The eradication of lookism

[MrMan]

I'm sorry, but this discussion seems kind of pitiful. But I guess it is the sort of thing guys could discuss behind usernames.

In addition to physical activity, there is an 'emotional energy' you can get off a woman, that same thing you feel off a hug or an embrace. If that's missing, I'd imagine sex would be pretty bland and dull. Why would men pay $1000+ to masturbate?

[Nailer]

I'm sorry, but this discussion seems kind of pitiful. But I guess it is the sort of thing guys could discuss behind usernames.

In addition to physical activity, there is an 'emotional energy' you can get off a woman, that same thing you feel off a hug or an embrace. If that's missing, I'd imagine sex would be pretty bland and dull. Why would men pay $1000+ to masturbate?

No chance of STDs, no chance of life-destroying pregnancies, no emotional rollercoasters when they dump you for one of the other 50 guys chasing them, and I can still have sex with normal nice girls when I'm in Europe. This might be a way to tide me over when I'm in the faggot states of America. I plan on being celibate otherwise, as a lifeless piece of silicon is more appealing to me than what America offers me.

If you know an attractive girl in America with a nice personality who is on birth control who wants to be my girlfriend, please let me know.

[Cornfed]

In addition to physical activity, there is an 'emotional energy' you can get off a woman, that same thing you feel off a hug or an embrace. If that's missing, I'd imagine sex would be pretty bland and dull. Why would men pay $1000+ to masturbate?

The thing is that sterile pillhead Western cunts aren't really human in a meaningful sense anyway, so it is a case of choosing between defective sex dolls and quality ones.

[MrMan]

None of that explains why men would pay $1000 to masturbate.

[Cornfed]

None of that explains why men would pay $1000 to masturbate.

Because it presumably enhances the masturbation experience. The real question is why men continue to risk everything to masturbate into horrible Western females.

[Nailer]

I assume it would be more fun than regular masturbation, and it might help keep your sexual performance good for when you go overseas, as I find masturbation tends to weaken my sexual stamina when I resume having intercourse.

[flowerthief00]

I'm sorry, but this discussion seems kind of pitiful. But I guess it is the sort of thing guys could discuss behind usernames.

Pitiful is relative. To me, male financial servitude to females is pitiful. Far many more males choose that sorry road. It's what I want to see change.

Also, I discuss these things with my real-life friends all the time. They know my position with no username.

In addition to physical activity, there is an 'emotional energy' you can get off a woman, that same thing you feel off a hug or an embrace. If that's missing, I'd imagine sex would be pretty bland and dull. Why would men pay $1000+ to masturbate?

Why do you assume you can't have the same thing with a doll? Many doll owners report that they enjoy cuddling with their doll even more than the sex. Lying in bed with your arms around a doll is virtually the same feeling as lying in bed with your arms around an organic woman. Maybe better, since the doll doesn't snore, toss or turn, get up to go take a shit, or compete with you for blanket or bed space.

None of that explains why men would pay $1000 to masturbate.

My friend, a doll is a whole different game from masturbation, porn, or garden variety sex toys. Unlike those options, a doll provides intimacy AND companionship.

Straight men really cannot have intimacy and companionship in any form without paying for it, excepting the top few percent of attractive or high-status men who women will actually chase. For all the rest:

Get into a long-term relationship and you're paying.
Get married and you're paying; maybe even after she leaves you.
Get with hookers and you're paying.
Get into pick-up "artistry" and you are still paying; you pay with your time more than with your money.

If you're going to pay, why not pay in such a way that

1. does not give power to the female collective
2. puts you in complete control of every variable

Also, the cost of a doll is all up-front. The cost of a relationship with a real woman often turns out to be more expensive than you thought. And not just in terms of money. The loss of your freedom, the loss of your friends, the loss of your life in some cases.

[traveller]

No . He is absolutely right. I just came back from South Korea..and I want to go back just for the eye candy you see everywhere. Here in NYC it's like barf zone everywhere. I mean you have to really look hard to find a attractive women. And I notice if a woman is attractive all the guys look only because it's so rare and they act sooo stuck up.

But that's not the case in other countries where the norm is being average to OK looking. It's like in America there is no more pride in how you look and becoming fat with tattoo is the look that many women and some men are going for. It's depressing really.

It's just getting worst saying that on my last trip to South Korea I also notice a slow change that even Koreans are starting to copy that stupid American look in getting over weight and getting tattoos.

It really disappoints me that there are a lot of obese women here in Southwest Florida. The weather in Southwest Florida is perfect all 12 months a year for swimming, bicycle riding, walking, jogging, growing healthy fruits and vegetables in your own yard. Foods such as oranges, coconuts, grapefruits, lemons, broccoli, avocados, and such. But what does even tropical paradise get in return? Obesity rates that stink!

And I even keep saying it all the time. Obesity has no excuse in a tropical climate! And it makes me unhappy that even in a tropical climate, there are people that just love sitting in front of the television, shovelling sausage, bratwursts, and heart attack on a platter meals into their mouths, and pretending like it's 5 below zero outside with a roaring blizzard.

[Nailer]

I doubt I will ever follow through with buying one of these, but check this out. A dude was prosecuted for buying one that wasn't tall enough:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... court.html

Yeah, yeah, I know the official story is that it might have been "too childlike" but it's funny how anything that threatens the western female monopoly on sex is treated as top priority with utmost urgency.

It's also funny how "childlike" and "not obese" are subtly being intentionally confused.

[flowerthief00]

^If you're in the USA it's still safe, I believe, to import any doll. The UK, tho, is clamping down.

How is it that laws against "obscene or indecent articles" can still exist today. What the hell counts as "obscene". What the hell counts as "indecent". How about they restrict the scope of laws to things which demonstrably causes harm, dammit, instead of picking on some poor harmless guy at taxpayer expense. As an advocate for dolls, stories like the above piss me off.

[Nailer]

I don't really have any opinion on the doll thing. Yeah, obviously it is sick, but the guy is living in a nightmare dystopia, so go figure.

The real story obviously is "You are not paying homage to women, now we will publicly humiliate you".

[flowerthief00]

I don't really have any opinion on the doll thing. Yeah, obviously it is sick, but the guy is living in a nightmare dystopia, so go figure.

The real story obviously is "You are not paying homage to women, now we will publicly humiliate you".

Yep, that is much pretty much it.

Which implies that we should have opinions on dolls. They have the potential to change the game; that is, weaken the gynocentric stranglehold on us all. Which is why they are being opposed so vigorously. Which is why even a man who has no interest in getting a doll himself ought to be supporting them.

[Cornfed]

Which implies that we should have opinions on dolls. They have the potential to change the game; that is, weaken the gynocentric stranglehold on us all.

I don't think they do. Even if half of men gave up on females in favor of dolls the females could still get plenty of sex and attention from the other half. We just need to overthrow the ZOG, punish the asshole traitors enforcing it and reduce females to slave status. That is the only hope.

[Nailer]

I don't really have any opinion on the doll thing. Yeah, obviously it is sick, but the guy is living in a nightmare dystopia, so go figure.

The real story obviously is "You are not paying homage to women, now we will publicly humiliate you".

Yep, that is much pretty much it.

Which implies that we should have opinions on dolls. They have the potential to change the game; that is, weaken the gynocentric stranglehold on us all. Which is why they are being opposed so vigorously. Which is why even a man who has no interest in getting a doll himself ought to be supporting them.

You really don't understand market forces. Basically, these MGTOW types are trying to create a cartel situation where supply is artificially limited, in hopes of increasing the market price (what women offer in return). But if women improve their offer (by not being bitchy and fat) then men will re-renter the market and we are right back to square one.

The market-based solution is to import 20 million slim white girls instead of 20 million more aggressive brown men.

Of course no one will suggest this because western men tend to have this blind spot for solutions that actually work, and prefer to support suspicious viral marketing campaigns that look Jewish in origin.

[rabbithabit]

Lookism is a alive & "very well" in every country. This post is certainly instigated by a misogynist woman hater fantasy from lack of affection.