Post your suggestions and feedback for this site and movement. You can also report a problem or suggest new board topics.
Why do you want to ban them? For what reason?
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.
Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
I think democracy is nothing more than mob rule. Cornfed is clearly not a troll; he has opinions and beliefs (which he argues for instead of just throwing around) that some here do not like. This forum is supposed to be based in free speech. And if they are banned, I will leave too. I can't stay and support such hypocrisy. And this forum has fallen in other ways as well. I would rather take what help I can offer and help those with better principles and morals.
I don't want them banned. I voted no. But it seems that they have been banned. See:
http://www.happierabroad.com/forum/view ... hp?t=22133
http://www.happierabroad.com/forum/view ... hp?t=22136
Sorry to hear if Cornfed has been banned, he is abrupt and refreshing.
Mr. Darcy has done some racebaiting and trolling, easy to ignore though.
Primebait is a troll-y sometimes, other times he has valid comments.
"Well actually, she's not REALLY my daughter. But she does like to call me Daddy... at certain moments..."
Pretty much what Magnum says. They don't bother me to the point that they should be banned.
I just wish better posters came back. I miss cats like AiB, ContrarianExpatriate, All_Is_Man, more posts from SkateboardStephen, at least we have Terrance back when I thought he was scared away, a lot of other guys I had not mentioned should be here. Spammers are the only ones whom should be banned. Enough said.
It's time to expatriate to evade your fate; it's time to expatriate before the barn door permanently closes on "US" sheep.
Debut mixtape "The Skilled Neophyte of RNB (x64)" dropping Spring 2016 - Follow me on Twitter @eirizarryRNB
Exactly. Here we have a mod who initiates a poll to skirt responsibility but when it doesn't go his way, he still bans them and cites majority rule. When called-out on this, he claims many of the offended posters refused to even vote until the 'trolls' were gone.
If we take him at face value on this (over 12 additional non-voting posters PMing him), then we are encouraged to secretly whine to mods to get what we want here. But more realistically, I think we all know that he didn't get PMs from that many quiet contributing members.
zboy1 himself wanted this and when his little poll didn't work, he moved-on to plan b - manipulate the truth to justify the bans instead of accepting the poll outcome or taking personal responsibility for his actions.
If I could be given a one-time unconditional ban hammer, guess who I would use it on.
I found that interesting as well. Also thought it was amusing that in the thread where he was asking who should be banned, seems Winstons name came up most often.
Everybody has a plan til they get punched in the mouth
The vote right now is 5 for banning and 18 against banning. So even on democratic grounds there is no justification for this ban. I will stop actively posting here until this ban is reversed.
If a mod or the forum owners want to ban someone - that is their right. If someone breaks a rule - or breaks it often - I have no problem banning him. But asking everyone's opinion seems silly. The mod either has the guts to do it or don't do it - and suffer the complaints either way.
Check out my blog @ www.marriedafilipina.com
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest