Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


....

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

....

Postby Paloaltoguy » Thu Aug 14, 2014 11:44 pm

:wink:
Last edited by Paloaltoguy on Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Paloaltoguy
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:47 am







Postby Paloaltoguy » Sat Aug 16, 2014 8:46 pm

LMAO @http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maia-james/phthalates-health_b_2464248.html

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/08/140814191528.htm

In the last 50 years, research has identified a trend of declining testosterone in men and a rise in related health conditions, including reduced semen quality in men and genital malformations in newborn boys. Animal and cellular studies have found that some phthalates block the effects of testosterone on the body's organs and tissues. Researchers set out to examine whether these chemicals, which are widely used in flexible PVC plastics and personal care products, had a similar effect in humans.


Most of you have been turned into feminine versions of yourselves...

:lol:
Paloaltoguy
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:47 am

Re: A lot of men are frustrated in dating because they lack.

Postby nicho12 » Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:54 pm

Paloaltoguy wrote:MALE testosterone. The single biggest reason men hold positions of power is that biologically they are driven to be more ambitious and take more risks than women. Many studies have been released in recent years (several conducted by women) showing that testosterone drives risk-taking, domineering, powerful behavior. Guess which gender has exponentially more testosterone? But what happens when men lack testosterone? One of the reasons Northern California is such a social-graveyard is men are actually women i.e. passive, unambitious, lacking physical and mental willpower, and unwilling to aggressively pursue goals or fulfill sexual desires (the typical SF bay area guy sleeps with subpar leftovers).

Here's an awesome and amazing and powerful way to go through life.

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2014/03/14/become-dominant-man/

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2011/12/26/how-to-choke-a-woman/

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2014/07/30/science-shows-dominant-behavior-posture-increase-testosterone/

A woman's biological imperative is to acquire the resources to produce offspring, as well as the protection granted by a strong capable mate. As a result of this men produce protection and physical resources.

The exchange which is prevalent in the majority of nature is that males provide resources while females provide physical gratification in the forms of nurture, nourishment, and physical affection.

Of course, nowadays, in the modern world -- in major cities, women no longer need a man to provide these resources. They are married to a career that provides all the resources to produce offspring. Hence why out of wedlock children has gone from 5% back in the 1950s, 6% in the 1960s, to 45+% in the 2000s... No need to have strong family units. So society produces weaker men (especially in cities) to be used as dildos, slaves and entertainment. Most guys enjoy their sperm donor status -- i.e. not all men are complaining. They are usually losers with no real depth. This is spreading worldwide.

The truth is that the only time you truly *love* a girl, completely, is when you practically worship her and don't want to have sex with any other girl. For a man’s love consists of wanting to have and not the renunciation and giving away of a woman's love. Nevertheless, wanting to have always comes to an end with having. It is actually man’s more refined and suspicious lust for **possession** that rarely admits his **having** and then only late, and thus permits his love to persist. It is even possible for his love to increase after the surrender: he will not readily concede that a woman should have nothing more to give him. She becomes the girl whose beauty you are reminded of when you see another girl (that's why I only seriously date bitches 8+ in looks) -- that is when you know you are in love with a girl or true woman... That woman may or may not accept you as a mate but when you feel like that, it doesn't matter what the world thinks, you want to meet her parents and be there for her and your ability to solve problems goes up and up, your own problems included. You can take over the world, if you know enough about the world, and there's nothing that will stop you except her voice and her touch. That's what love does to a guy.

The problem is that you can date a hundred girls and women, and not one will be bring out that type of dedication in your soul BeCaUsE it takes a few months to a year to induce that desire and depth of passion in your neocortex, meaning every time you f**k a girl after a few dates you are jumping the gun and screwing yourself out of a more meaningful relationship that doesn't involve being a sperm donor / dildo to girls who are enjoying their new found dominance and little boys who watch p**n all day, play video games, and are distracted by technology all day long. The same goes for women who are after sex, they just feel the physical relationship and nothing else will form except the chemical nuances of sex and attachment through that.

So, from the neocortex perspective, dating for short term fun from both the male and female perspective is the problem that debases the maturity of both sexes and utterly destroys the problem solving potential of a huge number of humans.

Unless we bring back longer than a year long courtship and child rearing pursuits between the sexes, AKA longer than a few dick rides and a few movies, we are facing the equivalent of a female dominated world where the males are so submissive that they don't mind being sperm donors and retailed/market-brainwashed into being a consumer of technology.

But, the truth is, no human that goes through the public school system is even half as smart as they need to be to be able to engage the mind of the oppose sex and thus you might as well hammer away because you aren't going to be satisfied by their discourse level -- there's the reason they stopped talking about communication as intercourse after all, as debased as you can get today's sex is not intercourse without communication patterns that stimulate the mind -- the brain is the largest sex organ by mass, not to mention sensory perception and feedback, creativity and desire and planning etc.

Why even discuss this issue with dating? Wait around for your robostitute

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/188047-by-2025-sexbots-will-be-commonplace-which-is-just-fine-as-well-all-be-unemployed-and-bored-thanks-to-robots-stealing-our-jobs

The robots win, no war, no bombs, no grand battles or even whimpers of dying humans... just the sound of ejaculation and robot emulating the moans of the opposite sex, as good as any p**n they said but it was better than any other sex a guy or girl could have -- as the human race fell asleep after great sex and the robots took over peacefully.

No skynet, just xxxskynet brain-stimulation domination of the sex organs, as the human race withers away into the trashcans of the 21st century.


Yea but what's the point of trying to get women when the prize is a big pile of shit, c'mon it's common sense, Most men are not going to compete for women who are fuckin obese, loud obnoxious and feminist almost half men. Would you compete for a prize that was completely worthless?
nicho12
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 268
Joined: Mon Aug 19, 2013 5:51 pm
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: A lot of men are frustrated in dating because they lack.

Postby Devil Dog » Sun Aug 17, 2014 12:47 am

nicho12 wrote:
Paloaltoguy wrote:MALE testosterone. The single biggest reason men hold positions of power is that biologically they are driven to be more ambitious and take more risks than women. Many studies have been released in recent years (several conducted by women) showing that testosterone drives risk-taking, domineering, powerful behavior. Guess which gender has exponentially more testosterone? But what happens when men lack testosterone? One of the reasons Northern California is such a social-graveyard is men are actually women i.e. passive, unambitious, lacking physical and mental willpower, and unwilling to aggressively pursue goals or fulfill sexual desires (the typical SF bay area guy sleeps with subpar leftovers).

Here's an awesome and amazing and powerful way to go through life.

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2014/03/14/become-dominant-man/

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2011/12/26/how-to-choke-a-woman/

http://www.dangerandplay.com/2014/07/30/science-shows-dominant-behavior-posture-increase-testosterone/

A woman's biological imperative is to acquire the resources to produce offspring, as well as the protection granted by a strong capable mate. As a result of this men produce protection and physical resources.

The exchange which is prevalent in the majority of nature is that males provide resources while females provide physical gratification in the forms of nurture, nourishment, and physical affection.

Of course, nowadays, in the modern world -- in major cities, women no longer need a man to provide these resources. They are married to a career that provides all the resources to produce offspring. Hence why out of wedlock children has gone from 5% back in the 1950s, 6% in the 1960s, to 45+% in the 2000s... No need to have strong family units. So society produces weaker men (especially in cities) to be used as dildos, slaves and entertainment. Most guys enjoy their sperm donor status -- i.e. not all men are complaining. They are usually losers with no real depth. This is spreading worldwide.

The truth is that the only time you truly *love* a girl, completely, is when you practically worship her and don't want to have sex with any other girl. For a man’s love consists of wanting to have and not the renunciation and giving away of a woman's love. Nevertheless, wanting to have always comes to an end with having. It is actually man’s more refined and suspicious lust for **possession** that rarely admits his **having** and then only late, and thus permits his love to persist. It is even possible for his love to increase after the surrender: he will not readily concede that a woman should have nothing more to give him. She becomes the girl whose beauty you are reminded of when you see another girl (that's why I only seriously date bitches 8+ in looks) -- that is when you know you are in love with a girl or true woman... That woman may or may not accept you as a mate but when you feel like that, it doesn't matter what the world thinks, you want to meet her parents and be there for her and your ability to solve problems goes up and up, your own problems included. You can take over the world, if you know enough about the world, and there's nothing that will stop you except her voice and her touch. That's what love does to a guy.

The problem is that you can date a hundred girls and women, and not one will be bring out that type of dedication in your soul BeCaUsE it takes a few months to a year to induce that desire and depth of passion in your neocortex, meaning every time you f**k a girl after a few dates you are jumping the gun and screwing yourself out of a more meaningful relationship that doesn't involve being a sperm donor / dildo to girls who are enjoying their new found dominance and little boys who watch p**n all day, play video games, and are distracted by technology all day long. The same goes for women who are after sex, they just feel the physical relationship and nothing else will form except the chemical nuances of sex and attachment through that.

So, from the neocortex perspective, dating for short term fun from both the male and female perspective is the problem that debases the maturity of both sexes and utterly destroys the problem solving potential of a huge number of humans.

Unless we bring back longer than a year long courtship and child rearing pursuits between the sexes, AKA longer than a few dick rides and a few movies, we are facing the equivalent of a female dominated world where the males are so submissive that they don't mind being sperm donors and retailed/market-brainwashed into being a consumer of technology.

But, the truth is, no human that goes through the public school system is even half as smart as they need to be to be able to engage the mind of the oppose sex and thus you might as well hammer away because you aren't going to be satisfied by their discourse level -- there's the reason they stopped talking about communication as intercourse after all, as debased as you can get today's sex is not intercourse without communication patterns that stimulate the mind -- the brain is the largest sex organ by mass, not to mention sensory perception and feedback, creativity and desire and planning etc.

Why even discuss this issue with dating? Wait around for your robostitute

http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/188047-by-2025-sexbots-will-be-commonplace-which-is-just-fine-as-well-all-be-unemployed-and-bored-thanks-to-robots-stealing-our-jobs

The robots win, no war, no bombs, no grand battles or even whimpers of dying humans... just the sound of ejaculation and robot emulating the moans of the opposite sex, as good as any p**n they said but it was better than any other sex a guy or girl could have -- as the human race fell asleep after great sex and the robots took over peacefully.

No skynet, just xxxskynet brain-stimulation domination of the sex organs, as the human race withers away into the trashcans of the 21st century.


Yea but what's the point of trying to get women when the prize is a big pile of shit, c'mon it's common sense, Most men are not going to compete for women who are fuckin obese, loud obnoxious and feminist almost half men. Would you compete for a prize that was completely worthless?


The OP posts a detailed and interesting article and your response is a random piece of HA dogma?

You can't succeed with AW, therefore they are all bad and you don't want them. I understand. The problem is that you can't compete for good women in Asia either. You just don't know that yet.
Devil Dog
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 6:55 am

Postby Paloaltoguy » Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:32 am

Yea but what's the point of trying to get women when the prize is a big pile of shit, c'mon it's common sense, Most men are not going to compete for women who are fuckin obese, loud obnoxious and feminist almost half men. Would you compete for a prize that was completely worthless?


Lol, whoa, where do you live?
Paloaltoguy
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 5:47 am

Postby Kublai Khan » Mon Aug 18, 2014 8:09 am

I think it is almost impossible to be everything in thtat article as a man, these are the high expectations western women have of men today. This explains their lack of succes.
Kublai Khan
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 7:46 am


Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests