Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics Mobile Friendly Theme
Discuss news and current events around the world.
13 posts • Page 1 of 1
For the first time in 23 years, employees of government in the criminal "justice" system have done right by O.J. Simpson, as he won parole today and will be freed after serving nine years on trumped up charges.
I know what the media have instructed you to believe about the case, and I assure you that, like in most every other instance where the mainstream American media have reached a virtually unanimous consensus, it is wrong. I watched a good bit of the trial in the '90s and have recently refreshed my view of the evidence, and if you want to go chapter and verse on the evidence that actually did come into court, I'm ready. But it would consume more time than probably any of us want to spend.
A new instance of police malfeasance practically every day -- the latest a crazed, violent Somali in Minnesota gunning down an unarmed woman in her pajamas who had called for help (yeah, Somalis fit real well into Minnesota culture) -- and people find it impossible to believe the cops would plant a little bit of blood evidence after they had jumped the gun and made a bad arrest in the most closely watched criminal matter in history? Do your best to avoid having anything to do with them.
I have to go overseas, if for no other reason than to avoid American media, which make me just spitting mad every time I'm exposed to them. Simpson didn't kill anybody, Amanda Knox almost certainly did, and yet we are instructed by the media to believe the opposite -- just two instances of tens of thousands where they are aggressively, smugly, disgustingly wrong in their group-think.
The entire OJ saga proves this verse " allow me to issue the currency and I care who not makes the laws "
This whole entire travesty proves this point, OJ should be in prison for life for double homicide but was allowed to walk free because the court system was completely corrupted by the money.
Then once he was let go for this crime it became " how can we parasites get all his money " and forget about the outrageous murder of two people.
The whole thing from start to finish proves why this civilization has no soul.
Time to Hide!
What does bankster control of the currency have to do with the Simpson case, Johnny-one-note? The prosecution had 45 lawyers working the case, and spent far more money than the defense did. The full weight of media power and money was brought to bear against Simpson to shape public opinion. The Simpson case was indeed when I first realized the U.S. had lost its soul, but for very different reasons.
I assume you mean Jason. I doubt it, though I read Deer's book and it isn't a completely implausible theory. More likely a drug-related hit, and it's not entirely clear Goldman wasn't the main target. He and Nicole were involved in a netherworld of drugs, porn and prostitution, but Simpson wouldn't allow any such information to come into court and taint the name of his children's mother. There is lots of reasonably informed speculation about possible killers in the book Killing Time, which is also a pretty good source of information on a fair amount of the evidence that came into the trial.
In any case, I'd imagine one of the killers was the person whose blood and flesh was found under Nicole's fingernails. It wasn't Simpson's blood type, so the cops weren't interested. Just like they weren't interested in even testing the blood on Goldman's car keys, which he obviously used as a defensive weapon in a prolonged struggle.
So are you saying that OJ did not commit the crime of murder, I remember reading about it from the beginning and from the beginning the prosecutions execution of the case looked like the 3 stooges multiplied by 100, totally inept !
You can have all kinds of people handling a case or mishandling it and everything from the evidence to the jury selection was a total sham tampered with con so he could try and be set free on the inner judicial side " MONEY PAY OFF's " to stir racial trouble up....He should be free now and not have been locked back up but the legal parasites " of the Crown " went after him for his cash and forget about true justice for the families who lost their loved ones.
Ronald Goldman was Jewish if I am not mistaken and just like Irwin Schiff if it does not meet the socialist agenda you are disposable even if you are a Jew or whatever.
If you cannot figure out what 51 trillion $'s missing in the US system alone over the last 25 plus years means you have a problem understanding how the socialist world order woks and what it means for truth on this planet.....
Time to Hide!
I won't even begin to try to unpack all that into comprehensible propositions that can be responded to, but yes, I am saying that O.J. did not commit the crime of murder.
You seem to be saying that O.J. murdered Ronald Goldman because Goldman wasn't a committed socialist ...... no wait, I said I wouldn't try to unravel the nonsense, and I won't.
Were sorry if you cannot figure out how the socialist commie world really works, this was a high profile case for the whole entire world to see with one of the greatest black men to ever chase daa ball in the coliseum on public display for murder of the fairer sex.
They want to shape our minds to think a certain way and a case of this magnitude is not going under the radar of the illuminated ones tampering hands.
This was just more trying to do the divide and conquer to try and end up at the end goal of where the ruling elite own everything and lease it back to whoever they haven't killed when it's all said and done at compound interest.
One last thing, that MOFO could dam sure chase dat ball! very impressive.....
Time to Hide!
Yes. At the preliminary hearing (when the cops and prosecution realized they had a dog shit case and subsequently went about "discovering" the "trail of blood" evidence) the coroner who performed the autopsies testified that there were likely two knives used, and one of the killers was probably left-handed. Such testimony being inconvenient for the prosecution, he was disappeared for the main trial and replaced by his assistant, who knew nothing about two knives (picture Sgt. Schultz in Hogan's Heroes).
I think it was a drug hit team. Apparently Goldman and Nicole's insane crackhead friend, Faye Resnick -- whom the media have taken as the expert on the Simpsons' relationship -- were way deep in debt to the dealers, and you can also find speculation on the internet that Goldman was a drug snitch, which is why his lengthy criminal file is not available to the public.
Hi. I've been reading about the Simpson/Goldman murders. Can't say for sure that he didn't do it, as I haven't finished investigating it. But I think OJ got railroaded big time anyway. If you don't mind, I have a few questions:
How many gloves were there at the murder scene? And did Mark Fuhrman plant that one glove on Simpson's property?
I ask because according to Vincent Bugliosi, Fuhrman couldn't have done it, because 14 LAPD officers showed up at the Bundy murder scene first, before Fuhrman arrived at 2:10 am. He goes on to say all 14 saw saw just one glove at the murder scene, so therefore there was no second glove for Fuhrman to pick up and plant at Simpson's property. Just wondering what the real story is.
Re: the 5th Amendment.
Fuhrman's supporters claim that you can't pick and choose questions after you plead the 5th. So once you take the 5th on one question, you have to do so for all questions, otherwise you revoke your 5th Amendment right. Is this true?
After Fuhrman was caught lying when he testified he didn't use racial slurs, he took the 5th when asked "was the testimony you gave in this case completely truthful"? His supporters say he had to take the 5th for every question thereafter, including the question "did you plant or manufacture evidence in the OJ case?" Fuhrman took the 5th on that one too. He claims he had no choice. He seems to be arguing that he couldn't honestly say, "no I didn't plant evidence" without risking legal consequences, which is kind of strange.
Vincent Bugliosi dismisses the argument that Fuhrman framed OJ because he is a racist. He asks,"how come there wasn't a parade of black people taking the witness stand at the criminal trial to testify that Mark Fuhrman framed them?" I'm not endorsing his view, I'm just honestly curious whether his argument is right or not.