Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.



View Active Topics       View Your Posts       Latest 100 Topics       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


History is Possibly a Fraud

If you're a history buff, love to talk about history and watch the History Channel, this is the board for that.

Moderators: fschmidt, jamesbond

History is Possibly a Fraud

Postby josephty1 » December 19th, 2016, 9:02 am

Image
http://www.caam.rice.edu/~yad1/miscellaneous/References/Other/(E)%20Anatoly_Fomenko_History_Fiction_or_Science_1.pdf

I just skimmed this book and his thesis is that most ancient times events actually occured in the middle ages (900 AD - 1400 AD). Even the birth of Jesus Christ, he theorizes its around 1000 AD - 1100 AD.

Well, the printing press was invented around that time period, so it would make a lot of sense.

He uses the examples of Troy a lot, where he compares the Battle of Troy with the Siege of Paris

Image
Public school and the people in it are fake as shit. Money and workaholic culture replaces healthy social interaction.
josephty1
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 94
Joined: October 7th, 2015, 9:23 pm
Location: North America




Check out our Dating Sites and HA International Romance Tours!



Re: history is Possibly Incorrect

Postby Cornfed » December 19th, 2016, 9:23 am

Yeah, the idea is that before the invention of the printing press about 500 years ago, any noteworthy event would generate a bunch of different versions of the story. Hence what we stratify into different time periods are really retellings of the same things. The Middle Ages didn’t really happen, the British Empire directly took over from the Roman Empire, recorded history is in fact about 1500 years old etc. I’m not sure how one would go about substantiating this.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: August 17th, 2012, 5:22 am

Re: history is Possibly Incorrect

Postby Kradmelder » December 19th, 2016, 3:47 pm

Just as long as he doesn't question the jewish holy hoax. That must be believed as dogma, 6 million, 6 million gassed, oh the suffering. You can question the bible or anything, but not jews.

Print was invented, yet not one stitch of physical or written evidence except faked pics and testimony of jews.
User avatar
Kradmelder
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1716
Joined: September 6th, 2016, 1:59 pm

Re: history is Possibly Incorrect

Postby JohnDoeBigBaller » December 19th, 2016, 5:27 pm

Amazing how brainwashed people really are. There is ZERO evidence to prove the Holohoax happened. There wasn't even 6 million jews in the whole of Europe in the 1930s. Also, if 6 million people died, where are the remains? Bones, or dust or whatever?
JohnDoeBigBaller
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 332
Joined: May 14th, 2016, 7:59 pm

Re: History is Possibly a Fraud

Postby Winston » December 19th, 2016, 6:45 pm

We already have a thread on Anatoly Fomenko's work here:

viewtopic.php?t=9196

Wikipedia says his work is wrong though, because Fomenko doesn't explain why we have coins and artifacts from Ancient Rome and Ancient Greece. But of course, Wikipedia is controlled by the establishment as is highly biased on controversial topics. Here is Wikipedia's lengthy debunking of Anatoly Fomenko's historical revisionism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Fomenko)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Fomenko

Historical revisionism[edit]

Fomenko is a supporter of drastically revising historical chronology. He has created his own revision called New Chronology, based on statistical correlations, dating of zodiacs, and by examining the mathematics and astronomy involved in chronology. Fomenko claims that he has discovered that many historical events do not correspond mathematically with the dates they are supposed to have occurred on. He asserts from this that all of ancient history (including the history of Greece, Rome, and Egypt) is just a reflection of events that occurred in the Middle Ages and that all of Chinese and Arab history are fabrications of 17th and 18th century Jesuits.

He also claims that Jesus lived in the 12th century A.D. and was crucified on Joshua's Hill; that the Trojan War and the Crusades were the same historical event; and that Genghis Khan and the Mongols were actually Russians. As well as disputing written chronologies, Fomenko also disputes more objective dating techniques such as dendrochronology and radiocarbon dating (see here for an examination of the latter criticism). His books include Empirico-statistical Analysis of Narrative Material and Its Applications and History: Fiction or Science?.

Most Russian scientists and worldwide historians considered Fomenko's historical works to be pseudoscientific.[2][3][4]
Check out my video series Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind and Full Russia Trip Videos!

Also see my HA Grand Ebook and Join Our Dating Sites to support us!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 24760
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 2:16 pm


Return to History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest