Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Looks mean nothing!

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Postby Johnny1975 » Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:11 pm

True.
***** Join my forum for entrepreneurs and aspiring entrepreneurs : *****

http://inspiredentrepreneur.forumotion.com/

And while you're at it...

*** Buy my motherf***ing book NOW!!!!! *** -----> http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00K5ZHTCW

DO IT!
Johnny1975
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:07 pm







Postby HouseMD » Sun Oct 27, 2013 3:52 pm

Cornfed wrote:But if the female is fugly, that would mean that she would be likely to produce fugly and unhealthy children. In a functional society it is in fact the female's personality that wouldn't matter much, since aberrant behavior could be corrected by beating. Anyway, since Western females are essentially all giant vermin now, in their case their looks, before they binge eat, drink and f**k them away, is all they could possibly have to offer.

In a functional relationship no beating is necessary, ever. What situation aside from cheating would merit such violent behavior is beyond me.

I feel like there are two types of men on this site, those that have been burned by women and are full of rage and anger toward western society, and those that simply feel western society and women are simply not ideal for them and thus desire dating elsewhere. The latter of us will likely never be able to relate to the former.
User avatar
HouseMD
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:20 am
Location: Buried Under a Pile of Books

Postby Falcon » Sun Oct 27, 2013 4:36 pm

Gold post OTB! This should be made a sticky on the forum. Love this:

OTB wrote:She's a mind. A soul with thoughts, feelings, and desires. That body is just a covering.



This expands very well on Voice of Reason's thread "I'm tired of all this superficiality based on looks".
http://www.happierabroad.com/forum/view ... hp?t=13598

Keep up the great posts showcasing your outside-the-box thinking! :D

Great avatar too, that looks like one of the big Ottoman mosques (masjids) in Istanbul, Turkey.
Falcon
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:59 pm

Postby djfourmoney » Mon Oct 28, 2013 12:41 am

Tsar wrote:I am after everything. Very attractive, nice personality, virtuous, virgin, and young (15-19) so she will be the closest thing to a true princess.


And you'll get nothing because you don't take my advice seriously.
djfourmoney
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Postby Rocky Top » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:17 am

onethousandknives wrote:As long as she can cook? That's kinda my only criteria really. Sounds dumb, but in America a girl who can cook usually is fairly healthy (as you can't eat prepackaged food here and stay healthy/fit looking very long) and has wide and varied tastes, and likely has taught herself because her mother's generation probably didn't cook, or she comes from a fairly traditional values type of family and her mother taught her and that's great, too.

It might be a silly joke, but I'm serious about the cooking thing. If you find a girl unwilling to learn to cook things or eat reasonably (ie, not from a TV dinner box) you should run run run. To me also lack of cooking shows lack of self help skills. It's seriously just a basic life skill. Why would you want a girl who cannot handle basic tasks like that?

Keep in mind, this is coming from someone who can cook for himself, and does. So it's not like I "need" her to cook for me or anything, hell I'd probably even do most of the cooking, but I actually do not want a useless girl with zero skills who needs to rely on me for everything. That's way too much work. I want an actual strong independent woman, but not a feminist who proclaims strength and independence but can't even boil a potato or check her car's oil.


Cooking and being able to maintain a home are very important. I am the same way in hat I am able to cook and clean for myself and have been doing so since I've been on my own for almost 20 years.

1. Physical attraction (lets be honest, that is usually the first thing we notice, but she doesn't have to be a super model)
2. Co-operative nature
3. Domestic skills
Rocky Top
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 231
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 3:23 pm
Location: Tennessee

Postby OTB » Mon Oct 28, 2013 1:23 am

Falcon, I'm glad you liked the post. I remember that thread by Voice of Reason. And I made a comment about the topic as well.

This is definitely an extension of that.

And yes, in my avatar, I'm standing in the Blue Mosque.
OTB
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:28 pm
Location: Washington Twp, NJ

Postby HouseMD » Mon Oct 28, 2013 2:22 am

Tsar wrote:I am after everything. Very attractive, nice personality, virtuous, virgin, and young (15-19) so she will be the closest thing to a true princess.

You should really up the age rage to 16-19 if you wish to avoid prosecution, what with the PROTECT Act and all. Even if it is legal overseas, your 15 year old princess that doesn't exist will land you an extradition and 15 years of being your cellmate's princess in a federal pen if you were ever "fortunate" enough to meet her and have some sex.
User avatar
HouseMD
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1196
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 2:20 am
Location: Buried Under a Pile of Books

Postby Cornfed » Mon Oct 28, 2013 3:40 am

HouseMD wrote:
Cornfed wrote:But if the female is fugly, that would mean that she would be likely to produce fugly and unhealthy children. In a functional society it is in fact the female's personality that wouldn't matter much, since aberrant behavior could be corrected by beating. Anyway, since Western females are essentially all giant vermin now, in their case their looks, before they binge eat, drink and f**k them away, is all they could possibly have to offer.

In a functional relationship no beating is necessary, ever.

What gave you that idea? Not only do females need discipline, but they need to be physically dominated to bond properly with men. My point was that in a sane society where the pigs wouldn't be sicked on husbands disciplining their wives, lousy personalities in females would be less of a problem since they could be corrected.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4645
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Postby Rich » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:14 am

Cross cultural studies show that the physical appearance of women is the most important thing to men, especially an appealing hip to waist ratio. It's pretty much the only thing that matters to us. Let's face it, It's almost impossible to resist a beautiful woman, even if in your heart of hearts you know she's poison.

Anyway, the same studies suggest women want to mate with someone:

1) who can offer them financial security
2) who is intelligent (this links to the money side of things, the more intelligence the more likelihood of the guy making money)
3) who is older (age may also relate to the likelihood of more resources).

They don't really care what we look like.
Last edited by Rich on Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2013 11:19 am

Postby Jester » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:15 am

Billy wrote:
depends for what you need the chick. i mean people have women for different reasons. like in art things have their place. some like to see a pretty face in bed when the wake up in the morning. some want a loyal parner. there are many different reasons for everybody.

i am somekind of artist. aesthetics play a big role for me. don´t know if it´s good or bad or if i could change that or if it would make to change that.

the thing is i don´t feel that i need a female partner so what it´s left: probably looks. i don´t want to make business with her so all other parts of her life ist good and so on. immanuel kant wrote like: marriage is a contrast to youse each others private parts. who i am to say kant was wrong though he didn´t mention looks.



Billy, Billy, Billy.




You are indeed an artist, yes, and even a bit of a philosopher.




Yes.




But the real metaphysical question here is:








WHAT ABOUT THE KIRGHIZ GIRL IN PINK YOGA PANTS????????

DID YOU EVER TAKE HER OUT TO DINNER????
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Postby Jester » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:23 am

HouseMD wrote:
I feel like there are two types of men on this site, those that have been burned by women and are full of rage and anger toward western society, and those that simply feel western society and women are simply not ideal for them and thus desire dating elsewhere. The latter of us will likely never be able to relate to the former.




Did you ever lose a family, Dr. House?
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Postby Jester » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:29 am

Tsar wrote:
I am after everything. Very attractive, nice personality, virtuous, virgin, and young (15-19) so she will be the closest thing to a true princess.



And you'll get her -- because you know what you want, you stay focused, you pray, and you take action.

Build it, and she will come.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Postby Jester » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:33 am

Rocky Top wrote:
1. Physical attraction (lets be honest, that is usually the first thing we notice, but she doesn't have to be a super model)
2. Co-operative nature
3. Domestic skills



All well-stated.

#2 rarely gets mentioned.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Postby Jester » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:44 am

HouseMD wrote:
Tsar wrote:
I am after everything. Very attractive, nice personality, virtuous, virgin, and young (15-19) so she will be the closest thing to a true princess.



You should really up the age rage to 16-19 if you wish to avoid prosecution, what with the PROTECT Act and all. Even if it is legal overseas, your 15 year old princess that doesn't exist will land you an extradition and 15 years of being your cellmate's princess in a federal pen if you were ever "fortunate" enough to meet her and have some sex.



Dr. House is trying to help here, wisely, but let's be clear, there is no law against a young guy like Tsar chatting with a high school girl.

And lots of teen girls get married, but almost never without parents' permission.

And such is easily given if a young man seems sincere, has an income, and the girl is amenable. Piece of cake, actually. Ask ANY parent of a daughter anywhere (outside the Anglosphere and Northern Europe).

The 16 year old limit I believe is kind of a trafficking thing - don't fly the girl somewhere for a nefarious purpose if she is under 16.

In my experience, most girls from age 13 on are thinking of boys (or thinking of their own attributes) most of the time. Thus beginning a romance with a girl aged from 15 to 19 is normal, particularly for a young guy like Tsar.

There was a time we used to hold hands first, you know.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Postby Jester » Mon Oct 28, 2013 7:49 am

Cornfed wrote:
HouseMD wrote:
In a functional relationship no beating is necessary, ever.



What gave you that idea? Not only do females need discipline, but they need to be physically dominated to bond properly with men. My point was that in a sane society where the pigs wouldn't be sicked on husbands disciplining their wives, lousy personalities in females would be less of a problem since they could be corrected.



So true.

Lots of aging women would still have husbands, and lots of children would grow up in intact homes, if this were the case.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Yohan and 3 guests