Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


My Theory About Women

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

My Theory About Women

Postby Eric » Thu May 12, 2016 5:53 pm

I think that women are so much the target(s) of manipulation for the simple reason that women are easier to manipulate. They lack the faculty of logic & rationality of men. Women require guidance and leadership - which is why the false guidance they have now is so terrible - it is from the State, and they eschew it from men - who are just trying to help them. The snake has gotten in deep this time.
Women are the Trojan Horse for which to unseat a society. Notice how the snake went to Eve and not Adam, this is symbolizing something. Women also have a rebellious nature which makes them constantly try to overthrow their submissive position in any way possible. The State helping them do that - with an iron fist, is DISASTROUS.
When these Jewish assholes took over our society, before they did it - they sent in loads of anthropologists and sociologists to study and scan the weaknesses and fissures of our society - manipulating them at will.
We are sitting ducks.

Anyways,
this is why I think it's literally impossible for women to see the flaw in feminism. They are not able to see it, because they do not think rationally. Their emotions are being manipulated - and women rely heavily on emotions for reasoning.
Without leadership - a society is hopeless. We are hopeless unless we decide to take our country back. It is just going to get worse.
Last edited by Eric on Thu May 12, 2016 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-"Virescit vulnere virtus"
User avatar
Eric
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 3:07 am







Re: My Theory About Women

Postby Ghost » Thu May 12, 2016 6:54 pm

Women are much more malleable than men, yes. Manipulate the women and the men are soon to follow.

The serpent = Chad Thundercock

Eve = woman as she always is

Adam = beta-cuck who gets separated from God because he's a pussybeggar
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:23 am

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby cdnFA » Fri May 13, 2016 3:05 am

Eric wrote:They lack the faculty of logic & rationality of men. Women require guidance and leadership



Based on your performance in messages to me, you are not in a position to judge anyone on logic or reason, nor are you in a position to provide anyone with guidance or leadership.
cdnFA
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 582
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2015 4:51 am

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby MarcosZeitola » Fri May 13, 2016 8:33 am

My theory on women is that men who make theories on women should spend less time making theories on women, instead speak to more women.
User avatar
MarcosZeitola
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1977
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 7:13 pm
Location: Phillipines

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby Johnny1975 » Fri May 13, 2016 9:18 am

Women are supposed to be the guardians of morality. I believe they are, or can be. Maybe they once were. So what I'm wondering is, what is it inside a woman that makes her both capable of being not only moral but also a moral guardian, and at the same time be so corruptible.

Also, I don't think women are amoral or immoral. If they were, men wouldn't waste any energy being disappointed.
Last edited by Johnny1975 on Fri May 13, 2016 4:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
***** Join my forum for entrepreneurs and aspiring entrepreneurs : *****

http://inspiredentrepreneur.forumotion.com/

And while you're at it...

*** Buy my motherf***ing book NOW!!!!! *** -----> http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00K5ZHTCW

DO IT!
Johnny1975
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1326
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 11:07 pm

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby Wolfeye » Fri May 13, 2016 9:19 am

I don't think that's exactly true. It was mostly women that pointed out issues in feminism to me, for one thing. For another, there's an emotional drive to be rational- so men are being emotional, too. Men sometimes even get hysterical in a different way- they usually get mentally rigid, instead of raving & screaming.

Men are also frequently COUNTER INTUITIVE, which may or may not get depicted as being more intelligent. I know that it's actually impossible to successfully be counter intuitive, since someone isn't going against their urge to go against their urges in that case- but someone can always "try to go faster by hitting the brakes." I think a lot of men are have easily damaged egos & they "move the goalposts" whenever they're wrong- much like calling "not it" when they f**k up. Same deal with being too arrogant to catch their own mistakes. Not limited to men, but self-recrimination is not always one of the more common male traits.
Wolfeye
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 6:18 am

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby Ghost » Fri May 13, 2016 9:14 pm

Johnny1975 wrote:Women are supposed to be the guardians of morality. I believe they are, or can be. Maybe they once were. So what I'm wondering is, what is it inside a woman that makes her both capable of being not only moral but also a moral guardian, and at the same time be so corruptible.

Also, I don't think women are amoral or immoral. If they were, men wouldn't waste any energy being disappointed.


It's just the opposite. Men are the moral guardians; women go along with whatever/whoever is dominant. Civilization started only when men controlled female desire (hypergamy) and channeled it into monogamy.
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:23 am

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby Eric » Fri May 13, 2016 10:24 pm

This is an interesting theory. I can see it myself that women definitely - although they may want to be with one man - they are not very good at it. And even the ones who are with a man, you can see them looking around at, darting their eyes desperately for men - all the time. It's obvious. I think they are hardwired to just find the best mate.
And we are hardwired to just find the most attractive mate - and pure and pristine young woman, and mate.

Unfortunately - not many left, on both sides.
-"Virescit vulnere virtus"
User avatar
Eric
Junior Poster
 
Posts: 627
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 3:07 am

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby Ghost » Fri May 13, 2016 11:10 pm

Eric wrote:This is an interesting theory. I can see it myself that women definitely - although they may want to be with one man - they are not very good at it. And even the ones who are with a man, you can see them looking around at, darting their eyes desperately for men - all the time. It's obvious. I think they are hardwired to just find the best mate.
And we are hardwired to just find the most attractive mate - and pure and pristine young woman, and mate.

Unfortunately - not many left, on both sides.


Yes, women operate based on hypergamy. They only want one mate - the best one. And who the best mate is changes according to what the society is like. American society is rotten, so the best mate in a female's life at any given time tends to be a Chad Thundercock.
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5749
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 1:23 am

Re: My Theory About Women

Postby Wolfeye » Sat May 14, 2016 7:01 am

The thing about finding the best mate is that it's limited & frequently untrue- ever watch Jerry Springer? I figure women DO want it to be someone that's sturdy/virile/proficient/etc..., but it's not JUST that. There's a lot of women that could be compatible for a man, some that might even have bigger tits than the one he's with, but that doesn't make them interchangeable or in constant comparison. A woman might be the same way- her man isn't quite as strong & hunky as the guy that moved in across the street that seems attracted to her, but he's been a good father/companion/etc... or is simply the one she wants & so she stays with him.

No offense, but a lot of the guys on here are very cynical about women & I think it has more to do with going by the American cultural twist that blankets the population, including women (A LOT of things are blatantly narcissistic/sociopathic/psychopathic, so that's going to f**k things up in a very broad way). I recently heard another term that seems to be increasingly applicable: "robopath." The book that it's from (Bureaucratic Insanity) is still in the mail, but it's kind of hard to miss the meaning- even if articulating it can be tricky.

No other way to phrase it: "niggerization" is another potential issue to run into. I know black people have issues with this "cultural dynamics," but the idea of a woman looking only for a man that "be all about his paper & stacks that shit to the ceiling" is a bit of a popular theme. The men sometimes affirm the truth of this idea to feel more sure of things, but a sure thing isn't necessarily a good thing to begin with- plus, it's not going to be that way just because someone acts in a congruent way with it. There aren't going to be bullets in the gun just because you point it at someone as if it's loaded, either.
Wolfeye
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1130
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 6:18 am


Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests