Update: WE ARE BACK ONLINE! The Forum has been RESTORED! See announcement here. If there are any problems or issues, please report them in the announcement thread. Note: Unfortunately I was not able to import the posts made after the crash (on Sept 18) into the restored forum. However, I exported all the posts submitted after the crash into a Word file, so you can download it, find your posts and re-post them. Download the posts here. Thanks for your patience and welcome back everyone!
Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics Mobile Friendly Theme
Discuss culture, living, traveling, relocating, dating or anything related to Africa or The Middle East.
I hear that the black president of South Africa wants to take the lands from the whites and just give it to black people. That's racist but the main stream media doesn't really talk about this. I think Zimbabwe tried going that way and look what happened to that country.
I hear that white people in South Africa are getting killed off by blacks but again the media does not report this. To I residence South African . Is it that bad in South Africa?
That canard has been around a long time. Things are the same and when ever the ABC is caught with gross corruption exceeding their normal thievery they placate the masses by saying they will take from the whites to deflect attention and blame white thievery.
Over 90 pct of the land taken from whites and given to black farmers lies derelict with the blacks too.lazy to farm. They prefer to rent it out to squatters for yet more shacks.
Murders are the same as usual. The whites being killed are generally the very old. Darkie gangs always go for soft targets. It is hard to protect the old as they are so set in their ways. We didn't do this in the old days etc. But the old apartheid days where you didn't need walls nor to lock your doors are gone. Whitey took the battle to darkie so the white areas were safe. These days it is like the 1800s where the battle comes to your home. White kids of 6 to 8 need to be able to shoot to defend themselves. You adapt to it, run away, or die. The big difference is that with modern communications, Radios, beams etc you get early notice and within 3 minutes other white men are there to help.
Why dont blacks move back to western africa where they originate from? they are not native to southern africa. They are murderous savage invaders and colonisers who built nothing. They stole the land after slaugthering the bushmen who are not negroid.
Why do blacks feel the need to move into lands settled and developed by white men if they so despise whites?
Why don't american blacks go back to africa, besides that black africans don't want such niggers?
Why don't they accept apartheid, which only made borders based on where blacks and whites first met and made mutually accepted borders, including the expulsion of whites from black lands such as ciskei and transkei?
Why should whites go to europe? It is not our land. Why should we go and claim land and consume the taxes paid by europeans just because we are of the same race? we are not muslim or black parasites. It is land built up by citizens of european nations and the wealth of it should be theirs.
Why don't japanese go to china and claim back land they migrated from since they are all of the asiatic race?
Why dont americans move to europe and return america to indians? And aussies as well? They are also white people. Should they too have a claim to europe for being white and having ancestors from there?
Exactly what european nation should we move to? European blood here is a mix of 1/3 dutch, 1/3 german, english, scottish, welsh, french, portuguese, irish, greek. Sort of like america, except unfortunately we didnt exterminate the other races we encountered like your ancestors did. If we had we would be fat and happy like america but we would have had to continue north slaughtering to stop blacks from continually coming to steal from whitey.
Why go to europe to be with whites when Liberals are ensuring europe will no longer be white but chock a block with muzzies, pakis, indians, chinese, vietnamese, jews, darkies and every nation of Babel. So what we have here is coming soon to a nation near you. At least we are used to living with it, are all suitably racist, and the liberal nonracial have long gone to escape the consequence of their vote. So we don't have to deal with such naive whites anymore. Enjoy it and I suggest you don't let jewish pressure groups make laws to disarm you. Better still, don't try this multiculti at home.
I am also relatively sure my work place, places I socialise, and and my neighbourhood are whiter than yours and most cities in western europe. So why would I want to go there?
Your more or less right but the problem is that the liberal mass media does not report the white genocide in South Africa because it does not fit in with their agenda. I never really believe in conspiracy theories or even a global agenda until Trump ran for presidency in USA. I notice how the main stream media(which is run by the jews) had their own agenda. Notice if anything bad happens to a jew it's big news in the media here in the states.
According to the media blacks do no evil and we should always help them which creates the victim mentality that you see in USA. I predict in 50 years Africa will still be lagging behind and a mess. I also predict any city that has a high black population will have higher than normal crime rate with higher than normal demand for aid. I don't know if it's genetics or years of culture that created this.
I don't want to believe in stereotypes or if there is really a genetic difference but I wonder now maybe there is a difference. It's scary that the media does not want to talk about this.
In the same way the WN media uses it for its own agenda by calling it white genocide. It is not. For white genocide you have to kill the young women, or race mix them. It is the killing of very old people on farms because they are soft targets. This does not affect white reproduction. It is not called genocide here. It is called plaasmoorde. Farm murders. Because that is what it is. It is an attempt to have whites move of the land by intimidation. Intimidation plays a large part in African politics.
Jew influence also happens here. Zuma and malema can sing kill the whites and afrikaner boys we are coming for you. But if the anc says one thing about jews the board of Jewish deputies makes a legal case. If one jew is harmed it is news when a usual robbery is not news.
https://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&sourc ... Jo6Av7mL4A
http://citizen.co.za/news/news-national ... -comments/
Any place run by Blacks becomes a shit hole. Without a white man in charge the darkie sinks back to the bush. It is genetic and cultural. The low IQ combined with cultural laziness, acceptance of corruption and thievery. Like the expression you can take a kaffir out of the bush but you can never take the bush out of a kaffir
It seems the genocide is being carried out by economic means, and strangely with your approval, as in the West. Obviously if the only white SA men who can breed are those who get advanced technical degrees that happen to be hiring and not subject to affirmative action at the time they graduate and then earn incomes so vast they greatly exceed those of their own females who have gone to med school and such, then long term survival is impossible.
No, by the UN definition and most common sense definitions, if you deliberately cause a particular population of humans to go extinct by any means, that is genocide.
1. Why don't we force all the Blacks in America move back to Africa?
2. Why don't we kick the Jews out their homes force them out of America and send them to Israel?
Why don't the whites move back to Europe?
Because their homes, families, friends, life and culture is in South Africa.
1. Africa doesn't want those niggers. The USA took them strictly COD. there is no 300 year return period if you are not satisfied You are welcome to ship them back and sink the ships though.
2. They dont belong in Israel either. they defrauded the palestinians and manipulated and committed terrorism against the british to take palestine. What about Madagaskar like Adi suggested? But wait, the monkeys don't want jews either or the jews will find a way to monopolise the bananas
And besides, the whites built up the nation. why should we hand it over to some darkie who did nothing but steal from neighbouring tribes, murder, and eat each other? What have they built up?
I grew up occasionally hearing a white racist in the south talk about the need to send the blacks back to Africa, so I thought I'd ask a white who comes off as quite racist who lives in Africa why the whites there don't move back to Europe. The question does make sense when you are dealing with someone who complains so much about blacks.
But of course, I know that if your family has lived in a land for 300 years, you probably don't have anything waiting for you in the ancestrial homeland. If whites with your mindset from South Africa wanted to move back to Europe, the UK or the Netherlands seem logical choices since people speak English and Afrikaans, which derived from Dutch. GIven your concerns about imigration, the UK or Switzerland may make good choices for immigration. But I'd imagine being an educated white man in Africa may give you a 'reverse discrimination' advantage like the one you described in the contract you were negotiating, where the employers wanted a white man to do the work.
I make this commentary without ever having been to South Africa or knowing the internal details, after seeing the country presented through the biased lens of the US media. But here goes. When whites still controlled South Africa under apartheid, you'd think the thing they could have done strategically, seeing that the rest of the White world was against the white minority maintaining power in the country, was they could have made a small white country. Now, that would have been really hard if people were scattered, but if they could have gotten the best city on the coast, some decent farmland, and natural resources, maybe 25% of the land for the 8% white population, or else made a country of whites and coloreds that they could still have a say in, that they could have made a country where they wouldn't have been a weak minority. They could have made sure the weapons industry and part of the diamond mining was in the white area. They could have spun it so that the various Bantu people's could have had a referrendum to be independent, and split most of the country off of the prime real estate that the whites took. The world could have backed that. And one small white or mostly white country could have it's own self-determination, without whites having to worry so much about being an oppressed minority or having to put up with the liberal policies that came later.
That might work in a strong monarcy or dictatorship. In a democracy where whites have individual rights, a lot of them would not have wanted to give up their land and relocate. The white government would have had to have laid out the strategy of setting up a predominantly white state, and the world media could have spun that in a bad way. They might have been able to pull it off if ultra-right wing politicians pushed for the strategy and the head of state officially opposed the idea of a white state, while making moves toward it. Some things are hard to organize without a totalitarian regeime.
This has to do with the Swiss on immigration. Someone who spent time in Switzerland said if you work in the yard on Sunday, they'll fine you. So they have some of their own laws that may seem strange to outsiders.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/263473/ ... fitzgerald
A separate white state was exactly what whites wanted. Heard of orania? It is never going to fly with darkies as they need white tax payers to fund their corruption. They need whites for skills and development. Zambia now giving massive 20 000 ha farms to whiteys. Ideal farm land yet darkies are too useless and had to import food. Now with white farmers they are booming and exporting seed quality.
Darkies are good at mouthing off about whitey but once they get their wish of self rule they collapse and beg whitey to come back and 'oppress' them. No blacks were leaving apartheid. The rest of Africa was trying to get in for a piece of whitey's oppression and racism. There is no way they will allow whitey to break the embrace and segregate. They want to be as near to whitey as possible.
The other impossible thing is relocation. The world screamed about relocating blacks to black homelands yet were silent about relocating whites out of black homelands. Black homelands were ideal Farmland, best in sa, and much of the platinum was in black homelands
The world stayed silent about that.now to make white homelands with darkie clinging to whitey, how are you going to move darkie away without the liberal western world screaming for white blood again?
Holland and the uk don't exactly welcome 4.5 million racist whites arriving. They don't want whites at all.they take in nonwhites with no skills.4.5 million mostly skilled whites used to being independent don't exactly fit the ZOG agenda. Imagine the upheaval it would cause when they segregate feom the multiculti streets of Europe, or shoot or smack the first darkie stealing something.
Did you hear about the race riot at the University of the free state? My daughter studies there. Darkies rooted and disrupted a rugby match. White students promptly beat them up and dispersed the darkies.how would that go down in europe? There only non whites are allowed to beat whites.
How do you think a white government here would have handled your Ferguson Riots? Because with so many darkies that is what would happen. The world would never allow a white government standing up to protect white peol6 and their property. The world would never leave us alone.