Oh well, now you're quoting a blog that reports the "fact" from Vigilant Citizen...touche
No, really, anything can be, or its contrary. Those who know me or at least met me know I am not the While Knight kind of man. I am just being objective towards a way of thinking that sounds way too extreme in my books.
Not saying what you're saying is utter BS, but your inability to let go of the extreme stereotypes about women and their (alleged) evil power over us poor men is just as pathetic as what you're trying to bash.
Contrarian Expatriate wrote: ↑August 1st, 2018, 1:54 pm
publicduende wrote:
Why do you want to reduce a woman's innate desire to have a stable companion to some sort of evil entrapment? In ALL cases, really? Come on...
There are exceptions to almost every rule, but those exceptions actually further PROVE the rule! But you should ask yourself why you believe women have an inborn desire for a STABLE companion. This is emblematic of the fatal flaw of your gynocentric thinking. I would say healthy women wish to have a stable companion, but most Western women (especially young women) are not healthy in my view. Your in all cases argument is straw man baiting so I'll ignore it.
Women who want to have children and raise them in a quality environment will be looking for a stable companion. That a growing number of (Western) women believe they can do without men or continue to ride the c*ck carousel instead of tendering to their motherly duties, that's very unfortunate. This doesn't mean that more traditional girls who behave "healthily" do not exist, or that it's not worth pursuing them.
Contrarian Expatriate wrote: ↑August 1st, 2018, 1:54 pm
And I would say that the very fact that you believe in the "good woman" myth is that you are gynocentric and brainwashed by Western, errant, ideals. Every person on this earth is some mixture of good and bad. Picture every "Good Woman" you know. Now picture them bent over a chair being pounded by various men who gave them a vagina tingle in the past. Some of these women were church-going, some respected mothers, and some otherwise. But female nature is what it is. It is hypergamous and the good women have affairs, cheat, initiate breakups, abuse kids, abuse husbands in ways that for some reason you've been conditioned to not see. I would say it is the men who think like you who have the most to lose when "The Realization" finally manifests itself in your life.
In Italy we say "if granny had bollocks, then it would be grandpa". You start calling a woman a "good woman" and then you stick all the sort of degenerate behaviours that
won't make her a good woman. Is she good or not? Are you playing with words?
Women are "naturally" hypergamous like men are "naturally" polygamous. The ability for these primal instinct not to manifest, or to be tempered, is down to our reasoning. In worlds other than your fantasyland, women and men don't necessarily run wild chasing the alpha male and all the females in the pack, respectively.
Contrarian Expatriate wrote: ↑August 1st, 2018, 1:54 pm
I was born in the US, but I don't have to live in the USA anymore by the good grace of god.
I dread to think what kind of place you elected your home, with this way of thinking...
Contrarian Expatriate wrote: ↑August 1st, 2018, 1:54 pm
Your being divorced and remarried certainly explains a lot. You are fully INVESTED in the good woman myth. Your first wife was so "good" that you got rid of her, yet are afraid to view her as a woman not worthy of keeping as a wife. This is quintessential gynocentrism. Have you ever heard of the Latin concept of Marianismo? You reek of it.
To make matters worse, you remarried, hoping to get it right this time but in due time you will likely discover that this wife will no longer be worthy of keeping as a wife.
At some point the light bulb should be going off in your head young man!
The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again yet expecting a different result - Albert Einstein.
This is another big fallacy. I married my first wife and we had a very decent relationship, up to a point. Then we realised that we do not have much in common and we'd be better off being apart. It was a mutual decision and, a few fights apart, not one that was lived in particularly traumatic way by either of us.
We "got rid of each other", to use your expression. And so what? Why would that change the sense of respect we have for each other. We remain who we are even if we are no longer husband and wife. We did not break up because she was a nasty b*tch or I was an insufferable a**hole.
I have a gf now, a Filipina. We are not married yet and, frankly, we don't know if we will ever cross that bridge again. She is a very nice girl and we are still getting to know each other. Unlike you, most men are still capable of giving themselves the benefit of the doubt, or a suspended judgment at least, and enjoy while it lasts. It sometimes lasts for a long time...and it's worth checking out if that is the case or not.
CE, I don't remember having much of an exchange with you in the past and surely don't remember you having such extreme views on women. Anyone who doesn't subscribe to your self-reassured worldview is automatically a "gynocentric", right?