http://newobserveronline.com/zulu-king- ... th-africa/The official king of South Africa’s Zulu tribe has announced that that country was economically, militarily, and socially better under white Afrikaner rule—and that history will judge blacks as only having destroyed everything that they had inherited from the white government.
Update: WE ARE BACK ONLINE! The Forum has been RESTORED! See announcement here. If there are any problems or issues, please report them in the announcement thread. Note: Unfortunately I was not able to import the posts made after the crash (on Sept 18) into the restored forum. However, I exported all the posts submitted after the crash into a Word file, so you can download it, find your posts and re-post them. Download the posts here. Thanks for your patience and welcome back everyone!
Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics Mobile Friendly Theme
Discuss racial, ethnic and multicultural issues. Warning: The topics here are likely to be taboo, so if you are easily offended, you are better off not participating here.
8 posts • Page 1 of 1
Meanwhile South Africa has grown at an average 2.99 percent from 1993 until 2015, reaching an all time high of 7.60 percent in the fourth quarter of 1994. Let's also forget South Africa is top 10 destinations for UK expats. Over 300k brits move to South Africa a year!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... arino.html
http://uk.businessinsider.com/british-e ... res-2015-9
Notice anything significant about that date? It is the last year of white rule. The other thing is that the infrastructure, such as the electricity grid, is falling apart. At first it could keep on going for quite a while, but the lack of maintenance from the monkeys in charge will eventually cause it to collapse. And then there is the crime etc.
Yeah, I do. Once the incompetent white government was out of power(depressing a whole GDP block), investments flowed in.
http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2015 ... n-africa-/
South Africa has been identified as the top investment destination in sub-Saharan Africa for UK firms looking to expand, according to overall rankings in the Barclays Africa Trade Index. While South Africa is the standout performer in the overall index, Nigeria arguably represents the most exciting long-term opportunity for UK businesses in sub-Saharan Africa. Nigeria, ranked second, already imports around $2.4 billion in goods from the UK each year, making it the second largest market for exporters after South Africa, the index said. However, Nigeria’s performance in terms of openness (12th) and intra-African connectivity (16th) means that the country “still has a long way to go before it can hope to compete with South Africa as a regional trade hub or as a gateway to other African markets”.
http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2015 ... ys-report/
The ICA said in its annual report for 2013, commitments reported by its members, including the G8 nations, South Africa, African Development Bank (AfDB), Development Bank of Southern Africa, European Commission, European Investment Bank and the World Bank Group, were up 35% compared with 2012, reaching a record level of $25.3 billion.
Yeah because they can rape them of all their resources while the country becomes impoverished and turns to shit. That is what the globalists want. But of course you don't understand this, which is why the globalists wanted it in the first place.
Right, like Saudi Arabia, Norway(Norway is backed by big oil), Russia, and the United States of America
https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-worl ... per-capita
Your arguments are uneducated idiocy. You would have been laugh out of my primary school
A study by Swedish group Timbro compared the GDP of various European Union nations to those of individual states in the United States. As stated by the study:
If the EU were a part of the United States of America, would it belong to the richest or the poorest group of states?”
If Denmark were one of the US states, it would rank tenth among the poorest states for per capita GDP.
Finland would come in fifth among the poorest if it were a US state.
Sweden would be the seventh-poorest as a state of the US.
Additionally, the study found that the United States as a whole ranks higher in economic output per person than every European Union nation except for the tax haven economy of Switzerland. Denmark, Sweden and Finland all ranked significantly lower than the United States. Norway was not included in the study as it is not a member of the EU.
Next, the study compared individual US states to various countries in the EU. Once again, individual states ranked higher in economic output per person than each EU country. Only Luxemburg ranked near the top. Most EU nations ranked alongside the poorest states in the US.
So, that does it for economic output. Next, the study took a look at private consumption. Once again, we find that the US as a whole outranks the entire EU, including those Scandinavian countries that are EU member nations.