Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.



View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Are you sex addicts or looking for something deeper?

Ask questions and get advice. Disclaimer: Any advice you take here is at your own risk. We are not liable for any consequences you might incur from following advice here. Note: Before posting your question, do a search for it in the Google Search box at the top to see if it's been addressed.

Moderators: fschmidt, jamesbond

Postby chanta76 » May 14th, 2014, 11:13 pm

Test. I triet to post sonething but it came out in weird text. Not sure if a moderator is hijacking my post.
chanta76
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1688
Joined: February 11th, 2008, 4:56 pm




Check out our Dating Sites and HA International Romance Tours!



Postby Luc Furr » May 15th, 2014, 4:35 am

Chanta76,

I think western women are shite. They are too big plus they're entitled feminists living on the wealth created by the very men they reject. They look for the best dog (be it a socialist capitalist, employee or a Christian parasite) to attach themselves to not understanding that dogs have never created wealth.

Doesn't matter the country though, women all over the world are the same. Women prefer a dog man who serves a master so he can get nice shiny objects for the woman.
Luc Furr
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 288
Joined: March 29th, 2014, 12:48 am

Postby QuestionMark » May 15th, 2014, 5:18 am

Of course I want and like sex, but I want dating long lasting good relationships. I can't get either one in america, that's why I'm looking abroad.
QuestionMark
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 154
Joined: April 17th, 2014, 6:03 am

Postby djfourmoney » May 15th, 2014, 5:46 am

TopSpruce wrote:
Luc Furr wrote:Chanta76,

think the animal kingdom. "Dominate alpha" (magpies) males monopolize the best females, Beta's (successful/handsome/sexy dog men) get the next lower tier, the do all the work Delta's are left with the less desirable women (Delta males don't really want Delta females and Delta females don't really want Delta males).

But wait there is a massive catch....Delta MALES from the WEST are actually Alpha's or Beta's in most places of the world. So like any male they move into a new territory to find desirable females to mate with. Delta females of the west are even more undesirable in most places of the world.

true love? no such thing just mutually beneficial arrangements.

btw how can a male be a sex addict? Males are genetically programmed to procreate as much as possible. It is natural for males to want sex and unnatural if they do not. Women are the one's who limit sex since they raise offspring.


Ok, but I'd like to add something. Dominant Alpha men are the same the world over, but the definition of beta is different according to country.

For example, in places where women need men for financial reasons, the men with resources will do better. In Belarus, I know a guy who is a computer programmer. He is a delta by America's/the West's definition of delta (studious, more interested in academics than big parties). But, he has resources. He's not dating super models, but he has beta level girls (6s and 7s). He's doing well.

On the other hand, girls don't need men for their resources so computer programmers do poorly in the USA.

Undeveloped economies actually reward studying, academic success, and innovative ideas for a business a lot more than developed economies. In developed economies, the guy who spends the most time partying and socializing does best...not the guy who develops a career and resources.

That's why people who are more educated and career oriented should head to different societies where they are rewarded better for their hard work. Its up to the individual, but that's my opinion.


Very astute...

Women don't "need" a man's resources but welcomes them as that is how they gain wealth. Western women that complain are just picking men based solely on emotions and not economics. That's why I put the threshold on dating in America that a man should earn $50,000 or more if he expect to be successful.

But that's not all, there's much more too it, mindset is more important than that.

I totally agree and while I have had success in dating in America, I have to repeat again that age is the main issue not if women find me acceptable or not.

I also want to be able to live a middle-class to upper middle-class for less, much less than it typically takes in Western countries.

These reasons are the main push behind relocating to Latin America. But I will likely have my children educated in Western Europe, we shall see.
djfourmoney
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: October 17th, 2010, 12:09 am
Location: Los Angeles

Postby TopSpruce » May 15th, 2014, 6:44 pm

djfourmoney wrote:
TopSpruce wrote:
Luc Furr wrote:Chanta76,

think the animal kingdom. "Dominate alpha" (magpies) males monopolize the best females, Beta's (successful/handsome/sexy dog men) get the next lower tier, the do all the work Delta's are left with the less desirable women (Delta males don't really want Delta females and Delta females don't really want Delta males).

But wait there is a massive catch....Delta MALES from the WEST are actually Alpha's or Beta's in most places of the world. So like any male they move into a new territory to find desirable females to mate with. Delta females of the west are even more undesirable in most places of the world.

true love? no such thing just mutually beneficial arrangements.

btw how can a male be a sex addict? Males are genetically programmed to procreate as much as possible. It is natural for males to want sex and unnatural if they do not. Women are the one's who limit sex since they raise offspring.


Ok, but I'd like to add something. Dominant Alpha men are the same the world over, but the definition of beta is different according to country.

For example, in places where women need men for financial reasons, the men with resources will do better. In Belarus, I know a guy who is a computer programmer. He is a delta by America's/the West's definition of delta (studious, more interested in academics than big parties). But, he has resources. He's not dating super models, but he has beta level girls (6s and 7s). He's doing well.

On the other hand, girls don't need men for their resources so computer programmers do poorly in the USA.

Undeveloped economies actually reward studying, academic success, and innovative ideas for a business a lot more than developed economies. In developed economies, the guy who spends the most time partying and socializing does best...not the guy who develops a career and resources.

That's why people who are more educated and career oriented should head to different societies where they are rewarded better for their hard work. Its up to the individual, but that's my opinion.


Very astute...

Women don't "need" a man's resources but welcomes them as that is how they gain wealth. Western women that complain are just picking men based solely on emotions and not economics. That's why I put the threshold on dating in America that a man should earn $50,000 or more if he expect to be successful.

But that's not all, there's much more too it, mindset is more important than that.

I totally agree and while I have had success in dating in America, I have to repeat again that age is the main issue not if women find me acceptable or not.

I also want to be able to live a middle-class to upper middle-class for less, much less than it typically takes in Western countries.

These reasons are the main push behind relocating to Latin America. But I will likely have my children educated in Western Europe, we shall see.



No women in America need a man for his resources. Even the poorest woman can get government benefits and raise a child as a single mom.

I know doctors and scientists making upwards of 100,000 dollars a year and not dating.
Women in the US, just like women in Eastern Europe, don'n NEED a man.

In a place like Yemen or Ethiopia, a woman literally needs a man. Unless they get a man they live with their parents. Marriage actually raises their social status. In the west, marriage will actually lower a woman's social status since she doesn't get to flirt and receive attention from all sorts of men as she did when she was single.
TopSpruce
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 207
Joined: October 6th, 2013, 11:36 am

Postby Novem » May 15th, 2014, 10:09 pm

I'm going abroad to find someone to marry. The mongers ruining things is terrible and I do see some of the hypocrisy in their actions. I want something deeper and going abroad is like my final frontier to explore because I've given up finding anything where I am now.
Novem
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 53
Joined: April 6th, 2014, 1:59 am
Location: Delaware

Postby droid » May 16th, 2014, 4:21 am

chanta76 wrote:Thats what I find weird on this site. Half the guys that post here want a decent girl but cant find in the states so look else where. Which I completely understand.
Then the other half are looking for easy lay but complain that western women are slutty and not marriage material. Call what it is but does that say about western men.
let me use Russia as an example. At one point Russia probably had decent girls but because of over mongering the woman are spoiled.
I mean I understand if some guys are just looking for sex tourism but what I dont understand is why criticize western women for being slutty .

You're probably misinterpreting things.
I would guess the ones looking for easy lay do not say "slutty", while the ones looking for marriage do call out "slutty". Which would make sense, no contradiction.

Kind of a side note:
Using the word "slut" doesn't necessarily mean the user is judging on promiscuity, it's also used -from what I've seen- as an indication of disliking a general demeanor.
Just like 'douche' does not follow its literal meaning lol. Yet sometimes the usage of 'slut' is dishonestly pointed at as hypocrisy.

Another one:
"Sex addict" is used as a shaming tactic.
If great looking womanizers or pothead-pot-providers have bunches of chicks, they are "confident", have "game" etc.
If any other one tries to replicate part of this success in a non-approved way, then he's a "sex addict". Preposterous. (I'm not saying you used it with that intent chanta).
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
User avatar
droid
Veteran Poster
 
Posts: 2931
Joined: September 20th, 2013, 7:38 am

Postby djfourmoney » May 19th, 2014, 8:18 am

TopSpruce wrote:
djfourmoney wrote:
TopSpruce wrote:
Luc Furr wrote:Chanta76,

think the animal kingdom. "Dominate alpha" (magpies) males monopolize the best females, Beta's (successful/handsome/sexy dog men) get the next lower tier, the do all the work Delta's are left with the less desirable women (Delta males don't really want Delta females and Delta females don't really want Delta males).

But wait there is a massive catch....Delta MALES from the WEST are actually Alpha's or Beta's in most places of the world. So like any male they move into a new territory to find desirable females to mate with. Delta females of the west are even more undesirable in most places of the world.

true love? no such thing just mutually beneficial arrangements.

btw how can a male be a sex addict? Males are genetically programmed to procreate as much as possible. It is natural for males to want sex and unnatural if they do not. Women are the one's who limit sex since they raise offspring.


Ok, but I'd like to add something. Dominant Alpha men are the same the world over, but the definition of beta is different according to country.

For example, in places where women need men for financial reasons, the men with resources will do better. In Belarus, I know a guy who is a computer programmer. He is a delta by America's/the West's definition of delta (studious, more interested in academics than big parties). But, he has resources. He's not dating super models, but he has beta level girls (6s and 7s). He's doing well.

On the other hand, girls don't need men for their resources so computer programmers do poorly in the USA.

Undeveloped economies actually reward studying, academic success, and innovative ideas for a business a lot more than developed economies. In developed economies, the guy who spends the most time partying and socializing does best...not the guy who develops a career and resources.

That's why people who are more educated and career oriented should head to different societies where they are rewarded better for their hard work. Its up to the individual, but that's my opinion.


Very astute...

Women don't "need" a man's resources but welcomes them as that is how they gain wealth. Western women that complain are just picking men based solely on emotions and not economics. That's why I put the threshold on dating in America that a man should earn $50,000 or more if he expect to be successful.

But that's not all, there's much more too it, mindset is more important than that.

I totally agree and while I have had success in dating in America, I have to repeat again that age is the main issue not if women find me acceptable or not.

I also want to be able to live a middle-class to upper middle-class for less, much less than it typically takes in Western countries.

These reasons are the main push behind relocating to Latin America. But I will likely have my children educated in Western Europe, we shall see.



No women in America need a man for his resources. Even the poorest woman can get government benefits and raise a child as a single mom.

I know doctors and scientists making upwards of 100,000 dollars a year and not dating.
Women in the US, just like women in Eastern Europe, don'n NEED a man.

In a place like Yemen or Ethiopia, a woman literally needs a man. Unless they get a man they live with their parents. Marriage actually raises their social status. In the west, marriage will actually lower a woman's social status since she doesn't get to flirt and receive attention from all sorts of men as she did when she was single.


Nobody is talking about poverty in Western countries or extreme poverty in Africa/Middle East.

The truth is, even anti-poverty systems keep you in poverty because they don't pay enough to get out unless you are a critical thinker.

I know men in America have a challenging time dating no matter their income. But again the more you make the easier it will be, that can't be debated.

Eastern European women don't need men but the main difference is they WANT a man, they don't WANT to be single and want to have children.
djfourmoney
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: October 17th, 2010, 12:09 am
Location: Los Angeles

Postby djfourmoney » May 19th, 2014, 8:23 am

Novem wrote:I'm going abroad to find someone to marry. The mongers ruining things is terrible and I do see some of the hypocrisy in their actions. I want something deeper and going abroad is like my final frontier to explore because I've given up finding anything where I am now.


Mongers do ruin locations ahead of the less adventurous. They make it harder but not impossible to find women suitable.
djfourmoney
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: October 17th, 2010, 12:09 am
Location: Los Angeles

Previous

Return to Questions and Advice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests