Happier Abroad Forum Community

Review

"Makow blew the whistle on feminism. The cumulative impact of these essays is enormous. This book may change the way you see the world." --Jeff Rense --Rense.com

Product Description

FEMINISM, HOMOSEXUALITY AND HOW HETEROSEXUALITY WORKS -- Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women's rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are "socially constructed" to oppress them. Feminism is elite social engineering designed to neuter both sexes. It makes women less fit for marriage and motherhood, and men unable to lead and sacrifice for family. As a result, both sexes suffer from arrested development. The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their objective is totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God. "Cruel Hoax" shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and how we can take back our heterosexuality.

About the Author

Henry Makow Ph.D. has been exposing feminism and the New World Order weekly on his web site savethmales.ca for seven years. His articles are posted on many popular websites including Rense.com, David Icke.com. The Truthseeker.co.uk and Prisonplanet.com Makow, who got his Ph.D. in English Lit. from the University of Toronto in 1982, is at the forefront in exposing feminism as a program to make both males and females behave like homosexuals, even though they may not feel same-sex attraction. The object is to decrease population, break up the family, and change human nature into something more docile. Makow is also the author of "A Long Way to Go For a Date." (2000)

Here is quote by Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776, on why feminism should be created to serve the NWO agenda.

Winston wrote:Here is quote by Adam Weishaupt, the founder of the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776, on why feminism should be created to serve the NWO agenda.

This is exactly what I meant when I said that the goal of certain countries is to exalt women to godhood. Self-admiration borders on self-worship, naturally. They (the feminist women) want to bask in their own glory, and serve their egos as their gods, to be free to do anything they want. And naturally a person doesn't need liberation to do good. A person needs liberation to do evil.

These are people who have ascended out of their natural place, by design. That's why feminism is a reprobate religion. It is the belief in women as gods; the exaltation of women to godhood, and their status to the heavens and to the stratosphere. Women therefore can do no wrong, they are always right whatever they do, and people will look for an excuse to take the blame off of a woman. They are infallible therefore, faultless and blameless. They are righteous by virtue of who they are, in the eyes of society. Therefore their judgement is always righteous and pure, as if they were God.

Meanwhile men are just considered to be pigs who are simply chasing after their next meal. And they even brainwash people into following this with movies like American Pie.

By the way, if you remember, Satan also told Eve that she could be a god. Then she helped destroy Adam. That's what feminism is. Turning the woman into a god, and using her to destroy the rest of humanity. So this is Satan's plan.

Adama wrote:That's why feminism is a reprobate religion. It is the belief in women as gods; the exaltation of women to godhood, and their status to the heavens and to the stratosphere. Women therefore can do no wrong, they are always right whatever they do, and people will look for an excuse to take the blame off of a woman. They are infallible therefore, faultless and blameless. They are righteous by virtue of who they are, in the eyes of society. Therefore their judgement is always righteous and pure, as if they were God.

Meanwhile men are just considered to be pigs who are simply chasing after their next meal. And they even brainwash people into following this with movies like American Pie.

In Marxism you can see that feminism pulls this ethic straight from the Marxist ideology which sees the world thru the lens of class while feminism sees it thru sex(gender).

Marxist Proletariat = Women in Feminism

Marxist Capitalists = Men in Feminism

The proletariat in Marxism is considered infallible yet exploited and the ultimate goal of Marxism was "the dictatorship of the proletariat," something that the feminist variant has already achieved via the dictatorship of women by way of gynocentrism in public and private life.

Contrarian Expatriate wrote:

Adama wrote:That's why feminism is a reprobate religion. It is the belief in women as gods; the exaltation of women to godhood, and their status to the heavens and to the stratosphere. Women therefore can do no wrong, they are always right whatever they do, and people will look for an excuse to take the blame off of a woman. They are infallible therefore, faultless and blameless. They are righteous by virtue of who they are, in the eyes of society. Therefore their judgement is always righteous and pure, as if they were God.

Meanwhile men are just considered to be pigs who are simply chasing after their next meal. And they even brainwash people into following this with movies like American Pie.

In Marxism you can see that feminism pulls this ethic straight from the Marxist ideology which sees the world thru the lens of class while feminism sees it thru sex(gender).

Marxist Proletariat = Women in Feminism

Marxist Capitalists = Men in Feminism

The proletariat in Marxism is considered infallible yet exploited and the ultimate goal of Marxism was "the dictatorship of the proletariat," something that the feminist variant has already achieved via the dictatorship of women by way of gynocentrism in public and private life.

I don't understand something. China and Russia were under communism for many years. And China still has some communist policies today, though not as extreme as before. So how come China and Russia didn't develop feminism or women's lib? How come China still has traditional family values? And both are still patriarchical societies? And China and Russia are also definitely not in favor of gay rights or homosexuality.

Are there different forms of Marxism? Marx was only concerned with economics right? He never advocated racial or gender equality right? Nor did he defend gay rights. So how come the cultural marxism in the US includes feminism, multiculturalism, racial equality and gay rights?

Can anyone explain?

Winston wrote: I don't understand something. China and Russia were under communism for many years.

This is a common misconception. Both China and the Soviet Union were SOCIALIST economies, not Communist. The West tends to think that they were Communist systems because they were run by politically totalitarian Communist Parties. Communism, which is an economic system, has never actually existed as a national economic system largely because it is impossible to implement.

Winston wrote: And China still has some communist policies today, though not as extreme as before. So how come China and Russia didn't develop feminism or women's lib? How come China still has traditional family values? And both are still patriarchical societies? And China and Russia are also definitely not in favor of gay rights or homosexuality.

The Communist Party propaganda upheld women as a key component of revolutionary life as both traditional homemakers who could still contribute in the work force. However, the propaganda NEVER supported feminism or women undertaking the leadership of men as they have in the West. Incidentally, International Women's Day is a Communist party invention and it upheld women's traditional role as honorable.

Winston wrote: Are there different forms of Marxism? Marx was only concerned with economics right? He never advocated racial or gender equality right? Nor did he defend gay rights. So how come the cultural marxism in the US includes feminism, multiculturalism, racial equality and gay rights?

Yes, Marxism went thru various stages and variations such as Marxism-Leninism, Stalinism, Maoism, Titoism, etc. Most of those various stages are perversions of true Marxism to account for the impracticality of it.

Marxism tended to lionize racial minorities as the oppressed victims of colonialism and capitalist oppressors. Africans and Asians and all others were considers brothers in the struggle.

Today, the primary vessel through which Marxist theory exists is feminism but, again, the new focus is the struggle between men and women, not the classes. I posit that LGBT is currently encouraged to prompt men to become honorary members of the exhalted/oppressed class that is women according to feminism. Women are now the virtuous oppressed class of Marxism and men are the exploitative class which must be defeated at all costs. Marxism is worker-class based struggle for supremacy at all costs, and feminism is female-based struggle for supremacy at all costs.

Do you now see the ideological parallels?