Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Deepak Chopra whips Richard Dawkins in public debate!

Discuss religion and spirituality topics.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Deepak Chopra whips Richard Dawkins in public debate!

Postby Winston » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:43 pm

Check out this awesome debate in Spain between Deepak Chopra (spiritual guru and best-selling mind/body wellness author) vs. Richard Dawkins (closed minded atheist fundamentalist and evolutionist) about science, spirituality and consciousness.

Chopra outshines Dawkins and makes more sense, revealing Dawkins to be a closed minded fundamentalist who refuses to embrace consciousness.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4c_CrQzUGw[/youtube]
Last edited by Winston on Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:38 am, edited 2 times in total.
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23609
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:16 pm







Postby MrPeabody » Wed Apr 23, 2014 3:24 pm

I don't like either of these speakers. Dawkins is correct that Chopra is an obscuritanist who confuses the use of the word "quantum" mainly to sell his books. However, Dawkins has anger issues and if he were honest he would admit that science can't prove or disprove God. By using science to discredit religion, he is going beyond the competency of science just like Chopra does.
MrPeabody
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:53 pm

Postby Winston » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:02 am

MrPeabody wrote:I don't like either of these speakers. Dawkins is correct that Chopra is an obscuritanist who confuses the use of the word "quantum" mainly to sell his books. However, Dawkins has anger issues and if he were honest he would admit that science can't prove or disprove God. By using science to discredit religion, he is going beyond the competency of science just like Chopra does.


Yeah but Chopra's opinions and use of such words is qualified. He has many quantum physicists, scientists, neuroscientists, biologists and cosmologists on his side who agree with him. Such as Max Planck, Freeman Dyson, Karl Pribram, etc. He quotes many of them too. He is on the cutting edge of the merging of science and spirituality, consciousness research, etc. Many experts and scientists agree with Chopra. He's not that fringe.

Dawkins is simply uninformed about all this and acts very closed minded. He thinks all scientists agree with him, but they don't. Some are on the cutting edge of merging science and spirituality. He just isn't in tune with those circles.

Did you watch the debate? Or are you just commenting based on your prior knowledge? Chopra shines in this debate and wipes the floor with Dawkins. He makes more sense in it than Dawkins.
Last edited by Winston on Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23609
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:16 pm

Postby MrPeabody » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:35 am

Winston wrote:
MrPeabody wrote:I don't like either of these speakers. Dawkins is correct that Chopra is an obscuritanist who confuses the use of the word "quantum" mainly to sell his books. However, Dawkins has anger issues and if he were honest he would admit that science can't prove or disprove God. By using science to discredit religion, he is going beyond the competency of science just like Chopra does.


Yeah but Chopra's opinions and use of such words is qualified. He has many quantum physicists, scientists, neuroscientists, and cosmologists on his side who agree with him. Such as Max Planck, Freeman Dyson, Karl Pribram, etc. He quotes many of them too. He is on the cutting edge of the merging of science and spirituality, consciousness research, etc. Many experts and scientists agree with Chopra. He's not that fringe.

Dawkins is simply uninformed about all this and acts very closed minded. He thinks all scientists agree with him, but they don't. Some are on the cutting edge of merging science and spirituality. He just isn't in tune with those circles.

Did you watch the debate? Or are you just commenting based on your prior knowledge? Chopra shines in this debate and wipes the floor with Dawkins. He makes more sense in it than Dawkins.


Yes, I watched the whole thing. They were basically restating their positions and arguing about the philosophy of science. I am skeptical about Chopra saying any scientist agrees with him since he is a self-promoter. I don't like Dawkins either. I thought the debate was a wash. I have heard all those arguments before.
MrPeabody
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1246
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:53 pm

Postby Winston » Thu Apr 24, 2014 2:41 am

Yeah but Chopra was more eloquent and made more sense in the debate.

I'm not saying that many scientists, biologists and physicists agree with everything Chopra says. But many of them do agree with some of what he says, such as reality being an illusion, perhaps being conscious, thoughts having a greater effect on our biology and DNA than we previously thought, etc.

Chopra quotes many of them in his books and lectures. They are real quotes. Chopra isn't a liar. It doesn't mean they endorse everything Chopra says. But they have similar views about certain things.
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23609
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:16 pm

Postby Winston » Wed Apr 30, 2014 5:14 pm

In Deepak Chopra's video presentation "The Happiness Prescription" a woman told him "I was happier in Mexico and Puerto Rico. You were right about people there being happier." In response, Chopra said:

"In such cultures, people do not have as much purchasing power, so they focus on cultivating SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS with others, whereas America is more of a consumerist culture where people try to fill their void with consumerism. Hence people are labeled as "consumers". Americans also possess a strong competitive mentality toward others rather than a cooperative one like people in poorer countries do."

It's amazing how he was brave enough to mention that. Almost no New Age gurus will talk about how people are friendlier abroad. Instead, they always say that all the problems in America are the same all over the world, and that people are the same everywhere. The only cultural differences they talk about are usually in comparison with indigenous tribes in the forest that are not part of modern industrial society. So you gotta give Chopra some kudos for that.
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23609
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:16 pm

Postby Falcon » Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:46 am

Winston, you're more of a New Age-type guy right?

Brought up to be somewhat Buddhist, not Christian anymore after your adolescent conversion, but not actually atheist either.

And yes, you're a guy who refuses to be fit into neat categories and boxes. :wink:
Falcon
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1654
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:59 pm

Postby pandabear » Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:50 am

Did you notice the comment and link that Dr. Chopra put in the Comments section?

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/928 ... d-dawkins/
pandabear
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2077
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 3:54 am
Location: USA


Return to Religion and Spirituality

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest