Russian1860 wrote:
Winston:
1. If people show skin and bones, it means that they became like that being heavily mocked and starved. It doesn’t add up with your video, where “witnesses” narrate about concentration camps, like about health resorts, where they played football, attended theatre and had access to the shop.
2. Indeed jews don’t deserve to be mentioned as often as most of you do.
3. You can read unbiased history of ww2 from the open sources. If someone prefers to focus on jews only, he will definitely find a plea to inflate a new conspiracy theory
4. Low grade nazi propaganda. They were used to make such kind of exponential pictures for propaganda reasons.
5. Video – paid actors
6. 6000000- cheap argument. Try to type in google whatever number you want plus nationality. It will give you million of references. Same with that newspaper.
For me this discussion is over. Thank you for participation.
Wait a minute. Not so fast. You sound like you're copping out now when faced with hard evidence against your beliefs.
1. Those dead bodies in the video that were all skin and bones, well experts say that they died from diseases like typhus and also starvation because the Allies bombed German supply lines. They didn't die of gassings. Why would they starve inmates? Why not just shoot them? Starving inmates takes a whole month. The Nazis didn't have time to waste like that.
2. Ok thanks for agreeing that Jewish victims shouldn't have a special place among victims that is more important than other victims. But what about the million German civilians who died during the Dresden bombings which were unnecessary and NON-military targets? The Allies bombed Dresden just for the heck of it. It had no military targets.
3. What do you mean "low grade Nazi propaganda"? You mean that those "positive" photos of Auschwitz were propaganda? But don't you remember, Auschwitz was supposedly kept a SECRET from the outside world. So why would the Nazis spread propaganda about it to cover it up when no one knew it existed? That doesn't make sense. They were not asked to explain it because it was a secret.
4. Those video interviews with Holocaust "survivors" were done in modern times AFTER the Holocaust, not during it. Those film clips came from Steven Spielberg's Shoah Foundation. So the interviewers were his staff. They were not Nazi sympathizers. Why would Spielberg and the Shoah Foundation allow such contrary testimonies to be archived? Did you even watch the interviews? They were very revealing.
5. 6 million is NOT a random number! Come on! That is a TERRIBLE argument. You said I can make up any number? Ok then try it. Google "5 million Jewish victims" or "7 million Jewish victims" and see if you can find tons of newspaper clippings that allege that number of Jewish victims. I dare you. Try it in Google. You will see that your argument is TOTALLY WRONG. Then you will have to find another argument. Well? What's your NEXT explanation? You just shot yourself in the foot. That was a VERY bad argument.
Btw, did you know that the Germans did NOT want a world war? They tried VERY hard to avoid it. The Nazis may have done bad things in WW2, but for sure WW1 was started by the Allies and Zionists. So Germany was THE VICTIM in WW1. WW2 was just the continuation of it, it was part 2 of a war that Germany DID NOT start and was a VICTIM of. Both sides have admitted this, but the media doesn't want you to know about it. See the book "The Myth of German Villainy" and also these quotes from both sides here:
viewtopic.php?t=22086
