?

As "Feminism" (political) becomes more and more a problem/cost for women, that's when you'll see the biggest push-back against it.
As long as it is only a problem for men, it will be ignored.


This.the decline in marriage only hurts females.men can use p4p,go overseas and get brides,and the handsome ones can pump and dump the local populace.

maybe Islam is the only hope for western society.Islam will get rid of feminism and Hypergamy for good.I'm not muslim so Im not advocating Islam,but I am oberving the fact that without muslim immigrants in europe,europe will just become more of a social cesspool.
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Re: Were our male ancestors strict on women for a reason

Postby theprimebait » Mon Jul 29, 2013 5:03 pm

Voice of Reason wrote:
Mr.Darcy wrote:to prevent what we have today


Yes.

You give women an inch and they take a mile.

No matter how much you give them, they never stop...until we end up with the situation today where women are not held accountable for anything.


Image

THIS. the ancient Athenians didnt even allow women to leave the house without a Chaperone.there literaly has to be Saudi arabia style laws regarding women if you want a productive,stable society.
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Next

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: droid, JohnDoeBigBaller and 6 guests