Winston Wu - The Most Freethinking Asian of All-Time?

[jamesbond]

[jamesbond]

[jamesbond]

[livefreeordie]

Hehe I think Lao Tzu takes the win, author of the Tao Te Ching, or perhaps Genghis Kahn in his ability to use his thoughts to conquer more of the world in 25 years than Rome was able to conquer in 400

But you certainly are the most free thinking Asian ive come across at this present time There are so many historical examples of a culture of free thinking and intellectual study and questioning that are part of Asian culture that seem a bit suppressed at the present time in the pursuit of money~Genghis Kahn, the Ninja of japan, the Samurai code and Martial arts, the Shaolin and aesthetics of China, Buddhism, Confucianism etc etc

[Ghost]

We should work on a Wikipedia page for Winston.

"Winston Wu is an inter-dimensional, time traveling being though is currently incarnated as a highly freethinking Asian man. He also occasionally goes by other alias or titles, such as Great Leader or Most Freethinking Asian of all Time or f***er of 10,000 Bargirls. His freethinking abilities have been noted to be among the highest on earth. Deeply interested in such things as conspiracy theories, he currently holds the world record for forum posts about conspiracies. Due to his ability to time travel, Winston has been known to pop in and out of the timeline in various places, which is why he often revisits threads that have dead for ages and responding to peoples' messages from years ago as if they had posted said messages yesterday. Having a partly European soul, he feels more at home taking in the more intellectual European environment than in such stodgy and repressed environments as Taiwan or the U.S."

Well, it's a start.

[jamesbond]

Everybody loves Winston.

[pandabear]

Roosh has a wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roosh_V

Why not Winston? Particularly if NO Asian, at ANY point in time, has ever out-freethought our Winston. Certainly Winston's writings are superior to and vastly more intellectual than those of Lao-tse, the Buddha, Confucius, and Chairman Mao combined.

Unless there is a conspiracy, and Wikipedia is racist.

[jamesbond]

[Winston]

More quotes testifying to Winston's uniqueness among Asians:

viewtopic.php?p=280053#p280053

Only Winston, is the guy who accepts negative criticism on himself in his own forum and debates it and argues it logically.

I think Winston was a white guy in the past ....because no Chinese DNA will give you this much freedom ...There is not even a single Chinese forum that can even be compared closely to say it otherwise....Asian DNA is not meant to respect true freedom of speech...Winston is a different soul

viewtopic.php?p=279550#p279550

Winston is the only guy on the entire internet that I know, that truly follows White Man's spirit of freedom of speech. Even white owners of forums do not allow this much freedom...We already know Asian centric forums are crap...We are talking about levels that White man feels comfortable in.

[Winston]

Roosh has a wikipedia page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roosh_V

Why not Winston? Particularly if NO Asian, at ANY point in time, has ever out-freethought our Winston. Certainly Winston's writings are superior to and vastly more intellectual than those of Lao-tse, the Buddha, Confucius, and Chairman Mao combined.

Unless there is a conspiracy, and Wikipedia is racist.

To qualify for a Wikipedia page, you have to be featured on the mainstream media in some way. Roosh has met that qualification. That's the official requirement. You can read it on their site. If you start a Wikipedia page about me, it will probably be removed. I tried it once and it was removed. lol

However, it's not necessarily a good thing to be on Wikipedia, because you have NO control over what's put up there about you. The writers and editors there tend to be liberal and pro-establishment. They are highly biased too. So even if what's on your Wikipedia page is a LIE or factually false, you can't change it. All you can do is try to appeal to the editors. It's ultimately up to them. Not you. Also, Wikipedia could put up negative info about you and you would have no control over it. So it's not necessarily a good thing to be on Wikipedia.

[jamesbond]

[jamesbond]

[jamesbond]

[El_Caudillo]

James Bond, love your work.