Page 2 of 3

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 11:11 am
by S_Parc
Jackal wrote:
Woman'sview wrote:Are some men running from being responsible?
I will reply with another question: Are some women trying to have it both ways?

I would be very curious to know if Women's View has always been such a conservative, religious person. Was she at home washing her husband's shirts and praying when she was 22? Or was she out busily sucking all the bad boy cock she could get her hands on?

It seems to be a common pattern that American women will be as wild and slutty as they want when they are young, but then when they hit 35 or so and realize that they are no longer in such demand, they start to promote the conservative, religious outlook because it limits men's possibilities and gives women more emotional and economic stability.

The typical aging AW says, "Gee, I truly regret those thousands of times I've been pounded every which way by the cocks of psychotic bad boys. Now I've become religious and holy. Ta da!! Look, I'm great marriage material. I've changed--I swear! Nice guys, check me out!"

They are trying to have it both ways.

They had their fun. Now we can have ours. So they should shut the f**k up.

Most AW's statements about "holiness" are pure hypocrisy which are at least as self-serving as a man's desire for a really good blowjob.
Woman'sview wrote: Will you give America a bad name, by constantly hanging around bars and nightclubs, approaching women for casual sex, and treating women like a plaything? Will you make women objects?
That's the wrong reason for going overseas.
It's also a good way to get an incurable venereal disease.
Perhaps, but let me tell you of another activity that gives women a high chance of getting vernereal diseases: having unprotected sex with hundreds of male partners in America!
Woman'sview wrote: Forgive American women her errors, and just live your life. Become a man. It's a worthy quest you'll probably have to devote your whole life to 7 days a week, 24 hrs a day, 365 days a year.
What you really mean is that American men should sacrifice their lives to American women. No, thanks. Too many American men have given everything they had mentally and physically to their American wives and families only to end up with nothing. The whole thing smacks of fascism, "Work for the glory of your nation-state, reap the fruits of your labor, reproduce to create more mindless workers for the state, and enjoy your recreational time by doing one of several state-approved activities."

And who are you to judge who is a "real man"? For you it seems the term "real man" equals "slave." And that's really the heart of the feminist agenda, no matter what guise it takes: turning men into slaves.

We the members of this forum refuse to be slaves. Find your slaves elsewhere.
Jackal, excellent retort to WV's underhanded attack on men going abroad. Well done, I'm reposting it here on my thread, so that WV doesn't get a bump up.

This is great, WV is clearly not helping anyone but herself on this forum and now, she can't hide behind anyone anymore.

Fellows, we're now united :D !

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 11:58 am
by The_Hero_of_Men
UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL!!!!

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 12:32 pm
by jamesbond
the_hero_of_time wrote:UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL!!!!
Amen! Women's view is using shaming tactics to try and get men to do what SHE wants them to do. Apparently for a lot of women in the US, it's ok for THEM to sleep around when they are young and have their "cake and eat it too" but men should be waiting with open arms when these women hit 35 and are looking for a husband! :shock:

No thanks, I don't want an "Ameri-skank" for a wife. I don't want my future wife to have been f***ed six ways from Sunday by every bad boy this side of the Mississippi river! :shock:

In the US more women than men have herpes (25% of women in the US have herpes). This does not include other sexually transmitted diseases. American women are some of the most promiscuous women in the world! :shock:

Just say "no" to the American "hoe." :lol:

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 1:22 pm
by S_Parc
jamesbond wrote:Amen! Women's view is using shaming tactics to try and get men to do what SHE wants them to do. Apparently for a lot of women in the US, it's ok for THEM to sleep around when they are young and have their "cake and eat it too" but men should be waiting with open arms when these women hit 35 and are looking for a husband! :shock:

No thanks, I don't want an "Ameri-skank" for a wife. I don't want my future wife to have been f***ed six ways from Sunday by every bad boy this side of the Mississippi river! :shock:
Yeah, except that I know skanks who've done swine on both sides of the river :wink: and I'm not talking about Minneapolis, but a slew of states.

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 5:11 pm
by Truthville
As one whom TRIED to debate WV and just today sent her a PM she will no doubt ignore, I stand guilty of feeding the troll.

I apologize most sincerely.

I will say, in my defense, that I was trying to get this person to see the illogical fallicies of her arguments and at least ADMIT that her whole "biological programming" defense for the attraction to "bad boys" ie the "strong alpha male", is really just media induced cultural conditioning. Alas, to no avail I believe.

I've found most women, strike that ALL women, I've met, dated etc..........have a childlike ability to never question their own minds, thoughts, desires, and attractions and to just simply accept. Why, they must think, question things that they have been conditioned to WANT, the only question is how to get what they want.

"Joan" needs to wake up, as most of us have, BUT since it is now a woman's world in the west, she can keep living through her shackled perceptions. Good luck to her!


TruthVille

P.S. S_Parc? You mentioned Mpls. You live in Mpls?

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 7:13 pm
by S_Parc
Truthville wrote:P.S. S_Parc? You mentioned Mpls. You live in Mpls?
No, the Mpls reference was just a joke about the east/west Mississippi divide since the Twin Cities region flanks both sides of the river. I'd been on a few business trips to Mpls but I didn't have any extended stays there. My home base is Boston MA.
Truthville wrote:As one whom TRIED to debate WV and just today sent her a PM she will no doubt ignore, I stand guilty of feeding the troll.

I apologize most sincerely.

I will say, in my defense, that I was trying to get this person to see the illogical fallicies of her arguments and at least ADMIT that her whole "biological programming" defense for the attraction to "bad boys" ie the "strong alpha male", is really just media induced cultural conditioning. Alas, to no avail I believe.

I've found most women, strike that ALL women, I've met, dated etc..........have a childlike ability to never question their own minds, thoughts, desires, and attractions and to just simply accept. Why, they must think, question things that they have been conditioned to WANT, the only question is how to get what they want.

"Joan" needs to wake up, as most of us have, BUT since it is now a woman's world in the west, she can keep living through her shackled perceptions. Good luck to her!
Well Truthville, I'm also guilty of troll feeding but my idea was more to make her rhetorical articles have a more delineated "advice" approach as oppose to lengthy ramblings with that self-righteous religious overtone. But then, I realize that it was just that ... self-promoting ramblings and nothing of substance.

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 8:10 pm
by swincor
Truthville wrote: I will say, in my defense, that I was trying to get this person to see the illogical fallicies of her arguments and

Bad defense.

You do NOT use logic to get women to see the error of their ways.

Posted: March 6th, 2011, 5:36 pm
by S_Parc
Guys, in an attempt not to feed the troll, I'm responding to you fellows with WV's latest admonition towards this board. My responses are aimed towards you, I'm not actively engaging WV.
Woman'sview wrote:P.S. Don't hate me, I am your sister, daughter, mother, friend and classmate.
Well, considering that my sister is slowly killing her browbeaten husband, perhaps a little *distaste* is in order. But ok, I have a few decent friends and classmates :wink:
Woman'sview wrote:Hi. You feel you can run from the American female, but you really can't.
Good primer for a 'Night of the Living Dead' spinoff flick. :lol:
Woman'sview wrote:I hope that you find what you are looking for, overseas. But don't get too confident or complacent, because you have to remember you are going to return the the states sometime and your wife is going to see that other women don't live the way she does, and she has a good chance of succumbing to the lifestyle of her sisters in the U.S. And if she doesn't, your unborn daughters are definitely going to be American girls. This has happened to many men who have brought wives back from the third world and once they enter on American soil there is a a complete personality change. Often time, she might really be a sweet fawning wife, sincere and genuine, but the money, the freedom, the pedestal that Americans put pretty women on, may cause something in her to come out that even she did not know she had. Suddenly you may find yourself looking at a stranger you thought you knew, who sees your as her jailer. Suddenly you have become boring to her, a restraining force, and she soon knows that she has rights, she can call 911, she can have the police at her beck and call. The cops and laws are all on her side. She will soon find out that she can have pickings and choosing she never even dreamed of. My advice, don't bring your wife and daughters here. Or marry a foreign woman who practices a strong christian religion, that does believe in divorce.
Perfect, so she admits that American women are in fact, psychopaths. I rest my case.

All that talk about the exclusive ~5% is just that, a lot of hot air.

And fellows, you can raise your offsprings abroad and they'll get US citizenship at birth so you won't need to worry, if they ever decide to run for President :roll: in the future. Just make sure you've contact your consular officer and get their births registered. If you do decide to raise 'em here, even part-time, make sure that there's a diaspora community in the locale.

Posted: March 8th, 2011, 7:14 am
by S_Parc
Phoenix Sosa wrote:Why are you so concerned about the men here? Don't you have something better to do than to worry about grown ass men and their mission in life? Leave us alone and go somewhere else to troll.

Um, we all can leave America. It's called getting a plane ticket and a passport and/or a visa. It's not that hard. Just because no men want a dried up prune like you doesn't mean the rest of the men in America have to suffer. Go away.

200+ countries in the world and you sit here trying to preach your bullshit. There's a world outside of America and you are mad the men on here are smart enough to figure that out. Go back to drooling over mass murderers.
Bingo Phoenix, she's attempting a new 'turfing style to keep herself relevant around here.

Please try to respond to my thread rather than hers. It'll minimize the no of times she gets bumped up. Really, we need to maintain an embargo. Winston won't ban her since she only talks smack & avoids direct assaults.

Posted: March 9th, 2011, 10:27 am
by S_Parc
Jackal wrote:WV, no one cares about this shit. Start your own blog instead of cluttering up this forum with posts that address issues that we've all long since been aware of.

The last thing we care about on this site is to get deeper into the thought processes of an AW. It's irrelevant to us. We don't care. Tell someone who cares.
Hey Jackal, I think the more WV talks, the more she discredits AWs to her disadvantage. All her prior posts, before the full court press/smackdown of the past two weeks, was in the search for the elusive top ~5% of AWs.

Granted, she's spouting smack-talk to keep herself on this board, since calling us "AW haters" isn't effective anymore, but since she's now admitting that AWs like thugs and players ... well, she's exacted the exact karma which is that the good guys will stop dating AWs (see aforementioned thug/player magnet) and date FWs exclusively. What comes around goes around, hence, she's lost the battle, once again, with her malarkey.

I'm actually now beginning to wonder if WV even believes that this elite ~5% exists because she's beginning to depict this group as a unicorn or a lost continent of sorts, given all the mainstream AW ladies who're thug/player magnets. When an elite group doesn't have a clear description or a set of delineations, then they become more a legend than a real life entity.

Posted: March 9th, 2011, 4:22 pm
by S_Parc
ssjparris wrote:woman's view is fuckin' CRAZY. everything she says she won't do. she will go and do it. her most recent post above is simply stating how much she hates men. puts ALL the blame on men like they are the problem in society. she is brainwashed into thinking that men just want sex only. when this is not the case. she craves sex more then any man. and wants sex with them.

the girl groups here in america. they want his dick, his dick, and his dick. that want every man's dick in public. i have asked a prostitute before. and she admits this. she told me. the girls will never say it to men. but in the girl groups they talk about how they want dicks from male friends or college men they have the hots for or whatever!!!.

Women's View said " I don't practice premarital sex. Because of my faith, I don't advocate it either." this is BULLS***T. Tom Leykis stated before, " Whenever a woman says she won't go and do it. she is lieing. she WILL go and do the exact opposite of what she just said she would not do."

im sorry i am out of this conversation with woman view yeesh.
Good work ssiparris! Since the prior smackdown, when WV finally activated the 'Men who hate AW ala whoa is me' tagline, she's really become the joke of this forum.

I'm embargo-ing all her threads, however, if you want, you can respond with your observations on her neurosis here, so that we can have a discussion away from the troll baiting zone.

Posted: March 10th, 2011, 10:37 pm
by Grunt
I find it stunning that anyone here is actually wasting keystrokes on this obvious troll. Ignore it and it will surely go away.

Posted: March 14th, 2011, 12:17 pm
by S_Parc
BellaRuth wrote:This site is addictive. I got so busy recently, but I took a glance back here, and I got hooked again!

Woman's View (I am a female too, by the way): I don't really see the point in your post and the patronising tone of it probably didn't do you any favours either. What are you asking the men to do, exactly? Forgive American women and stay there? Doesn't make sense. You have one life to live. If things are that bad there, the best thing for men to do is go somewhere better and enjoy themselves. You too, if you agree it's a bad environment. There's no gain in anyone sticking around and trying to understand what's gone wrong unless they are interested in it anyway or getting paid to theorise.

I also get a bit annoyed at how you say you are showing 'how women think'. Every post I've read from you that describes this is totally off the mark to the point of making me gasp in horror. I'd have to counter it if I thought anyone believed it was true.

Being Western females, neither of us serve any purpose here, so I think it's best to just admit that rather than think you are an important asset and that you should be listened to. If you want to stick around, ask yourself why. It seems you aren't too keen on American society either, so maybe get tips on how to move, and where to. There's a whole world out there, and it's worth exploring.
BellaRuth, that's just it, WV is seeking a sense of self-importance, not a person disseminating practical advice for anyone who wants to listen.

And yes, 'forgiving AW and staying put' is more or less her M.O. because she's trying to validate herself and her sense of ownership on how the genders should behave.

In losing the fight on the forum, she's resorted to calling folks *haters* and then, tried divide/conquer among the posterers here, as if she was the "Housekeeping Seal of Approval" on who was a 'real' man and who wasn't. It's rather transparent now which is why you're seeing a lot of visceral reactions against each and every one of her posts.

Posted: March 14th, 2011, 4:41 pm
by jamesbond
Grunt wrote:I find it stunning that anyone here is actually wasting keystrokes on this obvious troll. Ignore it and it will surely go away.
The funny thing is, didn't women's view say she was married? I wonder if her husband knows she is spending time on this discussion forum. Shouldn't she be spending more time with her husband?

Posted: March 14th, 2011, 4:53 pm
by S_Parc
jamesbond wrote:The funny thing is, didn't women's view say she was married? I wonder if her husband knows she is spending time on this discussion forum. Shouldn't she be spending more time with her husband?
Perhaps this is her net version of the anti-'Desperate Housewives', tagline ... "Desperate Housewives and the single American guys who don't want 'em" :) ?