You do realize that many of these girls you monger with are only there because of guys (tons of Flips do this, more-so than poreners) who did this very same thing, right? If you deny this, you're being deliberately obtuse. You're either dumb or a hypocrite. Or a dumb hypocrite. Girls from good families where both parents were there typically do not go with porener mongers.nomadphilippines wrote:did the guy who just said that the guy wanting to go impregnating random girls to leave many fatherless children around is better than someone who just wants to have casual sex and not make fatherless children because at least he has a plan just call me retarded?
Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics Mobile Friendly Theme
Discuss dating, relationships and foreign women.
Check out our Dating Sites and International Romance Tours!
Special Offer! FREE 6 Month Membership on ForeignWomen.com! Sign up here.
Find Your Foreign Sweetheart Now! Try our international Dating Sites and Overseas Romance Tours!
just answer this:
you think a guy just wanting to have sex for fun only but not make babies is worse than a guy going out and trying to put as many fatherless kids in the world as he can, and that doing so in a third world country where they will struggle to support the baby is ok?
clearly you don't think that, you are just butthurt because you thought i was a former poster here, and even though im not you can't get over it and are now trolling my every post and will say things you don't even believe if they are against what i am saying
Yes, it's worse. One is pointless hedonism and the other is at least trying to do something useful. (Like I said, whether or not you agree with it is another matter entirely.) And, like I also mentioned, you're a hypocrite, sleeping with women who are largely a product of this very thing.
Aside from ethical implications, let's look at what will result from the two choices:
1. Pointless hedonism will leave behind no offspring and you will die out without having even tried to leave a legacy. More power to you. We need less like you.
2. Spreading genes is at least an attempt to do something lasting, and if done right, will almost certainly leave something behind. (My point of disagreement is that white women are probably an entirely lost cause, whereas doing it in the Philippines could help the offspring relative to how well it would work if a pinoy did the same thing.)
I'm like a detective - I don't believe in coincidences.
Trolls have come on here and made up stories, assumed another person's identity, all sorts of stuff. That you have a website doesn't prove anything. For all we know it's not even yours. Based on how useless your posts are here, I doubt the site is really yours, as a website owner/blogger would have to at least be able to write some interesting or useful things.
ok..... you think leaving lots of fatherless children with women that can't afford to raise them is a good thing
you are like a detective........ a regular paul blart...... keep up the good work
Last edited by nomadphilippines on August 2nd, 2015, 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I never said it was good. It definitely is not ideal, and Cornfed is saying this as well. I'm saying it's better than useless hedonism.
It appears that you lack even a basic grasp of logic and reading comprehension. Given your complete lack of capitalization and punctuation in your writing, I'm not surprised. Bonus: your reactions are very female-like.
im just smart enough to realize that causing no negative action is better than causing negative action
again your argument is like saying sitting and a chair and doing nothing is worse than what hitler did because at least hitler had a plan
when two people have sex just to have sex there is no downside
when you make a poor woman pregnant that can't afford to have a baby there is a very real downside
whether i use periods or capitals or not....... anyone with a brain would be on my side of the argument here
The thing is that if the females want to engage in unprotected sex and carry the kids to term then someone is going to impregnate them at some stage. The only question is who, and that being the case it is better me than some dysgenic.
i think you need to work on your self confidence because you don't have a high enough opinion of yourself
It damages the girls more, and doesn't serve procreation. That's pretty bad in my book.
Like Cornfed said, if the girls are willing to be knocked up, it's just a matter of time before someone does it. Might as well be you. (I mean, not you in particular. Hopefully you won't ever produce offspring.)
It's more than that. Seeing you write like this:
It makes me question whether English is your native language. Even if it's not, it's still pretty bad.
So when exactly will you be putting this plan in motion?
You're always creating and sharing theories on race and society but I rarely read anything from you about your personal life, your past experiences, past travels and past relationships. Or any reports of adventures you undertook recently. I'd like to see you go off the grid for a while, stop posting, and come back with a report of how your plan worked out. Or how it didn't. Will you ever?
girls like sex too, and they aren't normally damaged by it
and some small emotional damage is far less than a baby she can't support (FRIGGIN OBVIOUSLY YOU MORON)
again please don't listen to this...... keep living in your moms basement and coming up with these plans but not executing, thanks
If you're so worried about it, go "educate" the pinoys. They do it far more than any foreigners do. But you'd know all about that, miss Ginger.
If you met enough Filipinos you'd know that among the older generations especially, a macho mentality is highly prevelant. A man's masculinity is often measured by the number of mistresses he's capable of maintaining and keeping satisfied, by his sexual performance and "track record", and the number of bastard children he's fathered. One of my father-in-law's cousins is often discussed with a mixture of fascination and admiration for having fathered 10 out-of-wedlock children and having slept with "every race of women on the world'. Another cousin has a "mere" six kids with other women.
There are a lot of promiscuous men and women, women who, as Ghost correctly pointed out, will fall pregnant sooner or later anyway. If it isn't you, it's some other guy. So to sleep with such women and father their children does not make you any more or any less immoral then your average local.
You'd be surprised at the goals of your average pinoy.
Something tells me you aren't as new as you pretend to be. This isn't your first account, is it? Fairly certain that site isn't run by you, either.