Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics Mobile Friendly Theme
Discuss science and technology topics here.
7 posts • Page 1 of 1
Absolutely astounding that this was banned from Ted. Well, actually no it isn't. The current science establishment is as dogmatic as the Spanish Inquisition, but instead of torturing you they just make you disappear professionally. But Sheldrake has had a high profile for a very long time, enjoys a large lay audience and gets his books published by the commercial press, so he doesn't need them
Incidentally, dogma number one that he mentioned is why medicine is at an impasse. Why current modes of research into something like cancer will never bear fruit.
In another video, Sheldrake points out that morphic resonance explains why people have been scoring higher in IQ tests over the years while clearly actually getting dumber. The more people do the tests the easier the tests are to others.
The morphic resonance thing seems a little bit far fetched, but I would like to see his evidence. I wish he'd cited a source on the rat experiments, but that wouldn't fit with a speech for a 'lay' audience. He seems to be the big name behind this theory, but I couldn't find the rat paper with a brief Google Scholar search.
I had heard that there was evidence that speed of light measurements had changed over time. if it changes too much, and meters grow or shrink too much, then people will notice the difference. They could just not update the rulers and the masses wouldn't know.
If physicists believe that light bends due to gravity, they should be able to allow for the idea that variables could potentially effect the speed of light without changing their world view.
Here's a page on morphic resonance with some reference links:
Of course he has evidence. All his articles and books do. So does dean radin. Its not a matter of evidence. People who want to believe will see the evidence and people who dont will ignore and deny the evidence. We all have cognitive dissonance. People arent that objective. They believe what makes sense to them and cherry pick evidence to support it. Evidence never changes a skeptics mind if they've already made up their minds.
Science is a tool. It doesnt have a viewpoint or position. The problem is that the scientific establishment that funds people like lawrence krauss, bill nye, michio kaku, etc wants to suppress spirituality and God and metaphysics and push its atheism paradigm. It has an agenda. Thats what sheldrake is exposing. Not that science is good or bad. Its just a tool, like a computer. You use it or you dont. You follow the scientific method or you dont. If you have an agenda then you will only accept data that fits your agenda. Thats not how the scientific method works but its how the scientific establishment works. They arent the same thing. The scientific method is objective but the scientific establishment is not.
Check out my fun video clips in Russia and video series Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind and Full Russia Trip Videos!
See my HA Ebook and Join Our Dating Sites to support us!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World