Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Cute Girl (Thread became off-topic)

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Postby MarcosZeitola » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:20 pm

publicduende wrote:
Tsar wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2724534/Courtney-Stodden-19-reunited-husband-Doug-Hutchison-54-plan-renew-wedding-vows-end-year.html

http://www.christianpost.com/news/coupl ... deo-82763/


This guy married a 17-years old. If you're obsessed with virginity in these modern times, you will have to go as low as 13/14, which automatically puts you solidly in paedo territory. Are you actually aware of the social consequences of your choices (or rather, lack thereof)?


They already divorced. Didn't last longer then two years...
User avatar
MarcosZeitola
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1977
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 7:13 pm
Location: Phillipines







Postby Tsar » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:23 pm

publicduende wrote:
Tsar wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2724534/Courtney-Stodden-19-reunited-husband-Doug-Hutchison-54-plan-renew-wedding-vows-end-year.html

http://www.christianpost.com/news/coupl ... deo-82763/


This guy married a 17-years old. If you're obsessed with virginity in these modern times, you will have to go as low as 13/14, which automatically puts you solidly in paedo territory. Are you actually aware of the social consequences of your choices (or rather, lack thereof)?


Doug Hutchinson married a 16 year old girl, not a 17 year old girl.

Marriage is legal with parental consent of the girl or the girl's consent in most countries. Girls finish puberty at 15 or 16. If the girl is developed, completed puberty, and is biologically mature, she's an adult according to nature. I say let modern social norms be damned.

With parental consent or permission of the courts, a girl could get married at 15 or 16.

There are no social consequences for keeping things clean and platonic until marriage.
Tsar
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:40 pm

Postby Cornfed » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:45 pm

publicduende wrote:This guy married a 17-years old. If you're obsessed with virginity in these modern times, you will have to go as low as 13/14, which automatically puts you solidly in paedo territory. Are you actually aware of the social consequences of your choices (or rather, lack thereof)?

Obviously you wouldn't want to marry females from a slutified part of the world. Arguably there is no reason to regard leftover sluts as "married" under any circumstances.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4633
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Re: Cute Belarusian girl

Postby S_Parc » Sun Aug 31, 2014 9:56 pm

droid wrote:
S_Parc wrote:You do realize that in the future, there will be AI/expert systems which could generate these responses, now that the cause/effect pattern is delineated. Don't be the effect of automation, find something new to discuss.
It's already in place place, that that's what Winston has worked on so long to generate hits hits. We're all individual chat-bots in the same server.
You are the only actual human here, allowed by Winston just to introduce some random disturbances in the pattern sequence.


Ten years from now, what you're saying won't be a joke anymore :?
16 years ago, the Best Picture of 1999, "American Beauty", telegraphed the message of Happier Abroad to the world.

Beware of long term engagements with AWs, you may find yourself in a coffin.

AB discussion thread

BTW, despite settling down with an AW, myself, the warning is still in effect.
S_Parc
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:01 pm

Postby gsjackson » Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:18 pm

MarcosZeitola wrote:
publicduende wrote:
Tsar wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2724534/Courtney-Stodden-19-reunited-husband-Doug-Hutchison-54-plan-renew-wedding-vows-end-year.html

http://www.christianpost.com/news/coupl ... deo-82763/


This guy married a 17-years old. If you're obsessed with virginity in these modern times, you will have to go as low as 13/14, which automatically puts you solidly in paedo territory. Are you actually aware of the social consequences of your choices (or rather, lack thereof)?


They already divorced. Didn't last longer then two years...


Reluctant though I am to acknowledge being aware of such "news," they just got back together again a couple of weeks ago, she noting that now that she has seen what's available to her, she realizes he is indeed the one. According to Mom.
gsjackson
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1469
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 2:08 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA USA

Postby Cornfed » Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:19 pm

gsjackson wrote:
MarcosZeitola wrote:
publicduende wrote:
Tsar wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2724534/Courtney-Stodden-19-reunited-husband-Doug-Hutchison-54-plan-renew-wedding-vows-end-year.html

http://www.christianpost.com/news/coupl ... deo-82763/


This guy married a 17-years old. If you're obsessed with virginity in these modern times, you will have to go as low as 13/14, which automatically puts you solidly in paedo territory. Are you actually aware of the social consequences of your choices (or rather, lack thereof)?


They already divorced. Didn't last longer then two years...


Reluctant though I am to acknowledge being aware of such "news," they just got back together again a couple of weeks ago, she noting that now that she has seen what's available to her, she realizes he is indeed the one. According to Mom.

This will likely be increasingly common as it becomes apparent that the feminist alternative of being used as a dumpster by the scum of the earth before becoming a corporate whore and marrying some schlub like publicduende for the money isn't so great.
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 4633
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 4:22 am

Postby Tsar » Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:57 am

One of the reasons why she is getting back with him is because the news articles said that she was waiting until marriage and that he was also her first boyfriend. She was also a teenager and more capable of bonding. The feminism and toxic culture was what for a time made her want to see what was available and try out new men, but that's just because of the exposure and because she's a Western girl. Most Western girls are like that. She's getting back with him, because she viewed him as special and she has a deeper relationship formed with him during some of the years when they (girls, mainly virgin girls and innocent girls, but most girls even if they weren't) can form deeper bonds and be more impressionable.

That is why in traditional times of human history, teenage girls were married to adult men (usually 20s-30s) that earned the right to marry such a good young virgin girl. A brute, a convict, or a criminal wouldn't have the right to a good girl.

The thing is that if it was a woman that was in her thirties and cynical, slut, middle-aged woman in her thirties that had 10 previous partners before marrying some white knight mangina, then divorces him, that sort of couple wouldn't ever be getting back together.
Tsar
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:40 pm

Postby sea_dragon » Thu Sep 04, 2014 9:59 pm

Virgins again are the only acceptable bride material. The more different kinds of men a woman sleeps with, she takes in pieces of their genetic material. Thus she is more likely to be disloyal if she is a slut, a whore and a non-virgin.
The relationship between unprotected sex, brain damage, and the thousand cock stare
An unusual amount of brain area deals with the control of facial features. We have evolved to be genetically programmed to make a good deal of use of our faces, as well as pick an immense amount of unconscious information from other people's faces. Because the brain controls the face, if you damage enough brain, you will alter the control of the face. Since such a large area of the brain is dedicated to the face, almost any damage to any area in the brain is likely to alter face control.

Indeed, when a patient is seriously ill with some brain damaging disease, their facial expressions will often become bizarre, cold, or grimaced. Uncontrolled schizophrenia will melt the brain to the extent that schizophrenics are left with a cold, blank lifeless face; patients with advanced AIDS, where the HIV virus has started nuking the brain, develop a peculiar tortured grimace. These are just two of the obvious examples, but many minor causes of brain damage or brain dysfunction can cause alteration of facial control.

I would like to discuss one possible cause of brain damage that is unique to women - the phenomenon of microchimerism. This is the ability of the female body to absorb other people's genetic material and to incorporate the material into her own body. Recent studies have found that microchimerism can even manifest in the brain.

What does this mean? It means that if a female is pregnant with a child, or receives a blood/organ transfusion, or receives some other genetic payload (such as a man's semen), then her body may end up absorbing some of that DNA, splice it into her own genetic code, and she will end up carrying it with her, for as long as the cell that absorbed the genes will live and breed.

There is also evidence that microchimeric DNA can even splice itself into the DNA of brain cells, although how the gene material manages to migrate across the blood brain barrier remains, for now, a mystery.

Now, the consequences of microchimerism are still not understood, so from this point on I'm giving my speculation. My speculative hypothesis is this: that microchimerism causes inflammation which causes damage to the tissue surrounding it.

Why should this be? Well, the human immune system will naturally try to destroy any cell that carries DNA that doesn't match the host's code. This makes sense because unmatched DNA is usually from bacteria or viruses or parasites; or the human cell has gone cancerous or is itself infected with a virus/parasite. In other words, foreign DNA usually means the presence of foreign invader, and the immune system will attempt to destroy any cell that harbors foreign DNA to protect the body.

So presumably, when these microchimeric DNA strands insert themselves into brain cells, the immune system cells of the brain will become alarmed and try to nuke them. In essence, some brain damage occurs due to the presence of microchimeras.

Now consider this: the wider the variety of foreign DNA, obviously the greater the amount of possible targets that will activate the immune system, which will lead to a greater amount of immune inflammatory activity to kill the affected cells. A few rogue strands of DNA might go unnoticed, but if you pile a lot of junk DNA into the brain, the immune system will react.

Since women who undergo unprotected sex expose themselves to this danger of microchimerism, a woman's best bet is to have unprotected sex with as few partners as possible. The less variety of DNA she absorbs, the less likely the immune system will go into alarm mode. On the other hand, if she absorbs a lot of DNA from a wide variety of lovers, she is more likely to trigger off the immune system, simply because there are more potential triggers for the immune system to detect (i.e. the larger and more varied the sample size, the greater the statistical chance of the immune system picking up something abnormal and then trying to destroy that abnormal thing).

So in other words: less unprotected sex = less brain damage. More unprotected sex = more brain damage.

Now, since a large part of the brain controls the face, the microchimeric DNA has a pretty good chance of landing in a face control area when it splices its way into the brain. Meaning that facial control is altered, meaning that facial tone and expression is altered.

I am struck at how fresh-faced teenagers may after a few years develop what's called the thousand cock stare, while wholesome religious females who only ever love and marry one man seem to retain a girlish charm to their faces for several decades. I now suspect that the thousand cock stare is in face due to brain damage, because of exposure to massive amounts of a wide variety of DNA from semen forcing it's way into the brain and triggering off inflammatory brain damage, leading to an altered facial tone.
Like father like son? Nongenetic paternal effects reinvigorate the possibility of telegony

" As a first step towards disentangling whether the effect is borne by the sperm itself or by accessory-gland products (ACPs) in the seminal fluid, we mated females initially to a male in high or low condition and then remated the female to a new male in high or low condition two weeks later. Interestingly, offspring size and viability were determined by the condition of the first male, with no effect of the condition of the second mate. Genetic tests confirm this result holds even when the second male is the biological father of the offspring. These findings suggest the paternal effect is mediated by ACPs, and provide a compelling case for reassessing the possibility of telegony as a valid phenomenon."
Crean AJ, Kopps AM, Bonduriansky R , University of New South Wales

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad ... ne.0045592
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20844010
sea_dragon
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 201
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 5:17 am

Postby Tsar » Fri Sep 05, 2014 12:17 am

Those were interesting articles and good to know.
Tsar
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1807
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:40 pm

Previous

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests