Re: The myth of gender equality and equality itself
Posted: August 4th, 2016, 8:20 am
I don't understand something. We all know that:
Some people are smarter and wiser than others. Some people are richer and wealthier than others. Some people are stronger than others. Some people have more power than others. Some people are more attractive than others. Some people are more successful than others. Some people are healthier than others. Some people have more morals and virtues than others. Some people are taller than others. Some people are more likable and charming than others. Some people are better skilled in particular areas than others. Some people have more knowledge in a particular areas than others. Some people are more athletic than others. Some people are more refined and civilized than others. Some people are more educated than others. Some people are even above the law, such as powerful people. Etc. Etc.
And as we all know, we do not like everyone equally. No one does. Not even the most staunch liberals do. We all like some people better than others. We all like our friends more than our non-friends. No one denies this.
So how then is, "Everyone EQUAL" as Americans always claim? Where is the equality in all this??? Why are Americans and Westerners always obsessed with this word "equality' when it is clear that it does NOT EXIST anywhere in nature or reality, either in the animal kingdom or human society?! If it is totally nonexistent, then why do mainstream people treat it like a universal gospel truth and religion?! It's 100 percent ILLOGICAL!
Yet even the New Age movement and the Conspiracy/Truther movement adhere to the "gospel of equality" by constantly saying in their teachings that "No one is better than anyone else. No one is superior to anyone else, nor is anyone inferior to anyone else." which implies that they believe that everyone is equal too, along with liberal Americans.
Why is the American mainstream along with its alternative counterculture movements, so obsessed with a word that has no existence anywhere in reality? So weird and illogical. Totally irrational and downright delusional too, yet most people buy into it. Why?
Also, if men and women are "equal" in every way, as liberals and politically correct Western women demand, then:
1. How come in professional sports, they don't put teams of men and women together? Or an all male team vs. an all female team, if they are all "equal" as alleged? How come in professional tennis, they only have mixed doubles, or same sex doubles, but they don't have a team of two men vs. two women, if both genders are allegedly "equal"?
2. Why are women hardwired by nature to want a taller and stronger man than them? And usually one that makes more money than them too? Why don't they seek a man of equal height and strength and income, if both genders are "equal"?
3. If women can do anything men can do, then why can't they win any great military battles? For instance, why can't an army of women storm the beach of Normandy on D-Day like men did? We all know that an army of women would never be able to take the beachhead at Normandy from its German defenders, with their machine guns and cannons. And in fact, they would not be able to win any battles against armies of men. So how are women "equal" in every way, as liberals and social justice warriors vehemently claim?
These questions always stump liberals and feminists. I could give many other examples too. You get the point. So how are men and women "equal" in every way, as liberals and women claim? This claim is clearly indefensible, and laughable too, yet it is serious gospel truth in modern America and the Western world. It's not a joke. It's a doctrine of liberalism you are not allowed to question. What could be a bigger sign of insanity than to take a totally false doctrine and make it an unquestionable dogmatic truth? America is clearly wacko and out of touch with reality and common sense. It's an insane asylum run by the inmates, turning truth and falsehood upside down.
Yet have you noticed that it's only those of low class and low intelligence that try to claim that "everyone is equal"? Great thinker and intellects never make such an absurd claim. And upper class people and aristocratic classes don't claim that they are equal with everyone either. Only low class people believe in "equality", for obvious reasons, because they have something to gain by "equality" with the upper classes, but upper class people don't, for "equality" would mean that they are the same as the lower classes, which they do not believe. After all, how are rich people and poor people "equal" exactly? How is a refined, cultured, educated, civilized person equal to a degenerate, savage, barbaric, uneducated person? It makes no sense obviously. Nothing in nature is equal. Everything is different, in various ways. There is no equality in nature or in human society. Anyone can see this. So why deny it, just to cater to false standards of political correctness?
You know what's funny, in the alleged treatise for Jewish domination of the world, "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" -- in which virtually all of its predictions have come true -- it actually mentions how the word "equality" is a utopian socialist word that appeals to the ignorant masses, but has no basis in nature or reality. It talks about how utopian socialist concepts, though they have no basis in reality, always appeals to the dumb masses of Gentiles, which is sad but true. So even this infamous treatise confirms what I've said about "equality" and how it seems to be a false word used for mind control and manipulation of the masses by the elite.
In Protocol 1 it says:
"25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll- parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political - to all those things the GOYIM paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause."
Some people are smarter and wiser than others. Some people are richer and wealthier than others. Some people are stronger than others. Some people have more power than others. Some people are more attractive than others. Some people are more successful than others. Some people are healthier than others. Some people have more morals and virtues than others. Some people are taller than others. Some people are more likable and charming than others. Some people are better skilled in particular areas than others. Some people have more knowledge in a particular areas than others. Some people are more athletic than others. Some people are more refined and civilized than others. Some people are more educated than others. Some people are even above the law, such as powerful people. Etc. Etc.
And as we all know, we do not like everyone equally. No one does. Not even the most staunch liberals do. We all like some people better than others. We all like our friends more than our non-friends. No one denies this.
So how then is, "Everyone EQUAL" as Americans always claim? Where is the equality in all this??? Why are Americans and Westerners always obsessed with this word "equality' when it is clear that it does NOT EXIST anywhere in nature or reality, either in the animal kingdom or human society?! If it is totally nonexistent, then why do mainstream people treat it like a universal gospel truth and religion?! It's 100 percent ILLOGICAL!
Yet even the New Age movement and the Conspiracy/Truther movement adhere to the "gospel of equality" by constantly saying in their teachings that "No one is better than anyone else. No one is superior to anyone else, nor is anyone inferior to anyone else." which implies that they believe that everyone is equal too, along with liberal Americans.
Why is the American mainstream along with its alternative counterculture movements, so obsessed with a word that has no existence anywhere in reality? So weird and illogical. Totally irrational and downright delusional too, yet most people buy into it. Why?
Also, if men and women are "equal" in every way, as liberals and politically correct Western women demand, then:
1. How come in professional sports, they don't put teams of men and women together? Or an all male team vs. an all female team, if they are all "equal" as alleged? How come in professional tennis, they only have mixed doubles, or same sex doubles, but they don't have a team of two men vs. two women, if both genders are allegedly "equal"?
2. Why are women hardwired by nature to want a taller and stronger man than them? And usually one that makes more money than them too? Why don't they seek a man of equal height and strength and income, if both genders are "equal"?
3. If women can do anything men can do, then why can't they win any great military battles? For instance, why can't an army of women storm the beach of Normandy on D-Day like men did? We all know that an army of women would never be able to take the beachhead at Normandy from its German defenders, with their machine guns and cannons. And in fact, they would not be able to win any battles against armies of men. So how are women "equal" in every way, as liberals and social justice warriors vehemently claim?
These questions always stump liberals and feminists. I could give many other examples too. You get the point. So how are men and women "equal" in every way, as liberals and women claim? This claim is clearly indefensible, and laughable too, yet it is serious gospel truth in modern America and the Western world. It's not a joke. It's a doctrine of liberalism you are not allowed to question. What could be a bigger sign of insanity than to take a totally false doctrine and make it an unquestionable dogmatic truth? America is clearly wacko and out of touch with reality and common sense. It's an insane asylum run by the inmates, turning truth and falsehood upside down.
Yet have you noticed that it's only those of low class and low intelligence that try to claim that "everyone is equal"? Great thinker and intellects never make such an absurd claim. And upper class people and aristocratic classes don't claim that they are equal with everyone either. Only low class people believe in "equality", for obvious reasons, because they have something to gain by "equality" with the upper classes, but upper class people don't, for "equality" would mean that they are the same as the lower classes, which they do not believe. After all, how are rich people and poor people "equal" exactly? How is a refined, cultured, educated, civilized person equal to a degenerate, savage, barbaric, uneducated person? It makes no sense obviously. Nothing in nature is equal. Everything is different, in various ways. There is no equality in nature or in human society. Anyone can see this. So why deny it, just to cater to false standards of political correctness?
You know what's funny, in the alleged treatise for Jewish domination of the world, "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" -- in which virtually all of its predictions have come true -- it actually mentions how the word "equality" is a utopian socialist word that appeals to the ignorant masses, but has no basis in nature or reality. It talks about how utopian socialist concepts, though they have no basis in reality, always appeals to the dumb masses of Gentiles, which is sad but true. So even this infamous treatise confirms what I've said about "equality" and how it seems to be a false word used for mind control and manipulation of the masses by the elite.
In Protocol 1 it says:
"25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll- parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political - to all those things the GOYIM paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause."