Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


We are just evolutionary strugglers.

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

We are just evolutionary strugglers.

Postby Zionosis » Sun Jun 29, 2014 3:46 pm

Well the system has always been like this and looking back in time believing it was a paradise is stupid.
Women have always wanted the very best men. All the women want the top dog. Same as in a Lion pride all the females are with the Alpha and it's the same with goats, cows, apes, fish, birds etc. And yes humans also.

Don't blame women, Evolution would be an utter failure if females just settled for inferior males and didn't choose the best ones.
Every generation there are boys born who are just genetically going to never pass on their genes from failing to attract a woman. You have probably met some yourself in your time. You maybe question if you are destined to be one of these failures. Your father obviously managed to reproduce but that in itself doesn't mean that you are good yourself. After all there are boys born that in their adult state are less attractive and successful than their fathers.


I notice many women have kids but are single. Just like in a nature show they were impregnated by an Alpha male but he didn't stick around.
It's a sad reality but men are destined by evolution to be the more lonely sex. As a double whammy males are also coded to be more infatuated with the opposite sex than females are. So it's a hard time on the males that are genetic failures. This is also a major reason as to why males commit suicide at rates far higher than females.

Some people need to just realize that life is not fair and it never has been. You may as well be happy with what you have got and stop complaining. After all complaining isn't ever going to get you anywhere anyway. It's just counter productive.
Zionosis
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:08 pm







Postby Zionosis » Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:18 pm

It's obvious but I may as well point this out also.
There are two types of men that seem to fail with women and one type can change their own situation, The other can't.

1. The one that can change their situation is a man who is reserved and not confident but physically he is attractive. If you are just a little more reserved than normal it's possible if you are open to dating Asian women to find a woman that won't be too turned off about it though as they are more used to it.

2. The ones that usually can't change their situation are the ones that are physically unattractive and inferior looking to women. Usually these types have low self esteem and because of the physical reality of how they look it's hard for them to change and have higher self esteem.
Zionosis
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 414
Joined: Mon Dec 30, 2013 12:08 pm

Postby Temprano26 » Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:31 pm

We are not biologically inclined to be single and alone our whole lives. We are just living in the land of blind fools. It has been discussed over and over again how anti-social the US is with everyone on their smart phones ignoring everyone else.

We have to go places where people are more socially evolved than here. When you go to a place where people are not absorbed in themselves and are actually interested in dating other people, you will have more success. Some of us have outgrown our society.
Temprano26
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 3:08 pm

Postby sea_dragon » Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:51 pm

Decrease the amount of resources and increasing competition is the only way. That way better men pass down their own genes while subhman males don't get to pass down their genes.
sea_dragon
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 5:17 am

Re: We are just evolutionary strugglers.

Postby ntm1972 » Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:19 pm

Zionosis wrote:Don't blame women, Evolution would be an utter failure if females just settled for inferior males and didn't choose the best ones.


Really? Give women a free pass?

Here's some food for thought, courtesy of a guy who called himself Uzem and Luzem. His blog is no longer available, but some of his articles have been saved by others. Here's one of them. The URL is

http://antimisandry.com/chit-chat-main/excellent-article-uzem-luzem-13786.html#ixzz1u4ZuRDX7

I've pasted this from his site . . .quite long but very intruiging and makes good sense.

The first 3 paragraphs are from a poster, his response is below

I don't see why this behaviour in women is so hard for men to understand. All throughout nature females only f**k the males they perceive to be the best out of the pool of available males. Survival of the fittest, sexual selection, whatever you want to call it, has been going on for billions of years because it's the only way life can work.

A species in which average or below average males create children can not last. Creatures that engage in this unnatural behaviour quickly die out and are replaced with other creatures that take more care selecting the DNA that will go into their offspring.

The only reason this is taking a little longer in human civilization is that we use technology to keep the unfit alive a little longer. But eventually even the most advanced medicines won't be able to cover up multiple generations of careless breeding.

The Following Is My Response

"All throughout nature females only f**k the males they perceive to be the best out of the pool of available males."

True. The difference is that with females in the wild there is very little difference between their perception of who the alpha males are and the reality because the alphas are usually the ones left standing! It's pretty hard for a female to choose the wrong dude when the beta males are either licking their wounds or beating a hasty retreat out of the area.

With female human beings however, for reasons explained below, the problem is that there is often a huge difference between their perception of who the alpha males are and the reality. Despite what women think, perception is not reality.

As an aside, for reasons that will also be explained below, IMO you're giving women far too much credit comparing them to animals in nature.

"But eventually even the most advanced medicines won't be able to cover up multiple generations of careless breeding."

I agree 100% with that statement. Where I suspect we differ though, is in what we consider to be 'careless breeding'.

One of the consequences of feminism is that over the past 40 years WF have been greatly accelerating the process of breeding non sociopathic men out of existence (if you really think about it - over the course of hundreds or thousands of years most civilizations will slowly become more sociopathic because sociopaths tend to gravitate towards positions of power and we all know how wet women get for powerful men. In addition, most naturally gifted 'womanizers' are (borderline) sociopaths).

One of the main reasons why throughout history, so many societies have seen fit to have arranged marriages is because as a gender, females have consistently demonstrated that left to their own devices, they will make sexual selection choices that can destroy families in less than a generation and civilizations in less than a century which is exactly what is happening in the west right now.

Depending on which study you choose to believe, anywhere between 10 to 30 percent of children born to married women were sired by someone other than 'dad'. There’s even an African proverb that describes this phenomenon (proving that it is inherent in all women not just WF): “Mama’s baby. Papa’s? Maybe.â€￾

You can take it to the bank that these cheating whores weren’t cheating with 'nice guys'. They were cheating with bad boys, players, thugs and rich dudes - many (most?) of whom could be poster boys for the sociopathic personality – just think about the type of ‘character’ you would have to have to cheat with a married woman and knock her up.

Knowing how amoral females are as well as how pathologically addicted they are to bad boys & players, I strongly believe that the only thing keeping the percentage of children being sired by someone other than dad from being 80 or even 90 percent is that there simply aren’t enough bad boys & players to go around and service all of the willing whores.

So in addition to all of the reasons outlined in the last few posts about why marriage sucks and why smart man are staying single, another reason to stay single is that most females wouldn’t think twice about having their husbands unwittingly raise some thug’s kid. Yes, Holmes, they are that amoral, that sneaky and that sick. Always remember, these evil cowards kill defenseless, unborn babies practically for sport so absolutely nothing is beneath them.

The question is, do you really think that western civilization is best served by having the ‘exciting’, ‘reckless’, ‘fearless’ and ‘risk taking’ drenched DNA of bad boys and players coming to predominate?

Last time I checked, stable and healthy societies had a small percentage of the above types and a much larger percentage of people with responsible, loyal, dependable, diligent, cautious and conscientious type characteristics dominating their DNA – you know, all the boring, non sexy stuff required to bring up healthy, happy and well adjusted children in intact nuclear families.

But when was the last time you heard a brain dead WF list any of the above qualities when describing what they look for in a guy? And I’m supposed to believe that c**ts give a shit about the DNA that will go into their offspring? This is what I meant when I said that you are giving them way too much credit. c**ts give a shit about one thing and one thing only and that is themselves. Kids, like husbands, SUVs and the house in the ‘burbs are merely accessories to decorate their vapid and shallow existences.

And therein lies the problem with women and their perception of who the alpha males are: Women are fundamentally savagely primitive creatures and slaves to the emotional parts of their brain. Deep down, they still crave the cave man - as if we were still living in the jungle - when most men have evolved way past that stage.

It’s not by accident that the first & second characteristics I listed under 'CEX – Their Core Characteristics' (in the right hand column under ‘The Bad’ are:

1) Amoral & Unrestrained &
2) Primitive & Unevolved

If females weren’t fundamentally like that then left to their own devices they would gravitate towards ‘nice guys’ rather than ‘bad boys’. More accurate descriptors would actually be ‘evolved guys’ vs ‘primitive guys’.

The Bottom Line

Women are too amoral, too primitive & too emotional to be allowed to make any important decisions which explains a lot of things our forefathers did. Realistically though, there’s no going back now that they have so much power and freedom. This simply means that the decline of western civilization will accelerate in direct proportion to women’s collective ability (once their proverbial clocks start ticking) to find players and bad boys willing or careless enough to knock their asses up.

If we were still swinging from trees then, like the females in the wild, women's perceptions about who the alpha males are would be very close to reality but this is the 21st century yet c**ts refuse to evolve. I wish more men would call them on their primitive, cave whore mentalities.

