Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.



View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


No game = no woman?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: fschmidt, jamesbond

No game = no woman?

Postby drronnie » February 23rd, 2016, 3:32 am

Why do I keep on hearing these comments that if you cannot get women's attention in the cold West you would alos get no attention anywhere else? I have seen people who have had no female companionship in Europe end up having a significant other in Asia.
drronnie
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 317
Joined: September 30th, 2014, 2:50 am




Check out our Dating Sites and HA International Romance Tours!



Re: No game = no woman?

Postby Ghost » February 24th, 2016, 6:20 pm

-----
Last edited by Ghost on October 22nd, 2016, 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: April 17th, 2011, 2:23 am

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby travelsouth » February 27th, 2016, 3:08 am

In Latin America you need some sort of game. And all I mean by that is that you need to be interesting and you need to be able to listen. What's great about Latin America is women are generally less skeptical and jaded. But if you are socially awkward heading south wont solve that.
travelsouth
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 403
Joined: October 8th, 2013, 6:20 pm

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby drealm » February 27th, 2016, 5:12 am

travelsouth wrote:In Latin America you need some sort of game. And all I mean by that is that you need to be interesting and you need to be able to listen. What's great about Latin America is women are generally less skeptical and jaded. But if you are socially awkward heading south wont solve that.


I agree that Latin America is a game culture. It derives from southern Europe, which has been a PUA society for centuries. But part of game is looks. There's no perfect line a person can say if they're ugly or dress horribly to win over some kunt. I think if someone is handsome and dresses well then they'll do well in latin America, but ugly people should go in expecting to lose.
User avatar
drealm
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 936
Joined: November 10th, 2010, 6:23 pm

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby Adama » February 27th, 2016, 7:17 am

drronnie wrote:Why do I keep on hearing these comments that if you cannot get women's attention in the cold West you would alos get no attention anywhere else? I have seen people who have had no female companionship in Europe end up having a significant other in Asia.



Why are you asking the question? Why? For what reason? If you have SEEN this with your own eyes, then why do you need to wonder about the question? You already have your answer. Why are you asking when you already have the answer?
Look for women who automatically want to please you because it pleases them. Any woman who seeks to please her man is a treasure. Even better if you don't have to ask but rather suggest.
User avatar
Adama
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5322
Joined: August 23rd, 2009, 10:37 pm

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby Slick » February 28th, 2016, 4:23 am

I have game and know how to pick up on women in the U.S. The thing is that most women in the U.S. either ignore you or seem pretty robotic by only saying "Yeah", "Cool", "Okay". What kind of intelligent conversation is that when I'm only getting those replies?
User avatar
Slick
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 146
Joined: February 24th, 2016, 6:50 am

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby travelsouth » February 28th, 2016, 5:33 am

drealm wrote:
travelsouth wrote:In Latin America you need some sort of game. And all I mean by that is that you need to be interesting and you need to be able to listen. What's great about Latin America is women are generally less skeptical and jaded. But if you are socially awkward heading south wont solve that.


I agree that Latin America is a game culture. It derives from southern Europe, which has been a PUA society for centuries. But part of game is looks. There's no perfect line a person can say if they're ugly or dress horribly to win over some kunt. I think if someone is handsome and dresses well then they'll do well in latin America, but ugly people should go in expecting to lose.


Yes Latin America isn't a problem solver for people that dress poorly, are fugly, and have no social skills. Latin America is good for people that are maybe below average, average, or above average in looks. For people that are truly scary to look at they are better off not trying to bring someone back. Let their dollar work for them overseas. But I'd rather focus on talking about decent guys, because the fugly socially awkward types are more or less screwed the world over AND I DON"T THINK WE SHOULD BLAME OUR MOTHERS,AUNTS, SISTERS,COUSINS, etc for passing on that.

Latin America is a problem solver for the average or better gringo. Much of America is full of Americanized latin women. Basically they are latina in name and looks only (plus some extra pounds too). If you go to Miami it is too flashy, too $$, and the girls aren't looking to relocate. If you are middle class or above and you got to Latin America you are loaded and the women are open to moving to you more often than not. Some will not want to move from a posh area of Mexico City to some smaller town in the Midwest though. But overall Latin America just provides lots of options for decent guys.
travelsouth
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 403
Joined: October 8th, 2013, 6:20 pm

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby drronnie » March 7th, 2016, 12:14 pm

Adama wrote:
drronnie wrote:Why do I keep on hearing these comments that if you cannot get women's attention in the cold West you would alos get no attention anywhere else? I have seen people who have had no female companionship in Europe end up having a significant other in Asia.


Because I am sort of in a swimming pool and cannot swim. In other words I am in Thailand IRS already sort of playing in cheat mode but I have no clue of what to do. If I we're dirt poor and fugly I could cope but I see people who look worse and they end up getting dates. I have watched enough pua videos and I cannot implement it


Why are you asking the question? Why? For what reason? If you have SEEN this with your own eyes, then why do you need to wonder about the question? You already have your answer. Why are you asking when you already have the answer?
drronnie
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 317
Joined: September 30th, 2014, 2:50 am

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby Bao3niang » March 7th, 2016, 10:01 pm

Game only applies to locations that have been heavily corrupted by the West. If you need game to meet a good, loyal, and caring woman for lifelong companionship, that says a lot about the city / country you are in. A healthy society HAS NO (and I repeat, HAS NO) place for something like 'game'. If someone's goal is to be a serial monger and target the types of women that do require you to have game, it's a choice. The consequences that follow will affect that person and him alone, especially when he gets to a certain age. If you BELIEVE IN and RECOGNIZE the value for lifelong companionship and want to have a wife and a family, it's also a choice, AND a MUCH BETTER ONE. From a purely practical point of view (and I'm not that practical), you WOULD want someone to be there for you and take care of you when you are old. There are those who say things like "I was never destined to be in a long term relationship / get married" and blame it on absurd things like "karma" and "Murphy's Law." Alright. Unless you have a special calling from God (which 95% of us don't), it is meant for the vast majority of us to have a spouse. If you monger around while using less-than-acceptable excuses for your lack of desire / will for commitment, you are hopeless unless you get in the right mind and save yourself.
CYKA BLYAT!!!!!!
Bao3niang
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 593
Joined: October 15th, 2013, 4:22 am
Location: Beijing, China

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby Adama » March 7th, 2016, 11:01 pm

drronnie wrote:
Because I am sort of in a swimming pool and cannot swim. In other words I am in Thailand IRS already sort of playing in cheat mode but I have no clue of what to do. If I we're dirt poor and fugly I could cope but I see people who look worse and they end up getting dates. I have watched enough pua videos and I cannot implement it



You must escalate to the point where you can kiss her on the mouth. That is all. Then it will flow like magic.
Look for women who automatically want to please you because it pleases them. Any woman who seeks to please her man is a treasure. Even better if you don't have to ask but rather suggest.
User avatar
Adama
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5322
Joined: August 23rd, 2009, 10:37 pm

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby drronnie » March 9th, 2016, 3:30 am

Bao3niang wrote:Game only applies to locations that have been heavily corrupted by the West. If you need game to meet a good, loyal, and caring woman for lifelong companionship, that says a lot about the city / country you are in. A healthy society HAS NO (and I repeat, HAS NO) place for something like 'game'. If someone's goal is to be a serial monger and target the types of women that do require you to have game, it's a choice. The consequences that follow will affect that person and him alone, especially when he gets to a certain age. If you BELIEVE IN and RECOGNIZE the value for lifelong companionship and want to have a wife and a family, it's also a choice, AND a MUCH BETTER ONE. From a purely practical point of view (and I'm not that practical), you WOULD want someone to be there for you and take care of you when you are old. There are those who say things like "I was never destined to be in a long term relationship / get married" and blame it on absurd things like "karma" and "Murphy's Law." Alright. Unless you have a special calling from God (which 95% of us don't), it is meant for the vast majority of us to have a spouse. If you monger around while using less-than-acceptable excuses for your lack of desire / will for commitment, you are hopeless unless you get in the right mind and save yourself.


I think in the old cultures if you were a decent hard working man you were guaranteed a women either by arranged marriage or other means and that made sense. There was no need to have game back then.
drronnie
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 317
Joined: September 30th, 2014, 2:50 am

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby droid » March 9th, 2016, 4:00 am

Bao3niang wrote:Game only applies to locations that have been heavily corrupted by the West. If you need game to meet a good, loyal, and caring woman for lifelong companionship, that says a lot about the city / country you are in. A healthy society HAS NO (and I repeat, HAS NO) place for something like 'game'.


+1 spot on
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
User avatar
droid
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3065
Joined: September 20th, 2013, 7:38 am

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby drronnie » March 9th, 2016, 4:24 am

droid wrote:
Bao3niang wrote:Game only applies to locations that have been heavily corrupted by the West. If you need game to meet a good, loyal, and caring woman for lifelong companionship, that says a lot about the city / country you are in. A healthy society HAS NO (and I repeat, HAS NO) place for something like 'game'.


+1 spot on

and I dont think that by using game you will find a keeper
drronnie
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 317
Joined: September 30th, 2014, 2:50 am

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby travelsouth » March 9th, 2016, 11:19 pm

Competition has always existed in this world, and there have always been some men crying about it. This would have been true even before feminism corrupted the west.
travelsouth
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 403
Joined: October 8th, 2013, 6:20 pm

Re: No game = no woman?

Postby Ghost » March 10th, 2016, 2:13 am

travelsouth wrote:Competition has always existed in this world, and there have always been some men crying about it. This would have been true even before feminism corrupted the west.


Women are not meant to be competed over. That never turns out well. The golden era of history's successful and prosperous societies saw moral men banding together to co-dominate women. Men competing for women is a stupid idea and a massive waste of resources and creative effort.

Speaking of competition, you're well on your way to seeing just how well you'll compete with the daddygov. Though I do not wish learning that the hard way on any man.
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: April 17th, 2011, 2:23 am

Next

Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gsjackson and 2 guests