Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Alpha Male bullshit and Evo-psyche.

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Postby theprimebait » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:18 am

lol stop with the alpha mail bullcrap.agriculture created hypergamy and the human hierarchy.

hunter gatherer societies are very FAIR,they have no wealth inequality,and non-existant to very shallow hierarchies.

there is no sence of property or currency.there is no hoarding of women.all women get f***ed by the men in the tribe regardless of their worth.

HYPERGAMY is a result of CIVILIZATION.a ponzi scheme wich exploited most of humanity for thousands of years.
Last edited by theprimebait on Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am







Postby Cornfed » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:18 am

theprimebait wrote:
Cornfed wrote:
Ghost wrote:Monogamy and civilization are inseparable. What we are seeing now is Western civilization revert to a "state of nature."

Except it is not even a state of nature because the regime is subsidizing and protecting various low-quality assholes at the expense of people of ability.


lmao.the only thing that matters in nature is passing on your genes and survival.genetic fitness.sperm quality.

those who can do so with ease(Black men,Studs,handsome men,alpha type men)=high quality

those who cannot(Geeks,and limp wristed but''smart''IT nerds,libertarian tradcons)=low quality

Only within the context of the present artificial set up. Most of the scum being bred by the system today wouldn't even survive without the system looking after them.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4640
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Postby Cornfed » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:21 am

theprimebait wrote:lol stop with the alpha mail bullcrap.agriculture created hypergamy and the human hierarchy.

hunter gatherer societies are very FAIR,they have no wealth inequality,and non-existant to very shallow hierarchies.

there is no sence of property or currency.there is no harding of women.all women get f***ed by the men in the tribe regardless of their worth.

HYPERGAMY is a result of CIVILIZATION.a ponzi scheme wich exploited most of humanity for thousands of years.

I'd tend to agree. Comparing us with the great apes would tend to indicate we are naturally somewhat polygamous and somewhat monogamous, maybe serially monogamous. That is assuming we actually have a natural nature and weren't genetically engineered by aliens or whatever.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4640
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Postby theprimebait » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:25 am

Cornfed wrote:
theprimebait wrote:
Cornfed wrote:
Ghost wrote:Monogamy and civilization are inseparable. What we are seeing now is Western civilization revert to a "state of nature."

Except it is not even a state of nature because the regime is subsidizing and protecting various low-quality assholes at the expense of people of ability.


lmao.the only thing that matters in nature is passing on your genes and survival.genetic fitness.sperm quality.

those who can do so with ease(Black men,Studs,handsome men,alpha type men)=high quality

those who cannot(Geeks,and limp wristed but''smart''IT nerds,libertarian tradcons)=low quality

Only within the context of the present artificial set up. Most of the scum being bred by the system today wouldn't even survive without the system looking after them.


lmao @ Tradcons.

Black men were bred,and I mean BRED to reproduce and be genetically fit.who do yout hink wil survive in the wild?

some limp wristed It nerd or Tyrone

Image

Image

who did NATURE intend to reproduce?and who gets to reproduce because of enforced conditions?

Tradcons hate that question.

again nature doesnt care for ''IQ'',it cares of for genetic and sperm strength.

who is more likely to survive in nature?a limp wristed geek or a tall buff high Test hoodlum?

its only because of artifical conditioning,that geeks even survive.they would be slaves in the days of yore.probabely not even,as they can't do simple athletic work.
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Postby theprimebait » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:53 am

Cornfed wrote:
theprimebait wrote:lol stop with the alpha mail bullcrap.agriculture created hypergamy and the human hierarchy.

hunter gatherer societies are very FAIR,they have no wealth inequality,and non-existant to very shallow hierarchies.

there is no sence of property or currency.there is no harding of women.all women get f***ed by the men in the tribe regardless of their worth.

HYPERGAMY is a result of CIVILIZATION.a ponzi scheme wich exploited most of humanity for thousands of years.

I'd tend to agree. Comparing us with the great apes would tend to indicate we are naturally somewhat polygamous and somewhat monogamous, maybe serially monogamous. That is assuming we actually have a natural nature and weren't genetically engineered by aliens or whatever.


Read Sex at Dawn.we are polygamous and promiscuous.we are akin to bonobos.

and lastly monogamy doesn't exist in nature.the females cuckold the males.
(Replace white nationalists with Tradcon geeks)

Image[/img]
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Postby Cornfed » Mon Dec 02, 2013 5:21 am

theprimebait wrote: lmao @ Tradcons.

Black men were bred,and I mean BRED to reproduce and be genetically fit.who do yout hink wil survive in the wild?

They were bred to be slaves in a hot climate. American blacks aren't even bred for anything now other than to lower the tone really. If they were left to their own devices their numbers would be thinned really fast and females would avoid them like the plague. As to the feeble-bodied nerd stereotype, that seems to have only come about since the 60s. I'm not sure how it was achieved. Who in nature was designed to breed more? White people of course. Take the example of the Scots Irish, who started out as a few thousand peasants on the border between England and Scotland and bred by the millions once essentially released into the wild in the colonies. Blacks by comparison suck at living.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4640
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Postby Ghost » Mon Dec 02, 2013 6:58 am

theprimebait wrote:
Ghost wrote:Monogamy and civilization are inseparable. What we are seeing now is Western civilization revert to a "state of nature." Most men didn't pass on their genes in pre-history because they were not given exclusive access to any woman. It's common knowledge by now that women are not monogamous or even polyamorous - they are hypergamous. That is, they to mate with only the "best" man/men. Civilization exploded onto earth thousands of years ago because of monogamy: it gave "beta" men a reason to create and sustain. Thus we got civilization: literature, arts, agriculture, medicine, infrastructure...economies.

Now that the Western world is regressing again...what I want to know is what is the final result. There's no where else to run to on planet earth. No places left to colonize and corrupt. So it looks like the worst of human nature will be overcome (not likely) or perhaps we'll end up locked into a permanent global ghetto that never emerges from its brutishness.



bullshit

Hypergamy is a forced state within civilization.in nature,our natural state,women were anything BUT hypergamous .

Alpha males do not exist in hunter gatherer societies.they exist in agricultural ones.

Hypergamy,alphadom,and ''status''and resources as a means of hoarding the top women is a new phenomnon.

more oft-repeated manosphere bullshit.women do not mate with the ''best''man.this is manospherian myth.looka round you.average girls date average guys.hot girls date hot guys and men of their own calibre.nothing hypergamous about that.

''Best''man is totally subjective.

a poor guy who looks like that could be a best man to some women,while a average looking rich guy could be the ebst men to another one.

women go for the best man they can GET,relative to those who seek them out.if you think every woman is getting suited by tall handsome or rich studs you're deluded.

the main butthurt in the manosphere is that women go for men on their level,instead of low DHV bums.manospherians are essentially butthurt they cannot practice the hypergamy they yearn,but then they project it unto women.

again:

in nature women let all kinds of men f**k them,incels,hot dudes,buff dudes,short dudesetc

who ever's sperm was strongest won.

simple.and don't get me started on ''civilization''.for most of human history(up into the 19'40's)civilization benefited a top elite,while inflicting poverty,misery,and disease on everyone else.Hunter gatherer societies are remarkebely fair.

Civilization is a exploitative system to the benefit of a few.

ITT:butthurt incels that know without ''monogamy''they can't get laid.project hypergamy on women,when they are Hypergamous but are pissed they can't get what they want.

manosphere:pathetic male versions of fat feminists.


Women are extremely hypergamous. Perhaps in a state of nature they f***ed some betas or "lesser" men in their eyes, but it would not have been out of desire and only for resources. It would certainly be better than the present world where women don't f**k "down" and the daddygov robs from betas and gives their resources to the women for free, allowing women to f**k and breed with scum, like Cornfed pointed out.

Hypergamy has always been the truth for women. But now they have been unleashed to act on their hypergamy 100% of the time. Now betas don't have anything left to gain. So hypergamy was always trues for women; in the past, they had to f**k betas sometimes or risk being thrown out by alphas and getting nothing (that is, no pre-historic daddygov to prop them up.)

You can't even put a sentence together half-way decently, use words correctly, or spell correctly, so I can't take you seriously anyway. And you are way off about basic human nature. You see some of the evidence, but you are painting a very non-sensical picture.
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:23 am

Postby Maverick » Mon Dec 02, 2013 7:54 am

Personally, I don't want monogamy for the constant sex. I'm a fan of the feelz and shared experiences and shyt.

Also, intelligence is definitely a good thing to have in the wild. A big guy can run around, kill things, and gather food. A smart guy can create the tools that the big guy uses.

And a hot girl can suck both of these guys' d*cks at the end of the day. :D
Maverick
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 564
Joined: Sat May 18, 2013 10:46 pm

Postby theprimebait » Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:43 am

Ghost wrote:
theprimebait wrote:
Ghost wrote:Monogamy and civilization are inseparable. What we are seeing now is Western civilization revert to a "state of nature." Most men didn't pass on their genes in pre-history because they were not given exclusive access to any woman. It's common knowledge by now that women are not monogamous or even polyamorous - they are hypergamous. That is, they to mate with only the "best" man/men. Civilization exploded onto earth thousands of years ago because of monogamy: it gave "beta" men a reason to create and sustain. Thus we got civilization: literature, arts, agriculture, medicine, infrastructure...economies.

Now that the Western world is regressing again...what I want to know is what is the final result. There's no where else to run to on planet earth. No places left to colonize and corrupt. So it looks like the worst of human nature will be overcome (not likely) or perhaps we'll end up locked into a permanent global ghetto that never emerges from its brutishness.



bullshit

Hypergamy is a forced state within civilization.in nature,our natural state,women were anything BUT hypergamous .

Alpha males do not exist in hunter gatherer societies.they exist in agricultural ones.

Hypergamy,alphadom,and ''status''and resources as a means of hoarding the top women is a new phenomnon.

more oft-repeated manosphere bullshit.women do not mate with the ''best''man.this is manospherian myth.looka round you.average girls date average guys.hot girls date hot guys and men of their own calibre.nothing hypergamous about that.

''Best''man is totally subjective.

a poor guy who looks like that could be a best man to some women,while a average looking rich guy could be the ebst men to another one.

women go for the best man they can GET,relative to those who seek them out.if you think every woman is getting suited by tall handsome or rich studs you're deluded.

the main butthurt in the manosphere is that women go for men on their level,instead of low DHV bums.manospherians are essentially butthurt they cannot practice the hypergamy they yearn,but then they project it unto women.

again:

in nature women let all kinds of men f**k them,incels,hot dudes,buff dudes,short dudesetc

who ever's sperm was strongest won.

simple.and don't get me started on ''civilization''.for most of human history(up into the 19'40's)civilization benefited a top elite,while inflicting poverty,misery,and disease on everyone else.Hunter gatherer societies are remarkebely fair.

Civilization is a exploitative system to the benefit of a few.

ITT:butthurt incels that know without ''monogamy''they can't get laid.project hypergamy on women,when they are Hypergamous but are pissed they can't get what they want.

manosphere:pathetic male versions of fat feminists.


Women are extremely hypergamous. Perhaps in a state of nature they f***ed some betas or "lesser" men in their eyes, but it would not have been out of desire and only for resources. It would certainly be better than the present world where women don't f**k "down" and the daddygov robs from betas and gives their resources to the women for free, allowing women to f**k and breed with scum, like Cornfed pointed out.

Hypergamy has always been the truth for women. But now they have been unleashed to act on their hypergamy 100% of the time. Now betas don't have anything left to gain. So hypergamy was always trues for women; in the past, they had to f**k betas sometimes or risk being thrown out by alphas and getting nothing (that is, no pre-historic daddygov to prop them up.)

You can't even put a sentence together half-way decently, use words correctly, or spell correctly, so I can't take you seriously anyway. And you are way off about basic human nature. You see some of the evidence, but you are painting a very non-sensical picture.


you are butthurt that you cannot practice your own Hypergamy.that is it.

you want the 8s,the 9s.you can't have them.so you claim women are hypergamous.bullshit.they are no more hypergamous then men.any sane eprson would ant the best,and would go for the best if they can do so.including you pathetic incels.

the truth is people date in their league,average girls date average guys.hot men date hot women.get over it.

you state many times that ''lower'' persons such as blacks,poor people etc should accept their fate.as nature intended them to hold a certain place.wether due to Iq,genes whatever.but these same genetic determinist incels will try to cheat how nature works,by themselves being hypergamous and desiring women out of their league.

all your butthurt boils down to,is that women pass you over for men better than you(especially tall,muscular cool black men).something any sane individual would do.if you can get a Ferrari you won't go after the Toyota.simple.

what tradcons want,is to FORCE people to buy that Toyota,otherwise they will go out of bussiness!force them!financially blackmail them!

I see right through your pathetic hamsterizations.

and scum?who are you to say who is scum?obviousely the physichaly challenged nerds are scum.from a pure genetic view,they are scum.they don't deserve to reproduce.IQ is a liability and not a asset after a certain percentage,it serves no purpose in nature.
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Postby theprimebait » Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:49 am

Maverick wrote:Personally, I don't want monogamy for the constant sex. I'm a fan of the feelz and shared experiences and shyt.

Also, intelligence is definitely a good thing to have in the wild. A big guy can run around, kill things, and gather food. A smart guy can create the tools that the big guy uses.

And a hot girl can suck both of these guys' d*cks at the end of the day. :D


oh I support Monogamy.I'm just saying.the whole hypergamy and alpha -Beta dichotomy is manosphere bullshit created by butthurt hypergamous incels.

women are not nearly as hypergamous as men,and they in the past let all kinds of guys f**k them in gangbangs.watch any amateur gangbang video on a porn site.the women is in exctasy.many women who have done so recall pure exctasy.

tradcon incels say women are hypergamous only to excuse the fact tons of''Betas''get laid with very hot women,while they do not.maybe it is them?not the women or the environment?

the manosphere is just full of fantasies,projections and bullshit.
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Postby theprimebait » Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:02 am

agriculture created hypergamy and the human Alpha-Omega hierarchy.

hunter forager societies are very FAIR,they have no wealth inequality,and non-existant to very shallow hierarchies. it is a very egaliterian society.

if women are hypergamous it is because they have to be.in communal hunter-forager societies,they don't have to be.for one,.the commune takes care of their offspring,and secondely they have equal access to the resources of the tribe.

if you're a woman would YOU mate with a genetic trash and a guy who can't provide the best life for your offpsring and yourself?

this issue is absent in hunter-foraging society.
theprimebait
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Postby C.J. » Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:40 pm

Yeah, it was great how the women would f**k everybody etc.

But you must also note that A LOT OF HUMANS HAVE DIED FROM DAY-TO-DAY ACTIVITIES. And it seems a lot of times, it was from getting brained. Not the best way to go.

Which is why tribal communities were so important. But it was also why smaller groups had to be ruthless killing machines to protect their treasures. Having a harem is great, but what about that other guy who wants your hoes!? It was either kill him to keep them, or get killed by him. Humans are greedy, cunning and disgusting creatures, so a mind absent of vigilance wouldn't live long if they had resources considered valuable by their enemies. With so much time on their hands, you may have been tracked and watched for days.

Which is why I love recent civilization. Only difference is more people, less of a tech gap, and more docile idiots thanks to Nazi Germany. History is full of human stupidity, and I'm glad that we get the long end.

I'd rather get the b***y, without going to sleep knowing that the next day might be my last. :lol:
C.J.
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:56 pm

Postby Bane » Mon Dec 02, 2013 2:51 pm

ROFL at Primebait's suggestion that IQ means nothing. I find it ironic that he's saying this while using a computer, (presumably) wearing clothes, and (presumably) sitting in a nice, air conditioned house.
"A dreamer is one who can only find his way by moonlight, and his punishment is that he sees the dawn before the rest of the world." -Oscar Wilde

"Invincibility is in oneself, vulnerability is in the opponent" -Sun Tzu
Bane
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 310
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:58 am
Location: Parts Unknown

Postby C.J. » Mon Dec 02, 2013 3:35 pm

There's a difference between intelligence and practical application.
C.J.
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:56 pm

Postby Introvert » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:25 pm

you guys still have not figured out who he is yet..
Introvert
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 140
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 6:59 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests