Female preference for scum revisited
Female preference for scum revisited
In the past it has been pointed out that Western skanks tend to be attracted to stupid assholes because such men have certain practical advantages in modern society. A way of looking at the situation, and arguably stating the same thing in a different way, is that intelligent and decent men are actually perceived as being genetically inferior from the perspective of modern females.
To understand this it is necessary to realize that intelligence and decency are not universal positives but rather come at a cost. Intelligent people tend to be late developers, go off on tangents, take time out of short term useful activities to learn long term skills and are prone to various neuroses and addictions, since the more complex something is, the more there is to go wrong. Decency likewise carries obvious disadvantages. Decent people do stuff like defending their comrades from attack and nursing them back to health when they are sick, thereby diverting resources from themselves and risking being attacked or infected themselves. They can be taken advantage of by assholes and have reduced capacity to take advantage of others themselves.
Most of the time intelligence and decency are a net positive in that they allow for the efficient acquisition and exploitation of scarce resources. Intelligent men can come up with innovative ways of gaining resources and transmit this knowledge to others. Decency allows men to form tight teams whose members trust each other, allowing them to specialize different types of resource gathering and use teamwork to win battles with rival groups. Hence females mostly find intelligence and decency attractive in men.
The trouble now is that from a female perspective, resources are essentially a free good handed to them by a central rationing system. They just crank out babies and go on welfare or do some shit in an office and are given more money than most young men can possibly acquire, so resource acquisition is no longer a problem they require intelligent, decent men to solve. Similarly, since the system is essentially communism, with people largely getting whatever the elite want to give them, there are often few practical ways for men to use their intelligence and decency in obtaining resources. Hence intelligence and decency carry all the usual downsides with none of the corresponding advantages, so females regard such men as being genetically inferior and therefore find them unattractive. As long as the current situation lasts, there is really nothing that can be done about this. Self-improvement in the general case won't help - in fact quite the reverse.
To understand this it is necessary to realize that intelligence and decency are not universal positives but rather come at a cost. Intelligent people tend to be late developers, go off on tangents, take time out of short term useful activities to learn long term skills and are prone to various neuroses and addictions, since the more complex something is, the more there is to go wrong. Decency likewise carries obvious disadvantages. Decent people do stuff like defending their comrades from attack and nursing them back to health when they are sick, thereby diverting resources from themselves and risking being attacked or infected themselves. They can be taken advantage of by assholes and have reduced capacity to take advantage of others themselves.
Most of the time intelligence and decency are a net positive in that they allow for the efficient acquisition and exploitation of scarce resources. Intelligent men can come up with innovative ways of gaining resources and transmit this knowledge to others. Decency allows men to form tight teams whose members trust each other, allowing them to specialize different types of resource gathering and use teamwork to win battles with rival groups. Hence females mostly find intelligence and decency attractive in men.
The trouble now is that from a female perspective, resources are essentially a free good handed to them by a central rationing system. They just crank out babies and go on welfare or do some shit in an office and are given more money than most young men can possibly acquire, so resource acquisition is no longer a problem they require intelligent, decent men to solve. Similarly, since the system is essentially communism, with people largely getting whatever the elite want to give them, there are often few practical ways for men to use their intelligence and decency in obtaining resources. Hence intelligence and decency carry all the usual downsides with none of the corresponding advantages, so females regard such men as being genetically inferior and therefore find them unattractive. As long as the current situation lasts, there is really nothing that can be done about this. Self-improvement in the general case won't help - in fact quite the reverse.
Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
- MarcosZeitola
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: May 31st, 2014, 12:13 pm
- Location: Europe
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
Disagree on your conclusion. This is another typical example of the "superior, decent, intelligent man" essentially giving up. Self-improvement, as I see it, is a very broad definition. Say a man would dress better, get a better haircut, a better shape. By your definition he may not have "improved" at all, seeing as though only his exterior changed. He is not any more moral, his genes and personality did not change. But he FEELS better and this alone changes his outlook on things.Cornfed wrote:Self-improvement in the general case won't help - in fact quite the reverse.
He could have done nothing, this man, forever blaming society's perceived hatred for intelligent and decent men for his romantic and reproductive failure. But instead he embarked on a journey of self-improvement that improved his mindset, and with it his entire outlook on life. I would say self-improvement is still a major factor, and denying it's importance is just laziness on your part as it allows you to stop trying.
As for female's preference for scum, this mantra I find a bit troubling. Both me and several of my male relatives have had no trouble attracting female attention in my country of birth. We are not, however, scum. My uncle for example is a handsome man in his mid-forties, has his own company, divorced with one son. He always seems to have women around him and generally does well with them. He's well educated, very intelligent, and has some controversial political opinions that even you would agree with. And no, he is not a bad boy, does not drink to excess, is not violent to women. Still, he gets them.
Your theory is flawed. But I understand why you want to believe this. Believing this makes life much easier to cope with, for you.
On "Faux-Tradionalists" and why they're heading nowhere: viewtopic.php?style=1&f=37&t=29144
-
- Freshman Poster
- Posts: 113
- Joined: October 15th, 2015, 4:47 pm
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
This is the second time I agree with the poster above. Perhaps it's time for men as a whole to step away from the perpetual blame platform and take some accountability for their hand with women.
-
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: May 18th, 2008, 1:16 am
- Location: El Paso, TX
- Contact:
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
As usual I agree with 90% of what Cornfed says which is far more than I agree with most people. We are in complete agreement on the diagnosis of the modern condition, but we don't agree on the response. Decency is an asset on a team but a liability for an isolated individual. So decent men must join teams. The current economic system isn't communist at all, it is crony capitalism. Right now the entire economic system is designed to relieve the middle class of their money, and any sensible man would join in this process. A team of decent intelligent men can very effectively screw the middle class out of a lot of money, which is exactly what I am currently doing in such a team. But this process is limited by the total assets of the middle class which will run out in the next few years and the game will be over. Then we will return to the Dark Ages with an aristocracy and serfs, and then government support of women will end.
I urge Cornfed to join some team which means some sane religion. He is more than welcome to join mine which we have renamed from "Biblic Judaism" to "Mikraite" so there is no longer any association with Judaism. Or he can find some other religious group to join. But remaining an isolated individual in modern culture is a losing proposition for anyone with intelligence and decency.
I urge Cornfed to join some team which means some sane religion. He is more than welcome to join mine which we have renamed from "Biblic Judaism" to "Mikraite" so there is no longer any association with Judaism. Or he can find some other religious group to join. But remaining an isolated individual in modern culture is a losing proposition for anyone with intelligence and decency.
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
This is just rambling ad homidem gibberish. Do you have anything to say specifically refuting anything in my post that I could reply to?MarcosZeitola wrote:Disagree on your conclusion. This is another typical example of the "superior, decent, intelligent man" essentially giving up. Self-improvement, as I see it, is a very broad definition. Say a man would dress better, get a better haircut, a better shape. By your definition he may not have "improved" at all, seeing as though only his exterior changed. He is not any more moral, his genes and personality did not change. But he FEELS better and this alone changes his outlook on things.Cornfed wrote:Self-improvement in the general case won't help - in fact quite the reverse.
He could have done nothing, this man, forever blaming society's perceived hatred for intelligent and decent men for his romantic and reproductive failure. But instead he embarked on a journey of self-improvement that improved his mindset, and with it his entire outlook on life. I would say self-improvement is still a major factor, and denying it's importance is just laziness on your part as it allows you to stop trying.
As for female's preference for scum, this mantra I find a bit troubling. Both me and several of my male relatives have had no trouble attracting female attention in my country of birth. We are not, however, scum. My uncle for example is a handsome man in his mid-forties, has his own company, divorced with one son. He always seems to have women around him and generally does well with them. He's well educated, very intelligent, and has some controversial political opinions that even you would agree with. And no, he is not a bad boy, does not drink to excess, is not violent to women. Still, he gets them.
Your theory is flawed. But I understand why you want to believe this. Believing this makes life much easier to cope with, for you.
-
- Experienced Poster
- Posts: 1383
- Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 9:17 am
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
There is nothing you or anyone else can do about it, so why not focus on doing your thing, whether that be traveling abroad, writing books, or whatever stirs your passion? Go back and look at your fourth paragraph. What you just described was modern society. What you described is the the future, and I would argue that more and more countries in the world are, slowly but surely, becoming like your example.
Now go back and look at your third paragraph. You described how it was. In the past, this method of cooperation was absolutely necessary for success. However, the role of technology in all this should be given serious consideration. Technology also plays a huge part in making the world of your fourth paragraph a reality. That technology is not going away.
What began with the dishwasher and the washing machine will eventually lead to a future where technology will further erode the need for these cooperative relationships, the need for gender roles, and eventually, the need for any useful work at all.
I would argue that an isolated individual, using technology to outsource needed tasks around the globe can accomplish more than any hopes of putting together a "dream team" in this modern world. In reality, through the use of technology, you are, in fact, cooperating with far more people, who are far more specialised in their fields that if you attempted to put together your ideal team in front of you. The developers of the hardware, software and tools you use essentially become virtual members of your "team" allowing you to reach for any goal you desire.
The one goal that cannot happen, though, is turning back the clock. Time and the world continue to move forward and being stuck in the past, longing for the world to be as it was, is a sure way to be left behind.
Now go back and look at your third paragraph. You described how it was. In the past, this method of cooperation was absolutely necessary for success. However, the role of technology in all this should be given serious consideration. Technology also plays a huge part in making the world of your fourth paragraph a reality. That technology is not going away.
What began with the dishwasher and the washing machine will eventually lead to a future where technology will further erode the need for these cooperative relationships, the need for gender roles, and eventually, the need for any useful work at all.
I would argue that an isolated individual, using technology to outsource needed tasks around the globe can accomplish more than any hopes of putting together a "dream team" in this modern world. In reality, through the use of technology, you are, in fact, cooperating with far more people, who are far more specialised in their fields that if you attempted to put together your ideal team in front of you. The developers of the hardware, software and tools you use essentially become virtual members of your "team" allowing you to reach for any goal you desire.
The one goal that cannot happen, though, is turning back the clock. Time and the world continue to move forward and being stuck in the past, longing for the world to be as it was, is a sure way to be left behind.
“Booty is so strong that there are dudes willing to blow themselves up for the highly unlikely possibility of booty in another dimension." -- Joe Rogan
- MarcosZeitola
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: May 31st, 2014, 12:13 pm
- Location: Europe
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
The TL;DR version would be, you take a societal shift that is actually happening, then overgeneralize and exaggerate it to a ridiculous degree. You also oversimplify massively. It's all too convenient, and very much an ego thing. Your mantra is always the same:Cornfed wrote:This is just rambling ad homidem gibberish. Do you have anything to say specifically refuting anything in my post that I could reply to?
Man is successful with women in the West - must be scum
Guy fails to attract women - high quality man held back by his own greatness
On "Faux-Tradionalists" and why they're heading nowhere: viewtopic.php?style=1&f=37&t=29144
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
I think the disconnect here is that cornfed mostly refers to the west proper, namely the US of Americhump, but never clarifies that. I don't think conservative oriental ladies are applicable to the OP.Cornfed wrote:This is just rambling ad homidem gibberish. Do you have anything to say specifically refuting anything in my post that I could reply to?MarcosZeitola wrote:Disagree on your conclusion. This is another typical example of the "superior, decent, intelligent man" essentially giving up. Self-improvement, as I see it, is a very broad definition. Say a man would dress better, get a better haircut, a better shape. By your definition he may not have "improved" at all, seeing as though only his exterior changed. He is not any more moral, his genes and personality did not change. But he FEELS better and this alone changes his outlook on things.Cornfed wrote:Self-improvement in the general case won't help - in fact quite the reverse.
He could have done nothing, this man, forever blaming society's perceived hatred for intelligent and decent men for his romantic and reproductive failure. But instead he embarked on a journey of self-improvement that improved his mindset, and with it his entire outlook on life. I would say self-improvement is still a major factor, and denying it's importance is just laziness on your part as it allows you to stop trying.
As for female's preference for scum, this mantra I find a bit troubling. Both me and several of my male relatives have had no trouble attracting female attention in my country of birth. We are not, however, scum. My uncle for example is a handsome man in his mid-forties, has his own company, divorced with one son. He always seems to have women around him and generally does well with them. He's well educated, very intelligent, and has some controversial political opinions that even you would agree with. And no, he is not a bad boy, does not drink to excess, is not violent to women. Still, he gets them.
Your theory is flawed. But I understand why you want to believe this. Believing this makes life much easier to cope with, for you.
And Marcos keeps citing anecdotals, in this case regarding Holland, but as we know western Europe is still relatively decent.
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
- MarcosZeitola
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 4268
- Joined: May 31st, 2014, 12:13 pm
- Location: Europe
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
That would make even less sense, seeing as though Cornfed isn't even American himself. He's British or Scottish, isn't he?droid wrote:I think the disconnect here is that cornfed mostly refers to the west proper, namely the US of Americhump, but never clarifies that. I don't think conservative oriental ladies are applicable to the OP.
I wouldn't be so certain, man. The influence of American culture reaches far and wide. Europe is chock-full of materialistic, career driven people. A lot of fastfood, a lot of unhealthy people, issues with minorities, feminism just as out of control as it is in America with even less conservatives left and an even lower birth rate. Hardly the Valhalla some naive Americans like to portray it as.droid wrote:And Marcos keeps citing anecdotals, in this case regarding Holland, but as we know western Europe is still relatively decent.
It's a bit of a "the grass is always greener" narrative. An American may go to Germany or Holland thinking it's the greatest place on earth. Hating America, confirmation bias kicks in and suddenly it's heaven on earth. Similarly, a cousin of mine who became bored with the Netherlands went to America. Though he often remarks "Americans are odd", he seems overall positive and the whole thing is one big adventure for him. He almost immediately had an American girlfriend.
It's not nearly as black and white as people like to think it is. A lot of it is mentality-related. Problems are between people's ears and a simple change of scenery can do wonders to one's outlook on life.
On "Faux-Tradionalists" and why they're heading nowhere: viewtopic.php?style=1&f=37&t=29144
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
Is this a joke? Wide parts of EU are totally pro-feminist orientated. UK the worst of all I would say.droid wrote:... as we know western Europe is still relatively decent.
However there is a much better social network in EU compared to USA. Justice is somewhat 'softer' compared to USA. There is no headache with medical bills, labor rights are much more respected compared to USA etc.
Feminism in EU, especially in the Northern part is terrible, basically every corner of daily life is investigated about 'equality' but it is less hateful and all this annoying racist US BS-talk is missing.
It is also much easier to move around and to abroad, even by driving your own car. People have longer vacation. Most people in EU have a valid passport. To invite a foreign woman as a visitor to your home is not a big issue etc.
However, check out in my own native country divorce laws especially in case with children and how property is considered to be divided between the male and the female ex-spouse. Obligatory unpaid military service time for men only, retirement 60 for women but 65 for men and also the general behavior of women is bad and overdemanding and check out how they select men who are lining up to spoil them all the time.
Anyway I left EU for always. I never had any relationship with a woman within EU. I don't really care anymore and why should I?
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
Women are attracted to scum for one reason. That is regular men treat women as equals. They put women up on pedestals. Regular men suffer from one-itis. A woman doesnt want to be catered to. That is submissive behavior. In other words, most men act like they are the women and treat women like they are the men. Women are there to be commanded and seduced. They are not there to verify, cosign, lead or even be your equal.
That's why buying flowers and the rest of the romantic stuff does not work on Western women. They do not want to be treated like a delicate flower. They are looking for a man to come and make them feel like a woman by leading them.
Bad boys will do this. Regular men will not, because regular men were raised to regard everyone as an equal, which is definitely not true. Men > Women > Children.
Most regular men and manginas have it as Women > Men. Treat a woman as if she is your leader and she will lose respect for you. A woman doesnt want to lead (at least the ones who arent beasts). A woman wants a leader.
The best thing a man can do is to stand up and be a man. If there are women who don't want a real man, then that is great, because she eliminated herself. You don't want a woman who wouldnt let you be the man anyway.
I just solved this riddle for you. It has nothing to do with evil. It has to do with the man being in charge.
You remember when they say women are attracted to confidence? This is what they mean. Not the confidence to hit on them without concern, but the confidence to take charge and be the man so that she can be the woman.
That's why buying flowers and the rest of the romantic stuff does not work on Western women. They do not want to be treated like a delicate flower. They are looking for a man to come and make them feel like a woman by leading them.
Bad boys will do this. Regular men will not, because regular men were raised to regard everyone as an equal, which is definitely not true. Men > Women > Children.
Most regular men and manginas have it as Women > Men. Treat a woman as if she is your leader and she will lose respect for you. A woman doesnt want to lead (at least the ones who arent beasts). A woman wants a leader.
The best thing a man can do is to stand up and be a man. If there are women who don't want a real man, then that is great, because she eliminated herself. You don't want a woman who wouldnt let you be the man anyway.
I just solved this riddle for you. It has nothing to do with evil. It has to do with the man being in charge.
You remember when they say women are attracted to confidence? This is what they mean. Not the confidence to hit on them without concern, but the confidence to take charge and be the man so that she can be the woman.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
The problem you're really describing is choice. Women have more choices available to them now because of the way modern society is. In the olden days, especially in marriage-minded societies, women got married early and may not have been that picky.Cornfed wrote:In the past it has been pointed out that Western skanks tend to be attracted to stupid assholes because such men have certain practical advantages in modern society. A way of looking at the situation, and arguably stating the same thing in a different way, is that intelligent and decent men are actually perceived as being genetically inferior from the perspective of modern females.
To understand this it is necessary to realize that intelligence and decency are not universal positives but rather come at a cost. Intelligent people tend to be late developers, go off on tangents, take time out of short term useful activities to learn long term skills and are prone to various neuroses and addictions, since the more complex something is, the more there is to go wrong. Decency likewise carries obvious disadvantages. Decent people do stuff like defending their comrades from attack and nursing them back to health when they are sick, thereby diverting resources from themselves and risking being attacked or infected themselves. They can be taken advantage of by assholes and have reduced capacity to take advantage of others themselves.
Most of the time intelligence and decency are a net positive in that they allow for the efficient acquisition and exploitation of scarce resources. Intelligent men can come up with innovative ways of gaining resources and transmit this knowledge to others. Decency allows men to form tight teams whose members trust each other, allowing them to specialize different types of resource gathering and use teamwork to win battles with rival groups. Hence females mostly find intelligence and decency attractive in men.
The trouble now is that from a female perspective, resources are essentially a free good handed to them by a central rationing system. They just crank out babies and go on welfare or do some shit in an office and are given more money than most young men can possibly acquire, so resource acquisition is no longer a problem they require intelligent, decent men to solve. Similarly, since the system is essentially communism, with people largely getting whatever the elite want to give them, there are often few practical ways for men to use their intelligence and decency in obtaining resources. Hence intelligence and decency carry all the usual downsides with none of the corresponding advantages, so females regard such men as being genetically inferior and therefore find them unattractive. As long as the current situation lasts, there is really nothing that can be done about this. Self-improvement in the general case won't help - in fact quite the reverse.
Now that dating and marriage is more or less a game of playing musical chairs, and with birth control available, she doesnt have to pick a man based upon resources or necessity anymore. She can choose whoever she wants, almost.
That leaves the men who were operating under the assumption that all they needed were resources pushed out.
But it isnt like women are just ignoring the men with resources altogether. Women just gravitate towards certain types of personality types. Those men can be good individuals or bad. If young men see that women prefer bad individuals (or rather if they confuse the take charge traits with the bad boy traits) well then more boys will grow up to become bad men.
But what is missing though, is that if a woman is really attracted to a man, she will try to satisfy him. The men who are successful with women know this, and this is a useful indicator. But only for those men who know it is possible (first you must accept it), and then you must be willing to use it.
When a woman likes a man, he has just as much power over her and she has over him. It is just a matter of whether or not he is willing to exercise his control for his benefit, or whether he will let things go directionless without a rudder (which will not get you the girl), or whether he wants the woman to lead.
Next time a girl likes you, tell her you like women who do x activity. Then watch as she attempts to do x for you. She will even think it is her own idea.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
-
- Freshman Poster
- Posts: 113
- Joined: October 15th, 2015, 4:47 pm
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
In your opinion. Personally, I don't see why you're attached to the concept of community. A good number of people will do just fine on their own.fschmidt wrote:But remaining an isolated individual in modern culture is a losing proposition for anyone with intelligence and decency.
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
I found French and German girls to be a lot more polite and friendly (and not so much into scum,in regard to the OP), and in better shape than in the states, that's all I'm saying.Yohan wrote:Is this a joke? Wide parts of EU are totally pro-feminist orientated. UK the worst of all I would say.droid wrote:... as we know western Europe is still relatively decent.
However there is a much better social network in EU compared to USA. Justice is somewhat 'softer' compared to USA. There is no headache with medical bills, labor rights are much more respected compared to USA etc.
Feminism in EU, especially in the Northern part is terrible, basically every corner of daily life is investigated about 'equality' but it is less hateful and all this annoying racist US BS-talk is missing.
It is also much easier to move around and to abroad, even by driving your own car. People have longer vacation. Most people in EU have a valid passport. To invite a foreign woman as a visitor to your home is not a big issue etc.
However, check out in my own native country divorce laws especially in case with children and how property is considered to be divided between the male and the female ex-spouse. Obligatory unpaid military service time for men only, retirement 60 for women but 65 for men and also the general behavior of women is bad and overdemanding and check out how they select men who are lining up to spoil them all the time.
Anyway I left EU for always. I never had any relationship with a woman within EU. I don't really care anymore and why should I?
And well the thing is that Austria in particular really sucks, at least Wien. As much as I tried to like the place in my three visits, I finally accepted it *sucks*, what a cold social environment. I had always romanticized it as a living Strauss melody and all that stuff.
Man If you grew up in Vienna i can understand your disillusion. Funny thing is, it just takes a half hour train ride to Bratislava to have a 180 degree change in prospects; did you ever venture east? or was it at the time too difficult due to the iron curtain?
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
-
- Freshman Poster
- Posts: 113
- Joined: October 15th, 2015, 4:47 pm
Re: Female preference for scum revisited
Speaking of Europe, I wonder what to make of French, German and Italian women. Surely someone here can fill me in if they have experience.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 10 Replies
- 1229 Views
-
Last post by galii
-
- 1 Replies
- 2909 Views
-
Last post by Winston
-
- 14 Replies
- 5581 Views
-
Last post by GoingAwol
-
- 27 Replies
- 6928 Views
-
Last post by djfourmoney
-
- 7 Replies
- 3467 Views
-
Last post by jcris7