A civilization’s decades at the top of the food chain are numbered once it allows itself to be ruled primarily by emotions (females) instead of reason (men).
ntm1972
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 3:55 pm
Location: North America

Postby SilverEnergy » Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:50 pm

Giving in to defeat because your own women don't like you?

I've been able to get women in America of different races.

Decades past, women didn't demand as much from men in terms of money and status....it's a different ball game today.

Women make more money in western society, so they are going to expect more of you in terms of finances.

You have to go where women make LESS such as latin america, russia, eastern europe and asia.

Either become wealthy in western society or go overseas.

Men in the ancient days didn't have nearly as hard time finding wives as men do today.

If women throughout history only wanted the top 10 percent of men, then we wouldn't be here today.

The problem is that the average looking women are picky today.

You shouldn't expect the prettiest women to fall head over heels for you unless you have the status.

If you want to be alone, that's you but the rest of us are either improving our lives in western society or developing a plan and flying overseas.

You can always date women in their 40s and 50s until you're able to get out of the country.

Many of us have done it, I mean gone overseas and improved our lives financially.....it's not impossible.
"Allow me to show you the Power Cosmic!" - Silver Surfer
SilverEnergy
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 9:41 pm

Re: We are just evolutionary strugglers.

Postby Taco » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:33 pm

Zionosis wrote:
Don't blame women, Evolution would be an utter failure if females just settled for inferior males and didn't choose the best ones.


I'm not sure I believe this applies to all civilizations.

1000's of years ago there was a shortage of men in Scandinavia this allowed blond hair and blue eyes, a recessive mutation to become common among people from northern Europe. If a woman had blond hair and blue eyes she had a greater chance of attracting a man and having children. If she didn't have blond hair and blue eyes she was out of luck. The men were the ones doing the choosing in northern Europe not the women.
Taco
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4241
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2011 4:30 pm

Re: We are just evolutionary strugglers.

Postby Cornfed » Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:10 pm

Zionosis wrote:Well the system has always been like this and looking back in time believing it was a paradise is stupid.
Women have always wanted the very best men. All the women want the top dog. Same as in a Lion pride all the females are with the Alpha and it's the same with goats, cows, apes, fish, birds etc. And yes humans also.

It is a bit different now though because we have evil Western regimes effectively making decent men obsolete by becoming a universal surrogate husband and father, while at the same time providing police protection to scumbag men. This completely skews the situation.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4643
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Re: We are just evolutionary strugglers.

Postby Jonny Law » Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:15 pm

Zionosis wrote:Well the system has always been like this and looking back in time believing it was a paradise is stupid.
Women have always wanted the very best men. All the women want the top dog. Same as in a Lion pride all the females are with the Alpha and it's the same with goats, cows, apes, fish, birds etc. And yes humans also.

Don't blame women, Evolution would be an utter failure if females just settled for inferior males and didn't choose the best ones.
Every generation there are boys born who are just genetically going to never pass on their genes from failing to attract a woman. You have probably met some yourself in your time. You maybe question if you are destined to be one of these failures. Your father obviously managed to reproduce but that in itself doesn't mean that you are good yourself. After all there are boys born that in their adult state are less attractive and successful than their fathers.


I notice many women have kids but are single. Just like in a nature show they were impregnated by an Alpha male but he didn't stick around.
It's a sad reality but men are destined by evolution to be the more lonely sex. As a double whammy males are also coded to be more infatuated with the opposite sex than females are. So it's a hard time on the males that are genetic failures. This is also a major reason as to why males commit suicide at rates far higher than females.

Some people need to just realize that life is not fair and it never has been. You may as well be happy with what you have got and stop complaining. After all complaining isn't ever going to get you anywhere anyway. It's just counter productive.


Women generally are Evil and will choose other bad boys who fit their perverted life style.

But there are cultures not dominated by women that have family values and morals.

I recommend traveling and enjoying other women from different cultures.
Jonny Law
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Tue May 13, 2014 8:14 pm

Postby FusionX20 » Sun Jun 29, 2014 8:10 pm

I honestly don't think biology plays most of the role in this, I think it's brainwashing but that's just my view. Hollywood is the one indoctrinating all sexes. They think looks are more important than intelligence. Sometimes I wonder maybe it's true that the NWO is trying everything they can to extinct those considered inferior. Either way, Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking, all those guys were not considered attractive in society's eyes but they were geniuses and contributed so much.

If we went by their logic we'd probably be still living in caveman days, "not really" but you know what I mean. P.S. Hollywood loves sticking it in our faces, the magazines, etc.

Now it's possible that some people aren't meant to breed, like the ones with asexuality and aspergers, it's really sad b/c some only want companionship and love but are always shot down and rejected by society. I can tell you from experience just a little over 10 years ago it wasn't as bad, in fact maybe even less than that. Literally things are changing close to the speed of light before our eyes and people are being overlooked by technology and the brainwashing of the media.
Been at the mercy of western society since childhood.
FusionX20
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:11 am
Location: NYC

Postby Winston » Sun Jun 29, 2014 8:29 pm

OP:

Man what a pessimistic post. It is true that some men are rejected by every woman in America. But America is not the world, as most people, even the alternative/counter-culture movements, think.

You can always go to the Philippines and get someone. There, you will be seen as an alpha male. Location can change your status.

Steve Neese told me that his friend, who is balding and only 5ft6, is in Brazil right now and he got laid there 5 out of the last 7 nights, with regular girls, not prostitutes. Unbelievable! He said that the girls there are so eager to please men and do not have hang up about sex.

What a big difference location makes. It will mesmerize you.

OP, if your theory is right, then how come none of the average guys in Latin America, Ukraine, Russia, SE Asia, have any trouble getting dates? Even guys with no money get dates there. In third world countries, people do not suffer from loneliness, isolation and social disconnection. It's one of the biggest secrets that the media won't tell you.
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23609
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:16 pm

Postby FusionX20 » Sun Jun 29, 2014 9:58 pm

Winston wrote:OP:

Man what a pessimistic post. It is true that some men are rejected by every woman in America. But America is not the world, as most people, even the alternative/counter-culture movements, think.

You can always go to the Philippines and get someone. There, you will be seen as an alpha male. Location can change your status.

Steve Neese told me that his friend, who is balding and only 5ft6, is in Brazil right now and he got laid there 5 out of the last 7 nights, with regular girls, not hoes. Unbelievable! He said that the girls there are so eager to please men and do not have hang up about sex.

What a big difference location makes. It will mesmerize you.

OP, if your theory is right, then how come none of the average guys in Latin America, Ukraine, Russia, SE Asia, have any trouble getting dates? Even guys with no money get dates there. In third world countries, people do not suffer from loneliness, isolation and social disconnection. It's one of the biggest secrets that the media won't tell you.


Hey Winston, what's up?
Been at the mercy of western society since childhood.
FusionX20
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 2:11 am
Location: NYC

Postby hammanta » Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:39 am

FusionX20 wrote:I honestly don't think biology plays most of the role in this, I think it's brainwashing but that's just my view. Hollywood is the one indoctrinating all sexes. They think looks are more important than intelligence. Sometimes I wonder maybe it's true that the NWO is trying everything they can to extinct those considered inferior. Either way, Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking, all those guys were not considered attractive in society's eyes but they were geniuses and contributed so much.

If we went by their logic we'd probably be still living in caveman days, "not really" but you know what I mean. P.S. Hollywood loves sticking it in our faces, the magazines, etc.

Now it's possible that some people aren't meant to breed, like the ones with asexuality and aspergers, it's really sad b/c some only want companionship and love but are always shot down and rejected by society. I can tell you from experience just a little over 10 years ago it wasn't as bad, in fact maybe even less than that. Literally things are changing close to the speed of light before our eyes and people are being overlooked by technology and the brainwashing of the media.


I agree mostly with this point. I think the confusion here is that Alpha is generally assumed to be the most physically alluring, whether it be size, speed, looks, etc. Not every species is based on that assumption and it varies tremendously. Also not every species is the male considered superior. The human species would have never taken root if it wasn't for one important trait, our brains. We lack speed, strength, claws, teeth compared to the rest of the animal kingdom. If anything should be considered alpha it should be the most intelligent, not the most physically appealing. I think other than basic physical health and normal appearance (no disfiguration, disease or mutation) not much else matters when it comes deciding mates (on an instinctive level). It is society that skews our minds. Just look at the difference in cultures today and what they find as beautiful. Some women in tribes elongate their necks to impress men, others mutilate and disfigure themselves. Some find overweight women appealing as it signifies wealth where as my friend has some weird fetish for wanting to screw amputees.
hammanta
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2013 4:36 pm
Location: East Coast of USA

Postby NorthAmericanguy » Tue Jul 01, 2014 1:41 am

Winston wrote:OP:

Man what a pessimistic post. It is true that some men are rejected by every woman in America. But America is not the world, as most people, even the alternative/counter-culture movements, think.

You can always go to the Philippines and get someone. There, you will be seen as an alpha male. Location can change your status.

Steve Neese told me that his friend, who is balding and only 5ft6, is in Brazil right now and he got laid there 5 out of the last 7 nights, with regular girls, not hoes. Unbelievable! He said that the girls there are so eager to please men and do not have hang up about sex.

What a big difference location makes. It will mesmerize you.

OP, if your theory is right, then how come none of the average guys in Latin America, Ukraine, Russia, SE Asia, have any trouble getting dates? Even guys with no money get dates there. In third world countries, people do not suffer from loneliness, isolation and social disconnection. It's one of the biggest secrets that the media won't tell you.


Although I agree with you. The main problem is that for many men in America, traveling overseas just to get women, or sex, is not only a luxury, but unrealistic. For example, let's just say an American man has a good job, the thing is, even with a good job, being that he's American, he's only going to be able to take 2 weeks off at the most in a year because American companies treat their workers like slaves. So traveling overseas isn't really going to be able to solve a short, or even the long term issue of not getting sex or female companionship. In this case, it's just better and more cost effective to get a GF, and as soon as she pushes for marriage just find another GF and just keep doing that.



That said, what I would like to see is a mass movement of American men either getting totally fed up with the system and doing something about it (i.e, protest to decriminalize prostitution, boycott marriage), or mass migrating overseas and helping each other make the jump. Speaking of migrating, I was doing research behind Freetown Sierra Leone. And to me, it makes no sense that American black men don't want to move back to Africa, particularly Freetown Sierra Leone to rebuild the land and open businesses there.
NorthAmericanguy
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2182
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:16 am

Postby Jester » Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:15 am

Thanks, ntm.

This is good stuff, deep stuff.


One of the consequences of feminism is that over the past 40 years WF have been greatly accelerating the process of breeding non sociopathic men out of existence (if you really think about it - over the course of hundreds or thousands of years most civilizations will slowly become more sociopathic because sociopaths tend to gravitate towards positions of power and we all know how wet women get for powerful men. In addition, most naturally gifted 'womanizers' are (borderline) sociopaths).



Yeah back under Ghenghis Khan, or the Borgias, it was INTELLIGENT sociopaths who were hyper-breeding. Now it is the SHIFTLESS, TOO-STUPID-TO-USE-BIRTH-CONTROL sociopaths who breed. Wow.


One of the main reasons why throughout history, so many societies have seen fit to have arranged marriages is because as a gender, females have consistently demonstrated that left to their own devices, they will make sexual selection choices that can destroy families in less than a generation and civilizations in less than a century which is exactly what is happening in the west right now.



I keep wondering what happened to the master-races that have disappeared, like the builders of Machu Pichu and so on. I was thinking maybe the guys just started playing video games, and the women were into cats. But maybe this guy has it right, maybe they started letting women f**k the coolest guy, the one who spent his time dropping herbs and dyeing his mohawk.

Wow.


Depending on which study you choose to believe, anywhere between 10 to 30 percent of children born to married women were sired by someone other than 'dad'. There’s even an African proverb that describes this phenomenon (proving that it is inherent in all women not just WF): “Mama’s baby. Papa’s? Maybe.â€￾

You can take it to the bank that these cheating whores weren’t cheating with 'nice guys'. They were cheating with bad boys, players, thugs and rich dudes - many (most?) of whom could be poster boys for the sociopathic personality – just think about the type of ‘character’ you would have to have to cheat with a married woman and knock her up.



Shit. True, too true.


Knowing how amoral females are as well as how pathologically addicted they are to bad boys & players, I strongly believe that the only thing keeping the percentage of children being sired by someone other than dad from being 80 or even 90 percent is that there simply aren’t enough bad boys & players to go around and service all of the willing whores.

So in addition to all of the reasons outlined in the last few posts about why marriage sucks and why smart man are staying single, another reason to stay single is that most females wouldn’t think twice about having their husbands unwittingly raise some thug’s kid. Yes, Holmes, they are that amoral, that sneaky and that sick. Always remember, these evil cowards kill defenseless, unborn babies practically for sport so absolutely nothing is beneath them.




Shit.

Shit. Shit. Shit.

:x

Indisputably right.

Shit.
Last edited by Jester on Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 7869
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 9:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Next

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests