https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-wors ... mg00000003
The article also points out that many of the websites that point out this problem use the type or rhetoric that undermines the effect of the website:
MRA organizations could create some training for judges and attorneys about these issues. They could also support candidates who are open to their message, especially men, for elected family court judge roles. I wonder if it is the case that lower performers in law school go into family law, and the high performers tend to be male and go into higher paying legal professions. Feminists may be drawn to family law to do their idea of SJW activity. Pro-family conservatives may find becoming divorce lawyers distasteful, also, so I wonder if this causes family courts to lean too far left.Given the foregoing, this problem is certainly one that our judicial system should address and remedy. Part of the reason I believe that it hasn't is due to the fact that, unfortunately, those raising this legitimate concern tend to do so using vitriolic rhetoric. Websites focusing on men's and father's rights abound, and most use bombastic language that pretty much undermines their point that these men are peaceful and non-threatening.