Dating Guru: Avoid British women

[Mark_in_Bangkok]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie.

Adama -

The series of posts from you on this thread is very valuable.
Thank you for taking time to think and to write as you did.

Now I will go back and read them a second time.
.

[Adama]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie.

Adama -

The series of posts from you on this thread is very valuable.
Thank you for taking time to think and to write as you did.

Now I will go back and read them a second time.
.

Thank you sir for saying that. Even here though, this doctrine which I teach receives opposition. I am not sure how much people appreciate it.

However you seem to be a man with his eyes open and who is capable of understanding.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie.

Adama -

The series of posts from you on this thread is very valuable.
Thank you for taking time to think and to write as you did.

Now I will go back and read them a second time.
.

Thank you sir for saying that. Even here though, this doctrine which I teach receives opposition. I am not sure how much people appreciate it.

However you seem to be a man with his eyes open and who is capable of understanding.

I tend to agree Adama. Much of your stuff, when you take away the religious proselytizing, is pure fire.

I only wish you would reserve the proselytizing to a forum of people open to that. If you keep to secular explanations of these phenomena, you would find that people are far more open to receiving it.

Play to the audience here is all I ask.

[Adama]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie.

Adama -

The series of posts from you on this thread is very valuable.
Thank you for taking time to think and to write as you did.

Now I will go back and read them a second time.
.

Thank you sir for saying that. Even here though, this doctrine which I teach receives opposition. I am not sure how much people appreciate it.

However you seem to be a man with his eyes open and who is capable of understanding.

I tend to agree Adama. Much of your stuff, when you take away the religious proselytizing, is pure fire.

I only wish you would reserve the proselytizing to a forum of people open to that. If you keep to secular explanations of these phenomena, you would find that people are far more open to receiving it.

Play to the audience here is all I ask.

But how could I do that when it is the knowledge from the book of Job, the Psalms and the Proverbs which have given me knowledge and insight into these matters?

If I say that society has exalted women to the heavens, or that some of them are contending against God, well it is right there in the Bible that the man is the boss, that certain people are running upon God's neck, that the angels who arose out of their habitation are destroyed for that exaltation, etc.

The Proverbs tell us explicitly what evil women do: their traits and characteristics, from their personality down to the way they dress and even some of the games they play!

I don't have a secular understanding of this phenomena.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie.

Adama -

The series of posts from you on this thread is very valuable.
Thank you for taking time to think and to write as you did.

Now I will go back and read them a second time.
.

Thank you sir for saying that. Even here though, this doctrine which I teach receives opposition. I am not sure how much people appreciate it.

However you seem to be a man with his eyes open and who is capable of understanding.

I tend to agree Adama. Much of your stuff, when you take away the religious proselytizing, is pure fire.

I only wish you would reserve the proselytizing to a forum of people open to that. If you keep to secular explanations of these phenomena, you would find that people are far more open to receiving it.

Play to the audience here is all I ask.

But how could I do that when it is the knowledge from the book of Job, the Psalms and the Proverbs which have given me knowledge and insight into these matters?

If I say that society has exalted women to the heavens, or that some of them are contending against God, well it is right there in the Bible that the man is the boss, that certain people are running upon God's neck, that the angels who arose out of their habitation are destroyed for that exaltation, etc.

The Proverbs tell us explicitly what evil women do: their traits and characteristics, from their personality down to the way they dress and even some of the games they play!

I don't have a secular understanding of this phenomena.

You don't have to make a discussion of females into a religious discussion. People will tune you out and reject any and all value you have to impart.

Personally, I find your input to be simply sound logic and common sense over pop culture thinking, not biblical as much as you think it is. Otherwise I would not even agree with it!

[Mark_in_Bangkok]

... it is the knowledge from the book of Job, the Psalms and the Proverbs which have given me ... insight into these matters ... I don't have a secular understanding of this phenomena.

Adama -

Thank you for explaining that.
I appreciate knowing your premises.

And I look forward to reading more of your comments on these matters.
.

[Taco]

[mand38]

Well, guy is telling truth, trust me... I wasn't with 200 hundred Europian/Rusian girls but I was with 20-30 and what he says is simply truth BTW, who don't know, read this: https://crnchy.com/news/a-letter-from-j ... d-diggers/ it is on some way very similar ....

[mattyman]

Jeremy Ckarkson did the world a favour when he punched Piers Morgan. It was quite shocking how those harpies and their sycophants behaved in that video. Do you notice the hypocrisy? That woman is accusing Richard of stereotyping British women, yet she's doing exactly the same regarding Russian women. She's trying to imply that by marriying a Russian woman he's somehow a loser and that Russian women are somehow weaker and more submissive. How come it's perfectly acceptable for her to make sweeping generalisations about Russian women yet it's not OK to point out common traits in British women?

[mattyman]

Jeremy Ckarkson did the world a favour when he punched Piers Morgan. It was quite shocking how those harpies and their sycophants behaved in that video. Do you notice the hypocrisy? That woman is accusing Richard of stereotyping British women, yet she's doing exactly the same regarding Russian women. She's trying to imply that by marriying a Russian woman he's somehow a loser and that Russian women are somehow weaker and more submissive. How come it's perfectly acceptable for her to make sweeping generalisations about Russian women yet it's not OK to point out common traits in British women?

[mattyman]

Jeremy Ckarkson did the world a favour when he punched Piers Morgan. It was quite shocking how those harpies and their sycophants behaved in that video. Do you notice the hypocrisy? That woman is accusing Richard of stereotyping British women, yet she's doing exactly the same regarding Russian women. She's trying to imply that by marriying a Russian woman he's somehow a loser and that Russian women are somehow weaker and more submissive. How come it's perfectly acceptable for her to make sweeping generalisations about Russian women yet it's not OK to point out common traits in British women?

[mattyman]

Jeremy Ckarkson did the world a favour when he punched Piers Morgan. It was quite shocking how those harpies and their sycophants behaved in that video. Do you notice the hypocrisy? That woman is accusing Richard of stereotyping British women, yet she's doing exactly the same regarding Russian women. She's trying to imply that by marriying a Russian woman he's somehow a loser and that Russian women are somehow weaker and more submissive. How come it's perfectly acceptable for her to make sweeping generalisations about Russian women yet it's not OK to point out common traits in British women?

[mattyman]

Why has it post multiple times?