Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Dr. Helen Smith: Why men are boycotting marriage, fatherhood

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Dr. Helen Smith: Why men are boycotting marriage, fatherhood

Postby Johnny » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:05 pm

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/helen-smi ... 67778.html

Dr. Helen Smith: "Why men are boycotting marriage, fatherhood and the American Dream"
Johnny
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 4:35 am







Postby kai1275 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:11 pm

So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....
kai1275
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1436
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:19 pm

Postby Repatriate » Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:17 pm

This is the closest you will get to red pill type thinking in the mainstream. Unfortunately, this article will be relegated to the fringes and most men who read this will be like Icarus. Their wings will fall off because they tried to fly too close to the sun. U.S. Society will slap them down hard when they see any form of dissent happening. Even in that article you see kneejerk women shouting down the guys who are agreeing with why marriage is bad.

To a large extent it's American men who allow themselves to be manipulated in this way. I have little sympathy at the end of the day.
Repatriate
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2533
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2008 6:39 pm

Postby Contrarian Expatriate » Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:21 pm

kai1275 wrote:So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....

She is actually on our side. However, her well-intentioned book, Men On Strike, is a day late and a dollar short as we already know the story she is telling.

The value in her book is that it could be a vessel for the message to creep into the mainstream.
Feel free to visit my sites and to leave your respected words of wisdom:

http://thedeclineofmyamerica.blogspot.com/

http://www.youtube.com/user/ContrarianExpatriate
Contrarian Expatriate
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:57 am

Postby kai1275 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:33 pm

Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
kai1275 wrote:So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....

She is actually on our side. However, her well-intentioned book, Men On Strike, is a day late and a dollar short as we already know the story she is telling.

The value in her book is that it could be a vessel for the message to creep into the mainstream.


She is not on our side! Women that wrote anti-feminism books are the types on our side, although most of you would reject most of them because they are religious or too Christian for your heavy Atheism mindsets.

All she does is offer mainstream views on what "some" men are doing. There are millions of these kinds of articles all over MSM. Anyone, male or female, unwilling to address the 800 pound gorilla in the room (Feminism), is not our friend. Especially if they are not going to bother telling women what they can do to fix the problem. Most American women reading her article probably shrugged and said, "So f***ing what!"....
kai1275
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1436
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:19 pm

Postby Tsar » Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:16 pm

Sluts are not marriage quality. Most American/Western women have had between 7 - 12 sex partners by age 21. No man with a sense of pride and honor would marry a slut. Most American women aren't marriage quality. Rejecting marriage with sluts is the proper thing.

The slut wants a diamond ring, a wedding ring, a party, and then she gets all the benefits of divorce law. The man would be getting a slut, have a 50%-70% chance of divorce (depending on how much of a slut she is, 1 prior partner=50% divorce rating), he would have to pay the slut 50% of his assets, possibly alimony, and then child support if he chooses to have a child with a slut. Sluts don't make good mothers. Sluts are irresponsible, reckless, and narcissists. To a slut the child is an object they can show off and get benefits from. The slut also knows that divorcing the man she can keep the child, collect child support, and find a "more desirable" white knight mangina to accept her even if she has a child.

An engagement ring was used as "virginity insurance" so if the man left the woman after taking her virginity she would still have something to sell and support herself.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/arc ... gs/255434/

Not a virgin, then no engagement ring for the woman. Not a virgin, then the woman shouldn't be wearing white at her wedding.
Tsar
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:40 pm

Postby Contrarian Expatriate » Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:02 pm

kai1275 wrote:
Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
kai1275 wrote:So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....

She is actually on our side. However, her well-intentioned book, Men On Strike, is a day late and a dollar short as we already know the story she is telling.

The value in her book is that it could be a vessel for the message to creep into the mainstream.


She is not on our side! Women that wrote anti-feminism books are the types on our side, although most of you would reject most of them because they are religious or too Christian for your heavy Atheism mindsets.

All she does is offer mainstream views on what "some" men are doing. There are millions of these kinds of articles all over MSM. Anyone, male or female, unwilling to address the 800 pound gorilla in the room (Feminism), is not our friend. Especially if they are not going to bother telling women what they can do to fix the problem. Most American women reading her article probably shrugged and said, "So f***ing what!"....

I suggest you do some research on Helen Smith and read her book because you have a gross misconception of her general thesis.
Feel free to visit my sites and to leave your respected words of wisdom:

http://thedeclineofmyamerica.blogspot.com/

http://www.youtube.com/user/ContrarianExpatriate
Contrarian Expatriate
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1404
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:57 am

Postby kai1275 » Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:29 pm

Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
kai1275 wrote:
Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
kai1275 wrote:So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....

She is actually on our side. However, her well-intentioned book, Men On Strike, is a day late and a dollar short as we already know the story she is telling.

The value in her book is that it could be a vessel for the message to creep into the mainstream.


She is not on our side! Women that wrote anti-feminism books are the types on our side, although most of you would reject most of them because they are religious or too Christian for your heavy Atheism mindsets.

All she does is offer mainstream views on what "some" men are doing. There are millions of these kinds of articles all over MSM. Anyone, male or female, unwilling to address the 800 pound gorilla in the room (Feminism), is not our friend. Especially if they are not going to bother telling women what they can do to fix the problem. Most American women reading her article probably shrugged and said, "So f***ing what!"....

I suggest you do some research on Helen Smith and read her book because you have a gross misconception of her general thesis.


I read her article. It does not address anything I posted about. If her book is so vastly different, why then did she bother not to address this in her article? Because it is a Huffington Post article! Cannot attack feminism on a website created by one that strongly supports it.
kai1275
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1436
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 5:19 pm

Postby Guyver » Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:04 pm

Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
kai1275 wrote:So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....

She is actually on our side. However, her well-intentioned book, Men On Strike, is a day late and a dollar short as we already know the story she is telling.

The value in her book is that it could be a vessel for the message to creep into the mainstream.


Yes, and the fact that it is coming from a woman will mean a hell of a lot more to the media than it will coming from a man. Men have been saying the same things that she has been saying for years, but as usual we are all worthless and need to "man up" when we have issues to discuss. Unfortunately, the only way the media will take it seriously is if it comes from women such as Dr. Helen.
Guyver
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 2:13 am

Postby Guyver » Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:22 pm

kai1275 wrote:
Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
kai1275 wrote:So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....

She is actually on our side. However, her well-intentioned book, Men On Strike, is a day late and a dollar short as we already know the story she is telling.

The value in her book is that it could be a vessel for the message to creep into the mainstream.


She is not on our side! Women that wrote anti-feminism books are the types on our side, although most of you would reject most of them because they are religious or too Christian for your heavy Atheism mindsets.

All she does is offer mainstream views on what "some" men are doing. There are millions of these kinds of articles all over MSM. Anyone, male or female, unwilling to address the 800 pound gorilla in the room (Feminism), is not our friend. Especially if they are not going to bother telling women what they can do to fix the problem. Most American women reading her article probably shrugged and said, "So f***ing what!"....


Dude, seriously? Read the freakin book! Articles don't count. I read it, and I can vouch for the way she presents the content. Not one word in each chapter favors the western woman. The whole book surrounds the kind of bullshit that us men have to go through in western society from our own perspective. You will see that she is supportive in her tone. It is an easy read. Believe me, you will nod in agreement with everything that she talks about.

If you still don't believe me, then just listen to this interview and the way she talks:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yzUECFwU3U
Guyver
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 2:13 am

Postby Moretorque » Wed Aug 28, 2013 11:36 pm

Guyver wrote:
Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
kai1275 wrote:So what... Another PC/Pop culture article from a feminist apologist. Yawn. Nothing new to see here....

She is actually on our side. However, her well-intentioned book, Men On Strike, is a day late and a dollar short as we already know the story she is telling.

The value in her book is that it could be a vessel for the message to creep into the mainstream.


Yes, and the fact that it is coming from a woman will mean a hell of a lot more to the media than it will coming from a man. Men have been saying the same things that she has been saying for years, but as usual we are all worthless and need to "man up" when we have issues to discuss. Unfortunately, the only way the media will take it seriously is if it comes from women such as Dr. Helen.


Guyver if that is you in your Avatar you are one mean looking Mother Fuc ker, anyhow the media will not take it seriously no matter what. They work for the credit monopoly just like the rest of us and do as they are told by the people supplying them with their digits. To do UN 21 they must overturn male power.
Time to Hide!
Moretorque
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4149
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 2:00 pm
Location: USA,FL

Postby The Black Knight » Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:17 am

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324577904578559501706287178.html


↑ Men on Strike book review ↑


This review reminds me of the typical defensive mechanism I encountered after I've let a few female relatives read this book.

↓Their remarks ↓


"Not all women are like that"
"She must have been abused as a child (which is why she studied 'psychology')"
"Men are also bad too"
"Those men are a bunch of cowards who are 'afraid' of commitment"


Western Women... pff...
The Black Knight
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:34 pm


Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests