The problem with this is that he implicitly accepts the insane principle that the policies of America should be designed to help the interests of blacks. Why? Why would a North European Protestant country be run for the benefit of an invasive feral pest infestation designed to bring about its destruction? Also notable is this from the article:
During oral arguments in a pivotal affirmative action case on Wednesday morning, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia raised the suggestion that African American students might belong at less rigorous schools than their white peers, and that perhaps the University of Texas should have fewer black students in its ranks.
Scalia's comments came during arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas, a case over whether the university's use of race in a sliver of its admissions decisions is constitutional. The University of Texas-Austin is being challenged over its use of race in admissions decisions for about 25 percent of its freshman class. About 75 percent of the students at UT-Austin are admitted through what's known as the Top Ten Percent program, in which any student graduating within the top 10 percent of his or her class is guaranteed admission, regardless of race. The other 25 percent are admitted via a "holistic" process that takes race, and other factors, into account. It's the "holistic" program that Abigail Fisher—who was denied admission for the university in 2008—is challenging.
The University of Texas has determined that if it excluded race as a factor, that remaining 25 percent would be almost entirely white.
So hear that you blacks. This is a clear admission from apeffirmative action supporters that even taking into account other factors, it is in fact meritos white people who deserve a hand up, and it is only racism against whites that gives you your bullcrap placements and "jobs" etc.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/201 ... sity-texas
