Winston wrote:Ok so why would putting money in a Swiss bank be safer?
And why can't someone just fly to Switzerland and do it himself? He can transfer his cash account from his home bank by check. That's how most people do it I think. I don't think anyone carries briefcases with thousands of dollars in cash in it. lol
There is no need to risk using third party services.
switzerland has legislation about confidentially of bank accounts. The guvment will disclose bank account information to another guvment if sufficient evidence of criminal activity is presented to the guvment and the bank. There are rules about bank account disclosures that the man has to know about to make sure he does not break them or his bank account may be disclosed to his guvment.
One such rule is that a divorce is a civil and not criminal matter and so bank account details are not required to be disclosed just because of a divorce. But if the divorce lawyer can present evidence of the bank account being used to perpetrate some form of criminal act then the account details will be disclosed. Tax avoidance is not classed as a criminal act by the way. But contempt of court IS. So you have to KNOW these things to keep your bank account confidential from your guvment.
Further. The swiss are not short on on money. If you lob up at a swiss bank and promise that you can deposit EUR100,000 you will yawned at in indifference. It is not like they need the money. They are VERY picky about who they will open up bank accounts for. You have to establish your bonafides. You have to PROVE the source of the money. You have to PROVE a lot of things before they will open up an account for you. As it happens the guy handling my business is a man who was very badly screwed over in divorce. He will not break his banks rules or regulations but he will give men trying to avoid getting screwed over in divorce a better hearing than others who are just coming along to deposit money in his bank. That is not a guarantee...that is a "better hearing" because he has more in common with these men.
The swiss guvment has introduced a LOT of legislation over the last 20 years to reduce the amount of money that is in swiss banks that are the proceeds of criminal activities. They can prosecute the banks very severely for holding deposits that are the proceeds of crimes. So there is a LOT of paperwork that has to be done. And they ask for a LOT of evidence.
If you show up and you do not know ALL the things you might be asked for then you will waste your trip. If you happen to get a woman processing your application and you say you are trying to not get screwed over in divorce as your reason for wanting the account don't be imagining she will open it for you. The people who open the accounts have wide discretion for rejection and they do not need to tell you why they refused your account. Your trip could be fruitless. I was told do not bother trying to go to a bank and asking for an account off the street. Indeed. I was told by MANY banks I emailed that I was well advised to use one of the service providers to get a bank account. One of the services the service providers provide is screening of prospective clients and then presentation of the clients to the bank that best suites the client. Not all swiss banks are suitable for all people. They are very different organisations.
This process can take WEEKS and the paper work flows back and forth as the bank determines for itself as to whether you are a criminal looking to hide money or just a regular guy looking to grow your assets over time. Since both cases look VERY similar you can understand the banks position.
There are MANY service providers in Switzerland that provide this service. They will also help you find the right bank for your needs. The typical fee is EUR700-1000 and it is NOT REFUNDABLE if they can not find a bank that will open an account for you. That DOES happen. If the man can not provide enough evidence to establish bonafides the service provider will be paid and you will have no bank account. I know what the banks need.
Now. Once the account is opened the man has two choices MBA is offering.
1. Send the money directly.
In this case your guvment will know about it. In divorce the record of that transaction can be found. The amounts can be known. You will be assumed to have that money. And they WILL throw you in jail for contempt of court because they are criminals. I can not protect a man from criminals that want to throw him in jail. Similarly. Visa card transactions and the like are visible to your guvment.
2. Send the money indirectly via MBA.
In this case the money is transferred via MBA to the mans bank account. There is never, at any time, a record that the guvment can follow from the man to the account. The final movement would be in cash. Yes. The man has to rely on me to be honest. But I did not do all this work to rip men off. I did all this work to give them a chance to get their assets away from a bunch of criminals.
Do I want to be paid for doing this for men? Yes. I do. If men do not want to pay for this service because they do not value it then that's fine too. I paid for this service in the first place and the service that I was provided was well worth paying for in my opinion. By the way? I was told by this man in the bank that if I had walked in off the street there was NO WAY that I would have been able to open an account with them. The time and effort from the bank to go through that process is very significant. The service providers perform a lot of that time and effort and the man pays for that. Since the bank can not bill for such time and effort it is not very desirable for them to perform all that work. The service provider does a lot of the back and forth with the client before presenting any information to the bank. The service provider buffers the bank from wasting time on people who they should not offer accounts to.
The ONLY people I will provide this service for are MBA members who are UNDER BONDED OATH to be honest in their business dealings. Those members should expect that dishonesty will be HARSHLY punished.
If some other man wants to start a competing service, and there are many competing services out there already, that is fine by me. The differentiation of MBA services is that I demand honesty of the men who provide services and MBA LAW Services will provide the path to remedy for any man who commits a crime. That way all parties dealing with MBA members know they do not have to litigate thru guvment to get remedy for a crime or poor service. They can be assured MBA Law Services will remedy any PROVEN crime and MBA Adjudication Services will remedy any poor service.
It is not the individual service that is of such great value. It is the FRAMEWORK inside which the services are delivered that is of the greater value.
The age old question in buying.... "How do I know I am getting value for money and getting what I actually want?"
In the normal world the illuminati WANT to create disagreements and problems because disputes taken to THEIR COURTS give them a chance to rip off BOTH parties. They claim a monopoly on legal services.
MBA breaks this monopoly...and rather than promoting conflict and disagreement to be able to get people into court to steal from them......the MBA promotes LAWFUL OPERATIONS and honesty and harmony to make business transactions smoother.
THAT is why you would buy from MBA rather than some other competing service. MBA Law Services and MBA Adjudication Services and the fact that ALL members are UNDER BONDED OATH to act honestly. Whoever provides PROOF of a broken oath collects the bond. And the amount bonded will be public information.