Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


LOL the comments on this video are exactly my thoughts!

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

LOL the comments on this video are exactly my thoughts!

Postby BlackKnight » Thu Sep 17, 2015 2:14 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by BlackKnight on Thu Oct 29, 2015 12:15 am, edited 4 times in total.
BlackKnight
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:04 am







Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby MarcosZeitola » Thu Sep 17, 2015 2:24 pm

BlackKnight wrote:I think most males who have a hard time with women are just ugly or retarded. But it's funny to sit back and admire the psychological gymnastics going on with all their "theories". :lol:


While you are clearly oversimplifying things with this statement, it is true that many men who do bad with women are not anywhere near as good looking, intelligent and desirable as they think they are. There are armies of men who look average or below average, have lousy social skills and are very shy and reserved, but nevertheless expect women to throw themselves at them and are shocked to find this is not the case.

Similarly, you have a lot of men who have been brainwashed by today's "Women can do everything men can do" bullshit, and now believe women could (and should!) be the ones making the first move. This does not happen because, once again, they aren't as appealing as they think they are. These men come up with a million of theories on how society is corrupt and women are evil, conveniently ignoring their own part in their misfortune: their own inactivity, and unwillingness to change.

Successful men need not bother themselves with complicated theories on the state of womanhood, they don't need lifestyle gurus or dating coaches. They're just going through the motions, and allowing nature to take it's course. And sometimes, when nature takes it's course, certain men find themselves left out. Men who are too lazy, or too prideful, to look at alternatives.

For these fools, no mercy.
User avatar
MarcosZeitola
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1977
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 7:13 pm
Location: Phillipines

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are my exact thoughts.

Postby Yohan » Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:37 pm

RooshV is the typical PUA.

Switching over like an actor when facing stupid women, showing up with a different personality than he is in real life and tries to convince them to find him 'interesting'. Not my life-style.

While I do not like him at all, at least he is disturbing feminists a lot. That's nice...
User avatar
Yohan
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 am
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby Yohan » Thu Sep 17, 2015 5:42 pm

BlackKnight wrote:I think most males who have a hard time with women are just ugly or retarded. But it's funny to sit back and admire the psychological gymnastics going on with all their "theories".


It's not only about men. The point is that many women are also often ugly and/or retarded... not only men. To say this however is not politically correct and misogynistic. The best is maybe not to have contact with both of them.
User avatar
Yohan
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:05 am
Location: Tokyo, JAPAN

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby BlackKnight » Thu Sep 17, 2015 7:02 pm

MarcosZeitola wrote:
BlackKnight wrote:I think most males who have a hard time with women are just ugly or retarded. But it's funny to sit back and admire the psychological gymnastics going on with all their "theories". :lol:


While you are clearly oversimplifying things with this statement, it is true that many men who do bad with women are not anywhere near as good looking, intelligent and desirable as they think they are. There are armies of men who look average or below average, have lousy social skills and are very shy and reserved, but nevertheless expect women to throw themselves at them and are shocked to find this is not the case.

Similarly, you have a lot of men who have been brainwashed by today's "Women can do everything men can do" bullshit, and now believe women could (and should!) be the ones making the first move. This does not happen because, once again, they aren't as appealing as they think they are. These men come up with a million of theories on how society is corrupt and women are evil, conveniently ignoring their own part in their misfortune: their own inactivity, and unwillingness to change.

Successful men need not bother themselves with complicated theories on the state of womanhood, they don't need lifestyle gurus or dating coaches. They're just going through the motions, and allowing nature to take it's course. And sometimes, when nature takes it's course, certain men find themselves left out. Men who are too lazy, or too prideful, to look at alternatives.

For these fools, no mercy.



A++

Well said :D
BlackKnight
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:04 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are my exact thoughts.

Postby BlackKnight » Thu Sep 17, 2015 7:08 pm

Yohan wrote:RooshV is the typical PUA.

Switching over like an actor when facing stupid women, showing up with a different personality than he is in real life and tries to convince them to find him 'interesting'. Not my life-style.

While I do not like him at all, at least he is disturbing feminists a lot. That's nice...



Not really.

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/roosh-v-is-a-saddo-not-a-threat/17338

The men reading Roosh’s books are more likely to be lonely, desperate, web-based singletons. These men pose no threat to women. At worst, they might repulse them when they deploy Roosh’s creepy tactics.


Lol
BlackKnight
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:04 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby Ghost » Fri Sep 18, 2015 2:27 am

Yohan wrote:
BlackKnight wrote:I think most males who have a hard time with women are just ugly or retarded. But it's funny to sit back and admire the psychological gymnastics going on with all their "theories".


It's not only about men. The point is that many women are also often ugly and/or retarded... not only men. To say this however is not politically correct and misogynistic. The best is maybe not to have contact with both of them.


Very true. Most WW are ugly and retarded, but this doesn't hurt them in the dating game. It's disturbingly common to see male model types dating landwhales. It's a sick attempt at reversing human nature and ultimately it will fail. In the meantime, the social engineering continues apace.

And another politically incorrect thing to say is that for a man, his looks should not matter when it comes to finding a mate. This has been the case in sane societies throughout history. There is a different standard for men and women. Women have their looks to offer, and this is about where it stops realistically. (Intelligent is good too, but women ideally should not be allowed to "work," especially male jobs. Who wants stupid kids?) Men offer their resources, intelligence, strength and other male qualities. If his genetics just happened to give him a less attractive face than some prettyboy like Marcos, then tough shit for the woman. She doesn't get to choose because she'll choose the prettyboy or thug every time and end up littering society with thugspawn.

MarcosPrettyboy finds it easy to put down ugly men because he has a pretty face. I wonder how much his tune would change if, say, he suffered disfigurement? And his 'superior genes' didn't even make it in his own country. Even BlackFag is traipsing around Europe photoing hookers and bitching about how bad it is in California. :lol:
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:23 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are my exact thoughts.

Postby BlackKnight » Fri Sep 18, 2015 7:05 pm

[quote]It's disturbingly common to see male model types dating landwhales.[quote]

Lol, bullshit. If some male model is dating landwhales there must be something wrong with him. Either he is retarded, boring, etc, etc.

IT IS THAT SIMPLE.
BlackKnight
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:04 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby MarcosZeitola » Fri Sep 18, 2015 7:23 pm

Ghost wrote:MarcosPrettyboy finds it easy to put down ugly men because he has a pretty face. I wonder how much his tune would change if, say, he suffered disfigurement? And his 'superior genes' didn't even make it in his own country. Even BlackFag is traipsing around Europe photoing hookers and bitching about how bad it is in California. :lol:


Wow, someone's on his period today huh? :lol:

My 'superior genes' are doing alright; a woman I knew wanted to become a mother, sans husband or relationship. She seemed a bit damaged, probably asexual. She asked me to be the biological father of her children, and I fathered two sons by her through insemination. Therefore my genes live on in my country of birth as well as in my chosen country of residence where I have a wife and daughter.

For someone in his early twenties, I don't think it's a bad score so far, do you?

And, for the record, I don't recall claiming my genes as superior in any of my posts. I do believe, from what I've been told, that I am fairly attractive physically. And I won't deny it helps. But to dismiss all of my observations and opinions just because of my perceived "pretty boy" status, is a bit of a low blow. I am not making any assumptions on your looks either, Ghost, and using them to invalidate your opinion. This is the sort of behavior I would expect from a jealous high school girl hating on her prettier and more popular friend, not from a grown ass redpiller in his twenties. :roll:
User avatar
MarcosZeitola
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1977
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 7:13 pm
Location: Phillipines

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby Ghost » Sat Sep 19, 2015 3:32 am

MarcosZeitola wrote:My 'superior genes' are doing alright; a woman I knew wanted to become a mother, sans husband or relationship. She seemed a bit damaged, probably asexual. She asked me to be the biological father of her children, and I fathered two sons by her through insemination. Therefore my genes live on in my country of birth as well as in my chosen country of residence where I have a wife and daughter.


I'm sorry to hear that.

And, for the record, I don't recall claiming my genes as superior in any of my posts. I do believe, from what I've been told, that I am fairly attractive physically. And I won't deny it helps. But to dismiss all of my observations and opinions just because of my perceived "pretty boy" status, is a bit of a low blow. I am not making any assumptions on your looks either, Ghost, and using them to invalidate your opinion. This is the sort of behavior I would expect from a jealous high school girl hating on her prettier and more popular friend, not from a grown a** redpiller in his twenties. :roll:


You don't need to make any assumptions about my looks. I've stated many times in the forum that I am not attractive. You are so quick to dismiss unattractive men because of their looks, as if that should have anything to do with whether or not they get a mate. It shouldn't, which is my point. Women are the ones offering youth and fertility; indeed this is the crux of what they have to offer, whereas that is not nearly as crucial for a man - and he has many other things to offer as well. If we lived in a sane world, every man would be allowed a mate (assuming he is not some thug.) The very fact that women are allowed to choose mates based on looks (such as in the U.S. where looks supersede everything else) shows how sick society is. It means most men get left out and destroyed, and violence becomes inevitable as society implodes.

You're blind to your advantage. I don't think you're despicable for having the advantage, but for dissing those who don't get to have it as well. Can't control having an ugly face or being genetically programmed to lose your hair, nor can freak accidents be controlled. Just like virtually all prettyboys, you don't realize that the reason you have had it so easy is just because of your looks. Without that you would've actually had to work at it. But it all falls effortlessly into your lap, costing you no extra effort, and then you smugly sit back and gloat on it.

You're as shallow as a puddle.
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:23 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby gnosis » Sat Sep 19, 2015 9:09 am

Ghost wrote:You're blind to your advantage. I don't think you're despicable for having the advantage, but for dissing those who don't get to have it as well. Can't control having an ugly face or being genetically programmed to lose your hair, nor can freak accidents be controlled. Just like virtually all prettyboys, you don't realize that the reason you have had it so easy is just because of your looks. Without that you would've actually had to work at it. But it all falls effortlessly into your lap, costing you no extra effort, and then you smugly sit back and gloat on it.

You're as shallow as a puddle.


That's a bit harsh. Obviously, even if you're a man, having a pretty face helps, but the main thing is money. If you are a rich man, it doesn't really matter what you look like. (Of course, it's almost impossible to become a rich man.)
User avatar
gnosis
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 437
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2015 2:52 pm

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby BlackKnight » Sat Sep 19, 2015 11:34 am

Ghost wrote:
MarcosZeitola wrote:My 'superior genes' are doing alright; a woman I knew wanted to become a mother, sans husband or relationship. She seemed a bit damaged, probably asexual. She asked me to be the biological father of her children, and I fathered two sons by her through insemination. Therefore my genes live on in my country of birth as well as in my chosen country of residence where I have a wife and daughter.


I'm sorry to hear that.

And, for the record, I don't recall claiming my genes as superior in any of my posts. I do believe, from what I've been told, that I am fairly attractive physically. And I won't deny it helps. But to dismiss all of my observations and opinions just because of my perceived "pretty boy" status, is a bit of a low blow. I am not making any assumptions on your looks either, Ghost, and using them to invalidate your opinion. This is the sort of behavior I would expect from a jealous high school girl hating on her prettier and more popular friend, not from a grown a** redpiller in his twenties. :roll:


You don't need to make any assumptions about my looks. I've stated many times in the forum that I am not attractive. You are so quick to dismiss unattractive men because of their looks, as if that should have anything to do with whether or not they get a mate. It shouldn't, which is my point. Women are the ones offering youth and fertility; indeed this is the crux of what they have to offer, whereas that is not nearly as crucial for a man - and he has many other things to offer as well. If we lived in a sane world, every man would be allowed a mate (assuming he is not some thug.) The very fact that women are allowed to choose mates based on looks (such as in the U.S. where looks supersede everything else) shows how sick society is. It means most men get left out and destroyed, and violence becomes inevitable as society implodes.

You're blind to your advantage. I don't think you're despicable for having the advantage, but for dissing those who don't get to have it as well. Can't control having an ugly face or being genetically programmed to lose your hair, nor can freak accidents be controlled. Just like virtually all prettyboys, you don't realize that the reason you have had it so easy is just because of your looks. Without that you would've actually had to work at it. But it all falls effortlessly into your lap, costing you no extra effort, and then you smugly sit back and gloat on it.

You're as shallow as a puddle.


Stop using unattractive interchangeable with ugly. There is a difference. An ugly person is offensive to the senses.

Ugly
Image

Unattractive
Image

Outright ugly people are rare and HAVE to fight to stay alive. It's been like that since the beginning. If a woman mates with an ugly guy her kids will likely be undesirable. So an ugly guy has to compensate. So get off your ass and get with it!

Image
BlackKnight
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:04 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are exactly thoughts..

Postby BlackKnight » Sat Sep 19, 2015 12:16 pm

gnosis wrote:
Ghost wrote:You're blind to your advantage. I don't think you're despicable for having the advantage, but for dissing those who don't get to have it as well. Can't control having an ugly face or being genetically programmed to lose your hair, nor can freak accidents be controlled. Just like virtually all prettyboys, you don't realize that the reason you have had it so easy is just because of your looks. Without that you would've actually had to work at it. But it all falls effortlessly into your lap, costing you no extra effort, and then you smugly sit back and gloat on it.

You're as shallow as a puddle.


That's a bit harsh. Obviously, even if you're a man, having a pretty face helps, but the main thing is money. If you are a rich man, it doesn't really matter what you look like. (Of course, it's almost impossible to become a rich man.)


How men get women (one more time)

The real natural environment of hominids was less the savanna than the social group. If you were a hominid male, and people paid attention to you, carved your approval, shut up and listened when you spoke, that meant you were a leader. Men who commanded attention commanded access to community support. That meant a good nest-maker. Humans compete less for territory than for rank. Territory and possessions are only symbols of rank. He who controls the attention is high status and sexually attractive. That's why rap stars get more p***y than CEOs. And why thugs get more p***y than internet nerds. The bullet points on your resume don't elicit the same visceral Pleistocene reaction as fame (that's why it helps to be a braggart). I don't care whether you are a primate or a pipefish, all social systems among animal are hierarchical. Our ancestral tribal societies were economically unequal. A whole lot of hominids were competing for a small number of high-status positions in the tribe. This means only a few ended up on top, a few on the bottom (like you with your gay philosophy), and the rest somewhere in the middle. The human race is a race. The real Pleistocene currency by which a hunter was ranked was not cash but attention.
BlackKnight
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:04 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are my exact thoughts.

Postby Ghost » Sat Sep 19, 2015 1:46 pm

Outright ugly people are rare and HAVE to fight to stay alive. It's been like that since the beginning. If a woman mates with an ugly guy her kids will likely be undesirable. So an ugly guy has to compensate. So get off your a** and get with it!


It is only such a big issue in decadent societies that are declining. Such societies deserve to perish for their vapidity. Outside of the feminist West I do just fine and get treated like a human being. Many girls tell me I am handsome. Being chubby or fat is more often seen as cute. Things like thinning hair are probably neutral at best, though I try to conceal that a bit. And then my positive attributes here become very positive, such as height, white skin, and blue eyes. Making good money compared to the locals and having had some adventures I can talk about helps too.

At least abroad you get to weigh your positives against your negatives. In the West, you either are 'perfect' in every regard or you get rejected outright.
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:23 am

Re: Lol, the commentary on this video are my exact thoughts.

Postby BlackKnight » Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:53 am

Ghost wrote:
Outright ugly people are rare and HAVE to fight to stay alive. It's been like that since the beginning. If a woman mates with an ugly guy her kids will likely be undesirable. So an ugly guy has to compensate. So get off your a** and get with it!


It is only such a big issue in decadent societies that are declining. Such societies deserve to perish for their vapidity. Outside of the feminist West I do just fine and get treated like a human being. Many girls tell me I am handsome. Being chubby or fat is more often seen as cute. Things like thinning hair are probably neutral at best, though I try to conceal that a bit. And then my positive attributes here become very positive, such as height, white skin, and blue eyes. Making good money compared to the locals and having had some adventures I can talk about helps too.

At least abroad you get to weigh your positives against your negatives. In the West, you either are 'perfect' in every regard or you get rejected outright.


Lol, nonsense. It's the same all over the world. Being a tall, blue eyed white boy amought yellowish brown poor people gets you attention... especially if you speak the local language. You're seen as a possible star. Again: He who controls the attention is high status and sexually attractive. All social systems among animals are hierarchical. Being chubby or hairless is often seen as cute if you're a STAR.

Image

Sorry, but your life work based on the teachings of Winston "UFO" Wu. It's time for a complete rewrite that uses SCIENCE as a basis.
BlackKnight
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2015 12:04 am


Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests