Why do Western women seem to hate unwanted / incel men?

[Mr.Darcy]

Because american women don't give a **** about men they are not attracted to or can't use. Shockingly, unwanted men are becoming more aware of womens behavior, so they are becoming less slave like to the p***y.

[S_Parc]

Because american women don't give a **** about men they are not attracted to or can't use. Shockingly, unwanted men are becoming more aware of womens behavior, so they are becoming less slave like to the p***y.

Along with intrinsic jealousy, here's another thing ... at some point in time, even the "unwanted" will have a job and make something out of his life. And thus, the loser AWs will always want floaters around 'em, to fuel their Oxycontin, Booze, and Shopping habits. So what happens is that when they hit 30 and realize that years of bad eating, drinking, and lack of exercise are catching up with them, that they need any guy with a job, to finance their pathetic existence on this earth.

If every guy north of 30 marries abroad, then AW wannabe MILFs or Cougars are dead in the water. Realize, these b*tches will not work hard to pull themselves up by the bootstrap. My sister used to talk about how amazing she was in business and all that jazz. Since the moment she got married, she hadn't worked a day, nor did she start some great business. It was her hubby's duty to fuel her lifestyle and being the loser that he was, that's what happened.

[america sucks]

American women have a victim mentality and are angry and bitter about their lives. They are ungrateful and miserable. So of course they are negative and hate unwanted/incel men

[Anatol]

American women have a victim mentality and are angry and bitter about their lives. They are ungrateful and miserable. So of course they are negative and hate unwanted/incel men

Hello,

You are correct! However..............the stupid American men have done this. They are the ones responsible ~ they promoted feminism in every way, just as the rest of the world's men are stupid and promote it the previous 15 years.

[S_Parc]

You are correct! However..............the stupid American men have done this. They are the ones responsible ~ they promoted feminism in every way, just as the rest of the world's men are stupid and promote it the previous 15 years.

What American men have failed to acknowledge is this simple point ... in the past 1/2 century, no one had stopped women from attending engineering schools throughout the nation.

But here's the catch, engineering means studying a lot and putting in a ton of effort on homework and lab assignments. Thus, on the average, many AWs have not stepped up to the plate and studied engineering. Mel is an exception to this rule and thus, instead of drinking her college years away, she'd buckled down and did the work. In the end, she'd graduated Magna Cum Laude in Mechanical Engineering, no help from a bunch of lazy Femi-Nazis, who were into Women's Studies or was it recreational herbs like pot or opiates

What feminism wants, however, is a dumbed down engineering curricula of less assignments and less work, instead of telling women to get off their *sses and start doing the work required. What this does is encourage a lazy society of entitled b*tches instead of encouraging women to realize that if they want something, they need to actually work for it. If AWs are lazy then simply admit it. Don't make it look like that a cadre of men have conspired to prevent women from entering technical fields in science and engineering because of their gender.

[Gadfly]

Don't make it look like that a cadre of men have conspired to prevent women from entering technical fields in science and engineering because of their gender.

Actually, if such a cadre had conspired to prevent women from entering these technical fields because of their gender, society would have been much better off. American men failed because they offered their lax attitude towards women as some kind of virtue or character strength, when in fact it indicated the opposite.

[S_Parc]

Don't make it look like that a cadre of men have conspired to prevent women from entering technical fields in science and engineering because of their gender.

Actually, if such a cadre had conspired to prevent women from entering these technical fields because of their gender, society would have been much better off. American men failed because they offered their lax attitude towards women as some kind of virtue or character strength, when in fact it indicated the opposite.

There are women in eastern Europe and Asian countries, who'd been studying the technical fields for generations, w/o becoming like lazy American skanks.

The problem is that American guys assumed that they were the guilty parties, when it was really the women.

[Anatol]

You are correct! However..............the stupid American men have done this. They are the ones responsible ~ they promoted feminism in every way, just as the rest of the world's men are stupid and promote it the previous 15 years.

What American men have failed to acknowledge is this simple point ... in the past 1/2 century, no one had stopped women from attending engineering schools throughout the nation.

But here's the catch, engineering means studying a lot and putting in a ton of effort on homework and lab assignments. Thus, on the average, many AWs have not stepped up to the plate and studied engineering. Mel is an exception to this rule and thus, instead of drinking her college years away, she'd buckled down and did the work. In the end, she'd graduated Magna Cum Laude in Mechanical Engineering, no help from a bunch of lazy Femi-Nazis, who were into Women's Studies or was it recreational herbs like pot or opiates

What feminism wants, however, is a dumbed down engineering curricula of less assignments and less work, instead of telling women to get off their *sses and start doing the work required. What this does is encourage a lazy society of entitled b*tches instead of encouraging women to realize that if they want something, they need to actually work for it. If AWs are lazy then simply admit it. Don't make it look like that a cadre of men have conspired to prevent women from entering technical fields in science and engineering because of their gender.

Hello,

As you know I'm a PURE patriarchal male. Hence, I don't agree! Even if the standards are the same, females don't belong in any schooling or technical fields. Females can be trained to do the work and be 60% as good. It's not that they are 60% as good that is the issue ~ the issue is THEY HAVE NO BUSINESS TRYING TO BE MEN. It doesn't matter how capable they are. Females shouldn't be in any sort of studies whether they are 100% capable or 10% capable. This is the root problem.

[Gadfly]

Don't make it look like that a cadre of men have conspired to prevent women from entering technical fields in science and engineering because of their gender.

Actually, if such a cadre had conspired to prevent women from entering these technical fields because of their gender, society would have been much better off. American men failed because they offered their lax attitude towards women as some kind of virtue or character strength, when in fact it indicated the opposite.

There are women in eastern Europe and Asian countries, who'd been studying the technical fields for generations, w/o becoming like lazy American skanks.

The problem is that American guys assumed that they were the guilty parties, when it was really the women.

I don't think what's happening in E. Europe and Asia is right either, regardless of the work ethic of their women. The women there are becoming more difficult too.

American men (and men from elsewhere) are indeed guilty for not only not stopping but encouraging their women to enter fields they had no business entering in the 1st place. If men are going to be permissive like that towards the women, then they get what they deserve.

[Anatol]

Don't make it look like that a cadre of men have conspired to prevent women from entering technical fields in science and engineering because of their gender.

Actually, if such a cadre had conspired to prevent women from entering these technical fields because of their gender, society would have been much better off. American men failed because they offered their lax attitude towards women as some kind of virtue or character strength, when in fact it indicated the opposite.

There are women in eastern Europe and Asian countries, who'd been studying the technical fields for generations, w/o becoming like lazy American skanks.

The problem is that American guys assumed that they were the guilty parties, when it was really the women.

I don't think what's happening in E. Europe and Asia is right either, regardless of the work ethic of their women. The women there are becoming more difficult too.

American men (and men from elsewhere) are indeed guilty for not only not stopping but encouraging their women to enter fields they had no business entering in the 1st place. If men are going to be permissive like that towards the women, then they get what they deserve.

Hello,

THIS IS EXACTLY RIGHT! I'm very glad to see you.........if you believe what you stated then you are another pure patriarchal, unashamed to be a man, NORMAL male like myself!!!!