Dating Guru: Avoid British women

[Teh Amasin Spoderman]

http://www.itv.com/goodmorningbritain/n ... city-morse

[MrMan]

Piers Morgan must work really hard, because it is really hard to see how he has gotten to be as successful as he has with that unlikeable personality. The way he acted was really unprofessional. The male guest came off as very reasonable, well-spoken, and handled Piers' rudeness with unusual maturity. Piers had no other recourse than to call him names, misrepresent him, and talk over him.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

Everyone knows everything he said is accurate. The negative reaction of the panel is simply gynocentric impulse to spare the feelings of British/Western women.

Truthtellers like this bloke are often demonized and bullied. The issue is the negative reaction should have been foreseeable to the young man.

Oddly, it reminds me of my college days when fat, ugly, black women (and their mangina enablers) would react similarly when I publicly stated my preference for women from Europe. It is as if everyone demands that you ignore the fact that the emperor has no clothes. To admit it is to commit a huge social error punishable by scorn, ridicule, and hate.

[gsjackson]

La Ruina did an admirable job of remaining polite with these harpies and Morgan. Here is how he should have gone about it. Russell Brand absolutely demolishes a similar pack of on-air jackals who tried to lay some heavy condescension on him. He has Mika literally squirming:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynUjo99Gzbk

Piers Morgan really is an all-time jackass, isn't he?

[Zambales]

Three women and a man who's been married for the best part of thirty years are hardly qualified to comment on this matter are they? How many British women have they dated recently?

The underhand comment directed at La Ruina by Morgan was crude and uncalled for and just proves what an utter moron he really is.

[MrMan]

Not to mention the pot calling the kettle black.

He could have responded by saying he had thought he was going to meet with some professional journalists, but he was mistaken.

But not fighting back probably made him look better to his audience, while Piers Morgan came off as rude and out of line, so his calm response may have been a more effective approach.

[Adama]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie. He is an offender against the law. Therefore, in the eyes of the subscribers of feminism (the belief that women are gods), the infidels must receive condemnation.

How dare you speak against the gods? Don't you know you could die for such blasphemy? That is misogynie against the gods! There is nothing wrong with the gods. The problem is in you! The gods are infallible. If you question them, it is because there is iniquity within you, enough that it makes you worthy of instant condemnation. And no, we do not need to empathize with you or hear you out or consider your view. You are automatically wrong. Don't you know that women are incapable of committing wickedness? Don't you know that you should not criticize evil women's behavior? How dare you? Are you above them to cast judgment upon them? Are you better than they? [/sarcasm]

[Adama]

Remember, apostates don't just subscribe to one false ideology. They follow after many. Feminism is a religion just like science is. And a person can believe in more than one god at once, especially if there is no conflict.

-ism indicates belief in the root word. What is the root word in feminism? In Buddhism, people follow the teachings and the way of life proscribed by Buddha. What are feminists doing?

Communists follow after the teachings of communism. What do feminists do? Well they exalt women above men. They call it equality, but they cannot be equal because they would have to be the same to be equal. They would have to be men to equal men. They are not men. They were made for men.

They are men's helpers, but society elevates them above the man in authority, value, abilities, judgment, morality, and rights before the law. They've not just made women our rulers. They have truly exalted them out of their place to godhood.

The only one above man is Christ. God > Christ > Husband > Wife > Children. If they exalt women over men, they have essentially made women into gods.

And for those who can't recognize this, I am talking about authority within marriage and the household. According to the relationship of man and wife ordained by God, if the woman exalts herself over him, she is literally contending against Christ Himself to be the man's lord. Who is the lord of the husband? Christ is the husband's Lord, and the husband is the woman's lord. What has Christ said as the boss and commander, the law giver? Women are to obey their husbands. To disobey itself is rebellion, and it is far worse for the woman to bear rule over the man.

[Zambales]

Did you notice the woman on the far right pushing the blame onto La Ruina for his apparent lack of success with British women? This is the typical arrogant response you get from the vacuous Anglo wenches. It's never them is it?

[jamesbond]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie. He is an offender against the law. Therefore, in the eyes of the subscribers of feminism (the belief that women are gods), the infidels must receive condemnation.

How dare you speak against the gods? Don't you know you could die for such blasphemy? That is misogynie against the gods! There is nothing wrong with the gods. The problem is in you! The gods are infallible. If you question them, it is because there is iniquity within you, enough that it makes you worthy of instant condemnation. And no, we do not need to empathize with you or hear you out or consider your view. You are automatically wrong. Don't you know that women are incapable of committing wickedness? Don't you know that you should not criticize evil women's behavior? How dare you? Are you above them to cast judgment upon them? Are you better than they? [/sarcasm]

Yes, Anglo women are exalted to God like status by the media, teachers and politicians. Men are seen as second class citizens in Anglo countries.

Good examples of this is the fact that women get little or no jail time for committing the same crime a man commits (like having sex with an underage student). Another good example is that the divorce laws in Anglo countries are all in a women's favor (women get custody of the kids in almost every divorce preceding, the man has to give his ex wife half of his net worth, men may also have to pay alimony to his ex wife).

No wonder why so many men in Anglo countries are either going MGTOW or they are marrying women from foreign countries and avoiding Anglo women like the plague!

[Master]

why would i follow an unsuccessful dating guru who would tell me to avoid a certain type of women instead of telling me how to bang them?

[Misko_Varesanovic]

The crazy ironic thing is that the two ladies (and, indirectly, Mr Morgan) who contributed to this 'discussion' seemingly did everything in their power to prove Mr La Ruina correct. Moreover, no one on the panel actually engaged with him on the basic veracity of his assertions; even if you disagree with his approach or lifestyle, at least do your guest the honour of having a fair hearing.

[publicduende]

Not to be a contrarian, but Richard La Ruina's success, like all "life & dating coaches" is based on image over contents, appearance over substance.

Do you really believe all the beautiful Russian women he is posing with were all his dates? He may have as well contacted a local modelling agency for some shots, or even paid some of the hottest girls for short flings. Moscow is a relatively opulent city nowadays but how many young women can say no to a few hundred, perhaps thousand, pounds cash handouts? Hell, Mr La Ruina isn't that bad looking a man himself.

The takeaway is that, OK, British women are awful and all that, but dating in Russia isn't going to be a panacea, especially for the average British (or Western) man: not so wealthy, average looking, not so in shape, etc. Countless posts on this and other forums have long debunked the myth that Russia is replete with gorgeous-looking kind-hearted girls who are just looking for Mr American to get the love they always dreamed of.

Once again, the case of a PUA professional at the end of his career trying to rebrand himself with some new narrative.

[Adama]

The crazy ironic thing is that the two ladies (and, indirectly, Mr Morgan) who contributed to this 'discussion' seemingly did everything in their power to prove Mr La Ruina correct. Moreover, no one on the panel actually engaged with him on the basic veracity of his assertions; even if you disagree with his approach or lifestyle, at least do your guest the honour of having a fair hearing.

Why would they entertain the blasphemy of misogynie? of course they won't listen to it. Feminism is against the truth in all matters. The feelings of men do not matter. Men must really be destroyed to uplift women. Of course a horrible dating scene is merely a symptom of feminism.

A horrible dating and marriage scene in a feminist nation is caused entirely by feminism: it's caused by exalting the status of women to heights where women do not belong. The heads of evil women reach up to the clouds and to the stratosphere. They've been exalted to the heavens.

By definition exaltation inflates the ego. Anyone with an inflated ego is really a prideful, arrogant person. And we know that arrogant people really consider other people to be beneath them.

So it is no accident that in countries where women enjoy exalted status due to feminism that many of those women seem especially hard to deal with in those societies. It's direct cause and effect.

That's also why women who haven't been exposed to feminism are more humble and make better wives. Their societies have not uplifted them by lies and by inflicting cruelty onto their men.

[Adama]

Always remember that in the Anglo world especially, women are exalted to godhood. Basically anyone who questions or denies the majesty of women as gods is speaking the blasphemy of misogynie. He is an offender against the law. Therefore, in the eyes of the subscribers of feminism (the belief that women are gods), the infidels must receive condemnation.

How dare you speak against the gods? Don't you know you could die for such blasphemy? That is misogynie against the gods! There is nothing wrong with the gods. The problem is in you! The gods are infallible. If you question them, it is because there is iniquity within you, enough that it makes you worthy of instant condemnation. And no, we do not need to empathize with you or hear you out or consider your view. You are automatically wrong. Don't you know that women are incapable of committing wickedness? Don't you know that you should not criticize evil women's behavior? How dare you? Are you above them to cast judgment upon them? Are you better than they? [/sarcasm]

Yes, Anglo women are exalted to God like status by the media, teachers and politicians. Men are seen as second class citizens in Anglo countries.

Good examples of this is the fact that women get little or no jail time for committing the same crime a man commits (like having sex with an underage student). Another good example is that the divorce laws in Anglo countries are all in a women's favor (women get custody of the kids in almost every divorce preceding, the man has to give his ex wife half of his net worth, men may also have to pay alimony to his ex wife).

No wonder why so many men in Anglo countries are either going MGTOW or they are marrying women from foreign countries and avoiding Anglo women like the plague!

You can also see it socially. If a woman does something to you socially (not physical murder, but let's say she's playing games), absolutely no one is going to agree with you that she's being cruel. It is much more likely that when something psychologically evil happens to a man at the hands of a woman, that the people around him will start to blame him. Because the default is that women are perfect. And if women are perfect, then the blame must be shifted onto the man. They will make all kinds of excuses not to hold women accountable for any errors. It is always shifted. Because to lay sin to their charge is unthinkable.

I've had evil women do some strange things to me. And really, the average person can't and doesn't want to conceive of some of the games these people are playing. So if you start speaking about it, they''' just start blaming you as being a weak man, or they'll say you're deficient in some way. It can't be the women. Women have uteri and babies come from there, making them sources of righteousness who have the most upright integrity. (This is why feminists will cry out that their moral compass is in their vagina. They really do believe they are gods and lords over humanity.)

Or if you as a man turn a woman down or you feel harassed by women you're not attracted to, some people will say such things like, You should be happy to have any attention from any woman at all. But if you were pressing some woman who wasn't interested, they might try to get her to file charges against you.

You're always wrong. The woman is always right. Now who is really always right? And who is always spotless and without blame? Aren't these traits they've really stolen from God and placed upon women?

And then if you don't consent to female rule, they'll start looking at you as if you are a rapist-oppressor and some vile person who needs to be plucked out of the earth before you harm someone, when it is really the evil women who are seeking to rule by oppression (and by lies and intimidation).