Discuss and talk about any general topic.
Less than 15% of 16-25 year old guys are f***ing hot chicks. And basically no one outside that age range is. Why has there not been a massive incel uprising yet to combat this grave injustice?
We see incidences of sexually frustrated young men banding together to wreak havoc (e.g. the Vancouver riot, the Occupy movement), but nothing long-lasting and with a clear message.
I'm picturing a man in a mask, motioning towards a college arts building filled with prime poon, speaking to thousands of sex-starved men in a Sean Connery voice through a megaphone: "Take it. Vagina is yooours." And the movement would just grow from there.
85% of horny, frustrated,young men can cause some serious damage to the system and possibly bring economy down to its knees but then what?
You cant force women to sleep with guys they don't feel attraction for.
These 85% of men can chose to drop out of the system and go their own way, play video games,don't procreate, move abroad or keep trying to pick up
What else can you do?
That would be an absolute waste of time.
There are more constructive ways to spend your time.
You can't make western women be what you want them to be.
If you're that sexually repressed, there are many places in the world to get sex.
Spend the energy improving your life and making it better.
"Allow me to show you the Power Cosmic!" - Silver Surfer
First, what percent of women in your city is "hot", and if 85% of the guys in your city were humping local hot girls, how many boyfriends/sexual partners does each hot girl must have for this math to work?
Second, according to 2013 data from US Census Bureau, 14.1% of US couples have wife who is 2+ years or older than her husbands, vs 52.7% of couples have husband who is 2+ years or older than the wife. This means, older guys are taking and sleeping with younger women, reducing the pool of single young women to young men.
Third, if a man is sexually frustrated and unable to find a GF, there's a variety of discreet P4P options available in major cities. Prices range from moderate (AMP) to expensive (sugar daddy). Your buddies aren't rioting, possibly because they're getting some from their ATF from local AMP/LMP on regular basis. While they may join in vocal protest, in their minds they're thinking about calling mama-san later to inquire if she got any fresh, hot young talent this week.
But then once they bring down the economy to it's knees, it will knock down the house of cards that are sheltering women from reality. If the economy goes down, then there's no more welfare and government handouts, so young women won't have that gov't security which rewards them for f***ing around with bad-boys until their thirties. Women will now need to depend on men or starve to death, which means that they will no longer have these nasty attitudes of theirs. You have to understand that, feminism and all this nasty attitudes of American women can only continue for as long as the economy is still doing well. Why do you think foreign women act sweet, it's because they don't live in luxury and don't have welfare in their home countries, so they can't afford to f**k around with bad boys until 35 otherwise they will lose their market value
I've read that only 1 in 100 American men have paid for sex in the last year. Sounds about right. Out of all my buddies over the years, I was the only one who'd ever done it. This forum isn't representative of the male population at large; most men would never even consider using a ho. Plus once a week isn't enough to satisfy the male libido anyway.
So the question remains: why are men not collectively storming college campuses and taking young flesh by force?
Because they're too busy sitting at home playing video games, getting drunk, fapping to pr0n, and bitching about it on the internet to give a damn.
By the way I really hope you're not condoning rape, if so that's seriously fuk'd up dude...
Last edited by manly5000 on Wed Mar 05, 2014 10:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This sort of ridiculous shit has been covered before. You little pussies construct these little fantasy worlds and don't understand why things aren't what you wish they could be.
The real world answer to your question: Because the life expectancy of these dipshit rapists would be measured in days rather than years. You do not want to f**k around with the friends, girlfriends or daughters of alpha males.
P4P activities are vastly under-reported. What goes on behind closed doors between consenting adults is really their business.
Because it's wrong. Hypothetically, if our men "collectively storms college campuses to take young flesh", there wouldn't be young flesh at the college. If the security environment was that bad, parents wouldn't send their daughters to open-campus colleges or high schools.
My Vietnamese buddy married a Catholic Chinese Indonesian. Her mother did not like the security situation in Indonesia and sent her daughter to school in California, where local men do not usually riot and form gangs to rape girls of different religion. In other parts of the world where security and safety is a real concern, and the parents did not have the option to go abroad (or send their daughters abroad), they'd opt to send their daughters to fortified all-girl schools with armed guards. Try storming the campus and you'd probably take a burst of 7.62 in your chest.
Now, reverse the sexes and imagine yourself assigned to provide regular sexual services to some hirsute Ham-planet With Attitude ... and undie skids.
не поглеждай назад.
"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
Because men are too dumb to know the truth - that 99% will never get a decent wife until death & they are basically slaves to the system already.
"Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal... If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. Once they have achieved equality, they will be your masters." Cato the Elder
This is straight from one of the government websites:
'According to recent data published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) the public sector employs over 1.6 million people.
Traditionally, the public sector employs a higher proportion of women compared to other sectors. Women typically comprise greater than 60% of the public sector workforce in each state and territory. Recent data from the Western Australia Public Sector Commission, State of Sector Report 2012, indicates that this figure is approaching 70%"
70% of government employees are women?If situation was reversed there would be mass demonstrations and mind you these are secure jobs with good money and benefits. Btw private sector is not any better, especially since there is no manufacturing left in the country.
This can only lead women to become super selective and develop bad attitudes.
Now, all these women that our pussy-friendly government employs can easily live by themselves(either buy or rent), have a nice car, holidays, buy latest and greatest gadgets and so on. Role of a man has become obsolete as we can see.
That is like saying you can't force men to work in jobs they don't like. Of course you can. Besides, who females want to have sex with is influenced by the system. Say females want to have sex with rich men. If the system robs the majority of men and gives the wealth to the men at the top and to females, that will then cause the females to distain the majority of men in favor of the elite. If men got together and prevented this by rioting or whatever, then as well as a more equitable distribution of wealth, it would result in a more equitable distribution of sexual favors.
Why men of the West do not rebel is an interesting question. It is a combustible situation, but Western regimes seem quite adept at running around putting out the sparks. For one thing, effective rebellion was only ever going to come from young white men, and there are demographically far fewer young white men than in the past thanks to the genocide agenda that kicked in in the 70s. As well as thinning our numbers, Western regimes have reduced social contact young men have with each other by a number of means, so men getting the shaft don't realize what a huge aggregate percentage of other men are in the same position. They see men on television getting good jobs, casual sex and stable marriages with non-psycho females, and because that is all they see, they often assume this must be the norm. In such a situation, the regimes' propaganda that anyone can get unlimited money and sex providing they overcome whatever unspecified but no doubt horrific character flaws that are holding them back, might seem plausible. That combined with mass drugging and mass entertainment have worked so far.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media, Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests