Why are there so few young white women?

[Sackler]

The culprit is probably industrialization.

Industrialization/technology = cultural marxism/feminism = declining birthrates = less white women.

Industrialisation started in the early 1800s. There was no feminism nor below replacement birthrate. As late as the early 1960s the baby boom carried on and whites still prospered, dated, married and ruled.Then came the jew takeover of the media, jew cultural Marxism, jew divorce laws, the jew led protest movement and jew feminism. So what is the common denominator?

Kikery is toxic to the white race. And to anyone from the Canaanites, PhilistInes, early Egypt, Romans and christianity. It is now toxic to the US economy and the middle east.

Think about this. If I examine countries like Korea and Japan (and perhaps Taiwan), 3 countries that did not have a significant period of women's liberation, I still observe staggering decline in terms of birthrates.

When I say industrialization, I am not talking about the steam engine bud. I am referring to rapid technological evolution and change, which also includes birth control, believe it or not. What this means for the average guy is that women are are now more on an even playing field with office jobs and similar opportunities, thus raising the bar for hypergamy.

This is the crux of the issue. This is why developed white Anglo countries are more difficult for dating and sex. Jewish influence may be apparent in both, but no one is really denying that. It's really just the modernization of the world. Oddly, enough, white women do seem to be the most affected race of women by cultural marxism and feminism. Take that for what you will

[Adama]

The culprit is probably industrialization.

Industrialization/technology = cultural marxism/feminism = declining birthrates = less white women.

Industrialisation started in the early 1800s. There was no feminism nor below replacement birthrate. As late as the early 1960s the baby boom carried on and whites still prospered, dated, married and ruled.Then came the jew takeover of the media, jew cultural Marxism, jew divorce laws, the jew led protest movement and jew feminism. So what is the common denominator?

Kikery is toxic to the white race. And to anyone from the Canaanites, PhilistInes, early Egypt, Romans and christianity. It is now toxic to the US economy and the middle east.

Think about this. If I examine countries like Korea and Japan (and perhaps Taiwan), 3 countries that did not have a significant period of women's liberation, I still observe staggering decline in terms of birthrates.

When I say industrialization, I am not talking about the steam engine bud. I am referring to rapid technological evolution and change, which also includes birth control, believe it or not. What this means for the average guy is that women are are now more on an even playing field with office jobs and similar opportunities, thus raising the bar for hypergamy.

This is the crux of the issue. This is why developed white Anglo countries are more difficult for dating and sex. Jewish influence may be apparent in both, but no one is really denying that. It's really just the modernization of the world. Oddly, enough, white women do seem to be the most affected race of women by cultural marxism and feminism. Take that for what you will

Yes, but first the underpinnings of society had to be destroyed so that women could take those birth control pills. And men had to let women in. Just like a gun is not the problem, it is the person using it. Likewise, the pill itself is evil, but it is the people who believe that its use is valid who are the problem. Society must change its mind about the role of women before birth control and abortion are approved of. They do this using their Cultural Marxism.

Women's roles could survive industrialization. It is the mindset of the culture that is the problem. Rumor has it that even the Germanic tribes exalted women above their station. It isn't technology but the culture.

[Adama]

None of this makes sense. A general population reduction would reduce the number of men, as well as women.

If women are all at home on the internet, why do dating sites still have ten times more men than women? And this only occurs in the U.S.?

Why does every woman in the U.S. have unlimited choices at her fingerprints, yet good-looking guys struggle to find a girl who isn't fat? I don't believe that women are more inclined to seek relationships and men are more inclined to seek casual sex. From what I have seen, women are having sex with dozens of partners each year and men are struggling to get laid once in a blue moon, if they make a lot of effort. The life of any non-fat AW is dick being constantly offered to her, everywhere she goes. She never has to worry about finding a man because another will be paying attention to her as soon as she walks outside.

The life of any non-fat AW is basically like the show "Californication" with the sexes reversed. As ridiculous as that show seems with women throwing themselves at the main character after he makes a few jokes, it really does describe the reality AW are living in right now. Any AW who shows the slightest hint of a personality and sense of humor with a stranger will have multiple men throwing themselves at her every day.

Even fat ugly women have men out of their league on-tap, at any time. Men struggle to have sex with a girl who isn't fat. And sex is much easier to obtain than an actual relationship, given how flaky AW are.

Even if you are an expert pickup artist, you will make ten times more effort than a fat 40 year old woman and it will take you longer to find a new sexual partner.

The idea that women are less promiscuous or more relationship-minded is ridiculous. At the rate the girls I know are going, they probably have had sex with over 100 partners.

You can learn to compete and deal with this to some degree, since many men have completely given up. I still have success from time to time. But still no one can answer the question.

The BEST ratios you will ever see in America for any large mixed-gender social event is 50/50. The MAJORITY of the time, any large mixed-gender social event will have at least 20% more men. You will routinely see venues that are 90-100% male. Even marriage-minded dating sites have ten times as many men as women. I am completely confident I can go out to a bar tonight and find one with a 20:1 ratio, yet the opposite NEVER occurs.

I believe this is the cause of America's sexual dysfunction. Feminism, bad attitudes, male devaluation are all just symptoms of an enormously skewed apparent gender ratio that is an order of magnitude worse than China's.

No one has an answer to this.

I do agree about the gender ratios and some women really do get to choose from lots of men. However, I think the main problem is that most people only travel between work and home and then back to work and then back home. Many people are not going out to bars and clubs because they are late night dangerous places filled with scum who only want to use and manipulate others. There are lots of lonely women. It is just that many lonely women don't go to bars, don't use internet dating, and don't go out of their way to meet men.

Men are driven to go in look in those places, but women who have class steer clear of those places, because they see them for what they are: dangerous places where manipulators, users and criminals hang out at. How many assaults happen at bars and clubs? Add alcohol to a bunch of thugs who already lack restraint. (And if the thugs in the bars don't get you, the police will get you on the way home, as they harass you for being one of the few cars on the road after 11pm without witnesses to prevent them from bothering you.)

And it isn't that being on the internet is an act of desperation, it is that it is not normal, and people who are abnormal are the ones using those dating sites. NOT ALL, but most have some serious problem, which is why they are on there, looking for unsuspecting naive people who don't know to stay away. Well the smart women aren't on there.

And sexual harassment laws have made the work place a terrible idea, not to mention the fact that if the woman is a psycho manipulator, she will ruin your reputation.

I think the only hope is food shopping and just stalking the streets in major cities, hoping to get one to smile at you. The only time they will come out is to buy some organic food, or on the subway train to and from work or school. Otherwise everyone just isolates themselves from the outside world.

[Kradmelder]

The culprit is probably industrialization.

Industrialization/technology = cultural marxism/feminism = declining birthrates = less white women.

Industrialisation started in the early 1800s. There was no feminism nor below replacement birthrate. As late as the early 1960s the baby boom carried on and whites still prospered, dated, married and ruled.Then came the jew takeover of the media, jew cultural Marxism, jew divorce laws, the jew led protest movement and jew feminism. So what is the common denominator?

Kikery is toxic to the white race. And to anyone from the Canaanites, PhilistInes, early Egypt, Romans and christianity. It is now toxic to the US economy and the middle east.

Think about this. If I examine countries like Korea and Japan (and perhaps Taiwan), 3 countries that did not have a significant period of women's liberation, I still observe staggering decline in terms of birthrates.

When I say industrialization, I am not talking about the steam engine bud. I am referring to rapid technological evolution and change, which also includes birth control, believe it or not. What this means for the average guy is that women are are now more on an even playing field with office jobs and similar opportunities, thus raising the bar for hypergamy.

This is the crux of the issue. This is why developed white Anglo countries are more difficult for dating and sex. Jewish influence may be apparent in both, but no one is really denying that. It's really just the modernization of the world. Oddly, enough, white women do seem to be the most affected race of women by cultural marxism and feminism. Take that for what you will

Ok you don't mean the industrial age, but the technological age of mass media, topped with the internet and the electronic age. If young people meet, they fornicate. It has always been this way. These days they sit apart and socialise though jew media like facejew, google, wechat, instagram and a host of other rubbish. Or they are gamers. It seems like Japs and Koreans are the worst affected by gaming. why? I don't see what a young man would see in this?

They are bombarded with social media and a huge range of smut. The old days of groups of boys going out and meeting groups of girls in public venues, eventually to form couples and relationships seem to be gone, and replaced by electronic interaction. By meeting up physically the field was never equal as the boy took the natural male role and the girls giggled and had to behave feminine or the boy would look elsewhere. On social media everyone is equal.

White women have been the most corrupted because they have the largest sense of entitlement and me me me thinking. Largely because fathers didn't teach them the world is not like that and you have responsibilities, just like your brother. This thing of giving teenage girls cars, fancy cell phones, money etc is BS. It only feeds their irresponsibility.

[Nailer]

If the ratios were the reverse of what they are, we'd all be living in hog heaven and having the time of our lives, and women would be miserable and complaining on a forum like this. Notice there is no female equivalent to the "Happier Abroad" site.

The problem is supply and demand. Traditionalism isn't going to solve that.

[jamesbond]

I've read a lot of explanations of why America has such a surplus of single men:

• Natural birthrate
• Immigration
• Relocation for work
• Obesity disproportionately affecting women

I'm not really satisfied with any of these explanations.

I'm also not convinced the statistics we are told are true. If I had to estimate American demographics based on what I actually see, in every city in the country, I would guess that 80% of Americans are over 50 years old and that white women aged 20-30 make up perhaps 0.5% of the population. Everywhere I go I see young white men and young black and Mexican women, and virtually no young white women outside of college campuses. Of course everywhere, baby boomers are the vast majority. Go out on the freeway at any time of day. Look to your left, then look to your right, and you will see two people 45-65 years old.

Where are the young white women in America? They're not in the cities. They're not in the suburbs. They're not in the countryside. EVERYTHING is a sausagefest.
Have you EVER seen a bar full of 30 women and 1 man? Yet I can go out tonight and be guaranteed to find that if I look around for a bit. Can you even imagine how much power that would give you, if you could go out any time you wanted and experience those kinds of ratios in your favor?

Go to a gas station and see how long it takes before a young white woman comes by. Everyone needs gas, right? Yet you will see 50-100 baby boomers come and go before one white girl aged 20-30 stops for gas. It's like all the women evaporate after college.

Does anyone else get what I am saying? Am I the only one who sees this?

I have been saying this years, there are almost no single white women in America between the ages of 20 to 35. I live in Chicago and it literally is about a 25 to 1 ratio of single white men to single white women.

When I go to a shopping mall, book store, retail store or grocery store (during the week or on the weekends, in the morning, afternoon or evening) I ALMOST NEVER SEE ANY WHITE SINGLE WOMEN UNDER THE AGE OF 35.

The only time in my life I saw a lot of young, white single women was when I was in college. After college they have literally disappeared from the face of the earth! It's like they have been abducted by aliens or something!

I read a statistic about 10 years ago that stated in America, there are 6 million more single men than single women between the ages of 18 to 49. I bet now those stats are even more lop sided now.

[jamesbond]

Check out this audio interview from PBS talking about the shortage of women in generation X causing problems for men.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKnUGMH-qjY[/youtube]

[Nailer]

Wow. This recording sounds very old, but it still incredible. That would be a hate crime if it were broadcast today.

It is very validating to hear exactly what I'm saying.

I've seen enough. American men are without a doubt at an enormous disadvantage, whatever the reasons.

[HouseMD]

I've read a lot of explanations of why America has such a surplus of single men:

• Natural birthrate
• Immigration
• Relocation for work
• Obesity disproportionately affecting women

I'm not really satisfied with any of these explanations.

I'm also not convinced the statistics we are told are true. If I had to estimate American demographics based on what I actually see, in every city in the country, I would guess that 80% of Americans are over 50 years old and that white women aged 20-30 make up perhaps 0.5% of the population. Everywhere I go I see young white men and young black and Mexican women, and virtually no young white women outside of college campuses. Of course everywhere, baby boomers are the vast majority. Go out on the freeway at any time of day. Look to your left, then look to your right, and you will see two people 45-65 years old.

Where are the young white women in America? They're not in the cities. They're not in the suburbs. They're not in the countryside. EVERYTHING is a sausagefest. Check out this random picture from Chicago. It's about 50:1 men to women:


This is "fun" in America?

How are these extreme ratios even possible? I can understand how a 5% or in extreme cases 15-20% discrepancy could exist, but 5000% more men than women? These numbers make the Chinese gender ratio look like a dream come true. The situation in America seems to be so extreme, like it's one big homosexual prison camp.

The explanation that bars are male-oriented spaces does not make sense. Sure, girls congregate at yoga studios, but for every yoga studio full of women there are about 100 bars full of men. I understand the above picture is not representative of what you will always see, but you would NEVER see the reverse spontaneously occur in America. Can you even imagine seeing 200 girls out on a lake with three guys, unless it was a movie set or something? The idea is laughable, and yet the reverse happens all the time.

Have you EVER seen a bar full of 30 women and 1 man? Yet I can go out tonight and be guaranteed to find that if I look around for a bit. Can you even imagine how much power that would give you, if you could go out any time you wanted and experience those kinds of ratios in your favor?

Go to a gas station and see how long it takes before a young white woman comes by. Everyone needs gas, right? Yet you will see 50-100 baby boomers come and go before one white girl aged 20-30 stops for gas. It's like all the women evaporate after college.

Does anyone else get what I am saying? Am I the only one who sees this?

A lot of them are fatties, who tend to not go out often.

There are, however, some cities with a higher female:male ratio.
https://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/mortgag ... gle-men-2/

[Nailer]

In America "cities with the more women than men" is just a measure of the black population, since so many of their men off each other or are in prison.

The PUA guys think New York is p***y paradise, but every female I meet from their is absolutely insufferable. I actually had a conversation with a tourist from there and was explaining I could stay in Manhattan, and was thinking about going there for a while, and she started quizzing me as if I was lying. I don't know jack shit about the city, I was just telling the truth. I can definitely understand why the southerners hate yankees. These are the same miserable f***s who destroyed California.

Set the upper age to 34 and everything turns to blue except Jackson, MS:
http://jonathansoma.com/singles/#1/4/2/0

Wow, what a surprise, it's 79.4% black:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson,_ ... mographics

[Kradmelder]

In America "cities with the more women than men" is just a measure of the black population, since so many of their men off each other or are in prison.

The PUA guys think New York is p***y paradise, but every female I meet from their is absolutely insufferable. I actually had a conversation with a tourist from there and was explaining I could stay in Manhattan, and was thinking about going there for a while, and she started quizzing me as if I was lying. I don't know jack shit about the city, I was just telling the truth. I can definitely understand why the southerners hate yankees. These are the same miserable f***s who destroyed California.

Set the upper age to 34 and everything turns to blue except Jackson, MS:
http://jonathansoma.com/singles/#1/4/2/0

Wow, what a surprise, it's 79.4% black:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson,_ ... mographics

The only city I would recommend on that list is Nashville. But then you have to live in flyover country.

I was in NYC once and it is one of the worst places on earth. Fat rude negresses, arrogant jews, pushy obnoxious people, multiculti cess pool of every race, and that horrible nasal way of talking, crowded, dirty, smelly.

If niggers there want to off each other, all the better. If the muzzies and jews started it, even better. Then the africans and carribeans etc.

[HouseMD]

In America "cities with the more women than men" is just a measure of the black population, since so many of their men off each other or are in prison.

The PUA guys think New York is p***y paradise, but every female I meet from their is absolutely insufferable. I actually had a conversation with a tourist from there and was explaining I could stay in Manhattan, and was thinking about going there for a while, and she started quizzing me as if I was lying. I don't know jack shit about the city, I was just telling the truth. I can definitely understand why the southerners hate yankees. These are the same miserable f***s who destroyed California.

Set the upper age to 34 and everything turns to blue except Jackson, MS:
http://jonathansoma.com/singles/#1/4/2/0

Wow, what a surprise, it's 79.4% black:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackson,_ ... mographics

The only city I would recommend on that list is Nashville. But then you have to live in flyover country.

This makes sense though, as men are born in greater numbers than women because we have a higher rate of both genetic defects and early death, so all of the genetically defective and stupid take a little while to die off in the modern world. If there aren't more men than women, you've got an issue of sex selection and abortion going on. Regardless, so long as you can do better than the bottom 5% of mutants in a given city, there's some women to be had, and anything above that is gravy for the functional amongst us. Being slightly competent in the west made Eastern Europe feel so easy that I felt like I was in Westworld lol.

[Cornfed]

Regardless, so long as you can do better than the bottom 5% of mutants in a given city, there's some women to be had, and anything above that is gravy for the functional amongst us. Being slightly competent in the west made Eastern Europe feel so easy that I felt like I was in Westworld lol.

Competent at what exactly?

[HouseMD]

Regardless, so long as you can do better than the bottom 5% of mutants in a given city, there's some women to be had, and anything above that is gravy for the functional amongst us. Being slightly competent in the west made Eastern Europe feel so easy that I felt like I was in Westworld lol.

Competent at what exactly?

Getting what I want from them.

[Cornfed]

You may perhaps be making the common mistake of mistaking things within your control for things now within your control and then generalizing that mistake.